Negative Feedback

[Zeke2345]

Even though Op may have misunderstood bitmixers requirements, this highlight how negatively repping people till proof is provided, drives casual and new accounts away.
Signatures loved or hated bring people into the fold.
Even if you get one active contributor out of ten its worth the pains of spam.

[1714138076]

1714138076

[nydiacaskey01]

Even if you have a negative feedback you will be allowed to participate in Bitmixer campaign. Look at mine, someone left me a negative feedback and I never had a problem with joining and receiving payments from Bitmixer. Only if feedback was from a trusted member, that's the time that you cant. Another problem is if there's an available slot left for new participants.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Can you sign from this address that goes back to June 18, 2014? 16gFsh4FzVe5i7nqt81LCgRcqCwHcFSmCL
People staked their addresses here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.0
The thing is your full member and until now, don't know how to sign message so you could prove ownership of your account and that raises flags considering there's a gap between September 02, 2015 and March 01, 2016 in which you posted again and due to numerous cases of some accounts posting after some times (a lot recently), it would be good to prove ownership since IIRC there's a way that password changes don't appear or reflect on profiles (I heard it somewhere although not sure).

I'm a Sr. Member and until now I did not know how to sign a message. Does that mean I got my account hacked?

I'm in the same boat, never had to sign a message though I did verify one.  And I got scammed anyway from a green trusted member.

[shorena]

Fuck Bitmixer for not accepting you.

-snip-
I haven't actually been denied by BitMixer, just they specifically say no negative feedback, which I do have just it is untrusted. 
-snip-