th00ber (OP)
|
|
June 08, 2017, 06:51:50 AM |
|
It's not normal. Miner have to start automatically. When monitorig is run, the updater check for a New version + start monitoring + start Openhardwaremonitor + start miner
For ccminer, I don't know... I don't have NVIDIA card to test and integrate the miner.
But I'm thinking to invest in an Nvidia card this summer. If you can provide me the log from the miner, I may can add it sooner. PM me)
|
|
|
|
Nostromo1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
June 10, 2017, 10:29:15 AM |
|
Any support for Claymore's Dual Ethereum+Decred_Siacoin_Lbry_Pascal AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.4 ?
Doesn't seem to work for me when I run this version get Not running/hashing message.
|
|
|
|
Rostik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
June 11, 2017, 07:10:38 AM |
|
Hello. Nice project) I have some questions or offers 1)For future will be great add telegram support. When rigs not online or rebooted. Send message to telegram. 2)Add ccminer for LBC. 3)Auto reboot if rig frezed Offers 1 and 3 implemented at this software https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1442723.0 . You can find also sources. But there are some mistakes. When rig without internet connection, that software think that rig freze and reboot rig.
|
|
|
|
th00ber (OP)
|
|
June 11, 2017, 07:12:24 PM |
|
chrome wont let me download it.
Why ? I don't have problems. Some miners are embedded, maybe a virus scan that block the download ?
|
|
|
|
vydelek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2017, 03:01:39 PM |
|
Hello, I have ideas for improvements to SW V2. 1. The ability to set Core clock and Memory clock 2. The ability to adjust the voltage 3. Adjust the fan speed 4. Ability to set up the address in which the RIG should be mined. 5. The last point to be determined for points 1 to 4. To determine which RIG to set, such as address, bar, speed, reset and voltage. If it is possible to program some of these points, I will be very pleased. The main priority is to set the address in bulk, with the RIG name set in the editor. Something like Simpl. From Pole, that the RIG name may not be set in the address but directly into the SW from Poles https://simplemining.net/Thank you for your help Pictures: http://www.imgup.cz/image/LhFD
|
|
|
|
chongo
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
June 18, 2017, 05:34:53 PM |
|
site down? cant reach it
|
|
|
|
th00ber (OP)
|
|
June 18, 2017, 07:02:00 PM |
|
site down? cant reach it
It's ok, the vps has reboot, I just restarted the service. Sorry for the downtime, I'll watch that
|
|
|
|
Lex-DRL
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2017, 03:05:08 PM Last edit: June 19, 2017, 03:38:39 PM by Lex-DRL |
|
@th00ber I can't download the zip archive with the beta v2 release. My browser just doesn't let me to do so. https://image.ibb.co/hLvctQ/001.pngIt's in russian, the text says: "Blocked: It may contain a virus or spyware". I'm using Firefox 47.0.2 I can try to download it with another browser, but so far it never gave me a warning with no reason. And this is not even a warning. It's an authomatic block. So, the reasonable question is: what could be causing that? UPD: I've downloadid it with Opera and sent it to virustotal. You know, the VirusTotal detection rate is REALLY high. https://www.virustotal.com/ru/file/7a6d64511dca6fb75cafacc5fd7fb0e491f8315709877c2897676da1b64c9c22/analysis/1497884845/Your tool has 4 detections more than the miner itself. And, more importantly, it's forcefully blocked by the browser while the miner isn't. UPD2: OK, I've unpacked the archive, removed the miners subfolder, repacked it and sent to VirusTotal again: https://virustotal.com/ru/file/57d40e07074e4e50ec9abce6d6070485c00cb7ba4f93c253a9e3b02fe8e7b298/analysis/1497886011/Now it's almost perfectly safe. Then I bitwise-compared the embedded miner files with the ones downloaded from the official threads (Claymore's ZEC and ETH). And they don't match. Like, at all. It seems you're using an older versions (a much older ones). So now I've got a few questions: 1. Why do you use the old versions instead of new ones? 2. Is it safe to replace the embedded miners with the latest official releases that I download myself, or you have modified them in some way? 3. Is it safe to completely remove miners that I don't use? Won't it stop your tool from working? offtop: that's why open-source is always better.
|
|
|
|
th00ber (OP)
|
|
June 19, 2017, 04:51:03 PM |
|
It's just, that I packed some miners with the tools, when I opened the beta. but you can totally use the newer version, just delete the content (except start.bat and run.bat) and paste the new files in the miner folder.
My tool is totally virus-free. It's only node-js program made by myself. The only external parts are Openhardwaremonitor for the sensor reading and the miners that have to be in the sub folder "miners"
|
|
|
|
Lex-DRL
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2017, 09:41:19 PM |
|
There's also a VNC server included, providing the remote access to my PC. Which, technically, is an extremely high security risk. I see there's a "remote control" feature in your tool. So I totally get what you use it for. But I, personally, would prefer not to have this feature, rather than giving a full acces to my PC for some app I can't descrube as trusted. Yeah, I'm a security freak living in the era when almost any app spies on you and sends some kind of "telemetry", I know. But still. So I hope, removing vnc-server won't stop other parts of your tool from working properly? It will brake only "remote control" feature, right? From what I see, it works OK without VNC server.
