Sukrim
Legendary

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1014
|
 |
September 30, 2014, 09:25:33 AM |
|
Who cares about some arbitrary "ratios" displayed locally in a client?! What matters is how much you actually do upload...
|
|
|
|
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1644
No I dont escrow anymore.
|
 |
September 30, 2014, 10:30:18 AM |
|
Who cares about some arbitrary "ratios" displayed locally in a client?! What matters is how much you actually do upload...
Indeed, so in order to avoid a "bad ratio" just share the blockchain data torrent until you uploaded at least as much as you downloaded.
|
Im not really here, its just your imagination.
|
|
|
Kelp!
Newbie

Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 30, 2014, 04:47:00 PM |
|
Who cares about some arbitrary "ratios" displayed locally in a client? Of course I posted my tip for those that care about their ratio, not for those that don't care. ;-) Indeed, so in order to avoid a "bad ratio" just share the blockchain data torrent until you uploaded at least as much as you downloaded. Not necessarily. If you had a ratio of e.g. 2.0, you'd have to upload the file twice to get your old ratio back. For people with an average DSL connection, with typically fast download speeds but low upload speeds, that's almost impossible to achieve, especially when they prefer to go about other torrents. So, using a different torrent client exclusively for the blockchain torrent, is a simple way to keep your old ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1644
No I dont escrow anymore.
|
 |
September 30, 2014, 05:01:25 PM |
|
Who cares about some arbitrary "ratios" displayed locally in a client? Of course I posted my tip for those that care about their ratio, not for those that don't care. ;-) Indeed, so in order to avoid a "bad ratio" just share the blockchain data torrent until you uploaded at least as much as you downloaded. Not necessarily. If you had a ratio of e.g. 2.0, you'd have to upload the file twice to get your old ratio back. For people with an average DSL connection, with typically fast download speeds but low upload speeds, that's almost impossible to achieve, especially when they prefer to go about other torrents. So, using a different torrent client exclusively for the blockchain torrent, is a simple way to keep your old ratio. Esp. if you use torrents on a regular basis you should just keep this one running for a few months. Everyone seeding is increasing its speed for those downloading it. If you care enough about other torrents to get a 2:1 ratio, why not about this one?
|
Im not really here, its just your imagination.
|
|
|
Kelp!
Newbie

Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 30, 2014, 05:34:40 PM |
|
If you care enough about other torrents to get a 2:1 ratio, why not about this one? Like I said, with some DSL connections it's technically almost impossible to achieve (except you let your computer run 24/7 for some time). I'll try to reseed about half of the blockchain, I don't think I have the time and patience to reseed it entirely. I also need to delete the blockchain torrent eventually, to have more free space on my HDD for other torrents again. Such an ENORMOUS single file does bring about some problems on some set ups. ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1013
|
 |
October 01, 2014, 11:27:54 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1013
|
 |
October 01, 2014, 03:02:22 PM |
|
1 crash after read 2To and writing 18Go (task manager open on this bitcoin-qt.exe process).
Need to restart bitcoin core ... it must scan the 18Go and keep working of the integration of the bootstrap.dat (for me, 30 weeks to process after this crash).
|
|
|
|
|
mistercoin
Legendary

Activity: 1073
Merit: 1000
Rent Me!
|
 |
October 01, 2014, 06:03:27 PM |
|
Very nice! I will add it to my seedbox 
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1013
|
 |
October 01, 2014, 06:51:51 PM |
|
 thanks for this. I think that the torrent bootstrap.dat is the only way to download the blockchain now ... because bitcoin network is massively stopped by orphan block. 
|
|
|
|
|
Yoghurt114
Newbie

Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 03, 2014, 12:03:52 PM |
|
I was updating from the 16gig bootstrap to the current (21gig) torrent and noticed they don't go side by side initially (ie. the 21 gig one doesn't start off from where the 16gig one stopped). I deleted both torrents (not the actual bootstrap file) and loaded the 21 gig torrent by itself, it (uTorrent that is) started checking the file as I would expect, but then started downloading from 0%. I expected it would start downloading right around 70% or so. Is this expectation wrong? Or did I do it wrong?
TLDR; How do I update the torrent to a more recent version without downloading from scratch?
|
|
|
|
|
|
tl121
|
 |
October 03, 2014, 01:10:29 PM Last edit: October 06, 2014, 01:06:02 AM by tl121 |
|
I am running bitcoin-0.9.2-linux on Debian. I got a copy of linearize from github and ran it using Python 2.7.3. I had no problem creating hashlist.txt, but when I ran linearize-data.py I got errors. There were other skipped blocks, but the end was as follows: Wrote 239000 blocks Skipping unknown block 000000000000007dae319c0420d12bf47f14ed63a994d2402b9bb9a69d0b732d Input file/home/tony/.bitcoin/blocks/blk00024.dat Out of order block. Expected 000000000000008a098f009454d431be775eb87a3c4ffbfe04a8eaf127de0aa6 Got 000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f I figured that my block data was somehow corrupted, so I ran bitcoin-qt with checkblocks=0 and checklevel=3. Then I re-ran linearize with the same result. Then I ran bitcoin-qt --reindex and spent a day doing a complete reindex. I then reran linearize and got the same error. This concerns me, because if my blocks on disk had somehow gotten corrupted then bitcoin-qt should have found the corruption. Does anyone have an idea what may be wrong? Follow-up edit. I cleared out all of the files in .bitcoin and downloaded the block chain from another node on my network. This took about 18 hours. Then I ran linearize and produced a good bootstrap.dat file and it is presently seeding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sd
|
 |
October 08, 2014, 10:00:32 PM |
|
Who cares about some arbitrary "ratios" displayed locally in a client?! What matters is how much you actually do upload...
The only thing that really matters is that anyone who wants the data should be able to get hold of it as fast as possible. The more bandwidth we have seeding the better but if anyone really can't seed they should not feel bad about it. It's not an obligation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sd
|
 |
October 26, 2014, 07:48:46 PM |
|
I've been seeding the new torrent for 2 months now on a well connected server and have a seed ratio of 548. That's about 12 TB uploaded by one server in 2 months. I'm wondering if this is all due to people setting up full nodes, or if something else is happening here.
If you are a long term seeder are you getting similar results?
|
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary

Activity: 2954
Merit: 1065
|
 |
October 27, 2014, 10:08:07 AM |
|
I've been seeding the new torrent for 2 months now on a well connected server and have a seed ratio of 548. That's about 12 TB uploaded by one server in 2 months. I'm wondering if this is all due to people setting up full nodes, or if something else is happening here.
If you are a long term seeder are you getting similar results?
Armory likes to use it
|
|
|
|
LeMiner
Member


Activity: 139
Merit: 10
|
 |
October 27, 2014, 12:25:01 PM |
|
I've been seeding the new torrent for 2 months now on a well connected server and have a seed ratio of 548. That's about 12 TB uploaded by one server in 2 months. I'm wondering if this is all due to people setting up full nodes, or if something else is happening here.
If you are a long term seeder are you getting similar results?
Armory likes to use it This exactly, armory loves using this torrent. I've been seeding it for quite a while now. I tried out the download speed yesterday from this torrent and got around 25MB/s (around the max of the connection I'm using at home). I'm sure it would be even faster on my business connection. Either way, keep seeding and everybody thanks for providing this service.
|
|
|
|
|
defcon23
Legendary

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1002
|
 |
November 10, 2014, 10:03:20 AM |
|
Hi, is anyone got a FRESH & CLEAN bootstrap.dat file around ? it will be much appreciated by many users ,( me included ) , since it became almost impossible to syncronise bitcoin core in a decent downloading time...even with a really good conection. Actualy it is a serious problem for this software..  Bitcoin core developpers should have to seriously work on this.. Thanx in advance 
|
|
|
|
|
Sukrim
Legendary

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1014
|
 |
November 10, 2014, 07:26:45 PM |
|
header first syncing is already merged, so this is already fixed in the next version. There is likely not going to be a new bootstrap.dat until then...
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1013
|
 |
November 10, 2014, 07:30:32 PM |
|
Hi, is anyone got a FRESH & CLEAN bootstrap.dat file around ? it will be much appreciated by many users ,( me included ) , since it became almost impossible to syncronise bitcoin core in a decent downloading time...even with a really good conection. Actualy it is a serious problem for this software..  Bitcoin core developpers should have to seriously work on this.. +1 from the last time that i have rebuilded the blockchain (october 2014). bitcoin core is heavy duty corrupted by orphan block (for the new arrival members) ... and very high restriction from the client to upload blocks to others.
|
|
|
|
|
jgarzik (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1164
|
 |
November 11, 2014, 03:52:09 PM |
|
Hi, is anyone got a FRESH & CLEAN bootstrap.dat file around ?
Read the OP and download the torrent.
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
defcon23
Legendary

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1002
|
 |
November 11, 2014, 07:49:36 PM |
|
Hi, is anyone got a FRESH & CLEAN bootstrap.dat file around ?
Read the OP and download the torrent. i did it.. problem solved. i was able to rebuild the blocks in 1 ( long ) day  thanx for your answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|