Put some Respeck On Craig Wright's name

[LCSociety]

He is the inventor of the Blockchain and Bitcoin. He has "signed a message" and confirmed this, but yet the character assassination continues

Don't let media spin guide your thoughts.

I just read the UK's Guardian, and they have already began to paint Craig as a potentially criminal liar. Which is very troublesome indeed.

We have seen the guy speak many times, and he doesn't seem prideful that he created bitcoin. He doesn't even want any accolades or awards. Why is that?

Would you want to be etched in stone as a contributor to the enslavement of mankind?

I think we need to put at least two tablespoons of Respeck on Craig White's name. He has allowed most us to grow wealthy.

Try to resist falling into the trap of believing the media spin. I mean, there is clearly alot more to be revealed but the machine has already set to work on tarnishing this guys credibility, so when he does present us with some merky facts of who else is involved with Bitcoin, he'll be dismissed as some incompetent liar.

Sad times... I've nothing else to say on this matter. So yes, I'm finshed AND done! And I wont say it anymore

[alani123]

He signed a message privately to Gavin Andresen, that's no irrefutable proof that he's satoshi. Did you know that Wright's fortune literally depends on being Satoshi? Hee took $54m in R&D subsidies, to qualify for those he claimed that he had signed the rights of millions of dollars worth of bitcoin to a third party. Do you see why he'd want to lie about being Satoshi now?

[LCSociety]

He signed a message privately to Gavin Andresen, that's no irrefutable proof that he's satoshi. Did you know that Wright's fortune literally depends on being Satoshi? Hee took $54m in R&D subsidies, to qualify for those he claimed that he had signed the rights of millions of dollars worth of bitcoin to a third party. Do you see why he'd want to lie about being Satoshi now?

I have an incapability to respond to "wealth shaming."

So what, he is making a bit of money here and there - as he should. He is one of the only human beings that can say that they have created THOUSANDS of millionaires. Everyone that was mining bitcoin on their laptops back in 2010 - 2012 should be reacting with aggression now that this man is being slandered like this.

Tony Blair the man that turned Iraq into a derelict bombshell, murdered millions and is directly responsible for the 'rape by solider' of hundreds of thousands of females (child and adult) has earned $100,000,000++ over the last 6 years, I think that is something worthy of outrage. Not some powerless, lone man making a few million here and there.

Craig white was the lead developer of this software that has changed all of our lives. He signed a message live on camera, but the BBC edited this out of their slanted presentation - for obvious reasons.

If you call yourself an Anarchist... If you call yourself a Libertarian... If you're anti this, and anti that - why are you so easily lead by this very same government that you defame? I mean, really? All it takes is media spin to whip you anti-establishment "rebels" into a frenzy?

Rest assured, there will be a big bitcoin pump in the coming weeks

So we'll all continue to make big money. But I must say it again. Let us all stop playing with this man's name. Let us all put more than a generous amount Respeck on it

[alani123]

He signed a message privately to Gavin Andresen, that's no irrefutable proof that he's satoshi. Did you know that Wright's fortune literally depends on being Satoshi? Hee took $54m in R&D subsidies, to qualify for those he claimed that he had signed the rights of millions of dollars worth of bitcoin to a third party. Do you see why he'd want to lie about being Satoshi now?

I'm incapable of responding to "wealth shaming."

So what, he is making a bit of money here and there - as he should. He is one of the only human beings that can say that they have created THOUSANDS of millionaires. Everyone that was mining bitcoin on their laptops back in 2010 - 2012 should be reacting with aggression now that this man is being slandered like this.

Tony Blair the man that turned Iraq into a derelict bombshell, murdered millions and is directly responsible for the 'rape by solider' of hundreds of thousands of females (child and adult) has earned $100,000,000++ over the last 6 years, I think that is something worthy of outrage. Not some powerless, lone man making a few million here and there.

Craig white was the lead developer of this software that has changed all of our lives. He signed a message live on camera, but the BBC edited this out of their slanted presentation - for obvious reasons.

If you call yourself an Anarchist... If you call yourself a Libertarian... If you're anti this, and anti that - why are you so easily lead by this very same government that you defame? I mean, really? All it takes is media spin to whip you anti-establishment "rebels" into a frenzy?

