invest in my gambling

[Meistro]

I am a professional gambler.  Invest and I will gamble for you at low stakes pot limit omaha cash game.  I have previously gambled for other people and won money on their behalf.  References available upon request.

[Google+]

I am a professional gambler.  Invest and I will gamble for you at low stakes pot limit omaha cash game.  I have previously gambled for other people and won money on their behalf.  References available upon request.

I also gamble and win $ 1 million, would you believe? certainly not just like you do people will not believe that you are a professional gambler
anyone can say the same thing but if you can prove it all might be considered, so now you need is to show proof at least in the form of a video while you play.

[Evildrum]

I can flip a coin with the best of them but seriously you need to prove you can make selections by posting here as evidence or link to where you are tracked on a site.
Otherwise you come off as some one attempting to take a free ride with other peoples money. Lot of guys trying to do the shill/tips per pay and I do not know how many are actually getting anywhere,might be worth looking into.

[--Encrypted--]

I am a professional gambler.  Invest and I will gamble for you at low stakes pot limit omaha cash game.  I have previously gambled for other people and won money on their behalf.  References available upon request.

why would people trust you to gamble using their money when they can just do it themselves?

[CarlesPuyol]

I am a professional gambler.  Invest and I will gamble for you at low stakes pot limit omaha cash game.  I have previously gambled for other people and won money on their behalf.  References available upon request.

why would people trust you to gamble using their money when they can just do it themselves?

Maybe they are only loosing 
But about the thread, you have to show us some proves of your growing bankroll.

[sebzak]

LOL, professional poker players use their own money. Why would you give your winnings to someone else instead of keeping it? I guess you lost your money.

[Meistro]

I am a professional gambler.  Invest and I will gamble for you at low stakes pot limit omaha cash game.  I have previously gambled for other people and won money on their behalf.  References available upon request.

why would people trust you to gamble using their money when they can just do it themselves?

Like many things in life, it is very easy to gamble, and very difficult to do it well. 

[Meistro]

I can flip a coin with the best of them but seriously you need to prove you can make selections by posting here as evidence or link to where you are tracked on a site.

https://imgur.com/a/xJqlV

A fair point.  My strongest game right now is PLO cash.  In dec. of 2015 I was staked to play PLO cash and did pretty well, winning for my backer 3k (and 3k for myself).   As you can see in the above screenshots I've been winning at a statistically significant sample size for PLO levels .10/.25 - .5/1.  I use an aggressive game selection methodology "bum hunting" as well as the myriad skill set that every professional player has at their disposal.  I observe my opponents carefully.  Sometimes I'll be in a three handed game with two fish, and I do something I call 'opposition research', which is I flip through all the hands I have on them in hold'em manager, often hundreds, in order to pick up patterns.  Some people never bluff, or don't value bet light; if they don't value bet light, but then are somewhat aggressive, you have to wonder, is he a frequent bluffer?  I adapt to fish and crush them.  I'll sit alone at 24 tables, if a reg sits I sit out, if a fish sits I'll play and sit out my other 23 tables (sometimes I wait to get 2 heads up games vs fish just so I can quit if a reg sits).

We could get started for as little a $75 USD (a somewhat risky 'hail mary' 15 buy in bankroll for PLO 5).  This is a great investment for whoever chooses it because you are only risking whatever $75 or $150 USD.  I am going to inputting 40-50+ hours a week.  And over time your investment will snowball, as I safely move up limits and reinvest our winnings.

[libby515]

so where do u play at as reg.
 not sure that $75 dollars is even close to enough for those stakes you say u r playing, unless of course you are just sitting back and waiting..
  so what are your screen names so u can be looked up on sharkscope and other sites?
   are u playing Bovada at all as i play there several hours a day and nothing u have said resembles any player there.
 i was supernova elite on stars for years till Black Friday ruined it for players like me in the states.
  let me know where you play as a reg, i will gladly sit down at the table and watch your action, and if u r good like u say u r i will gladly play at your table.

[Meistro]

I play on Pokerstars.  $75 would represent 15 buy ins for .02/.05 ($5 PLO).  While this is still a somewhat risky (I estimate ROR to be 5%, although that can be mitigated significantly with a plan to move down to PLO 2 @ say $40) my point was more to demonstrate that we could get started for a relatively minor investment rather than to suggest that exact course of action.

[Tred]

Poker or Sports?

[libby515]

have to say you are super lucky to be able to still play on stars,, great site

[twicezeroiszero]

So if you always win why are you begging ?

[Meistro]

tred : poker, I don't know anything about handicapping sports.

[lorylore]

I am a Math Major and i grad from one of the world top 10 university. I know how to calculate the odds of winning at any one point of time so winning more than half of the time in poker etc is reasonable for me.

So what games are you planning to play and how are you going to ensure that you will end up winning most of the time?

