BoldNinja
|
|
April 15, 2016, 12:22:49 PM |
|
I think there is no worry that WAVES wouldn't be listed on Poloniex - it's just a matter of time if they will jump in immediately after WAVES launch or later on.
|
|
|
|
|
mikevanegan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
April 15, 2016, 12:38:59 PM |
|
With Waves and Lisk added to Poloniex, there would be an ungodly amount of traffic. I'm sure they will be added. They want to make bank, bro. Then again... what the f@ck do I know?
|
|
|
|
noms
|
|
April 15, 2016, 12:46:34 PM |
|
So, the testnet client works perfectly. I've sent and received a bunch of testnet waves!!!! This is super exciting! http://127.0.0.1:6869/transactions/address/Vt48LMV321x2XxJaJ8eB1MeScsAGzuUva[[{"type":2,"fee":1,"timestamp":1460723506928,"signature":"29J3knmEQVRRhc5XEWjHgwGPd39aRC9zuEvRjREQAeCaJc7wtcGfJrr1DmcnwfXEwiByuAdR8g9V2WcgFAor693c","sender":"aBLHjuxTk6nfxTwq1LuqiAgHF27GK3TZa","recipient":"Vt48LMV321x2XxJaJ8eB1MeScsAGzuUva","amount":27}, {"type":2,"fee":1,"timestamp":1460723511801,"signature":"29r7d2S79KmbK7LXBW6HBXEMJNhb485vz5wYPffUU2ph1e6czW4R48kDfWbHDrCHaPWARkZyLEc6XP7peKe2f9wL","sender":"jACSbUoHi4eWgNu6vzAnEx583NwmUAVfS","recipient":"Vt48LMV321x2XxJaJ8eB1MeScsAGzuUva","amount":10000}, {"type":2,"fee":1,"timestamp":1460723758651,"signature":"GjQYdWWZZ4pAiHj531a56p7wMjYrn4eTZoW24bRHFBceAqhqybH9Yvp3S7wdtxELDkjLr8nYqSdavpBM1o5aVTK","sender":"Vt48LMV321x2XxJaJ8eB1MeScsAGzuUva","recipient":"aBLHjuxTk6nfxTwq1LuqiAgHF27GK3TZa","amount":42}, {"type":2,"fee":1,"timestamp":1460723883087,"signature":"2nzdvpa2f4UarpNxGVC7ScRaMjZkmu52e4GNiGQkiY3dC5yjGAuYS7TWnHeYxE2h64cLHo2HAxi6g6P6sGfrGr21","sender":"ZFrpiTzudfttrfkMQUSVwZ1zRNxXXGS7F","recipient":"Vt48LMV321x2XxJaJ8eB1MeScsAGzuUva","amount":40}, {"type":2,"fee":1,"timestamp":1460724111056,"signature":"2QKBBLQC6LPyzYvNfxr6xEwJ62JYZxk8BCoNiy3eF993CygEXW3aczbxZv6QCMzY2vE2je5h3FwmAxEUPyjU3hrM","sender":"Vt48LMV321x2XxJaJ8eB1MeScsAGzuUva","recipient":"ZFrpiTzudfttrfkMQUSVwZ1zRNxXXGS7F","amount":42}]]
http://127.0.0.1:6869/addresses/balance/Vt48LMV321x2XxJaJ8eB1MeScsAGzuUva{"address":"Vt48LMV321x2XxJaJ8eB1MeScsAGzuUva","confirmations":1,"balance":9981}
|
Monero.
|
|
|
noms
|
|
April 15, 2016, 12:53:27 PM |
|
If anyone wants to send or receive testnet waves with me, my address is: Vt48LMV321x2XxJaJ8eB1MeScsAGzuUva If you post your address, i'll send some testnet waves to you as well
|
Monero.
|
|
|
bitcoinrocks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 15, 2016, 12:54:25 PM |
|
What makes Waves different from the other cryptotokens like Omni, Counterparty, and NXT assets?
|
|
|
|
CoinManiac1
|
|
April 15, 2016, 12:56:23 PM |
|
Thanks!! I tried the link to download but asks me to sign in..Do i need to get an invite to test
|
|
|
|
|
mxxxxxx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 15, 2016, 12:57:53 PM |
|
Thanks!! I tried the link to download but asks me to sign in..Do i need to get an invite to test http://slack.wavesplatform.com
|
|
|
|
orendel
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
April 15, 2016, 01:01:08 PM |
|
Waves must trade on Poloniex from the launch day.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinrocks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 15, 2016, 01:10:20 PM |
|
That post says: "Main differences are asset-asset trading and fiat tokens at launch" But Counterparty already has asset-asset trading and Omni, NXT, and Bitshares already have fiat tokens.
|
|
|
|
zaph3t
|
|
April 15, 2016, 01:24:06 PM |
|
That post says: "Main differences are asset-asset trading and fiat tokens at launch" But Counterparty already has asset-asset trading and Omni, NXT, and Bitshares already have fiat tokens. Ok i think you are trying to FUD here. How abt you go ask the same Question in LISK thread and also dont forget to stop by IOTA, FACTOM and ETH threads. And please post that same question in all 1000 + Bitcoin clones. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
April 15, 2016, 01:32:13 PM |
|
Waves must trade on Poloniex from the launch day.
