But Lutpin, you should probably expect more of this retaliatory feedback if you're going to be policing the forum. Look at Vod's trust feedback, which is filled with bogus negatives. Hell, even my trust feedback is filled with red from assholes who I called out on BS. That's just the nature of the forum.
However, look at the general rank/age of the accounts leaving these retaliatory feedbacks. They are mostly new accounts who are annoyed that they didn't get their own way, correct?
To have someone who was once trusted enough to escrow, like defcon23, do exactly the same thing (because his thread was removed for breaking the rules) is nothing less of sad.
with many reports on over user ( often for no real reason )
No, pretty much all feedback sent by the users you just listed is valid as they are on the Default Trust network. Should the feedback they leave be invalid, they would have been removed.
everyone can judge by themselve
However, this doesn't happen. Newbies here have been scammed by people with red trust before, and it will continue to happen. Trying to say that people shouldn't leave feedback because others judge for themselves is wrong, because it doesn't happen.
but it seem they probably have no real life outside this forum... that's why these trolls grow their life in this way..
that's just a stupid kid who think wining more credibility in this forum with one more report
"Hmm, I need to look mature to win this argument. I know! I'll insult the people that disagree with me for no reason!". Are you a child? Grow up.
ask if bitcoin is accepted, and blame me for putting my referal link.. you see ? what's his problem?
So, you post a shop onto
BitcoinTalk which doesn't take bitcoin, with a referral link (which is against the rules to post) and you're surprised that it was reported and removed. What did you expect to happen?