Rest assured, there will be a big bitcoin pump in the coming weeks

So we'll all continue to make big money. But I must say it again. Let us all stop playing with this man's name. Let us all put more than generous amount Respeck on it

Defrauding the state for millions isn't making a bit of money here and there.

[ebliever]

He is the inventor of the Blockchain and Bitcoin. He has "signed a message" and confirmed this, but yet the character assassination continues

No, he didn't. You're taking someone's word for it, and he's specifically failed to do so publicly so that you can confirm it yourself. It would be a trivial exercise for an honest actor to provide the public proof, as Charles Lee demonstrated with his Litecoin genesis block proof. On the flip side he's been caught scamming over and over with back-dated documents and an obfuscated, dishonest proof from his May 2 blog post, among other things. It's not character assassination at this point to say he's being dishonest with the public and there is no objective reason to believe he is Satoshi.

[LCSociety]

He is the inventor of the Blockchain and Bitcoin. He has "signed a message" and confirmed this, but yet the character assassination continues

No, he didn't. You're taking someone's word for it, and he's specifically failed to do so publicly so that you can confirm it yourself. It would be a trivial exercise for an honest actor to provide the public proof, as Charles Lee demonstrated with his Litecoin genesis block proof. On the flip side he's been caught scamming over and over with back-dated documents and an obfuscated, dishonest proof from his May 2 blog post, among other things. It's not character assassination at this point to say he's being dishonest with the public and there is no objective reason to believe he is Satoshi.

Caught by whom? Were you there, or did you read that in some article produced by some media conglomerate? The same media conglomerate that dictates which toothpaste you use in the morning, and which brand of salt your mother uses to season your dinner every sunday?

Charles Lee was a lone actor. Craig White is not a lone actor. Edison was not a lone actor, he built GE following the direction of the Morgan Dynasty. The question is, which dynasty is Craig White working for?

I mean, this could all be a marketing ploy to get bitcoin back in front of the masses in preparation for another price manipulation - and with this being "halving year" this is most likely the case. But, who knows - i guess that would be too logical

Personally, it's not that important to me.

I personally respect Craig for creating the blockchain, and I think we should all give him his flowers whilst he is still alive to smell them.

The government isn't opposed to bitcoin at all. Having the wealth of the world concentrated into one digital protocol is the stuff of dreams for social engineers. If they were opposed to bitcoin, it wouldn't take up even an inch of precious air time on their mass indoctrination networks. Bitcoin has been all over the BBC the past few years. BBC is not a commercial organisation, it's literally a department of the british government.

Hence why you can turn on a programme like eastenders and be blasted with an onslaught of depopulation conditioning.

Anyway, we all have our opinions... and there are three sides to every story. Thus far we have only been presented with two sides

Defrauding the state for millions isn't making a bit of money here and there.

Libertarians, anti capitalists and anarchists all claim to hate and be opposed to all forms of government. Yet when one of your own gets one over on this government that you hate, you become a statist all of a sudden

Is this why they force american students to pledge allegiance to "the flag" every morning? That conditioning sticks like double sided tape doesn't it?

[Herbert2020]

i think you should read more about what identity theft is and what are the legal consequences of doing such a thing. also let us not forget about the 54 million dollars tax problem with the IRS or whatever the acronyms are for their tax thingy

[LCSociety]

i think you should read more about what identity theft is and what are the legal consequences of doing such a thing. also let us not forget about the 54 million dollars tax problem with the IRS or whatever the acronyms are for their tax thingy

I am not a Statist, and I don't knock you for being one.

I don't even knock those that are self professed libertarians and anarchists for unknowingly reverting back to Statisim when their government sponsored patriotism conditioning kicks in. It's difficult to control, I know.

A statist is a man who believes that some men have the right to force, coerce, enslave, rob, and murder others.

The fact that you reference "tax cheats," and "legality" shows that deep down you enjoy being oppressed.

The only tax cheat is the governemnt, because all taxes are illegal. If I were to smash up some local electronics store because they failed to pay me 30% of their yearly income, they'd throw me into a cage for 10 years due to "racketeering." When we do it it's a crime, when they do it - it's due to "legality."

In the purest form of reality 54 Million dollars is nothing.

Dollars are the figment of the imagination of a group of men that created the prison known as the united states of america. The Dollar is nothing except the legacy banking equivalent of a premine scam.

