Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
|
|
June 07, 2013, 03:52:06 AM |
|
update: - v0.8.2
- Updates to the new dust logic
- if you enter dust as recipient amount the label Low Ouput shows "DUST"
- fee is calculated correctly according to dust, this is when change would be dust, its added to the fee
- actual dust threshold is 5460 satoshis
grue, cozz, what's the difference between your builds? cozz is smaller (probably compressed) and doesn't include the warning message. But otherwise, are they the same?
|
|
|
|
cozz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 15
|
|
June 07, 2013, 07:47:33 AM |
|
grue, cozz, what's the difference between your builds? cozz is smaller (probably compressed) and doesn't include the warning message. But otherwise, are they the same?
grues doesnt include the Updates to the new dust logic. Also grues is based on some development snapshot, while mine is based on the latest stable version 0.8.2.
|
1cozzwyCJvDiyBA8zXGJ1qxtrd5b4i1nB
|
|
|
grue
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1431
|
|
June 07, 2013, 01:52:23 PM |
|
grue, cozz, what's the difference between your builds? cozz is smaller (probably compressed) and doesn't include the warning message. But otherwise, are they the same?
mine is based on sipa's branch, but it's otherwise the same as 0.8.2. The warning about not being a release version is there because I was too lazy to edit it out. Also, cozz's build is packed with UPX, hence why it's so small.
|
|
|
|
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1005
Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952
|
|
June 07, 2013, 02:06:04 PM |
|
Is this stable enough for everyday usage ?
I'm considering installing it.
|
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
|
|
June 08, 2013, 01:32:46 AM |
|
I've been using Cozz's build for awhile. I don't seem to have a problem. Not yet anyway. I'm only holding less than 100 BTC though.
|
|
|
|
cozz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 15
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:42:32 PM |
|
Using cozz version for few days now, no bugs found whatsoever. One feature request though, it would be cool if numbers on right to "Amount" and "Minus Fee" are selectable so that one just selects them and copy / paste to BTC amount field. It would make sending the exact "Minus Fee" amount faster and easier (moving all selected inputs - fee to some address).
you can copy to clipboard. simply direct right click.
|
1cozzwyCJvDiyBA8zXGJ1qxtrd5b4i1nB
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
|
|
June 19, 2013, 01:52:59 AM |
|
I'm not sure about your particular transaction, but on main net with real bitcoins it works like this:
1. select inputs or rather, select unspent outputs. Only those selected will be used. Everything in those outputs will be used. 2. pay to 1bitcoinaddress. If there is change, you can send it back to a custom change address which can be the same as any of the addresses used by an unspent output. 3. add more recipients as you need, or spend everything so you don't have change.
I have no experience with newly mined coins with coin control, but I believe new coins can only be used after several blocks or confirmations, like 144 or 150 or something, I forgot exactly.
|
|
|
|
Abandon
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
June 19, 2013, 11:01:38 PM Last edit: June 19, 2013, 11:14:13 PM by Abandon |
|
What do you mean by change? What is change? What change? What kind of change? What is a change address? I feel like I should know what this is, but I don't.
The change input field overflows to the right without being dynamic, as well as the change coin information when using the smallest default size for the client. I'm sure there's enough room to fit it all compactly.
|
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
|
|
June 20, 2013, 01:07:38 AM |
|
new coins can only be used after several blocks or confirmations, like 144 or 150 or something, I forgot exactly.
120 with Bitcoin, 520 with PPCoin, etc. Where is this info? I can't seem to find it on the wiki. Maybe it's in the source code? Anyway, that just means you need to wait a little bit less than a day to use newly mined bitcoins, or about 20 hours.
|
|
|
|
kerhac
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
RVelasco mi nuevo usuario
|
|
June 28, 2013, 12:31:26 AM Last edit: June 28, 2013, 12:05:52 PM by kerhac |
|
Hi. Thanks for the coin control. Waiting for coin control in 0.8.3
|
|
|
|
cozz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 15
|
|
June 29, 2013, 10:46:49 PM |
|
update: v0.8.3
|
1cozzwyCJvDiyBA8zXGJ1qxtrd5b4i1nB
|
|
|
Birdy
|
|
June 29, 2013, 10:47:57 PM |
|
Great! Thank you very much for your work
|
|
|
|
kerhac
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
RVelasco mi nuevo usuario
|
|
June 30, 2013, 11:35:56 PM |
|
update: v0.8.3
Yeah, Thank you very much
|
|
|
|
drrussellshane
|
|
July 11, 2013, 05:37:23 PM |
|
It works for me. Thanks!
|
Buy a TREZOR! Premier BTC hardware wallet. If you're reading this, you should probably buy one if you don't already have one. You'll thank me later.
|
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
|
July 15, 2013, 04:02:09 PM |
|
I would like to build on Windows myself (using EasyWinBuilder;)). Unfortunately the github link is not working any more and the linux source archive seems to be missing the Qt project file.
Trying Sipa's branch...
|
|
|
|
mandros
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
July 15, 2013, 04:50:14 PM |
|
new coins can only be used after several blocks or confirmations, like 144 or 150 or something, I forgot exactly.
