Why so little talk of Dave Kleiman?

[BitcoinFX]

"This is a little story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody.

There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it.

Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it.

Somebody got angry about that because it was Everybody's job.

Everybody thought that Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn't do it.

It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have done."

[Gyrsur]

Send a public information request to the Palm Beach Medical Examiner Office here: http://www.pbcgov.com/medicalexaminer/requestinfo/

Search Kleiman and you get:

Kleiman, David   Case #130467   Date of death 04/26/2013   Investigator Name: Jenkins, Doug

pls post a screenshot of the replied email.

[P-Funk]

Send a public information request to the Palm Beach Medical Examiner Office here: http://www.pbcgov.com/medicalexaminer/requestinfo/

Search Kleiman and you get:

Kleiman, David   Case #130467   Date of death 04/26/2013   Investigator Name: Jenkins, Doug

pls post a screenshot of the replied email.

I'm not going to request it. I don't give enough of a fuck to do it myself. Gleb might.

[Gyrsur]

Send a public information request to the Palm Beach Medical Examiner Office here: http://www.pbcgov.com/medicalexaminer/requestinfo/

Search Kleiman and you get:

Kleiman, David   Case #130467   Date of death 04/26/2013   Investigator Name: Jenkins, Doug

pls post a screenshot of the replied email.

I'm not going to request it. I don't give enough of a fuck to do it myself. Gleb might.

from where did you get this info above then?

investigator name: Jenkins, Doug

[P-Funk]

learn2read

edit: Maybe it wasn't so obvious. http://www.pbcgov.com/medicalexaminer/MEDatabase.htm/

[Gyrsur]

learn2read

edit: Maybe it wasn't so obvious. http://www.pbcgov.com/medicalexaminer/MEDatabase.htm/

ok thanks! i found the record. next step would be to contact the investigator and ask him.

is it difficult to fake a death in the US? i mean you have no registration record of the existens of a human as far as i know. just the driver license, right?

[ddink7]

I just came up with another theory though...we might be missing the forest for the trees. Much of what CW has said has proven sketchy, or even downright lies (claiming multiple fake phd's for instance). We do know one thing that's incontrovertible: CW was very interested in high performance computing / supercomputing. Think about that for a minute.

Now what if Kleiman, being the typical computer geek, enjoyed the intellectual challenge of creating the code but had little interest in testing...and asked his friend CW to help test Bitcoin by mining. It's very possible that CW could own Block 1, and even if not, it's still possible that a significant part of Satoshi's stash...actually doesn't belong to Satoshi. What if most/all the coins we thought were Satoshi's were actually CW's?

It's also possible that Kleiman wrote the first version of the Bitcoin code, and that CW took over testing, bug fixing, and future development. Kleiman could have written the code, while CW could have been the "Satoshi" that communicated extensively with Gavin and others...

[AgentofCoin]

learn2read

edit: Maybe it wasn't so obvious. http://www.pbcgov.com/medicalexaminer/MEDatabase.htm/

ok thanks! i found the record. next step would be to contact the investigator and ask him.

is it difficult to fake a death in the US? i mean you have no registration record of the existens of a human as far as i know. just the driver license, right?

Are you asking whether there is a US centralized government database with proof of his existence?

If so, I guess you could argue that the Social Security Administration would confirm his existence,
since they would have issued a Social Security Number at birth, and then terminated that number
after they receive some confirmation of his death or death certificate.

But ultimately, I'm sure Kleiman is dead. Faking someone's death and having the medical provable
backstory with years of medical pain and suffering BEFORE bitcoin was even that valuable, would be
amazing foresight and pre-planning of the likes of a time traveler.

...
It's also possible that Kleiman wrote the first version of the Bitcoin code, and that CW took over testing, bug fixing, and future development. Kleiman could have written the code, while CW could have been the "Satoshi" that communicated extensively with Gavin and others...

If your theory is considered to be true, why didn't CSW continue talking to Gavin and others?
Why would CSW disappear? Also there are issues with whether CSW even really understands
certain aspects of Bitcoin/bitcoin and how it actually functions and its shortfalls.
It would be more likely (IMO) that Kleiman, if was Satoshi, was in communication with Gavin and others.

[st4nl3y]

I believe Craig might have created Bitcoin with help of others, mainly Dave. Time will tell.