One more thing. There's a node.exe under peer-vnc folder. On the details section of this file's properties, I can see it has a version 0.8.28.0. So I downloaded the same version of Node.js windows executable from the official archive just to compare. And, again, they don't match. Not just in binary comparison, but even the size. And your node.exe has some noname-style digital signature. Is it some kind of a modified version of official Node.js release? Just to be perfectly safe, I've replaced it with the latest release of Node.js. It won't cause any problems, I guess?
|
|
|
|
th00ber (OP)
|
|
June 19, 2017, 11:57:38 PM |
|
There's also a VNC server included, providing the remote access to my PC. Which, technically, is an extremely high security risk. I see there's a "remote control" feature in your tool. So I totally get what you use it for. But I, personally, would prefer not to have this feature, rather than giving a full acces to my PC for some app I can't descrube as trusted. Yeah, I'm a security freak living in the era when almost any app spies on you and sends some kind of "telemetry", I know. But still. So I hope, removing vnc-server won't stop other parts of your tool from working properly? It will brake only "remote control" feature, right? From what I see, it works OK without VNC server.
One more thing. There's a node.exe under peer-vnc folder. On the details section of this file's properties, I can see it has a version 0.8.28.0. So I downloaded the same version of Node.js windows executable from the official archive just to compare. And, again, they don't match. Not just in binary comparison, but even the size. And your node.exe has some noname-style digital signature. Is it some kind of a modified version of official Node.js release? Just to be perfectly safe, I've replaced it with the latest release of Node.js. It won't cause any problems, I guess? For the vnc feature, it's not started automatically. And the service that provide the vnc proxy from the guys who host the service ... is really not reliable in term of performance. I leave it in the beta for now, but it's clearly an experimental feature. For the node.js, it's the standalone exe from the official repository. you can override it if you want
|
|
|
|
Lex-DRL
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2017, 03:03:50 AM |
|
Cool. Nice to know. Now, after you clarified security questions, I've got a question about the tool itself. Is it OK to run miltiple instances of monitorig on the same PC? I'm using my home PC for mining, not a dedicated rig. Just plugged the second GPU in via PCIe raiser. So I've got multiple-vendor setup. Nvidia's 970 as primary GPU, which only works for mining when PC isn't used (Claymore's ETH miner). And AMD's 7970 as a secondary GPU, which works 24/7 (Claymore's ZEC miner). As a result I've got two different miners working in parallel, each on it's own GPU. In the monitorig, I don't see the way to launch multiple miners at once. So the reasonable question is: is it possible to launch multiple copies of monitorig? Each with it's own configuration and miner.
|
|
|
|
Storx
|
|
June 20, 2017, 03:48:35 AM |
|
Is this monitor available with ccminer's?
|
- GPUs Mining : 128 (Updated 3/7/18) // CPUs Mining : 19 (Updated 2/23/18)
|
|
|
Jeebs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2017, 05:17:40 AM |
|
Am getting my Hashrate and am able to restart/reboot from the website but its not reporting my GPU stats? Any idea why this is? http://imgur.com/a/Txoux
|
|
|
|
th00ber (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2017, 11:37:00 AM |
|
@Lex-DRL Copy/Paste the folder and run the tool on 2 instances with each instance associated to a RiG ID in the config.json. It should work. The only problem, the tool will think all your GPU are mining each algo and display that you have 4 GPU on your farm. But every other things should works fine
|
|
|
|
th00ber (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2017, 11:39:32 AM |
|
Is this monitor available with ccminer's?
I can hardly add support for most of NVIDIA miners...I don't have NVIDIA GPU. But ... good thing is, that I ordered an GTX 1080 on eBay for my desktop. that I'll get in few days/weeks. So I'll will be able to run both AMD and NVIDIA miner soon
|
|
|
|
th00ber (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2017, 11:41:32 AM |
|
Am getting my Hashrate and am able to restart/reboot from the website but its not reporting my GPU stats? Any idea why this is?
For me it's the Openhardwaremonitor sensors that are now initialized. Is Openhardwaremonitor running ? I once got the trouble and also an another miner got this. I'll send you some cmd to run to check that
|
|
|
|
th00ber (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2017, 11:47:01 AM |
|
Here the instructions Is that the same problem you got ? Hello, I have setup everything but I have an issue when it starts up I have the message : [ERROR] Can't get hardware sensors informations. BE SURE OpenHardwareMonitor IS RUNNING But OpenHardwareMonitor is running. I tried to launch it before launching monitoring and I have the same issue Can you help ? Thanks 1- STEP 1 - Test the powershell scripting capability http://monitorig/download/powershell_debug.ziprun the bat and check if you got some error/warning (you should not having erros) If no errors, check the file content ... If it's empty, go to step 2 2- STEP 2 - WMI Database integrity While OperHardwareMonitor is running, it send it's sensors value to the WMI database. Can you check the sensors values from the WMI databases with https://wmie.codeplex.com/ check the value of the HardwareMonitor sensors (screenshot : http://imgur.com/a/EQB6z) If it's blank, it's probably a problem with rights or WMI database https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa394525(v=vs.85).aspxin CMD as admin, run the command : winmgmt /salvagerepository (if still not ok, test : winmgmt /resetrepository) If still got problems, go to step 3 3- STEP 3 - Pray the Mining Lord STEP 1 & 2 did not correct the problem ... Go for a fresh install win 10/win 7 ?
|
|
|
|
a_gaudi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2017, 02:16:38 PM |
|
Hi.. good-luck with your coins.
|
|
|
|
densets
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
June 25, 2017, 12:23:04 PM |
|
im getting this error and the monitor doesnt find the miner Open hardware monitor Version: 0.8.0.0 System.ArgumentException: Value does not fall within the expected range. at OpenHardwareMonitor.TaskScheduler.TaskSchedulerClass.GetRunningTasks(Int32 flags) at OpenHardwareMonitor.GUI.StartupManager..ctor() at OpenHardwareMonitor.GUI.MainForm..ctor() at OpenHardwareMonitor.Program.Main() Common Language Runtime: 4.0.30319.42000 Operating System: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.10586.0 Process Type: 64-Bit
|
|
|
|
|