Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services

[james.lent]

What happened:: This member started a thread on the service section offering 3d rendering/modeling services. He has also 'updated his portfolio' which are actually random images grabbed from google and he slapped trademarks on them

Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=93844

Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.0
         Archived : https://web.archive.org/web/20160130051714/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.0

Images source: first pic : https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datagrafikk  / https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Glasses_800_edit.png

                     second pic : http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0FBjowpxpxU/TjgX8-M0gbI/AAAAAAAAAEw/Bgf7nAR1xG4/s1600/Home-theatre.jpg

                        third pic : http://s3images.coroflot.com/user_files/individual_files/407503_ZEl1NoCTwdYBpAVqUS1QckNtr.jpg

                         fifth pic : http://www.offshorerenderingservices.com/images/architectural-samples/3d-interior-rendering-18.jpg

Slapping on a trademark on someone else's work doesn't make it yours. Only proves that you're out to scam.

edit: If you really did design them, then im sure you have no issue's proving it as maybe a screenshot when its under the designing process or something.

[1714022710]

1714022710

[1714022710]

1714022710

[actmyname]

Seems stupid. He should have at the very least distorted the images a little bit so you couldn't do a reverse google image search. I'm sure that the images were simply stolen randomly. Looks like legendster just found the images and then slapped a watermark on it.

Not sure why he would do this if he was expecting people to pay for his services - once they see his REAL work, they would most likely bomb him with negative feedback (maybe he wanted them to send first?)

[james.lent]

Not sure why he would do this if he was expecting people to pay for his services - once they see his REAL work, they would most likely bomb him with negative feedback (maybe he wanted them to send first?)

That would most likely be the intention he has.

[Lutpin]

The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.

Remember I have been doing this since 2009 so yes my portfolio is much bigger than what I have posted here - which is just 3D stuff.

Funny, the picture you claimed to be made by yourself was Picture of the day in 2006.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Picture_of_the_day/August_2%2C_2006

[Your Point Is Invalid]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

[james.lent]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

[Lutpin]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity

No I don't. A simple message from Gilles Tran would be enough, I've made an example here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lutpin
or a blog post on his website:
http://www.oyonale.com/blog/
Both thinks would be enough as proof.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

[james.lent]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

[james.lent]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

[james.lent]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.msg13354700#msg13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.

[Panthers52]

It looks like the hero member 'Quickseller' gave this person a negative rating over a year ago because he was trying to take out a 60 BTC loan while using a faucet as collateral

It also looks like Legendary member 'johnniewalker' left this person a negative rating over similar issues as were described in the OP, as legendster was trying to sell a high end car, but to prove ownership of such cars he used pictures of cars being sold in Las Angeles while legendster was(is) located in India.

There also appears to be some level of controversy over the ratings that escrow.ms left for legendster as legendster purchased bitcoin from escrow.ms at above market value and ended up receiving two positive ratings from the deal, one from escrow.ms and one from Benson Samuel who has worked closely with escrow.ms in the past.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

[GSpgh]

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

What are you on about... Nobody asked for original construction 6years ago you totally made that up. Reading comprehension fail. Just open the source file is basically what's being suggested. Maybe you should let the perp do their own shilling you're really bad at this lol.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.msg13354700#msg13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.

But my question is how you think he is going to prove that he made the images, do you think he made screenshots halfway through his work?

[james.lent]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.msg13354700#msg13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.

But my question is how you think he is going to prove that he made the images, do you think he made screenshots halfway through his work?

Wtf, are you retarded or just trolling ? If he owns the image im sure he has the means to prove em. Every project has a source file. Like photoshop has .psd files. Source files is a must for 3d renderings as they're needed for edits/ touch-ups . Stop shilling

[GSpgh]

It looks like the hero member 'Quickseller'

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Pathetic... Give up the socks already. You are tainting whatever point you may have.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.msg13354700#msg13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.

But my question is how you think he is going to prove that he made the images, do you think he made screenshots halfway through his work?

Wtf, are you retarded or just trolling ? If he owns the image im sure he has the means to prove em. Every project has a source file. Like photoshop has .psd files. Source files is a must for 3d renderings as they're needed for edits/ touch-ups . Stop shilling

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

[james.lent]

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.msg13354700#msg13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.

But my question is how you think he is going to prove that he made the images, do you think he made screenshots halfway through his work?

Wtf, are you retarded or just trolling ? If he owns the image im sure he has the means to prove em. Every project has a source file. Like photoshop has .psd files. Source files is a must for 3d renderings as they're needed for edits/ touch-ups . Stop shilling

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

No, as i've already stated, he can open that file, take a snapshot of his work and post it. Cant you read?