Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 01:40:37 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Which Alt-Coin without ASIC is the best to mine?  (Read 9648 times)
Koamder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 23, 2016, 12:51:46 PM
 #41

eth will be very profitable in the future ,be patient until the day where eth price will compete with BTC

 Right after the Sun goes nova and fries the Earth?

 (Presuming human civilization lasts that long)


Current-style Ethereum mining profitability will go to ZERO when it moves to PoS - and most folks don't consider PoS to be mining anyway, it's more "earning interest".



PoS will be at least a year away. So we can still mine the Etheruem. But the difficulty is rising too fast.
Tamilson
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 503



View Profile
May 28, 2016, 12:55:54 PM
 #42

eth will be very profitable in the future ,be patient until the day where eth price will compete with BTC

 Right after the Sun goes nova and fries the Earth?

 (Presuming human civilization lasts that long)


Current-style Ethereum mining profitability will go to ZERO when it moves to PoS - and most folks don't consider PoS to be mining anyway, it's more "earning interest".



PoS will be at least a year away. So we can still mine the Etheruem. But the difficulty is rising too fast.

The difficulty is 42 TH now. A month ago, it was 31 TH, that is 30% in a month. If this rate is kept, in 4 months, most of the miners will not be profitable.

Happy Coding Life Smiley
Paractor
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 133


View Profile
May 28, 2016, 07:48:18 PM
 #43

I just hope the big mining farms will invest wisely and do not ruin the whole mining business for the society.

ps_jb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 05:12:54 AM
 #44

I just hope the big mining farms will invest wisely and do not ruin the whole mining business for the society.

By whole mining business for society do you mean your 1-2 GPUs?

At the first moment investors believe that ETH deserves a ASIC - it will be build in 2 month
Fanpant
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 214
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 06:49:11 AM
 #45

I just hope the big mining farms will invest wisely and do not ruin the whole mining business for the society.

By whole mining business for society do you mean your 1-2 GPUs?

At the first moment investors believe that ETH deserves a ASIC - it will be build in 2 month

Do you think there will be ASIC soon? I thought the Ethereum mining algorithm is ASIC resistance.
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 07:22:59 AM
 #46

*ROFLMAO*

 Takes a LOT longer to design an ASIC - and Ethereum will go PoS before any ASIC for it can reach ROI.

 I seriously doubt that ANYONE would be dumb enough to waste the $MILLION(s) to design an Ethereum ASIC - and the bloody thing would be pretty expensive given the RAM requirement to mine Ethereum at all.


I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 07:29:39 AM
 #47

Can I ask for best settings for r9 280x - 1200/6700mhz? thanx.

 1100/1500 works best on my R9 280x - Gigabyte Windforce 3GB models.

 higher memory clock = quickly SLOWER mining, higher core doesn't give any better hashrate, lower clocks are a slower taperoff on hashrate.

 Other cards may vary, especially other models or other manufacturer cards.

I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Koamder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 30, 2016, 08:40:20 AM
 #48

Can I ask for best settings for r9 280x - 1200/6700mhz? thanx.

 1100/1500 works best on my R9 280x - Gigabyte Windforce 3GB models.

 higher memory clock = quickly SLOWER mining, higher core doesn't give any better hashrate, lower clocks are a slower taperoff on hashrate.

 Other cards may vary, especially other models or other manufacturer cards.


For the 280x, it has 256 memory bus, so it is better to raise the memory frequency. For the 390, 1250 MHz is fast enough.
bitcoinnee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 07, 2016, 04:09:48 AM
 #49

Maybe XRE right now.

QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
June 07, 2016, 06:29:02 AM
 #50

Can I ask for best settings for r9 280x - 1200/6700mhz? thanx.

 1100/1500 works best on my R9 280x - Gigabyte Windforce 3GB models.

 higher memory clock = quickly SLOWER mining, higher core doesn't give any better hashrate, lower clocks are a slower taperoff on hashrate.

 Other cards may vary, especially other models or other manufacturer cards.


For the 280x, it has 256 memory bus, so it is better to raise the memory frequency. For the 390, 1250 MHz is fast enough.

 390 is pretty much a rebadged 290 with a bios update IIRC - my 290s seem happy at stock 1250 mem clock (I can't underclock the core OR the memory under LINUX due to limitations of ATICONFIG/drivers) and I've been a bit conservative on temps even with the bios upgrade to them from TheStilt so only clocking the cores at 1120 - this is good for right about 30 MH/s so I can't complain especially at the price I paid for them.

 STOCK BIOS, they ran best at 1350 Mhs memory clock - apparently the memory timing updates done in The Stilt bios helped the memory throughput a LOT.


I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Fanpant
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 214
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 07, 2016, 06:40:33 PM
 #51

Can I ask for best settings for r9 280x - 1200/6700mhz? thanx.