[AgentofCoin]

I believe Craig might have created Bitcoin with help of others, mainly Dave. Time will tell.

Hey I would just like to, on behalf of everyone here, thank you for your analysis and
deep thought before posting your comment. I'm sure you expended a lot of valuable time
writing and providing such insight and we all just really gosh-darn appreciate it.

Thanks for being you.  

With all my love,
AgentofCoin

[Chakraball]

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2644014-Tulip-Trust-Redacted.html

this document implies Craig Wright is Satoshi when it says  

I acknowledge:

Dave Kleiman have received 1,100,111 Bitcoin from Craig Wright (of?Bagnoo,
NSW Australia).

is this even legit?
when was this writen?
did they put the hash of this document on the blockchain somewhere?

it seems really fishy, why would Craig Wright give his bitcoin to a trust? what's the point?

File name Tulip_Trust_Redacted

 Created: 08/12/2015 22:11:59

Modified: 08/12/2015 22:11:59

Advanced

PDF Producer:  Mac OS X 10.11.1 Quartz PDFContext
PDF Version:    (Acrobat 5.x)1.4

Interesting name Tulip_Trust considering  -  http://domainbigdata.com/tuliptrading.net

[Chakraball]

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2644014-Tulip-Trust-Redacted.html

this document implies Craig Wright is Satoshi when it says  

I acknowledge:

Dave Kleiman have received 1,100,111 Bitcoin from Craig Wright (of?Bagnoo,
NSW Australia).

is this even legit?
when was this writen?
did they put the hash of this document on the blockchain somewhere?

it seems really fishy, why would Craig Wright give his bitcoin to a trust? what's the point?

File name Tulip_Trust_Redacted

 Created: 08/12/2015 22:11:59

Modified: 08/12/2015 22:11:59

Advanced

PDF Producer:  Mac OS X 10.11.1 Quartz PDFContext
PDF Version:    (Acrobat 5.x)1.4

Interesting name Tulip_Trust considering  -  http://domainbigdata.com/tuliptrading.net

Some other interesting documents there too.

Who is John Cook ?

https://www.documentcloud.org/public/search/david%20kleiman

[Chakraball]

Kleiman or somebody died that's for sure.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2644005-DAVID-KLEIMAN-13-0467.html

[Gleb Gamow]

Kleiman or somebody died that's for sure.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2644005-DAVID-KLEIMAN-13-0467.html

Surely, I get bonus points for postin' a pic of Satoshi's penis, don't I? Here's to hopin' that "Foley" didn't stick a banana up Satoshi's tailpipe durin' the examination.

[AgentofCoin]

Kleiman or somebody died that's for sure.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2644005-DAVID-KLEIMAN-13-0467.html

Surely, I get bonus points for postin' a pic of Satoshi's penis, don't I? Here's to hopin' that "Foley" didn't stick a banana up Satoshi's tailpipe durin' the examination.

Gleb may have dug up the most important discovery about Satoshi to date!
He has done what others have only dreamed of.
We now have confirmation that Satoshi's penis' name was Foley.

So, Satoshi didn't work alone after all. There was also Foley.

(+10,000 Bonus Points to Gleb, and I throw in 10 strips of Gold-Pressed Latinum.)

Here is Foley's Bitcointalk account: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=66960
Clearly there are no posts, since he has no hands/fingers to type.
It is assumed Kleiman set this account up for him. Unless CSW was behind this as well.

[st4nl3y]

I believe Craig might have created Bitcoin with help of others, mainly Dave. Time will tell.

Hey I would just like to, on behalf of everyone here, thank you for your analysis and
deep thought before posting your comment. I'm sure you expended a lot of valuable time
writing and providing such insight and we all just really gosh-darn appreciate it.

Thanks for being you.  

With all my love,
AgentofCoin

No problem. If you need help with anything else just ask 

[NorrisK]

Kleiman or somebody died that's for sure.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2644005-DAVID-KLEIMAN-13-0467.html

Surely, I get bonus points for postin' a pic of Satoshi's penis, don't I? Here's to hopin' that "Foley" didn't stick a banana up Satoshi's tailpipe durin' the examination.

You are aware that "Foley" is a type of cathether that is intended to be placed in the urethra to drain urine from the urinary bladder?

It is just mentioning that a cathether was placed inside the penis at the time of autopsy.

