Post quality

[capcher]

Always try to make a constructive and creative post. Only long post not worth. Any one can write 1000 characters also. But writing a constructive, creative and about the main topic is not easy.

Such quality, much useful, wow.

I agree with others that post length is hardly an indicator of post quality.

in case of http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/ it's

Ooo... I did not know there's a price estimator. Interesting stuff.

Looks like it uses post length to determine post quality though...

pqm (post quality multiplier) determined by ratio of good posts (>75 characters excluding quoted text) to bad posts (<75 characters excluding quotes)

As i see many believe that lower ranked members are spamming here with their signature C.
I believe this is true, but also i saw many legendary members and hero members wearing same signatures, and posting answers to ridiculous topics and replying to those spam posts , so we have acceptance of spam.

That's true... those legendary or hero members might have just been spamming for a longer time, that's all.

[1714179250]

1714179250

[1714179250]

1714179250

[1714179250]

1714179250

[1714179250]

1714179250

[Hugroll]

I was wondering is the anything out there that says whats a poor- excellent post.

Such as over 100 characters for excellent  under 10 for poor etc.

Dont look at the length of the post for determining post quality, people can talk for paragraphs without it being constructive. I've seen that the account price checkers usually look at post lengths to display a post quality, but i usually just ignore that.

[achow101]

in case of http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/ it's

Ooo... I did not know there's a price estimator. Interesting stuff.

Looks like it uses post length to determine post quality though...

pqm (post quality multiplier) determined by ratio of good posts (>75 characters excluding quoted text) to bad posts (<75 characters excluding quotes)

Dont look at the length of the post for determining post quality, people can talk for paragraphs without it being constructive. I've seen that the account price checkers usually look at post lengths to display a post quality, but i usually just ignore that.

Indeed they do, as post quality is a relatively important part of an account's value. Most decent sig campaigns will not accept users with low post quality. Thus those sites (including mine, http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/) have a post quality check as part of the price. The problem though is objectively determining the post quality of an account. What I determine as a high quality post may not be what you consider as a high quality post. A bot most certainly doesn't have a mind to think subjectively like that short of it being an AI, so the only solution to objectively determine post quality is to do character count. However, when doing character count, my site only checks the unquoted text, so huge text pyramids aren't included in that count. I don't know if any other site does that.

[imbest]

I understand the whole thing now,its very important to keep my post useful and constructive.thank you all who write in this thread,very useful information I gathered from you guy's

[Nybbas]

Whether posts are long or short, the posts should add value to a thread and should not be merely because you are getting paid. People usually view threads that cross 10 pages as spam threads but all many not be just spam threads. There are also many users who keep posting the same questions "How to earn BTC" "How to gamble" and so on which makes users answer the same questions over and over again. In my knowledge, the following posts fall in the respective categories:

1. Very poor: "Thanks" "NP" "+1"

2. Poor: Less than 5 words, Posts without any meaning like "I like your idea and feel everyone should like it", "Posts containing too many emoticons" "Repeating the above posts" etc.

3. Average: Posts that are grammatically poor but the content is helpful to the users, engaging in a conversation without going off topic, giving references, posting meaningful content.

4. Good: Posts that are really helpful and have useful information (may it be technical responses regarding bitcoins, mining, wallet recovery and so on).

5. Excellent: Posts that are made by extremely knowledgeable people who give examples, tips, tricks, tutorials and explain their answers with examples. Their responses may be extremely long but the content is useful to one and all.



Obvious trolls and spammers do not fall in any category.

I must quote this answers it's my favorite and is between good and excellent!

Trolls and spammers with or without SIGs?

[aardvark15]

Does the forum actually rate the post quality for users?

[jonathgb25]

Does the forum actually rate the post quality for users?

There is no feature for that but you can actually report the account if the posts of that account is obvious pure spam and trolling only.

[squatz1]

Personally, I'd just say to not just go ahead and send in a few letter post something like "Hi" is not going to be acceptable as it just looks terrible.
Try to just add your input to this topic.

[LyQaN]

Does the forum actually rate the post quality for users?

Forum doesn't need to rate the post quality.Its signature campaigns providers who check post quality randomly because they pay for posts.

[mikehersh2]

In this case, quality certainly beats quantity. When people ask questions on here, they want a short, to the point, helpful response. Not to read through a bunch of mumbo-jumbo searching for info. Along as you have answered the question or stated your opinion fully and honestly, you have done all that is expected of you.