PoloniEx doesn't give information on coins they are going to list so it may be listed right after launch or they may wait a few weeks/months to make sure there are no bugs.
|
|
|
|
traumschiff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
|
|
April 15, 2016, 01:33:13 PM |
|
That post says: "Main differences are asset-asset trading and fiat tokens at launch" But Counterparty already has asset-asset trading and Omni, NXT, and Bitshares already have fiat tokens. And this will have both as it seems, on a new codebase.
|
|
|
|
sasha35625 (OP)
|
|
April 15, 2016, 01:36:29 PM |
|
That post says: "Main differences are asset-asset trading and fiat tokens at launch" But Counterparty already has asset-asset trading and Omni, NXT, and Bitshares already have fiat tokens. And this will have both as it seems, on a new codebase. Before there's Ligtning network I don't think that Counterparty or Omni can be really used for decentralized trading. even when (and if) it's there it's not so obvious if it's doable.
|
|
|
|
KarlKarlsson_
|
|
April 15, 2016, 01:56:55 PM Last edit: April 15, 2016, 02:27:52 PM by KarlKarlsson_ |
|
That post says: "Main differences are asset-asset trading and fiat tokens at launch" But Counterparty already has asset-asset trading and Omni, NXT, and Bitshares already have fiat tokens. Ok i think you are trying to FUD here. How abt you go ask the same Question in LISK thread and also dont forget to stop by IOTA, FACTOM and ETH threads. And please post that same question in all 1000 + Bitcoin clones. Thank you! Can't really talk about Omni, I don't really now a lot about it. Counterparty: Never tried it myself but I heard people complaining about the GUI. Also, keep in mind that Counterparty relies on the Bitcoin blockchain and, therefore, has very slow block times. Additionally, it is dependant on Bitcoin and it's Blockchain's future (see discussion about block size, etc.). Nxt: Well-tested platform with a lot of perks. However, you cannot trade asset-to-asset which is essential in opening up new ways for a decentralized asset exchange. Regarding the fiat tokens: BitShares offers a pegged token with no guarantee of keeping its value. The tokens offered on Nxt Asset Exchange are kept within a certain range of price through market making. Two different approaches of which I prefer the latter. BitShares: They broke the principles of a crypto currency when migrating from 1.0 to 2.0 - a no-go for me personally. Also, I think not every user is free to issue an asset like on Nxt or WAVES which is a major drawback. WAVES will provide a combined solution of all perks these platforms offer while keeping the user's freedom in doing what he wants to on the platform.
|
|
|
|
iambitcoin5
|
|
April 15, 2016, 02:08:29 PM |
|
That post says: "Main differences are asset-asset trading and fiat tokens at launch" But Counterparty already has asset-asset trading and Omni, NXT, and Bitshares already have fiat tokens. Ok i think you are trying to FUD here. How abt you go ask the same Question in LISK thread and also dont forget to stop by IOTA, FACTOM and ETH threads. And please post that same question in all 1000 + Bitcoin clones. Thank you! Can't really take about Omni, I don't really now a lot about it. Counterparty: Never tried it myself but I heard people complaining about the GUI. Also, keep in mind that Counterparty relies on the Bitcoin blockchain and, therefore, has very slow block times. Additionally, it is dependant on Bitcoin and its' Blockchain's future (see discussion about block size, etc.). Nxt: Well-tested platform with a lot of perks. However, you cannot trade asset-to-asset which is essential in opening up new ways for a decentralized asset exchange. Regarding the fiat tokens: BitShares offers a pegged token with no guarantee of keeping its value. The tokens offered on Nxt Asset Exchange are kept within a certain range of price through market making. Two different approaches of which I prefer the latter. BitShares: They broke the principles of a crypto currency when migrating from 1.0 to 2.0 - a no-go for me personally. Also, I think not every user is free to issue an asset like on Nxt or WAVES which is a major drawback. WAVES will provide a combined solution of all perks these platforms offer while keeping the user's freedom in doing what he wants to on the platform. Exactly! Excellent explanation!
|
|
|
|
axlroses
|
|
April 15, 2016, 02:13:12 PM |
|
VALORBIT #2 LOL
|
|
|
|
JollyTrades
|
|
April 15, 2016, 02:17:45 PM |
|
Waves must trade on Poloniex from the launch day.
Or maybe Poloniex should be traded on WAVES.
|
|
|
|
iambitcoin5
|
|
April 15, 2016, 02:19:39 PM |
|
Waves must trade on Poloniex from the launch day.
Or maybe Poloniex should be traded on WAVES. LOL yeah I like that idea.
|
|
|
|
|