One's and zeros that mean nothing until you attach iconography.

So when you talk about "legal consequences" please be aware that in order for a group of people to attain the power to enforce any such "legal" repercussion... murders must be committed. Mass murders. Entire populations and civilizations wiped out - i.e the indigenous american indians. Wars must be waged in which millions more are murdered. Yet these very same "legal" acts that you mention state that committing but one murder makes you a criminal.

The second king of england had to murder the first one.

So literally, this legal hogwash that you speak of is meaningless. There are no criminals, just human beings.

We all need to re-evaluate our ideologies of what reality is before we can cast judgement on another man. Especially before we cast ill judgement on Craig White, who has made all of us wealthier in one way or another

[Quartx]

He is the inventor of the Blockchain and Bitcoin. He has "signed a message" and confirmed this, but yet the character assassination continues

Gimme a minute, let me take my popcorn and listen to you explain how he "signed the message". We all can sign the message too, which part of technicality do you not understand?

[LCSociety]

Gimme a minute, let me take my popcorn and listen to you explain how he "signed the message". We all can sign the message too, which part of technicality do you not understand?

Look at this broadcast they put out on the Government of the United Kingom's Department of Propaganda. Sorry, i meant to say the BBC - although, since these individuals love acronyms, GUKDP seems more powerful than BBC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DCAC1j2HTY

Craig obviously went through the process of signing a message to confirm his identity, which was edited out due to the BBC being intent on forcing their sordid agenda onto the masses

I'm not aware of the technicality you speak of. If you can sign a message that proves that you're satoshi, then please do. That'll surely educate me as to the flimsy nature of the underlying code that supports the blockchain. I'd love to see this

I find it strange that human beings stare directly at the "facts" yet their beliefs override blatant evidence. I guess this is why the church is so powerful, and why the Vatican is one of the largest owners of land on a global scale

Interesting quirks in the construct of humanity

[AGD]

Sign Satoshi's PGP key from 2008 or STFU

[Kprawn]

Guys and Girls, this guy is clearly trolling. Op are you deliberately spelling his Surname wrong? The guy is a fraudster until he publically bring valid proof that he is the real Satoshi. You would think a

person who wrote the Bitcoin protocol would know how to sign a message that would be acceptable to all.   The fact that he done that behind closed doors with someone who has had ties with people

that wanted to deliberately sabotage Bitcoin... speaks for itself. {Mike Hearn}  

[LCSociety]

Guys and Girls, this guy is clearly trolling. Op are you deliberately spelling his Surname wrong? The guy is a fraudster until he publically bring valid proof that he is the real Satoshi. You would think a

person who wrote the Bitcoin protocol would know how to sign a message that would be acceptable to all.   The fact that he done that behind closed doors with someone who has had ties with people

that wanted to deliberately sabotage Bitcoin... speaks for itself. {Mike Hearn}  

If I were a philosopher i'd ask, "what is a name?"

I mean look at that word... Sur-name. What is that? Why is it necessary for a human being to have a first name, and a surname? Sure, you'd like to separate one person from another. Understandable. But, the queen of england doesn't have a surname... her full name is Elizabeth Alexandra Mary... their family name is Saxe coburg gotha - publicly, Winsdor. There is no Sur-name - at least when you're not a serf of one form or another.

Serfs are trained to cherish the tools of their oppressors. Interesting.

I apologise for the incorrect spelling, never will i mispell a person's sur-name again. Forgive me

Again he signed a message live.. captured by the bbc, who craig assumed to be the most respectable medium to broadcast this revelation with. Obviously not the case. The bbc edited this out of their broadcast in order to properly execute their spin

The guardian picked up the ball and ran with it, publicly calling the man a liar

These are traits of character assassination.

Michael Jackson owned 50% of the recorded music publishing arm of Sony the corporation - Sony/ATV. This is one man, owning 50% of an arm of a multi national conglomerate. There was obviously a good character clause in his contract (an exit strategy for Sony), violation of which would lead to the forced selling of his portion of the company. Hence why his character was publicly assassinated continuously. Still he wouldn't sell. So, "let's try the old drug overdose chestnut."

