Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 02:20:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [WTB] Btc for cash deposit at bank, bitmit arbitration  (Read 566 times)
Anon136 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
February 13, 2013, 06:19:20 PM
Last edit: February 13, 2013, 06:33:56 PM by Anon136
 #1

Cash deposit into bank account is by far the least reversible payment method.

Let me know what banks you use and ill see how far away they are.

If we decide to make a trade i will post an order on bitmit (where i have a strong reputation). You send the coins to bitmit escrow and i will drive to the bank and deposit the cash. You can feel secure because you know tosaki will rule in your favor unless i can produce a receipt, and i will not be able to produce a receipt unless i send the funds. Or if you prefer we can use an arbitrator of your chosing if he is trusted in the community.

pm me to work out the specifics.

as a side note, why dont more people use this method? it seems so obvious. almost no fees almost no risk to either party.

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714832400
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714832400

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714832400
Reply with quote  #2

1714832400
Report to moderator
1714832400
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714832400

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714832400
Reply with quote  #2

1714832400
Report to moderator
TheButterZone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3052
Merit: 1031


RIP Mommy


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2013, 08:36:51 PM
 #2

If only BitMit wasn't under a cloud of suspicion. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=135366.0

Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
Anon136 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
February 13, 2013, 08:45:52 PM
 #3

If only BitMit wasn't under a cloud of suspicion. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=135366.0

who ever bought it has reason to protect the reputation of his newly acquired business. What would be the point in spending thousands of dollars just to destroy the reputation of bitmit over a 100 dollar transaction? =P

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!