(NSFW) From the lovely girls of ClassyCams we have a treat for you!

[snrproductions]

I dont get why people would be negative to this site and similiar services taking bitcoins as payment.

Sure, I wont be a customer because I have no interest in it personally, but its obviously great news for bitcoin and the community.

Hope your site turns into a success! (and its due to the flood of bitcoin users )

Much appreciated

[1714623452]

1714623452

[1714623452]

1714623452

[snrproductions]

lol wow.  You think the people are fake or the signs?  I could see you thinking perhaps the signs were fake, but you honestly think I somehow made up these models in a simulator?  If that was the case, why would I link to her profile on the site?  Do you think the live models on cam are fake too?  You're an idiot.  People on the internet boggle my mind sometimes.

I don't think they are fake, I wondered how the images come out looking so fake despite having somehow been derived from actual photos of real live models. I wondered what kind of pcoressing produces that effect. I saw many many thousands of adult images back in the day and even glamour ones using some kind of soft-focus effect didn't produce that same kind of impression, nor did ones an "optimse images for the web" tool had trimmed down in size-in-bytes.

Indeed I visited one of the model's pages and at the smaller scale of the images there they didn't jump out at me as looking so artificial. SO maybe it is just the specific two images chosen rather than being an artifact added to images by processing. (For exampole in the top image the way the hair on the left is cut off looks a bit strange and its not clear how it relates to the window or frame or whatever behind her, and the rear view image lacks expanses of fleshtone so doesn't really provide much you can look closely at to see how real her features actually look.)

-MarkM-

Eesh it's a webcam pic.  I think you're trying too hard my man.

[markm]

Eesh it's a webcam pic.  I think you're trying too hard my man.

Thank you. I was seeing stills, taken with "real cameras", I hardly ever saw any web-cam stills that weren't rather small like the ones on the model's page. So by the sound of it the effect is simply what webcam pictures look like when shown at this larger size.

(I never was a paying customer, so I only ever saw live feeds for like five or fifteen minutes or whatever that they gave out free passes for to new affiliates so the affiliate could see what they would be selling. That was way back in early days when they did it with tricks like streaming endless animated gifs, or maybe the very first deployments of actual streaming of some kind.)

-MarkM-

[bbit]

How "unclassy" ! 

[farlack]

hAtErSGuNaHaTe

[snrproductions]

Here's another.  I swear it's not a fake girl lol.

http://www.camwithher.com/images/promo/AdrianaBitcoins.jpg
http://www.camwithher.com/images/promo/AdrianaBitcoins2.jpg

[b!z]

Weird, those images look more like OpenSim simulations than actual real humans. Even photos reduced in resolution to put on the web used to look more realistic to me than those two above for some reason back when I worked with and for "adult sites". What is producing that effect? The cameras? Something you do in processing them for the web? Maybe even some artistic effect to deliberately make them more appealing to a niche audience that actually prefers anime or other at least slightly unreal-looking models? I am genuinely curious how it is done.

-MarkM-

lol wow.  You think the people are fake or the signs?  I could see you thinking perhaps the signs were fake, but you honestly think I somehow made up these models in a simulator?  If that was the case, why would I link to her profile on the site?  Do you think the live models on cam are fake too?  You're an idiot.  People on the internet boggle my mind sometimes.

People are able to generate money with their computers now, why should it be impossible to simulate some ugly girls on cam?

[markm]

Yes, much better image, is it somehow from the same type of camera or did a "better"/different camera have to be used to achieve this?

Beautiful smile/expression by the way, very "warm" / expressive.

-MarkM-

[gweedo]

First off, I am not trying to troll or anything but maybe I can shed some light on this. I pretty sure we are all regular dudes, here and those girls are a little too fake. I am little messed up in this department cause I actually do think one of these girls is cute. But it is an acquired attraction. So try some more natural girls.

[Zedster]

As I said in another post.  I highly welcome this fine industry to BTC. The porn industry has a huge influence on so many things today it's scary.  You would have a HD DVD in your house instead of a Blu-ray in large part do to porn.  It will bring a huge amount a exposure to the coin. 

Oh and I need a job so if I can do anything to help with the ladies let me know

[bonker]

I love the name 'ClassyCams'.  If I had to choose one thing which is the epitome of low class it very well could be a web cam.  To each his own though.

^^^^
I would agree with this guy... Maybe it should be spelt "KlassyKams" too?

[Astro]

First off, I am not trying to troll or anything but maybe I can shed some light on this. I pretty sure we are all regular dudes, here and those girls are a little too fake. I am little messed up in this department cause I actually do think one of these girls is cute. But it is an acquired attraction. So try some more natural girls.

natural = fat

[oOoOo]

natural = fat

Nothing could be further from the truth.

[Spekulatius]

@ OP: 
 
What do you think of supplying your performers with the same kind of good cameras? That assures a certain standard for your product (also microphone).

Isnt that an industry standard already? (I have no clue). Anyway, I think its an idea worth pondering.
Regards

[tvbcof]

I love the name 'ClassyCams'.  If I had to choose one thing which is the epitome of low class it very well could be a web cam.  To each his own though.

^^^^
I would agree with this guy... Maybe it should be spelt "KlassyKams" too?

What I cannot figure out is why this thread is not moved by the moderators who are usually fairly active at moving posts to the most apporpriate sub-forum (and I applaud their persistence and often enough, their judgement as well.)  My conspiratorial mind wonders if the moderator is an investor or something (~hazek?)

BTW, what is 'NSFW'.  New Service For Wankers?

[Monster Tent]

Weird, those images look more like OpenSim simulations than actual real humans. Even photos reduced in resolution to put on the web used to look more realistic to me than those two above for some reason back when I worked with and for "adult sites". What is producing that effect? The cameras? Something you do in processing them for the web? Maybe even some artistic effect to deliberately make them more appealing to a niche audience that actually prefers anime or other at least slightly unreal-looking models? I am genuinely curious how it is done.

-MarkM-

lol wow.  You think the people are fake or the signs?  I could see you thinking perhaps the signs were fake, but you honestly think I somehow made up these models in a simulator?  If that was the case, why would I link to her profile on the site?  Do you think the live models on cam are fake too?  You're an idiot.  People on the internet boggle my mind sometimes.

People are able to generate money with their computers now, why should it be impossible to simulate some ugly girls on cam?

Now women can generate bitcoins with their tits.

[snrproductions]

NSFW = Not Safe For Work

Regarding the cams, no company really provides the cams for the models (unless they're trying to attract a really good model).  Sometimes they have studios who manage models that provide the cams but that's up to them.

[snrproductions]

Let me introduce to you...Monique...

http://www.camwithher.com/images/promo/Monique-Bitcoins.jpg

[conv3rsion]

wow.

[marhjan]

Some Bitcoiners put the J in INTJ.

QFT so damn true