Douglus should remove cryptodevil from DT due to conflict of interest

[skyline_king]

cryptodevil is trolling and spamming every thread in investor based games. he is making it so people can't even go there or speak there with out getting a neg trust.

he is a joke and now I read this and see his real interest.

so hope he does lose his default trust.

[1714104633]

1714104633

[1714104633]

1714104633

[1714104633]

1714104633

[cryptodevil]

cryptodevil, what do you have to say to this accusation?

If anyone can find more evidence that links cryptodevil to Antreas Kililis please post it.

LOL. Genuinely. LOL.

That's what I have to say to your accusation. By all means, please do continue to accuse me of being someone I'm not and then, if you get to actually dox me for who I am, I can tell you that I give not one flying fuck about it because my post history is clean! How do I know that my post history is clean? Because I'm not a scamming scumbag like most of you.

[SnukeySnizz]

LOL. Genuinely. LOL.

That's what I have to say to your accusation. By all means, please do continue to accuse me of being someone I'm not and then, if you get to actually dox me for who I am, I can tell you that I give not one flying fuck about it because my post history is clean! How do I know that my post history is clean? Because I'm not a scamming scumbag like most of you.

Well OK then. Just to let you know there is publicly available conclusive evidence that proves you live in Cyprus. Antreas was the closest match I could find out of all suspects I identified. I think you are definitely doxxable but I've no real interest in doxing you, I just wanted to see if you were lying about having no alts.

[cryptodevil]

Well OK then. Just to let you know there is conclusive evidence that proves you live in Cyprus.

I don't recall ever denying that I live in Cyprus. Hahaha. Twat.

Antreas was the closest match I could find out of all suspects I identified.

Because Cypriots all look the same and, more importantly, you assume me to be Cypriot?

QS, seriously, you so suck at this!

[SnukeySnizz]

Because Cypriots all look the same and, more importantly, you assume me to be Cypriot?

Not at all I made no assumptions whatsoever during the course of my short investigation. I've no interest in doxxing you, unless you are Antreas then clearly you should be removed from DT at the least. If you are, then maybe someone with more time on their hands will do the research now that I've posted a very possible suspect.

QS, seriously, you so suck at this!

Yeah... ugh... you got that wrong!

"I am not an alt of Quickseller"

No QS alt will post that statement. QS is crazy like that.

[Mist]

I'm with TECSHARE and the alts here. Cryptodevil is way out of control and can't formulate a proper response to his abuse without attacking everyone here.

[Gimpeline]

Someone that abuse the trust system so badly should clearly not be on the DT. I don't really read those forums myself, and I have never posted in any of them, but his abuse of the system is pretty obvious. Bow down to the mighty God cryptodevil and make posts he likes or get red trust. Giving newbies that looks for a free giveaway red trust doesn't help anyone.

[cryptodevil]

So, let me get this right.

A band of socks, alts and general idiots can't actually provide any evidence of trust abuse, but they believe simply whining about tagging posts indicative of untrustworthy behaviour will somehow magically make their fallacious reasoning and dishonest argument transmogrify into reasoned rebuttal?

Sure, sounds legit.

[Gimpeline]

So, let me get this right.

A band of socks, alts and general idiots can't actually provide any evidence of trust abuse, but they believe simply whining about tagging posts indicative of untrustworthy behaviour will somehow magically make their fallacious reasoning and dishonest argument transmogrify into reasoned rebuttal?

Sure, sounds legit.

God almighty cryptodevil is always right.

[Zeke2345]

So, let me get this right.

A band of socks, alts and general idiots can't actually provide any evidence of trust abuse, but they believe simply whining about tagging posts indicative of untrustworthy behaviour will somehow magically make their fallacious reasoning and dishonest argument transmogrify into reasoned rebuttal?

Sure, sounds legit.

Is the bubble getting tighter or you like people poking at you from all ends?
Know you are unable to back off because this is all this account is about,so keep posting.


edit***
Report his posts with the big red copy and paste as spam.

[Gimpeline]

So please tell me, Oh Lord, how to make a politically correct post that please your highness in the marked section without getting red trust.
Assholes like you that want to limit peoples free speech needs to be called out. You are making the reputation system worthless.
I'm guessing you are searching for any post I made there to give it red trust. I have never posted there and this is the only account I have so good luck

[whywefight]

So please tell me, Oh Lord, how to make a politically correct post that please your highness in the marked section without getting red trust.
Assholes like you that want to limit peoples free speech needs to be called out. You are making the reputation system worthless.
I'm guessing you are searching for any post I made there to give it red trust. I have never posted there and this is the only account I have so good luck

scamming people is not equal free speech.

[Mist]

So please tell me, Oh Lord, how to make a politically correct post that please your highness in the marked section without getting red trust.
Assholes like you that want to limit peoples free speech needs to be called out. You are making the reputation system worthless.
I'm guessing you are searching for any post I made there to give it red trust. I have never posted there and this is the only account I have so good luck

scamming people is not equal free speech.

