truckinusa (OP)
|
|
May 08, 2016, 04:29:07 PM |
|
got this email today:
To our valued customers ,
As of May 4, 2016 Spondoolies-tech has ceased operations.
It has been a great privilege to serve the Bitcoin mining community and especially our customers. We deeply appreciate the support and faith that you have placed in us and wish you success in your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Guy Corem CEO Spondoolies-tech
|
|
|
|
IanFoxley
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 08, 2016, 04:37:36 PM |
|
got this email today:
To our valued customers ,
As of May 4, 2016 Spondoolies-tech has ceased operations.
It has been a great privilege to serve the Bitcoin mining community and especially our customers. We deeply appreciate the support and faith that you have placed in us and wish you success in your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Guy Corem CEO Spondoolies-tech
Looks like it, http://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/news/bitcoin-mining-equipment-producer-spondoolies-dissolved-court/I guess Bitmain and Bitfury were too much for them to compete with in the end.
|
|
|
|
truckinusa (OP)
|
|
May 08, 2016, 04:41:43 PM |
|
I didn't catch the article. Thanks. Looks like we will have to keep our eyes out for the liquidation of any miners that are left?
|
|
|
|
IanQuinn
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
May 08, 2016, 06:17:34 PM |
|
Absolutely no surprise here. The deal with BTCS was not a good for them, but they got in way to deep.
(Received the same email)
|
|
|
|
talks_cheep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 09, 2016, 01:46:04 AM |
|
RIP Spondoolies Tech.
|
|
|
|
VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
|
May 09, 2016, 11:03:37 AM |
|
What a crap article, so much typos. Anyways, i guess this just prove competing with China's cheap labor, parts and manufacture is a hard thing to do.
|
|
|
|
sidehack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3402
Merit: 1864
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
|
|
May 09, 2016, 07:33:19 PM |
|
Well, that sucks. They were about the only ones with respectable customer service.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 8837
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
May 09, 2016, 07:39:15 PM |
|
What a crap article, so much typos. Anyways, i guess this just prove competing with China's cheap labor, parts and manufacture is a hard thing to do.
power costs killed them more then anything else they never could self mine to off set costs
|
|
|
|
notlist3d
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 10, 2016, 02:01:50 AM |
|
What a crap article, so much typos. Anyways, i guess this just prove competing with China's cheap labor, parts and manufacture is a hard thing to do.
power costs killed them more then anything else they never could self mine to off set costs It was also the machines to though. Compare the SP20 and S5 that went head to head. SP20 was metal all the way around they really did not keep material cost down. Then look at S5 they managed to use 2 slabs of plastic and keep cost's down. So there really was a big difference on materials. Bitmain just out designed them on a miner to sell to masses. And SP claimed they lost money trying to compete on price with S5 (we cannot be sure if true). But I do agree on power to if they would have self mined at less power costs... they might have been able to stay around much longer.
|
|
|
|
talks_cheep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 11, 2016, 02:14:25 AM |
|
What a crap article, so much typos. Anyways, i guess this just prove competing with China's cheap labor, parts and manufacture is a hard thing to do.
power costs killed them more then anything else they never could self mine to off set costs It was also the machines to though. Compare the SP20 and S5 that went head to head. SP20 was metal all the way around they really did not keep material cost down. Then look at S5 they managed to use 2 slabs of plastic and keep cost's down. So there really was a big difference on materials. Bitmain just out designed them on a miner to sell to masses. And SP claimed they lost money trying to compete on price with S5 (we cannot be sure if true). But I do agree on power to if they would have self mined at less power costs... they might have been able to stay around much longer. "Bitmain just out designed them" Really??? You mean, Bitmain beat them by cutting corners and lowering the price. Design-wise Spondoolies SP20 was miles ahead of Bitmain S5. SP20 is an elegant piece of hardware, S5 is a junk in comparison. Bitmain just does NOT know how to DESIGN anything, they know how to CUT CORNERS for more PROFIT. Bitmain Sux. I'm just so appalled by these pro-Bitmain people on the forum, do they get paid by Bitmain? If not, they must be smoking something. Did I tell you how crappy Bitmain S5/S7 miners are? They sux.
|
|
|
|
scyth3
|
|
May 11, 2016, 06:04:00 AM |
|
What a crap article, so much typos. Anyways, i guess this just prove competing with China's cheap labor, parts and manufacture is a hard thing to do.
