Release of GLBSE's Documents

[augustocroppo]

Revenue-Growth.JPG

TOS - April 7 2012.doc

BitcoinGlobal - Annual Report - March 2012.pdf

BitcoinGlobalGoverningBylaws.pdf

Balance-Sheet-Aug-1-2012.JPG

Financials-Apr-May-June-2012.JPG
    
Financials-May-July-2012.JPG

Rev-Sources-Apr-May-June 2012.JPG

BG-AGM-Minutes-April-13-2012.pdf

BG-Shareholder-Meeting-Minutes-August-10th-2012.pdf

BG-Shareholder-Meeting-Minutes-May-26-2012.pdf

BG-Shareholder-Meeting-Minutes-Sept-22nd-2012.pdf

[Third Way]

Where those supposed to be links to files, or, what? 

[augustocroppo]

Where those supposed to be links to files, or, what? 

It is a list of files which I received in a compacted archive. This files reveals interesting details about the GLBSE enterprise which were not disclosed by the original shareholders.

[Deafboy]

This might be a silly question, but considering that Nefario already lost all the trust and share issuers are slowly getting over all the shit caused by the infamous "cleanest shutdown ever", what's the point of this stupid voting thread, and why don't you just release what you have so we can all learn from mistakes of GLBSE?
edit:
I really hate people who are publicly saying things like "I got these interesting documents that could get him and him into the trouble" but not willing to release them. I meet people like this every day, and I am sick of them.

[Blazr]

I definitely think this should be released.

[augustocroppo]

This might be a silly question, but considering that Nefario already lost all the trust and share issuers are slowly getting over all the shit caused by the infamous "cleanest shutdown ever", what's the point of this stupid voting thread, and why don't you just release what you have so we can all learn from mistakes of GLBSE?

The point is to let the users of this forum decide if they are really interested to look into the documents. Keep in mind that GLBSE had 13 shareholders. Most of this shareholders are active users in this forum. So they are also entitled to participate in this decision.

edit:
I really hate people who are publicly saying things like "I got these interesting documents that could get him and him into the trouble" but not willing to release them. I meet people like this every day, and I am sick of them.

I understand your hate, but I am not one of these 'people' since I am willing to release the documents. However, I want to know if the users if this forum are also willing to look into the documents.

[repentance]

When are you going to make a decision - when a certain date arrives or when a certain number of people vote "yes".

[augustocroppo]

When are you going to make a decision - when a certain date arrives or when a certain number of people vote "yes".

Good question!

I will set a threshold to determine the final decision.

By the way, why do you think I received this documents from an anonymous user without any instruction at all?

[repentance]

By the way, why do you think I received this documents from an anonymous user without any instruction at all?

I presume they expected that you'd "publish and be damned".

[Walter Rothbard]

You could post them and then people who are interested could look and those who aren't could ignore them, right?

[Phinnaeus Gage]

I'm guessin' the sender's a horny ~45 y/o Bitcoiner who wears pajamas, if you know what I mean, Gavar bean.

[Third Way]

Just UP the files somewhere. There's no need for drama or suspense.

Otherwise, you made up those files.

[augustocroppo]

By the way, why do you think I received this documents from an anonymous user without any instruction at all?

I presume they expected that you'd "publish and be damned".

Good answer.

That was my first thought when I decide to understand the expectation of the anonymous sender.

[augustocroppo]

You could post them and then people who are interested could look and those who aren't could ignore them, right?

Completely right!

However I am very interested to know what the forum users thoughts before I release the documents.

[theymos]

The documents could be fake.

[repentance]

The documents could be fake.

Could be, but I don't think that the partners in GLBSE are a cohesive enough group that every single one of them would lie about the authenticity of the documents. 

[augustocroppo]

Just UP the files somewhere. There's no need for drama or suspense.

Otherwise, you made up those files.

I did not 'made up those files'.

The documents contains references to OpenPGP certificates of the GLBSE shareholders. That is impossible to forge.

[augustocroppo]

The documents could be fake.

I am very aware of this.

Perhaps parts of the documents were doctored and then sent to me.

Do you have any of the files listed?

[Deafboy]

Sure, there is possibility that documents are fake or has been altered. People should be aware of this.
However same argument was used by Giga and others regarding the shareholder list from Nefario. They simply said it could not be trusted. Giga then forced all shareholders to identify themselves. But that's another story...

[adamstgBit]

this is BS, these "sensitive documents" can't be trusted, so who gives a f*** what they say...