|
|
|
imperi
|
 |
June 08, 2011, 06:56:17 PM |
|
Hopefully the dollar, so that I can quit my job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MacFall
Member
 Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Agorist
|
|
June 08, 2011, 07:03:58 PM |
|
Conspiracy freak BS. Not even worth the time to look for a decent .gif of a cat yawning.
|
|
|
|
|
rezin777
|
|
June 08, 2011, 07:05:12 PM |
|
Quite a good article exposing Bitcoin
Huh? He doesn't even understand Bitcoin and it's a good read? And his conclusion is ponzi scheme. How original. |
|
|
|
|
Durr (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 07:14:58 PM |
|
This is not my blog. I'm just linking it to inform. |
|
|
|
|
Durr (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 07:17:49 PM |
|
Conspiracy freak BS. Not even worth the time to look for a decent .gif of a cat yawning.
What's your take on the part about the Crime of 1873? Second half of the article. |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
June 08, 2011, 07:21:57 PM |
|
Bad title since the dollar has already collapsed, since 1913 the dollar has lost more thant 95% of its initital value, now if that isnt a collapse then i don't know what is. But as silly as the topic is, given its factual record, for the Bitcoin to achieve same level of collapse it will have to trade all the way downto something like 0.0001 $ / BTC |
|
|
|
|
Durr (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 07:24:51 PM |
|
Bad title since the dollar has already collapsed, since 1913 the dollar has lost more thant 95% of its initital value, now if that isnt a collapse then i don't know what is. But as silly as the topic is, given its factual record, for the Bitcoin to achieve same level of collapse it will have to trade all the way downto something like 0.0001 $ / BTC 5% of 30$ = 0.0001$ according to your math which would define a collapse of a currency. Good luck to you |
|
|
|
|
clickbangdone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 07:26:10 PM |
|
But as silly as the topic is, given its factual record, for the Bitcoin to achieve same level of collapse it will have to trade all the way downto something like 0.0001 $ / BTC I don't think that's going to be a problem .0 /BTC is right around the corner |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
June 08, 2011, 07:29:00 PM |
|
Bad title since the dollar has already collapsed, since 1913 the dollar has lost more thant 95% of its initital value, now if that isnt a collapse then i don't know what is. But as silly as the topic is, given its factual record, for the Bitcoin to achieve same level of collapse it will have to trade all the way downto something like 0.0001 $ / BTC 5% * 30$ = 0.0001$ according to your math which would define a collapse of a currency. Good luck to you Well much less when bitcoins first started trading they werent 30$, they were more like 0.001$ so you need a figure or 5% of 0.001$ and that is only to make it match dollar performance. Topic here asks for which will crash first, well the dollar already did. |
|
|
|
|
Durr (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 08:13:11 PM |
|
That didn't make much sense
|
|
|
|
|
MacFall
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Agorist
|
|
June 08, 2011, 08:19:34 PM |
|
Then apparently you lack the ability to understand it. It was coherent enough for me.
|
|
|
|
Durr (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 08:22:37 PM |
|
Then apparently you lack the ability to understand it. It was coherent enough for me.
No you didn't |
|
|
|
|
prizzy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 08:43:20 PM |
|
Then apparently you lack the ability to understand it. It was coherent enough for me.
No you didn't wow dude. your such a bro. |
|
|
|
|
Durr (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 09:05:13 PM |
|
There seems to be an instant hostility against anything questioning Bitcoins usefulness and integrity, even to messengers.
That's not really a bullish signal.
Don't be such a wuss, most of us here are to make that quick buck, time the market.
|
|
|
|
|
MacFall
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Agorist
|
|
June 08, 2011, 09:07:24 PM |
|
"Most of us" must refer to the majority of your multiple personalities, right? Because it certainly doesn't refer to me or anyone else I know well enough to be aware of their motivations for supporting bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
rezin777
|
|
June 08, 2011, 09:12:19 PM |
|
There seems to be an instant hostility against anything questioning Bitcoins usefulness and integrity, even to messengers.
Well you said the article was good. That isn't a messengers job. And to top it off, the article sucks. The guy is commenting on something that he clearly doesn't even understand. I have instant hostility against ignorance pretending to be insightful. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jaime Frontero
|
|
June 08, 2011, 09:19:54 PM |
|
"Most of us" must refer to the majority of your multiple personalities, right? Because it certainly doesn't refer to me or anyone else I know well enough to be aware of their motivations for supporting bitcoin.
"multiple personalities"? you're playing my song... http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=13344.0 |
|
|
|
|
Durr (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 09:20:45 PM |
|
There seems to be an instant hostility against anything questioning Bitcoins usefulness and integrity, even to messengers.
Well you said the article was good. That isn't a messengers job. And to top it off, the article sucks. The guy is commenting on something that he clearly doesn't even understand. I have instant hostility against ignorance pretending to be insightful. You seem to believe 'good article' means 'agree with conclusion of article'. There isn't much about Bitcoin that's not to understand by the way, it's a simple concept, just the coding of it was hard. |
|
|
|
|
|
