Trust Abuser Lutpin

[ausbit]

Today when I checked my account I found it received negative from lutpin for old proofs

Other accounts linked to the proofs were not given the negative but only my account was given while ownership of this account changed multiple times after that


I wonder why someone add such people to Default trust who don't even know how to check if the account was linked to a scammer or not, looks like a kid who just using walletexplorer to link them but don't know anything else about how these things work.


I request this negative to be removed when they don't have solid proof.

[whywefight]

you have a ton of negs and you really decided to complain about lutpin?

[Lutpin]

Neotox, is that you?

[Zeke2345]

The other feedbacks show up as untrusted and I only saw Luptin as well. Might be what happened for him.

[Neotox]

Neotox, is that you?

you expecting me here? 

[xetsr]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg13887541#msg13887541

I guess that's the risk of buying accounts.

[ausbit]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg13887541#msg13887541

I guess that's the risk of buying accounts.

why the only my account from the list was tagged when its ownership was changed already and any blind person can see that from security log

[Lutpin]

you expecting me here? 

After your two messages in 20 minutes about me removing my negative from that exact account, yes.

[Neotox]

you expecting me here? 

After your two messages in 20 minutes about me removing my negative from that exact account, yes.

you only believe what you see

[Lutpin]

you only believe what you see

I saw your previous post about the "rest or mind treatment" I supposedly need.
I didn't take it too positive, but I value your opinion.
So you care for your customers, next step would be caring for the accounts you sell and where they come from.

[Neotox]

you only believe what you see

I saw your previous post about the "rest or mind treatment" I supposedly need.
I didn't take it too positive, but I value your opinion.
So you care for your customers, next step would be caring for the accounts you sell and where they come from.

thanks for your tips but I know how to do business,I am doing this before you was registered

but you really need to learn how to find scammer before acting to be smart

[xetsr]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg13887541#msg13887541

I guess that's the risk of buying accounts.

why the only my account from the list was tagged when its ownership was changed already and any blind person can see that from security log

Security log doesn't prove who changed the password. The whole, I bought this account and etc has been used before. Not saying this is what you did, instead trying to show you why account buying can be risking.

Your account was linked to others through block chain evidence and received the appropriate feedback. That is not trust abuse.

[ausbit]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg13887541#msg13887541

I guess that's the risk of buying accounts.

why the only my account from the list was tagged when its ownership was changed already and any blind person can see that from security log

Security log doesn't prove who changed the password. The whole, I bought this account and etc has been used before. Not saying this is what you did, instead trying to show you why account buying can be risking.

A user with common sense can get idea from security log that account ownership is changed

[xetsr]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg13887541#msg13887541

I guess that's the risk of buying accounts.

why the only my account from the list was tagged when its ownership was changed already and any blind person can see that from security log

Security log doesn't prove who changed the password. The whole, I bought this account and etc has been used before. Not saying this is what you did, instead trying to show you why account buying can be risking.

A user with common sense can get idea from security log that account ownership is changed

You telling me a scammer can't change their own password and claim the same thing? A user with common sense would also understand that. Let's not forget this is bitcointalk after all.

This is the risk of buying accounts. You might as well take it as a lose unless you can prove you're not said member. Sure it sucks but you can thank those who abused the system by buying accounts and using them for the wrong reasons.

[ausbit]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg13887541#msg13887541

I guess that's the risk of buying accounts.

why the only my account from the list was tagged when its ownership was changed already and any blind person can see that from security log

Security log doesn't prove who changed the password. The whole, I bought this account and etc has been used before. Not saying this is what you did, instead trying to show you why account buying can be risking.

A user with common sense can get idea from security log that account ownership is changed

You telling me a scammer can't change their own password and claim the same thing? A user with common sense would also understand that. Let's not forget this is bitcointalk after all.

This is the risk of buying accounts. You might as well take it as a lose unless you can prove you're not said member. Sure it sucks but you can thank those who abused the system by buying accounts and using them for the wrong reasons.

If you have missed something proofs are available that account was sold

[mexxer-2]

If you have missed something proofs are available that account was sold

And what made you think opening a drama thread before giving all the necessary proofs, would help your case and perhaps change Lutpin's opinion?

[Lutpin]

And what made you think opening a drama thread before giving all the necessary proofs, would help your case and perhaps change Lutpin's opinion?

But jumping in on the recent drama instead of contacting me with the proofs is so much easier.

[sase007]

I think this should be in reputation.

LutPin is usually quite good wit trust ideas. Usually there opinion is quite good.
If it is old then I don't really thing he shoul dhave brought it back u uness the post was deleted.

[ausbit]

And what made you think opening a drama thread before giving all the necessary proofs, would help your case and perhaps change Lutpin's opinion?

But jumping in on the recent drama instead of contacting me with the proofs is so much easier.

Don't be stupid, did you checked the linked post and seen it was only my account to that post
you are giving stupid negatives without proofs and now trying to be smart, don't make others fool
accept our mistake and remove negative

if you get solid proof you are free to give negative

[mexxer-2]

if you get solid proof you are free to give negative

ausbit uses the address 1JqhHA5YRbSGhqtrMMjSNF3T2vj25cyLY8 that is connected to the addresses 1MzanHD42LRWzQKYm5mtQ5JJGgMsjhJ2PD, 1CGpDLK7uBp6jbzL9J2aa4LMqGDhpiNY5m and 18AEV6fmCbGtQsJLWyisiaTwJFK2rwMzdW throught the transactions 3033f1dd85bb77b519db61207bb51a9fab0b3837b7a5934a759af1c0d9a01207 (Linking 1CGpD and 18AEV) and d65cd7b17e146f0e4fd9298bbdf632e4529ef06a3f4894813dda16ca89126cd2 (Linking 1CGpD, 1JqhH and 1Mzan).

ausbit posting the 1JqhH address:

I am going away from this campaign, there must be a new slot open.

I just applied, can you check please
UID: 390217 showing no free slots found.
BTC address: 1JqhHA5YRbSGhqtrMMjSNF3T2vj25cyLY8
Since there is a free slot, please join me in, i would love to be in Bitmixer campaign.

BigBoy89 is posting the 18AEV address here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1269463.msg13276186#msg13276186

Hey, I am joining your Campaign
Name: BigBoy89
Post count: 1055 (Including this)
Position: Hero Member
Bitcoin address: 18AEV6fmCbGtQsJLWyisiaTwJFK2rwMzdW
Profile UID: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=248564
FastDice username: BigBoyBitcoins

greBit is posting the 1CGpD address here:

*Pay Per Post:
*Name: GreBit
*Post count:824
*Rank: Hero Member
*Bitcoin Address: 1CGpDLK7uBp6jbzL9J2aa4LMqGDhpiNY5m
I would like to join your campaign, please let me know about your acceptance and accordingly I will wear your signature and I have sent a PM to you.

HarHarHar9965 is posting the 1Mzan address here (aswell as on his profile):

Hi zengryt,
I would like to join in your signature campaign, Please kindly let me know about spot availability for me.
*Fixedrate or Pay Per Post: Pay Per Post
*Name: HarHarHar9965
*Post count: 1043
*Rank: Hero Member
*Bitcoin Address: 1MzanHD42LRWzQKYm5mtQ5JJGgMsjhJ2PD
Regards,
HarHarHar9965...

And now it's getting interesting. HarHarHar9965 has got negative feedback from Quickseller for this reason:

Participating in trust farming, and faking trades. I would consider this person to be untrustworthy