120 with Bitcoin, 520 with PPCoin, etc. Where is this info? I can't seem to find it on the wiki. Maybe it's in the source code? Anyway, that just means you need to wait a little bit less than a day to use newly mined bitcoins, or about 20 hours. Here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_rules#.22tx.22_messagesRule 12. For each input, if the referenced output transaction is coinbase (i.e. only 1 input, with hash=0, n=-1), it must have at least COINBASE_MATURITY (100) confirmations; else reject this transaction.The bitcoin client might decide to wait longer, but below 100 confirmations the network would reject the transaction.
|
|
|
|
cozz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 15
|
|
July 15, 2013, 07:34:01 PM |
|
I would like to build on Windows myself (using EasyWinBuilder;)). Unfortunately the github link is not working any more and the linux source archive seems to be missing the Qt project file.
Trying Sipa's branch...
I updated the source code link now
|
1cozzwyCJvDiyBA8zXGJ1qxtrd5b4i1nB
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
|
July 15, 2013, 09:40:33 PM |
|
I would like to build on Windows myself (using EasyWinBuilder;)). Unfortunately the github link is not working any more and the linux source archive seems to be missing the Qt project file.
Trying Sipa's branch...
I updated the source code link now Thanks! Before I dump my time into it... do you also have a hint on this one? g++ -Wl,--dynamicbase -Wl,--nxcompat -Wl,--large-address-aware -Wl,-s -mthreads -Wl,-subsystem,windows -o release/bitcoin-qt.exe object_script.bitcoin-qt.Release -L'c:/Qt/4.8.5/lib' -lmingwthrd -lmingw32 -lqtmain build/bitcoin-qt_res.o -Llibs/miniupnpc-1.8 -lminiupnpc -liphlpapi C:/_temp/_bitcoin_0.8.3_coincontrol/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a C:/_temp/_bitcoin_0.8.3_coincontrol/src/leveldb/libmemenv.a -lshlwapi -Llibs/boost_1_54_0/stage/lib -Llibs/db-4.8.30.NC/build_unix -Llibs/openssl-1.0.1e -lssl -lcrypto -ldb_cxx -lws2_32 -lshlwapi -lmswsock -lole32 -loleaut32 -luuid -lgdi32 -lboost_system-mgw46-mt-sd-1_54 -lboost_filesystem-mgw46-mt-sd-1_54 -lboost_program_options-mgw46-mt-sd-1_54 -lboost_thread-mgw46-mt-sd-1_54 -lboost_chrono-mgw46-mt-sd-1_54 -lQtGui4 -lQtNetwork4 -lQtCore4 ./build/coincontroldialog.o:coincontroldialog.cpp:(.text+0x1cda): undefined reference to `WalletModel::listLockedCoins(std::vector<COutPoint, std::allocator<COutPoint> >&)' ./build/coincontroldialog.o:coincontroldialog.cpp:(.text+0x2077): undefined reference to `WalletModel::isLockedCoin(uint256, unsig ned int) const' ./build/coincontroldialog.o:coincontroldialog.cpp:(.text+0x2324): undefined reference to `WalletModel::unlockCoin(COutPoint&)' ./build/coincontroldialog.o:coincontroldialog.cpp:(.text+0x263e): undefined reference to `WalletModel::lockCoin(COutPoint&)' ...
|
|
|
|
cozz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 15
|
|
July 15, 2013, 11:01:00 PM |
|
Before I dump my time into it... do you also have a hint on this one? g++ -Wl,--dynamicbase -Wl,--nxcompat -Wl,--large-address-aware -Wl,-s -mthreads -Wl,-subsystem,windows -o release/bitcoin-qt.exe object_script.bitcoin-qt.Release -L'c:/Qt/4.8.5/lib' -lmingwthrd -lmingw32 -lqtmain build/bitcoin-qt_res.o -Llibs/miniupnpc-1.8 -lminiupnpc -liphlpapi C:/_temp/_bitcoin_0.8.3_coincontrol/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a C:/_temp/_bitcoin_0.8.3_coincontrol/src/leveldb/libmemenv.a -lshlwapi -Llibs/boost_1_54_0/stage/lib -Llibs/db-4.8.30.NC/build_unix -Llibs/openssl-1.0.1e -lssl -lcrypto -ldb_cxx -lws2_32 -lshlwapi -lmswsock -lole32 -loleaut32 -luuid -lgdi32 -lboost_system-mgw46-mt-sd-1_54 -lboost_filesystem-mgw46-mt-sd-1_54 -lboost_program_options-mgw46-mt-sd-1_54 -lboost_thread-mgw46-mt-sd-1_54 -lboost_chrono-mgw46-mt-sd-1_54 -lQtGui4 -lQtNetwork4 -lQtCore4 ./build/coincontroldialog.o:coincontroldialog.cpp:(.text+0x1cda): undefined reference to `WalletModel::listLockedCoins(std::vector<COutPoint, std::allocator<COutPoint> >&)' ./build/coincontroldialog.o:coincontroldialog.cpp:(.text+0x2077): undefined reference to `WalletModel::isLockedCoin(uint256, unsig ned int) const' ./build/coincontroldialog.o:coincontroldialog.cpp:(.text+0x2324): undefined reference to `WalletModel::unlockCoin(COutPoint&)' ./build/coincontroldialog.o:coincontroldialog.cpp:(.text+0x263e): undefined reference to `WalletModel::lockCoin(COutPoint&)' ...
looks like you are using the original bitcoin-qt.pro, not the new one. I have tested the code I gave you again, it sure compiles for me.
|
1cozzwyCJvDiyBA8zXGJ1qxtrd5b4i1nB
|
|
|
|