The thing about Ponzi's is you know what you get when you use them. It's VERY clear.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

So please tell me, Oh Lord, how to make a politically correct post that please your highness in the marked section without getting red trust.
Assholes like you that want to limit peoples free speech needs to be called out. You are making the reputation system worthless.
I'm guessing you are searching for any post I made there to give it red trust. I have never posted there and this is the only account I have so good luck

scamming people is not equal free speech.

Posting in a ponzi thread is not scamming

[The Sceptical Chymist]

So please tell me, Oh Lord, how to make a politically correct post that please your highness in the marked section without getting red trust.
Assholes like you that want to limit peoples free speech needs to be called out. You are making the reputation system worthless.
I'm guessing you are searching for any post I made there to give it red trust. I have never posted there and this is the only account I have so good luck

scamming people is not equal free speech.

Posting in a ponzi thread is not scamming

I agree with this and I don't agree with YPII much.  He's out of control.

[Dorrittulx]

So please tell me, Oh Lord, how to make a politically correct post that please your highness in the marked section without getting red trust.
Assholes like you that want to limit peoples free speech needs to be called out. You are making the reputation system worthless.
I'm guessing you are searching for any post I made there to give it red trust. I have never posted there and this is the only account I have so good luck

scamming people is not equal free speech.

Posting in a ponzi thread is not scamming

THIS. EXACTLY THIS.

[whywefight]

I see you crying for days but not offering a solution, except for Your Point Is Invalid who took a few minutes to review some of the ratings. If you think ponzis are okay you are free to do so but as stated before, and maybe you just need to read it: i belive operators and supporters are scamming people. If i think so i am free to do so.



Come up with something better, and i will join you.

EDIT: Also, personally, i dont tag people that are posting in those threads i tag users who advertise them. But yeah, why read when its easier to moan.

[cryptodevil]

The thing about Ponzi's is you know what you get when you use them. It's VERY clear.

PM's I have received prove that you cannot know that everybody who participates understands what a ponzi is so, therefore, your assertion is false.

Posting in a ponzi thread is not scamming

Posting support in a ponzi thread implies legitimacy, especially from established forum members. This is what the ponzi scammers need you to do and, by doing so, you encourage other people to deposit which is pretty much the reason why you do it. Don't pretend you're too stupid to understand even that basic principal. This means you are intentionally helping scumbags run a scheme which *will* result in people having their money stolen.

He's out of control.

I keep hearing you lot use that phrase. I do not think that phrase means what you think it means.

Please, go ahead, define 'out of control' for me. Surely, for me to be 'out of control' you would be able to offer up evidence of how I am on a rampage of abusive and outrageously unfair issuing of negative rating to users?

Surely, on the basis of just how frequently you muppets and puppets employ that phrase, you'd actually have some fucking evidence to support it?

No?

[Zeke2345]

The thing about Ponzi's is you know what you get when you use them. It's VERY clear.

PM's I have received prove that you cannot know that everybody who participates understands what a ponzi is so, therefore, your assertion is false.

Posting in a ponzi thread is not scamming

Posting support in a ponzi thread implies legitimacy, especially from established forum members. This is what the ponzi scammers need you to do and, by doing so, you encourage other people to deposit which is pretty much the reason why you do it. Don't pretend you're too stupid to understand even that basic principal. This means you are intentionally helping scumbags run a scheme which *will* result in people having their money stolen.

He's out of control.

I keep hearing you lot use that phrase. I do not think that phrase means what you think it means.

Please, go ahead, define 'out of control' for me. Surely, for me to be 'out of control' you would be able to offer up evidence of how I am on a rampage of abusive and outrageously unfair issuing of negative rating to users?

Surely, on the basis of just how frequently you muppets and puppets employ that phrase, you'd actually have some fucking evidence to support it?

No?

Talk a lot about people not seeing things for what they are ,how about your perspective of private messages from people you have threatened!
Negative trust on a new account is a threat,especially if it is unfounded and you are using people under duress as a example of how much good you are doing. It would be like holding some one hostage and having them praise Allah. So much for that agrument.

Out of Control to me would be pure trolling of any one that thinks differently and carrying forward with the agenda of bully tactics in a sub forum.
What you think is right does not give your permission to threaten people for using a part of the forum that is established by the forum. You have a issue you should take it up with them not every one in it.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

The thing about Ponzi's is you know what you get when you use them. It's VERY clear.

PM's I have received prove that you cannot know that everybody who participates understands what a ponzi is so, therefore, your assertion is false.

Posting in a ponzi thread is not scamming

Posting support in a ponzi thread implies legitimacy, especially from established forum members. This is what the ponzi scammers need you to do and, by doing so, you encourage other people to deposit which is pretty much the reason why you do it. Don't pretend you're too stupid to understand even that basic principal. This means you are intentionally helping scumbags run a scheme which *will* result in people having their money stolen.

~snip~

The problem is, I've seen some of the feedback that you have left, and when i look at the references for some, i dont see how the users are directly posting support