[Meistro]

I am planning to play specifically micro to low stakes pot limit omaha cash games on Pokerstars.  These are games with a buy in between $10 and $100.  My edge comes from a number of things.  I game select religiously.  By choosing to play only against people who are 'bad' at poker I can win at a higher rate than someone who is not selective about their games. My software tracks how much money people lose, and I use that to determine where I should be playing, or not playing. I spent my entire adult life studying poker in all it's forums; my opponents are just trying to blow off some steam or relax after they are out of work.

[Meistro]

First I'd just like to thank everyone for participating so far, this has been a fun and I think beneficial discussion.  There are two things I would like to address at this time.  The first is the question of edge, advantage and skill in poker and the second is the topic of variance and reasonable expectations with regards to short and long term results.  First, edge.  Edge can be defined as the advantage one gambler enjoys over another. You may have heard the term 'House Edge' with refers to the advantage the house holds in a particular table game (.5% for blackjack, 1% for the pass bet in caps, 5.5% for most bets in America Roulette). The essence of being a winning gambler is making positive expectation bets (and of course the corollary to this, avoiding any negative expectation bets).  Hence forth I will refer to expectation (more exactly, expected value) as EV. The EV of most wagers can be determined either through mathematical analysis or brute force simulation. This is not really the case with poker, which has a tremendous amount of variables, and a rich and detailed strategic depth matched only by the most complicated games (if indeed it even is).  Most of poker's complexity lies in the fact that it is a game of incomplete information.

My play is fundamentally adaptive.  I don't really have a 'style' or strategy.  What I aim to do is to understand my opponents and to exploit their weaknesses.  For example some players are incredibly passive.  They are loathe to bet or raise.  Instead they prefer to call or fold.  This is a very easy style to beat, since you can take free showdowns at will and punish them with your strong hands and strong draws.  Unfortunately it's tough to get a nice heads up game against a loose passive player, but if you are vigilant you will find some of these and they are basically free money. Other players compulsively bluff, and then of course you should take some lines check call lines to induce when it is reasonable. Adapting to your opponent's play is important.  So is focusing on what is going on at the table (only play 1 table, and make sure you are in a room without any distractions when you play, never browse or anything like that, always focus on what is going on and what your opponents are doing).

So as to expectations.  I think a fairly reasonable expectation is that I will win at a rate of say 13 big blinds per hour.  So playing at $10 PLO with a bankroll of $250 that would be $1.3 / hr.  But there would be fluctuations, where winning or losing $10-$30 in one day is very common, and where winning or losing $50-$100 in one day is less common but possible.  But in the long run we would expect to win roughly $1.3 / hr at PLO 10 and $3.25 / hr at PLO 25.  And I'm basing these estimates on the > 100k hands played at these limits within the last 6 months.

This is like investing in a stock.  On a day to day basis it can increase or decrease in value, but by implementing a move down upon losing plan you can keep the actual ROR (Risk of Ruin, chance of busting) to a fraction of 1%.

[Phildo]

I can flip a coin with the best of them but seriously you need to prove you can make selections by posting here as evidence or link to where you are tracked on a site.

https://imgur.com/a/xJqlV

A fair point.  My strongest game right now is PLO cash.  In dec. of 2015 I was staked to play PLO cash and did pretty well, winning for my backer 3k (and 3k for myself).   As you can see in the above screenshots I've been winning at a statistically significant sample size for PLO levels .10/.25 - .5/1.  I use an aggressive game selection methodology "bum hunting" as well as the myriad skill set that every professional player has at their disposal.  I observe my opponents carefully.  Sometimes I'll be in a three handed game with two fish, and I do something I call 'opposition research', which is I flip through all the hands I have on them in hold'em manager, often hundreds, in order to pick up patterns.  Some people never bluff, or don't value bet light; if they don't value bet light, but then are somewhat aggressive, you have to wonder, is he a frequent bluffer?  I adapt to fish and crush them.  I'll sit alone at 24 tables, if a reg sits I sit out, if a fish sits I'll play and sit out my other 23 tables (sometimes I wait to get 2 heads up games vs fish just so I can quit if a reg sits).

We could get started for as little a $75 USD (a somewhat risky 'hail mary' 15 buy in bankroll for PLO 5).  This is a great investment for whoever chooses it because you are only risking whatever $75 or $150 USD.  I am going to inputting 40-50+ hours a week.  And over time your investment will snowball, as I safely move up limits and reinvest our winnings.

Where did the 3k you won with your backer go?

Poker staking is a better idea than lots of the other horseshit I've seen on this forum, but I really would question someone who isn't able to stake themselves for a game this small.

[arseaboy]

$75-$100 if 1000 members here joined you and you just disappear in no time what will happen? we lose right away right? if you really wanted us to believed you prove yourself mate. if you really can make our money wins might be
better to bet with you after proving yourself.

[goldcoinminer]

I think you need to prove yourself first that you are good in gambling. The best thing you can do right now is sell your picks  through sports betting. If you can share your picks in a daily basis for free that would be better so you can build your reputation. It is really hard to trust people these days because scammers are all around this forum just watching us.Good luck