|
machinek20
|
 |
May 03, 2016, 03:45:13 AM |
|
legacy only can tell  about him |
|
|
|
|
b!z
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1010
|
|
May 03, 2016, 03:47:53 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2dogs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1267
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 03, 2016, 03:53:59 AM |
|
Zero factual evidence provided as always. Cut the bullshit.  The first step is something in the lines of:  Amen, brother! |
|
|
|
|
avikz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3276
Merit: 1531
|
|
May 03, 2016, 04:06:50 AM |
|
I don't understand why you all are behind the satoshi myth?? Why u all want to know his actual identity??
Bitcoin has created history and it is always better to just take the profit out of it. Let the creator sleep in peace. Because of your curiosity, probably the creator of bitcoin is living a miserable life out in somewhere in the world.
This is not done, take benefit of the creation but lets not make his life tougher because of our curiosity.
|
|
|
|
|
bitboy11
|
|
May 03, 2016, 04:51:19 AM |
|
Surely this fool can at least spend 1 of Satoshi's coins! He's a total shyster!!!  |
|
|
|
|
DimensionZ
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 251
Shit, did I leave the stove on?
|
|
May 03, 2016, 05:14:46 AM |
|
I guess people want to know who Satoshi Nakamoto is because everyone wants to know what he/she will do with that 1 million Bitcoins. Satoshi can pretty much crash the whole market if he/she decides to cash out and be done with Bitcoin. In reality Satoshi Nakamoto can act as a God and I think for now Satoshi is keeping a low profile but what will happen if he/she gets fed up with all the bullshit going on within the Bitcoin community?
|
|
|
|
Rubberduckie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 03, 2016, 06:52:04 AM |
|
this could definitely lure out the real satoshi if he isnt him
I dont think he is and hopefully this makes the real satoshi
come out and go cmon now its not this clown..
|
|
|
|
Cryddit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1132
|
|
May 03, 2016, 06:55:20 AM |
|
No, it could not lure out the real Satoshi.
This clown opened his own mouth. There is absolutely no reason why the original Satoshi should rescue him from the consequences.
|
|
|
|
|
o0o0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1021
|
|
May 03, 2016, 07:06:41 AM |
|
No, it could not lure out the real Satoshi.
This clown opened his own mouth. There is absolutely no reason why the original Satoshi should rescue him from the consequences.
Im waiting for a signed message from the real satoshi that says I am not Craig Wright I wonder what he'll say then  |
|
|
|
|
|
Ghoom
|
|
May 03, 2016, 07:10:07 AM |
|
If this is true Satoshi, he made a small transaction and it's over.
I do not understand why the bitcoin team wants Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto...
|
|
|
|
|
Cryddit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1132
|
|
May 03, 2016, 07:16:34 AM |
|
An "I am not Craig Wright" message seems very unlikely.
Dorian was in trouble via no fault of his own, and because of the name coincidence to the pseudonym, the original Satoshi might have considered himself to blame for that. "I am not Dorian" was rescuing the poor guy from what might have otherwise been a life-ruining (or even life-ending) situation.
Craig Wright on the other hand climbed a tall tree in a lightning storm with a copper cable tied to his scrotum and thrust a lightning rod into the sky with his own stupid hand. He deserves whatever he gets, and I'm rooting for it to be the Jolt to End All Dolts.
|
|
|
|
|
P-Funk
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 360
Merit: 250
Token
|
|
May 03, 2016, 07:22:19 AM |
|
Ive read so many claims "liar" "asshole" "insane" etc. today. But you're all wrong. HE is SATOSHI. If you don't like him, it doesn't matter. Bitcoin lives on because it's the making of a genius. It lives on in a decentralized manner. The real Satoshi could just send a message saying he is not Craig.
This actually might happen the more I think about it. If Craig is not the real Satoshi, then the real Satoshi might want to dispel these rumors before it goes too far.
Craig Wright could well be Satoshi - OK, is Satoshi. Not that my opinion or conjecture matters one way or the other, but there it is nonetheless. I think the Sartre reference was the start of it for me, turning down the Nobel Prize for lit. He said art isn't a competition. Most people would give their left arm to even be nominated - but he turned it down. Anyhow, the degree in Theology, the autodidactic (and academic) eclecticism, the London/England connection, the massive amounts of BTC shifted early on, the diffidence around going public with proof to anyone beyond Gavin Andresen, Gavins belief in his authenticity. And even the way he came across in the BBC interview - which he rather strongly avowed would be his first and last. So he's Satoshi because you say so? What else may you decree, mighty dictator of reality? |
|
|
|
|
|
JeanMcCoy
|
|
May 03, 2016, 08:36:27 AM |
|
Yesterday i heard something about this rumor is it true.
Why would he come with this information now and not years before.
I think he just want some publicity because no one has told before that it was his coin.
|
|
|
|
|
alyssa85
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1088
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
May 03, 2016, 11:26:45 AM |
|
Yesterday i heard something about this rumor is it true.
Why would he come with this information now and not years before.
Because Wired did a doxing article on him in Dec 2015, and the Australian tax authorities descended on him as a result. He is being audited, and they are eager to tax all his coins. His argument seems to be that unless he sells the coins, there is no tax to pay. |
|
|
|
|
PinkLlama
|
|
May 03, 2016, 11:30:13 AM |
|
We need some actual fucking proof. The threads arguing over him being real can stop. When he provides actual proof, then we'll know that he's Satoshi.
|
Developing great Bitcoin tools for the community
|
|
|
|
BitcoinSupremo
|
|
May 03, 2016, 11:49:30 AM |
|
It doesn't cost anything to the real satoshi to sign a message "Craig Wright is not Satoshi" and clear all this mess up. I don't believe craig wright is satoshi. Beside that this guy still haven't give us a true proof like a signed message which is quite easy to do if he is the real satoshi.
|
|
|
|
|
JPred
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
my magic is growing strong[er]
|
|
May 03, 2016, 03:47:29 PM |
|
Is it really real, really? Craig Wright is SN...hmm Ok, I mean why not.
|
FREEDOM
|
|
|
|
aakashsangwan
|
|
May 03, 2016, 04:31:51 PM |
|
I actually do not think that he is satoshi nakamoto. Also news have surfaced that he has a created false proofs of him being nakamoto. It is also beleived that the PGP key he had given turned out to be a fake and had been generated by Wright. Also I think that if he was media conscious then he wouldn't be interested in making this statement even now.
|
|
|
|
|
streazight
|
|
May 03, 2016, 04:38:28 PM |
|
Craig Wright could well be Satoshi...Well i never trust this.
We need Proof OP
|
|
|
|
|
Cryddit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1132
|
|
May 03, 2016, 09:54:01 PM |
|
The nicest thing anybody could do for Satoshi would be to convince the world that the Satoshi pseudonym was his.
Wright will fail in this, but it's nice of him to try.
Wright apparently has large amounts of Bitcoin of unexplained origin. It seems likely to have reached his hands via a ransomware scam - he started telling people that he was an early miner to account for the coins, and now it's looking like he's escalated to the point of claiming to be Satoshi.
If only enough suckers would believe him, the original Satoshi could rest easier at night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