The media is a powerful tool

I'm just saying, if most people here are opposed to government coercion and abuse, then we should all be a bit wiser than to jump when they tell us to

[Kprawn]

Guys and Girls, this guy is clearly trolling. Op are you deliberately spelling his Surname wrong? The guy is a fraudster until he publically bring valid proof that he is the real Satoshi. You would think a

person who wrote the Bitcoin protocol would know how to sign a message that would be acceptable to all.   The fact that he done that behind closed doors with someone who has had ties with people

that wanted to deliberately sabotage Bitcoin... speaks for itself. {Mike Hearn}  

If I were a philosopher i'd ask, "what is a name?"

I mean look at that word... Sur-name. What is that? Why is it necessary for a human being to have a first name, and a surname? Sure, you'd like to separate one person from another. Understandable. But, the queen of england doesn't have a surname... her full name is Elizabeth Alexandra Mary... their family name is Saxe coburg gotha - publicly, Winsdor. There is no Sur-name - at least when you're not a serf of one form or another.

Serfs are trained to cherish the tools of their oppressors. Interesting.

I apologise for the incorrect spelling, never will i mispell a person's sur-name again. Forgive me

Again he signed a message live.. captured by the bbc, who craig assumed to be the most respectable medium to broadcast this revelation with. Obviously not the case. The bbc edited this out of their broadcast in order to properly execute their spin

The guardian picked up the ball and ran with it, publicly calling the man a liar

These are traits of character assassination.

Michael Jackson owned 50% of the recorded music publishing arm of Sony the corporation - Sony/ATV. This is one man, owning 50% of an arm of a multi national conglomerate. There was obviously a good character clause in his contract (an exit strategy for Sony), violation of which would lead to the forced selling of his portion of the company. Hence why his character was publicly assassinated continuously. Still he wouldn't sell. So, "let's try the old drug overdose chestnut."

The media is a powerful tool

I'm just saying, if most people here are opposed to government coercion and abuse, then we should all be a bit wiser than to jump when they tell us to

Apology accepted... in any way, I was a bit anal on the Surname because I want to stop further confusion in other people's reference to him.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1463230.new#new

Your point is taken, and I agree.. We should give the guy a fair chance to prove himself and then decide if he is a fraudster or the real deal. I too was a bit quick on the trigger, when other people

started to doubt his honesty. The best way to do this, would be for people with sound technical knowledge to meet with him and then giving him a chance to prove himself. The one-on-one thing with

Gavin behind closed doors was a bit dodgy. Do a sort of Peer review with developers and then they can decide if there are any proof in this. If he can sign a message in the Genesis block... it would

make this option obsolete and we can just move forward. Him being a early adopter, makes signing early blocks as proof so much more complex. 

[LCSociety]

Gavin behind closed doors was a bit dodgy. Do a sort of Peer review with developers and then they can decide if there are any proof in this. If he can sign a message in the Genesis block... it would

make this option obsolete and we can just move forward. Him being a early adopter, makes signing early blocks as proof so much more complex

There's nothing complex about signing a message, which is why he wanted to broadcast himself doing just that live so that the BBC can present the code to a global audience, for every one to verify.

Things didn't pan out this way.

He said himself he doesn't care if people believe him or not. He simply wanted to prove that he wasn't a liar... so the BBC sold him a dream, and he fell for it

The fact that they are trying to tarnish this mans reputation only makes it obvious that there is alot more going on behind closed doors that Craig could potentially reveal

I said it before in another post... I won't be surprised if the guy turns up dead due to suicide via two gunshots to the head.

Character assassination requires air time to be sacrificed, they do not do this for no reason

[hhanh00]

It would take him a few seconds to sign a message with genesis key or one of the keys associated with Satoshi. And that would immediately clear his name and make fools of all the doubters. But no, instead he came up with a BS post followed by an apology.

If he's Satoshi and lost the private keys or can't access them for some reason, then he should have stayed anonymous . It is obvious that people would demand a better proof than what he showed. There aren't any good scenarios for him:

- He's not Satoshi: He's getting what he deserves
- He's Satoshi but all his stuff is locked somewhere else: He's also getting what he deserves for not showing the slightest foresight
- He's Satoshi and he's toying with us: He's getting what he deserves for being a douche

The media can be crappy but he was the one who contacted them. Now they are just doing the fact checking that they should have done in the first place before. So what if they are now calling a liar, no one really cares anyway. They are covering their ass and that story will blow away like it did before.

