|
February 16, 2016, 03:42:58 AM |
|
Both of your issues are most likely related.
I am going to go out on a limb and say that the electrum wallet that you are spending from has an xpubkey with a very large number of transactions, and likely has a very large number of unspent inputs. When you create a transaction with electrum, it will need to (among other things), sign each input, and when it needs to sign thousands of inputs, this will take a lot of time. I believe it also needs to review (?) all of the unspent outputs to see what combination of unspent outputs would be most efficient.
What you are describing blockchain.info doing is not actually something that is possible with the bitcoin protocol. I would say that you most likely have a (nearly?) $10,000 unspent output contained in your wallet when you sent $10,000 to your exchange deposit address (you might have also send some of the penny transactions as well). It is not actually possible for a wallet to change the size of individual inputs without some intermediary transaction (and AFAIK, blockchain.info does not create any kind of intermediary transaction to consolidate inputs)
|