 1100/1500 works best on my R9 280x - Gigabyte Windforce 3GB models.

 higher memory clock = quickly SLOWER mining, higher core doesn't give any better hashrate, lower clocks are a slower taperoff on hashrate.

 Other cards may vary, especially other models or other manufacturer cards.


For the 280x, it has 256 memory bus, so it is better to raise the memory frequency. For the 390, 1250 MHz is fast enough.

 390 is pretty much a rebadged 290 with a bios update IIRC - my 290s seem happy at stock 1250 mem clock (I can't underclock the core OR the memory under LINUX due to limitations of ATICONFIG/drivers) and I've been a bit conservative on temps even with the bios upgrade to them from TheStilt so only clocking the cores at 1120 - this is good for right about 30 MH/s so I can't complain especially at the price I paid for them.

 STOCK BIOS, they ran best at 1350 Mhs memory clock - apparently the memory timing updates done in The Stilt bios helped the memory throughput a LOT.



Do you also have the 390? I heard that the 390 is a bit more efficient than the 290 .  But I am not sure.
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
June 08, 2016, 06:37:59 AM
 #52

I do not have any 3xx series AMD cards. Probably will end up skipping that generation entirely.

I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Lavander
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 369
Merit: 101


View Profile
June 11, 2016, 11:46:32 AM
 #53

I do not have any 3xx series AMD cards. Probably will end up skipping that generation entirely.


I think it is better to wait for 2-3 weeks to get the 480 RX. It will consume much less power than the 380.
SpaceBallsOne
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 11, 2016, 03:15:31 PM
 #54

i was planning on ordering 5 480s when they launch.. but i just picked up 2 290x for $400.  undervolted / clocked im getting 25mh/sec and the temps and noise are reasonable.  I have a feeling with difficulty increases i may not be in ethereum too much longer.  id rather mine now then wait weeks for the 480s to ship.
Lucky - Luciano
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 711
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 11, 2016, 03:20:55 PM
 #55

I just hope the big mining farms will invest wisely and do not ruin the whole mining business for the society.

By whole mining business for society do you mean your 1-2 GPUs?

At the first moment investors believe that ETH deserves a ASIC - it will be build in 2 month
Do not slam nonsense Shocked.
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
June 12, 2016, 09:38:27 AM
 #56

Just getting an ASIC *CHIP* designed, taped out, tested, and into production is more like a 6 month process on highly mature process nodes (like 40nm, PERHAPS 28nm) and you're looking at millions to get a significant number made all costs totaled.

 Then you get to spend another month or three designing, testing, and getting a miner into production.


I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Koamder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 13, 2016, 11:12:30 AM
 #57

i was planning on ordering 5 480s when they launch.. but i just picked up 2 290x for $400.  undervolted / clocked im getting 25mh/sec and the temps and noise are reasonable.  I have a feeling with difficulty increases i may not be in ethereum too much longer.  id rather mine now then wait weeks for the 480s to ship.

That could be a good idea. I will buy some cheap 390. The price is around $300 in my country at the moment.
Fanpant
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 214
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 07:40:44 PM
 #58

i was planning on ordering 5 480s when they launch.. but i just picked up 2 290x for $400.  undervolted / clocked im getting 25mh/sec and the temps and noise are reasonable.  I have a feeling with difficulty increases i may not be in ethereum too much longer.  id rather mine now then wait weeks for the 480s to ship.

That could be a good idea. I will buy some cheap 390. The price is around $300 in my country at the moment.

That is quite good price. I also noticed the old graphics has reduced in price. That could be due to the new graphics card coming.
charles2k
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 326
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 08:44:46 PM
 #59

Can I ask for best settings for r9 280x - 1200/6700mhz? thanx.

 1100/1500 works best on my R9 280x - Gigabyte Windforce 3GB models.

 higher memory clock = quickly SLOWER mining, higher core doesn't give any better hashrate, lower clocks are a slower taperoff on hashrate.

 Other cards may vary, especially other models or other manufacturer cards.


For the 280x, it has 256 memory bus, so it is better to raise the memory frequency. For the 390, 1250 MHz is fast enough.
R9 280x has 384bit memory bus
Koamder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 21, 2016, 01:13:58 PM
 #60

Can I ask for best settings for r9 280x - 1200/6700mhz? thanx.

 1100/1500 works best on my R9 280x - Gigabyte Windforce 3GB models.

 higher memory clock = quickly SLOWER mining, higher core doesn't give any better hashrate, lower clocks are a slower taperoff on hashrate.

 Other cards may vary, especially other models or other manufacturer cards.


For the 280x, it has 256 memory bus, so it is better to raise the memory frequency. For the 390, 1250 MHz is fast enough.
R9 280x has 384bit memory bus

You are right. Even though the 280x has 384 bit memory bus, it is slower than the 380x now due to the big DAG.
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!