DT. Member is abusing his powers.

[katerniko1]

As you can see user lutpin gave me red trust and he is on DT list witch making me 2/1 trade with extreme caution, as you can ses on reference i repaid a loan he put as "proof" and that is not fair
I'm taking loans with no collateral and i repaid every last one of them so i dont see why is that a red trust from DT i want my red trust removed or him removed from DT as he was spamming my trust before he entered DT because i acused site he is admin on of getting in run mode and taking investitors money, and that is why he gave me red trst so it is abuse of power..
regards.
-Katerniko1

[Catink]

I got one from selling lbc accounts which is also allowed here. This user must be removed from DT  asap. He is clearly abusing his power.

[Lutpin]

Thanks for not contacting me via PM. Thanks for immediately opening a thread.
In my feedback, I don't say you defaulted on any loan (you repaid your last loan, I'm very aware of that),
however, you are taking a hell lot of no collateral loans, often shortly after repaying your last loan.
I don't consider that very trustworthy, even more in face of the trust you have gotten for them.


Further, you have recieved a feedback from an obvious sockpuppet account stating

Scam alert! Real name Leon M******** out of Zagreb! Facebook link /l***.p***************

which you answered with the following feedback

copy my name and leaves me some strange guy facebook link in profile yeah im from zagreb but who this guy on fb i have no idea

Now I have been looking into you and the named facebook account, and I could connect the both of you via a) your bitcoin address 1638u and b) your PrimeDice account "katerniko1".
-snip verification (no need to publicly expose the guy here)-
If you would not have any bad intentions, why would you try to lie about your identity, when being uncovered?

I got one from selling lbc accounts which is also allowed here.

Being allowed does not mean I have to tolerate. I can leave feedback as I want to, and I believe with your actions you are helping users to scam others.
But don't take this OT, PM me or be like katerniko1 and open a thread of your own, telling everyone how bad I am.

[katerniko1]

Thanks for not contacting me via PM. Thanks for immediately opening a thread.
In my feedback, I don't say you defaulted on any loan (you repaid your last loan, I'm very aware of that),
however, you are taking a hell lot of no collateral loans, often shortly after repaying your last loan.
I don't consider that very trustworthy, even more in face of the trust you have gotten for them.


Further, you have recieved a feedback from an obvious sockpuppet account stating

First of all this is public forum with a lot who dont need to know my real identity the peoe eho need to know it and who i trust i have no problems taking picture lf myself with id csrd ofc.in pm, and ofc ill take no collateral loan if i give my account i would not repay it as sig payments are my repaying funds. If you want everyone to know your real identity post it public but i wont.post mine public to 1mil users
regards.
-Katerniko1

[Lutpin]

First of all this is public forum with a lot of people who dont need to know my real identity the peoe eho need to know it and who i trust i have no problems taking picture lf myself with id csrd ofc.in pm, and ofc ill take no collateral loan if i give my account i would not repay it as sig payments are my repaying funds. If you want everyone to know your real identity post it public but i wont.post mine public to 1mil users
regards.
-Katerniko1

Fair enough, as a token of good will, I've removed the archives and your full name/facebook link from my post.
I'd suggest you do the same with your quote of it.
Contact me via PM to talk this through in private.

[Quickseller]

I don't see the issue here. IIRC, the size of the OP's loans are identical (in terms of BTC) so he is not attempting to borrow more and more money until he is able to borrow a large enough amount of btc to pull a runner.

If the above is correct, then I would say that the OP is involved in a perpetual pattern of borrowing essential all of his future income, and never being able to get "caught up". I would say that this makes him a poor credit risk (although this can be mitigated with a high interest rate), and that I would not personally lend to him. I would not call him a scammer though.

[EcuaMobi]

I do find katerniko1's behavior somewhat suspicius but I think a DT negative trust is too much, especially considering he hasn't got any DT positive feedback from those loans -even assuming those are trust loans-. I would think a neutral feedback would be more than enough, and I'd also ask any DT member to refrain from leaving positive feedback to him in the future for any loan.
katerniko1 could you explain why you're asking for so many loans?

Regarding his identity I think he's completely allowed to try and stay anonymous. I consider only scammers should be forced (as far as possible) to identify themselves.

I don't see the issue here. IIRC, the size of the OP's loans are identical (in terms of BTC) so he is not attempting to borrow more and more money until he is able to borrow a large enough amount of btc to pull a runner.

Well he did ask for more the last time but indeed I don't see a clear pattern to increase his loans over time.

[Lutpin]

I don't see the issue here. IIRC, the size of the OP's loans are identical (in terms of BTC) so he is not attempting to borrow more and more money until he is able to borrow a large enough amount of btc to pull a runner.

Well he did ask for more the last time but indeed I don't see a clear pattern to increase his loans over time.

The loan linked in the reference was indeed almost twice his usual size, which led me to the feedback.