[AgentofCoin]

Kleiman or somebody died that's for sure.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2644005-DAVID-KLEIMAN-13-0467.html

Surely, I get bonus points for postin' a pic of Satoshi's penis, don't I? Here's to hopin' that "Foley" didn't stick a banana up Satoshi's tailpipe durin' the examination.

You are aware that "Foley" is a type of cathether that is intended to be placed in the urethra to drain urine from the urinary bladder?

It is just mentioning that a cathether was placed inside the penis at the time of autopsy.

Typical Norris.... Always raining on our parade.

(Foley actually means that at the time of death, Kleiman had a cathether in,
since he was paralyzed as evident by the report's mention of numerous ulcers
and sores on his behind, presumably from constantly sitting in that wheelchair.)

[Gleb Gamow]

Kleiman or somebody died that's for sure.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2644005-DAVID-KLEIMAN-13-0467.html

Surely, I get bonus points for postin' a pic of Satoshi's penis, don't I? Here's to hopin' that "Foley" didn't stick a banana up Satoshi's tailpipe durin' the examination.

You are aware that "Foley" is a type of cathether that is intended to be placed in the urethra to drain urine from the urinary bladder?

It is just mentioning that a cathether was placed inside the penis at the time of autopsy.

Typical Norris.... Always raining on our parade.

(Foley actually means that at the time of death, Kleiman had a cathether in,
since he was paralyzed as evident by the report's mention of numerous ulcers
and sores on his behind, presumably from constantly sitting in that wheelchair.)

Yeah, [Chuck] Norris, quit ruinin' our parade.



Back on-topic. Is it common practice to proclaim the day of death as when a decomposing body is first discovered like done here with David Kleiman? Clearly, Dave died days before April 26, 2013, and not on it.

[Gleb Gamow]

From the WBM dated April 5, 2003: http://web.archive.org/web/20040405113415/http://isecureu.com/NM/about/about.asp

About Security Solutions Center:
Our staff has over 20 years of Information Systems experience including networking, security, and internet services.
Our mission is to consistently deliver optimum secure solutions to our customers that increase their business productivity.
To meet the challenge our clients face, our professionals strive to maintain a comprehensive understanding and awareness of advanced technologies to determine which will best address their business requirements in a cost-effective manner.
Our goal is to be recognized and respected by our clients as a company dedicated to providing best-of-class service that is secure, reliable, timely, affordable, and always available.

Security Solutions Principal Consultant is David Kleiman:
As a recognized security expert, David brings 14 years of professional experience in Information Security Management to the Security Solutions Center Team. He specializes in Computer Forensics Investigations, Incident Response, Intrusion Analysis, Security Audits, and Secure Network Infrastructures. He has written several Windows NT/2000 technologies secure installation and configuration guides for use by network professionals. David has developed a Windows Operating System lockdown tool that surpasses NSA, NIST, and Microsoft Common Criteria Guidelines.

David is a member of:
The FBI's InfraGard
The Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA)
The International Information Systems Forensics Association (IISFA)

He holds the following certifications:
Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP)
Certified Information Security Manager (CISM)
Certified Information Forensics Investigator™ (CIFI)
Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE)
F.D.L.E. Certified Law Enforcement Officer (Inactive)

©2003 NetMedic.Net. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Accessibility

From the desk of A Person Closely Working with the FBI Possessing More Secure Shit than the NSA and ain't goin' Share if with Them:

Eight years later: http://web.archive.org/web/20120205000420/http://www.davekleiman.com/computer-forensics-expert-florida-miami-palm-beach-lauderdale-dave-kleiman-about.php

About Computer Forensic Expert Dave Kleiman of Florida:

Certified Computer Forensics Expert Examiner with strong experience in Information Security. As a recognized security expert, I have over 15 years of professional experience in Information Security Management. A former Florida certified law enforcement officer, I specialize in Computer Forensic Examinations, Data Recovery, Electronic Discovery, Litigation Support, Incident Response, and Intrusion Analysis. I developed a Windows Operating System lockdown tool, S-Lok™, which surpasses NSA, NIST, and Microsoft Common Criteria guidelines.

On April 5, 2004: David Klieman, fresh out of the Army and in law enforcement in circa 1990, already had 14 years experience in computer forensics, in spite of not getting formal education in said field until after his accident in 1995.

On February 5, 2012: David Klieman had over 15 years experience in said field, this somewhat undisputed.