Bitcoin Classic Roadmap annonced

[pawel7777]

Schoolboy mistake. You, as a staff member, just openly admitted this forum is being censored.

If Classic is an altcoin, then it is an altcoin in both cases (positive or negative), therefore both kinds of threads should be moved or should stay.
So are you shilling openly now, or still pretending to be neutral and open-minded?

Here we go again, ad hominem as always. I don't move these threads, nor do I make the rules (nor does my opinion matter on whether Classic is an altcoin or not). I don't have an idea as to why any kind of Classic threads are left in B. Discussion. Maybe nobody bothered to report them. If you feel like they should be moved, then report them yourself. I only know of one that is there right now though.

That's not ad-hominem, that's simple logic. Just minutes ago you tried to justify presence of anti-"altcoin" topics in Bitcoin Discussion board while removing pro-"altcoin" topics. Now you're saying you don't know why they're allowed. F**king please... You know exactly why, so do I and so everyone else who's active on the forum.

And yes, I did report one of such threads. Can you guess what happened?

[1714141572]

1714141572

[1714141572]

1714141572

[1714141572]

1714141572

[1714141572]

1714141572

[1714141572]

1714141572

[Lauda]

That's not ad-hominem, that's simple logic.

No.

Just minutes ago you tried to justify presence of anti-"altcoin" topics in Bitcoin Discussion board while removing pro-"altcoin" topics.

That's certainly not what I said. I've explained the reasoning. A lot of people dislike Classic, ergo a 'positive thread/post' will attract a lot of attention and reports.

Now you're saying you don't know why they're allowed. F**king please... You know exactly why, so do I and so everyone else who's active on the forum.

You certainly do not know how the 'staff group' functions, nor does me being a staff member imply that I know why every single thread, that is not part of my 'jurisdiction', is located at a certain section.

And yes, I did report one of such threads. Can you guess what happened?

Sometimes reports are not justified. This is becoming off-topic and we should not continue this further here (PM for additional questions/new thread). If you have a complaint/suggestion/opinion regarding the forums rules, then you're free to make a thread about it in meta.

peter todd thinks there somthing wrong with everything, segwit included.

You can't deny that his input is very valuable. It is not easy to create a proper implementation of dynamic blocks. Additionally we really don't have adequate data on them (I think; maybe I've missed something). Q3/Q4 seems too quick to push such a radical change.

[Sir Lagsalot]

with apologies to Chris Rea

The Roadmap to Hell

And common sense is ringing out the bells
This ain't no technological breakdown
Oh no, this is the roadmap to Hell

And all the roads jam up with credit
And there's nothing you can do
It's all just bits of paper
Flying away from you

Oh look out world
Take a good look what comes down here
You must learn this lesson fast and learn it well

This ain't no upwardly mobile freeway
Oh no, this is the roadmap, said this is the roadmap
This is the roadmap to Hell

 

[DooMAD]

Nope. This board is just right.

Have you not noticed that XT/Classic/BU threads get moved somewhere?

I still don't see why they aren't moved to the vastly better suited alternative clients subforum.  Classic, XT and Unlimited are, after all, clients, not altcoins (at the risk of further discourse).

[adamstgBit]

Nope. This board is just right.

Have you not noticed that XT/Classic/BU threads get moved somewhere?

I still don't see why they aren't moved to the vastly better suited alternative clients subforum.  Classic, XT and Unlimited are, after all, clients, not altcoins (at the risk of further discourse).

This discussion is the single most relevant discussion in bitcoinland ATM, let's keep it on the main board....

[achow101]

So any dates more specific than q1, q2, q3, and q4? Those are pretty vague and they encompass several months. How about actual months specified like Bitcoin Core did with their roadmap (because this is pretty clear to be fighting back against the Core roadmap).

And how about making the roadmap more specific than just the "2016 roadmap"? A lot of things will happen in 2016, but this discusses specifically just scalability.

[adamstgBit]

So any dates more specific than q1, q2, q3, and q4? Those are pretty vague and they encompass several months. How about actual months specified like Bitcoin Core did with their roadmap (because this is pretty clear to be fighting back against the Core roadmap).

And how about making the roadmap more specific than just the "2016 roadmap"? A lot of things will happen in 2016, but this discusses specifically just scalability.

these dates are goals not deadlines.

[Lauda]

I still don't see why they aren't moved to the vastly better suited alternative clients subforum.  Classic, XT and Unlimited are, after all, clients, not altcoins (at the risk of further discourse).

This was discussed in the past. This is not the right place do discuss this.

these dates are goals not deadlines.

Yet Classic supporters complained about the 'lack of dates' on the Core Roadmap.

[adamstgBit]

i can't fucking believe it.

HELLO altcoins

have you heard about bitcoin, and the war going on with classic vs core??? O_o?

[bitcoin carpenter]

i can't fucking believe it.

HELLO altcoins

have you heard about bitcoin, and the war going on with classic vs core??? O_o?

Yes, we are watching. 

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

Don't mind Adam. He seems to have just become politically active. I think it's a phase.
PS. OP can you please run some spell-check once in a while. This is embarrassing.

[gentlemand]

What I find very, very, very exciting about this new coin is that you can mine Bitcoin blocks with it. Surely this is a world first? Maybe it should be moved from the altcoin section now this important news has been uncovered?

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

What I find very, very, very exciting about this new coin is that you can mine Bitcoin blocks with it. Surely this is a world first? Maybe it should be moved from the altcoin section now this important news has been uncovered?

Interesting. I hadn't noticed any of this. In which discussion section do you think this might be more suitable?

[gentlemand]

Boy, that's a toughie. I'll let you know when it comes to me.

[Proxiebuier]

this is just altcoin ?
BItcoin Core, Bitcoin Clasic, Bitcoin XT   

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

Boy, that's a toughie. I'll let you know when it comes to me.

I suggest we add two new sections to the forum:

1. Alternative Implementations (that don't threaten to break consensus rules)
2. Alternative Implementations (that do)

?

[rdnkjdi]

Did they move this from the bitcoin forum?  Hahaha

[Lauda]

this is just altcoin ?
BItcoin Core, Bitcoin Clasic, Bitcoin XT   

Bitcoin Core is not comparable to Bitcoin Clasic and XT. The other two are different implementations, or altcoins (depending on who you ask).

I suggest we add two new sections to the forum:

1. Alternative Implementations (that don't threaten to break consensus rules)
2. Alternative Implementations (that do)

That's pretty redundant.

Did they move this from the bitcoin forum?

It was moved to the appropriate section.

HELLO altcoins

have you heard about bitcoin, and the war going on with classic vs core??? O_o?

42 million coins.

[pedrog]

Looks good, BIP 109 promises something like 100 TX/s and we really need that, that gives us something like 60000 transactions per block, which, probably, almost pays for mining when full, at this point other layers can be implemented for off-chain payments with on-chain settlements.

So, when/if Bitcoin Classic is adopted by majority all Bitcoin Core discussions will be moved to Altcoins section?

[Lauda]

So, when/if Bitcoin Classic is adopted by majority all Bitcoin Core discussions will be moved to Altcoins section?

This predefined majority as found in the older systems is not applicable here. You're asking very situation specific questions which can not be answered at this time. Only theymos could tell you that.

..almost pays for mining when full.

It doesn't. You don't have data to back this up. However, BIP109 does look good but I'd like to see an implementation of it as soon as possible.