[Decoded]

It really depends on your grammar and what you're saying. No bot can figure that out. Someone else might've said your point before you, and you're just paraphrasing. But the general idea is <75 is low-medium, <249 is medium, and 250+ is a relatively good quality post.

[pocarime32]

In this case, quality certainly beats quantity. When people ask questions on here, they want a short, to the point, helpful response. Not to read through a bunch of mumbo-jumbo searching for info. Along as you have answered the question or stated your opinion fully and honestly, you have done all that is expected of you.

It's depend though, every campaign manager have their own opinion how is their quality. That's why i join bitmixer.io because its running by a bot and we know how is our track.

[Rotator]

Post quality is very important topic i agree, but i don't see much tension here about rising scams with accounts
 and with ipo, icon, into, coins.
Also bunch of infected files , phishing attacks and more..
This is more important i think?

[Zeke2345]

Report spammers to the signature provider,they get blasted about the same member they will be forced to do something about it.
If that does not work blast the mods about the person in question,I heard they love getting reports from people.

[Aamir1]

Does the forum actually rate the post quality for users?

There is actually no such things on this forum to rate post qualitites of users, it's just that some campaign managers check your post quality for checking if you are eligible for being a part of their campaign.

[damiano]

Post quality is very important topic i agree, but i don't see much tension here about rising scams with accounts
 and with ipo, icon, into, coins.
Also bunch of infected files , phishing attacks and more..
This is more important i think?

Well that is indeed important but that is another conversation for another thread and has little relevance to a post quality thread. The thread starter had a question regarding quality nothing else. If you feel that is more important then create a thread and do not hijack or derail someone elses.

Or are you trying to show what a poor quality posts is? Makes sense.

For OP. 100 char post can be good, a 10 char post can be good. There is nothing that I know of that differentiate between the both unless you read the thread and post in is hard to know. Always read main post and last page to see if you can add to the thread if so post and it is always good regardless of the size of the post.

[Kepariy]

Does the forum actually rate the post quality for users?

There is actually no such things on this forum to rate post qualitites of users, it's just that some campaign managers check your post quality for checking if you are eligible for being a part of their campaign.

I think the campaign managers will check the quality of the posts. If they are not good, the poster will be removed.

[Aamir1]

Does the forum actually rate the post quality for users?

There is actually no such things on this forum to rate post qualitites of users, it's just that some campaign managers check your post quality for checking if you are eligible for being a part of their campaign.

I think the campaign managers will check the quality of the posts. If they are not good, the poster will be removed.

Yes, if the post quality is low then they won't even accept the user, removing would be there if he/she is accepted once.

[Rotator]

Or are you trying to show what a poor quality posts is? Makes sense.

You mean that post was perfect example for low quality?

Post quality is very important topic i understand that, but with signature campaigns menaged like this, this is just the beginning i think. I mean what do you people expect?
This is ethical question and must be processed on some higher levels not here.

[Jet Cash]

Whether posts are long or short, the posts should add value to a thread and should not be merely because you are getting paid. People usually view threads that cross 10 pages as spam threads but all many not be just spam threads. There are also many users who keep posting the same questions "How to earn BTC" "How to gamble" and so on which makes users answer the same questions over and over again. In my knowledge, the following posts fall in the respective categories:

1. Very poor: "Thanks" "NP" "+1"

2. Poor: Less than 5 words, Posts without any meaning like "I like your idea and feel everyone should like it", "Posts containing too many emoticons" "Repeating the above posts" etc.

3. Average: Posts that are grammatically poor but the content is helpful to the users, engaging in a conversation without going off topic, giving references, posting meaningful content.

4. Good: Posts that are really helpful and have useful information (may it be technical responses regarding bitcoins, mining, wallet recovery and so on).

5. Excellent: Posts that are made by extremely knowledgeable people who give examples, tips, tricks, tutorials and explain their answers with examples. Their responses may be extremely long but the content is useful to one and all.



Obvious trolls and spammers do not fall in any category.

I agree with 1, 2, 4, and 5. I would qualify 3 to compensate for posters that don't have English as their first language. For example, should we downgrade you post because you say "less than 5 words" rather than " fewer than 5 words".

Also, I think that people asking questions can be valuable members, even though their level of knowledge is low.