Martingale Soccer Betting System

[Amadues]

another system that is going good in italy is called "masaniello" search on google the excel sheet.

[phreaky]

Using Martingale in sportsbetting is tricky to nearly impossible not because it can't be done but because of the unfavourable odds. You need to have at least 2 odds and only bet on sports that have 2 possible endings which most American Sports are suitable for. I have seen NHL teams with odds near or above 2 which could work with Martingale if you have a huge bankroll and pick the odds wisely.

I've tried this tactic a few weeks ago. And it sure has it benefits. But there is no guarantee it will work with every game.
Which is why i switched back to my normal gambling habits (a few times a week) and that's it.

[Pleja]

Did you mess me
We're talking about sports betting not about dice or roulette...
I work on sports betting for a long time what are you talking about has no meaning.
If you're talking about dice or roulette or same game with chance for win OK.
But we are talking here about sports betting people,
Here is forecast who will win or loss, or draw,
and everything is decided to look at the form of the team H2H how many goals will be scored etc.
You're talking about some chance, It is not in sports betting.
All you need is good info and good stats.

[patt0]

Did you mess me
We're talking about sports betting not about dice or roulette...
I work on sports betting for a long time what are you talking about has no meaning.
If you're talking about dice or roulette or same game with chance for win OK.
But we are talking here about sports betting people,
Here is forecast who will win or loss, or draw,
and everything is decided to look at the form of the team H2H how many goals will be scored etc.
You're talking about some chance, It is not in sports betting.
All you need is good info and good stats.

Martingale, or any other betting system, is not particular of a type of game, like dice or roulette or whatever. Of course OP can apply the martingale strategy in sports betting. Since sports betting also require skill, and is not just about chance, if you do your research, it could actually be a very good strategy to increase your winning percentage even further. It is risky of course, because the system is risky, but if you don't usually have many losing streaks in a row, because you are a skilled punter, then it could be a good wagering system.

[Barcode_]

You still need a big bankroll for this betting system.

[FrueGreads]

You still need a big bankroll for this betting system.

I think you are right, but to be honest it could work, since sports betting is much more skill related than gambling, so I think it's a really good approach to increase your chance to profit.

[BitcoinSupremo]

for play soccer bet with martingale you necessity really high balance (if you like bet and earn a good amount).
for the math, you can lose already all bet at odd 3 (personally, i have lose 9 consecutive bet at 1.4 but not in martingale)

Some one made some wizardry to you, I cannot imagine let alone happen to have 9 consecutive losses at an odd 1.4 . This is the worst case I have seen so far on this forum.

[mixan]

I never liked the martingale system. It is making yourself vulnerable as you betting on negative outcomes. This only costs you money than earning it winning, in the long run.

[23dzmaz]

Actually using martingale strategy on sports betting is good, the problem is the odds. You need find the same odds. But i think bet on 3.00 odds is a bit risky, just find a normal odds x2.00.

[adaseb]

Basically unless you have an edge, you might as well do martingale with simple dice. Sports betting is very difficult for most.

[Indrawan77]

Martingale betting system is a dangerous system and martingale for soccer is not a good idea the reason is because of the odd and it take a lot of time

[BlockEye]

Martingale and sports betting will not work since in sports betting we are dealing with human, example is if a team is competing with a team who is in a winning streak.

[simonloff]

Martingale is not smart IMO specially with sports, The house edge is even more with sports than in dice sites and the like, soccer is also one of the least predictable sports too..

[bering]

Actually using martingale strategy on sports betting is good, the problem is the odds. You need find the same odds. But i think bet on 3.00 odds is a bit risky, just find a normal odds x2.00.

if we see OP calculate these strategy have very huge profit if we win but i think bets on odds 3.00 not only just a bit risky but is too risky because sport results are unpredictable i'm afraid if someone try these strategy he will lost with big amount and i personally would not recommend martingale strategy on sport betting

[tech_solutions]

I think the martingale will work in cricket betting as their are scores ups and down and team goes up and down so what like you said we can have all odds from low to high, so in this sports betting you can try martingale.

[relq]

Actually using martingale strategy on sports betting is good, the problem is the odds. You need find the same odds. But i think bet on 3.00 odds is a bit risky, just find a normal odds x2.00.

if we see OP calculate these strategy have very huge profit if we win but i think bets on odds 3.00 not only just a bit risky but is too risky because sport results are unpredictable i'm afraid if someone try these strategy he will lost with big amount and i personally would not recommend martingale strategy on sport betting

Yes you are right. betting on sports with x3.00 odds is very risky, it's rare to win a match with x3.00 odds. Maybe using martingale and increasing your bet depend the odds.

[LayTheHorseTipster]

Don't do martingale. It never works on the long term!

[poplolnman]

another system that is going good in italy is called "masaniello" search on google the excel sheet.

interesting if you could open a thread to explain that method , since i didn't find yet any reliable source explaining what exactly "masaniello" betting system .
i just found this http://forum.bettingadvice.com/showthread.php?t=26236 , and this one http://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=79&sub=811378 . both are an old posts . i was bored with martingale even it's in sports.

[Phildo]

You still need a big bankroll for this betting system.

I think you are right, but to be honest it could work, since sports betting is much more skill related than gambling, so I think it's a really good approach to increase your chance to profit.

True, while playing dice I experienced up to 15 red streaks in red while playing martingale on 50% or 49.5%, i really doubt you'll see 15 losses in a row if you trail some good sport capper, probably 5 at most.

If you are a good capper you should just bet regularly.

Increase your bet when you are more confident in the bet, not because you lost the last one. That way if you lose 5 in a row you only lose 5 bets instead of 31.

[iTradeChips]

martingale is psychologically satisfying. you feel like you are "beating the system". but in reality, you are always in a -EV situation since every bet is raked by the house.