I do find katerniko1's behavior somewhat suspicius but I think a DT negative trust is too much, especially considering he hasn't got any DT positive feedback from those loans -even assuming those are trust loans-. I would think a neutral feedback would be more than enough, and I'd also ask any DT member to refrain from leaving positive feedback to him in the future for any loan.

A neutral it is. I've reformulated my feedback and adjusted it.

katerniko1 could you explain why you're asking for so many loans?

Interesting question I'd also like an answer to.

[katerniko1]

I do find katerniko1's behavior somewhat suspicius but I think a DT negative trust is too much, especially considering he hasn't got any DT positive feedback from those loans -even assuming those are trust loans-. I would think a neutral feedback would be more than enough, and I'd also ask any DT member to refrain from leaving positive feedback to him in the future for any loan.
katerniko1 could you explain why you're asking for so many loans?

Regarding his identity I think he's completely allowed to try and stay anonymous. I consider only scammers should be forced (as far as possible) to identify themselves.

I don't see the issue here. IIRC, the size of the OP's loans are identical (in terms of BTC) so he is not attempting to borrow more and more money until he is able to borrow a large enough amount of btc to pull a runner.

Well he did ask for more the last time but indeed I don't see a clear pattern to increase his loans over time.

4th week in sig campaign is doubled and then i ask for more and that is pattern. i explained to lutpin on pm why im taking loans and as im on mobile i cant copy/paste but hw can if he wants to.
regards.
-Katerniko1

[whywefight]

I got one from selling lbc accounts which is also allowed here. This user must be removed from DT  asap. He is clearly abusing his power.

Might be OT but didnt you contact me after i left feedback for you, telling me you wouldnt do this anymore and now you have several threads open, for selling different types of accounts?

LBC: http://archive.is/uzSfz
VCC for PP: http://archive.is/UvVJh
FB: http://archive.is/suyeb
BHW: http://archive.is/CbeoM
BTCT: http://archive.is/9pUXl (i am cool with those, personally)

Ofc, you are free to sell them but after a while beeing around here we know how this will end up 90% of the time. Just speaking for me like i wrote before, i review my feedbacks after some time.

[Lutpin]

4th week in sig campaign is doubled and then i ask for more and that is pattern. i explained to lutpin on pm why im taking loans and as im on mobile i cant copy/paste but hw can if he wants to.

Don't see a reason not to.

I'm doing loan by loan as that way im having money always, i dont mind give 1$ more i just play sports and gamble invest withdraw loans and then repay a bit more to loaners and as my bct account is my income and it repays loans its not like im risking account of .15-.20 for 0.04 or something like that, you can ask any loaner that im honest and i kept them updated woth situation atm and i had some extensions but they were always paid with intrest so m not scamming anyone i just have my scheme and you can see alot of people didnt leave trust and i never ask for it as i dont care for it..

[Catink]

I got one from selling lbc accounts which is also allowed here. This user must be removed from DT  asap. He is clearly abusing his power.

Might be OT but didnt you contact me after i left feedback for you, telling me you wouldnt do this anymore and now you have several threads open, for selling different types of accounts?

LBC: http://archive.is/uzSfz
VCC for PP: http://archive.is/UvVJh
FB: http://archive.is/suyeb
BHW: http://archive.is/CbeoM
BTCT: http://archive.is/9pUXl (i am cool with those, personally)

Ofc, you are free to sell them but after a while beeing around here we know how this will end up 90% of the time. Just speaking for me like i wrote before, i review my feedbacks after some time.

Its my accounts. What is wrong selling those accounts? Yet you allow selling bitcointalk accounts?

[whywefight]

I got one from selling lbc accounts which is also allowed here. This user must be removed from DT  asap. He is clearly abusing his power.

Might be OT but didnt you contact me after i left feedback for you, telling me you wouldnt do this anymore and now you have several threads open, for selling different types of accounts?

LBC: http://archive.is/uzSfz
VCC for PP: http://archive.is/UvVJh
FB: http://archive.is/suyeb
BHW: http://archive.is/CbeoM
BTCT: http://archive.is/9pUXl (i am cool with those, personally)

Ofc, you are free to sell them but after a while beeing around here we know how this will end up 90% of the time. Just speaking for me like i wrote before, i review my feedbacks after some time.

Its my accounts. What is wrong selling those accounts? Yet you allow bitcointalk selling?

Its not up to what "i" allow or not. i dont see a problem if the accs are traded here. Makes it easier to spot them. As i lender i end up with accounts from time to time.
I am also cool on FB and dont care about BHW. I just dont like LBCs being sold, thats my persoanl opinion.

[Catink]

Its my accounts. What is wrong selling those accounts? Yet you allow bitcointalk selling?

And it's my opinion.

Yeah its your opinion, but you are on Default Trust and you should act one. Not using it as epenis.

[katerniko1]

As my problem was resolved with no damages done to my account im locking this thread
regards.
-Katerniko1