You seem to believe 'good article' means 'agree with conclusion of article'.
There isn't much about Bitcoin that's not to understand by the way, it's a simple concept, just the coding of it was hard.
No, I believe good article means someone does their homework before writing it, not just making assumption and then basing their conclusions on those assumptions.
I never said Bitcoin was hard to understand, just that the author of that article doesn't.
And you said, "good article exposing Bitcoin". I guess you don't agree with the conclusion, yet it still somehow "exposes" Bitcoin.