Nice try Craig but you are still gonna have to pay your bills.

[Boosterious]

He is the inventor of the Blockchain and Bitcoin. He has "signed a message" and confirmed this, but yet the character assassination continues

Don't let media spin guide your thoughts.

I just read the UK's Guardian, and they have already began to paint Craig as a potentially criminal liar. Which is very troublesome indeed.

We have seen the guy speak many times, and he doesn't seem prideful that he created bitcoin. He doesn't even want any accolades or awards. Why is that?

Would you want to be etched in stone as a contributor to the enslavement of mankind?

I think we need to put at least two tablespoons of Respeck on Craig White's name. He has allowed most us to grow wealthy.

Try to resist falling into the trap of believing the media spin. I mean, there is clearly alot more to be revealed but the machine has already set to work on tarnishing this guys credibility, so when he does present us with some merky facts of who else is involved with Bitcoin, he'll be dismissed as some incompetent liar.

Sad times... I've nothing else to say on this matter. So yes, I'm finshed AND done! And I wont say it anymore

can you give me source or link that guardian already began to paint Craig as a potentially criminal liar?
this is too far for judge Craig as Criminal,yes i do respect his name as big investor of bitcoin,even people hate and not believe on hi,but yes we should respect Craig's name.

[LCSociety]

The media can be crappy but he was the one who contacted them.

Do you have evidence of this? Probably not.

He said he was forced to speak out publicly due to his staff and family members being harassed. This is something that all revolutionaries are forced to come to terms with.

The revolutionary himself may be willing to go out all guns blazing... but what about his wife, mother... kids.... employees... ? They didn't sign up to being harassed by the secret service. Having the police force entry into their homes to remove "goods" and so on.

No one knows why he decided to come out

Entertainment isn't real, it's all a show. The television and media in general should be known universally as 'The Reality Machine' because that's it's purpose. To construct, maintain and promote only a specific set of universal perceptions that benefits a specific agenda.

Look at Russia.

All of the media corporations, even the privately owned ones, are dominated by the government.

They script their news casts similar to the way they write and direct movies in hollywood. Ever heard of crisis actors?

Listen to this for a run down and explanation of how your "news" is created: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h992YwxLg44

In the 80's and early 90's the entire russian government was usurped by the russian mafia. 19 and 20 year old gangsters were running riot, going on murder spree's, scamming their way into owning BILLION dollar state assets like steel factories, and gas companies - i.e Roman Abramovich and his camp.

Boris Berezovsky, a famous Russian oligarch and mentor to Roman Abramovich - and former owner of the largest media organisation in russia by the way - scammed his way into wealth by scamming $50 Million via creating a joint stock IPO, offering the first "Russian people's car." By subscribing investors would have had a chance to own one of the first cars that rolled off the factory floor........ the factory was never built, Boris ran with the money and later became a powerful member of the Kremlin.

Watch this for a primer on how "real" power is amassed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2Cl8lSv9Is

You say the media can be "crappy" yah, tell me about it.
 

It would take him a few seconds to sign a message with genesis key or one of the keys associated with Satoshi. And that would immediately clear his name and make fools of all the doubters. But no, instead he came up with a BS post followed by an apology.

If he's Satoshi and lost the private keys or can't access them for some reason, then he should have stayed anonymous . It is obvious that people would demand a better proof than what he showed. There aren't any good scenarios for him:

There is a lot more to this story than what has been brought to light. I don't think anyone can jump to conclusions without being DIRECTLY involved

I mean, remember that huge KONY 2012 campaign that went on a few years ago that pulled 101 Million views on youtube... Didn't "the media" say that the organizer of that campaign "went crazy...."

Character assassination baby. This is your Democracy
 

[x13]

I do believe that he has something to do with Bitcoin. Probably he is one part of the group behind Satoshi Nakamoto. But why did he do this step to go public without wanting to present a bombproof way to prove he is Satoshi? He is smart enough to know that he would get attention and a broad publicity.

[adamskona]

He is the inventor of the Blockchain and Bitcoin. He has "signed a message" and confirmed this, but yet the character assassination continues

Gimme a minute, let me take my popcorn and listen to you explain how he "signed the message". We all can sign the message too, which part of technicality do you not understand?

Yeah, but Gavin won't tell you're Satoshi so it's not true...