power costs killed them more then anything else they never could self mine to off set costs It was also the machines to though. Compare the SP20 and S5 that went head to head. SP20 was metal all the way around they really did not keep material cost down. Then look at S5 they managed to use 2 slabs of plastic and keep cost's down. So there really was a big difference on materials. Bitmain just out designed them on a miner to sell to masses. And SP claimed they lost money trying to compete on price with S5 (we cannot be sure if true). But I do agree on power to if they would have self mined at less power costs... they might have been able to stay around much longer. "Bitmain just out designed them" Really??? You mean, Bitmain beat them by cutting corners and lowering the price. Design-wise Spondoolies SP20 was miles ahead of Bitmain S5. SP20 is an elegant piece of hardware, S5 is a junk in comparison. Bitmain just does NOT know how to DESIGN anything, they know how to CUT CORNERS for more PROFIT. Bitmain Sux. I'm just so appalled by these pro-Bitmain people on the forum, do they get paid by Bitmain? If not, they must be smoking something. Did I tell you how crappy Bitmain S5/S7 miners are? They sux. Bitmain suxed all the way to the bank
|
|
|
|
notlist3d
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 11, 2016, 01:26:51 PM Last edit: May 11, 2016, 01:44:06 PM by notlist3d |
|
What a crap article, so much typos. Anyways, i guess this just prove competing with China's cheap labor, parts and manufacture is a hard thing to do.
power costs killed them more then anything else they never could self mine to off set costs It was also the machines to though. Compare the SP20 and S5 that went head to head. SP20 was metal all the way around they really did not keep material cost down. Then look at S5 they managed to use 2 slabs of plastic and keep cost's down. So there really was a big difference on materials. Bitmain just out designed them on a miner to sell to masses. And SP claimed they lost money trying to compete on price with S5 (we cannot be sure if true). But I do agree on power to if they would have self mined at less power costs... they might have been able to stay around much longer. "Bitmain just out designed them" Really??? You mean, Bitmain beat them by cutting corners and lowering the price. Design-wise Spondoolies SP20 was miles ahead of Bitmain S5. SP20 is an elegant piece of hardware, S5 is a junk in comparison. Bitmain just does NOT know how to DESIGN anything, they know how to CUT CORNERS for more PROFIT. Bitmain Sux. I'm just so appalled by these pro-Bitmain people on the forum, do they get paid by Bitmain? If not, they must be smoking something. Did I tell you how crappy Bitmain S5/S7 miners are? They sux. I'm not saying the SP20 was not a nice miner, I did like it. But the all metal design and cost of making SP claimed to sell it at loss at end when trying to compete with bitmain on price. So the "elegant piece of hardware" people did not care a much for a getting most hash for their money. People went with the lower cost solution the S5. I think designing out deigned them by offering a lower price solution with S5. You could consider it out producing them vs out deigning them. Either way though Bitmain won and SP lost. You talk so bad on miners and seem to make up things to. I'm still waiting on you to backup claims of: S7 is a fire hazard, especially in hot climate like India. Many of the S7 owners risk burning down their houses. This will be a front page news in many countries around the world: "Bitcoin miner burns house down!"
Where are stories of S7's burning down houses?
|
|
|
|
Erumara
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
I mine because math
|
|
May 11, 2016, 03:42:50 PM |
|
What a crap article, so much typos. Anyways, i guess this just prove competing with China's cheap labor, parts and manufacture is a hard thing to do.
power costs killed them more then anything else they never could self mine to off set costs It was also the machines to though. Compare the SP20 and S5 that went head to head. SP20 was metal all the way around they really did not keep material cost down. Then look at S5 they managed to use 2 slabs of plastic and keep cost's down. So there really was a big difference on materials. Bitmain just out designed them on a miner to sell to masses. And SP claimed they lost money trying to compete on price with S5 (we cannot be sure if true). But I do agree on power to if they would have self mined at less power costs... they might have been able to stay around much longer. "Bitmain just out designed them" Really??? You mean, Bitmain beat them by cutting corners and lowering the price. Design-wise Spondoolies SP20 was miles ahead of Bitmain S5. SP20 is an elegant piece of hardware, S5 is a junk in comparison. Bitmain just does NOT know how to DESIGN anything, they know how to CUT CORNERS for more PROFIT. Bitmain Sux. I'm just so appalled by these pro-Bitmain people on the forum, do they get paid by Bitmain? If not, they must be smoking something. Did I tell you how crappy Bitmain S5/S7 miners are? They sux. To say that Bitmain's miners are subpar is fair, you can't for a second deny the fact that building things cheap and en masse is China in a nutshell. You've failed to consider the fact that in terms of price/reliability/efficiency they are fantastic (not perfect). You're arguing that "Spondoolie makes far superior miners" yet here they are, out of business, almost certainly due to refusing to "cut corners" as you put it. Guess what, when your competition comes out with a cheaper, mass produced product and drives you out of business; THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF CAPITALISM! Just look at the f**king Iphone! A cheap, poorly made imitation product mass produced by nearly slave labor that holds a huge chunk of the market FOR THOSE PRECISE REASONS! I have two family members who scoff anytime Bitcoin is mentioned because "China owns 70% of Bitcoin". THIS FACT MAKES PERFECT SENSE! China has 1bn people and some of the most restrictive currency controls. Of course they're adopting Bitcoin. They have one of if not the best mass-production capability for consumer products especially electronics. Of course they're mass-manufacturing miners. Don't hate China for doing what they do best, don't even hate the USA or EU for NOT being the manufacturers, your livable wages and quality of life are the price you pay for your country not being able to compete with them. Whether that's good or bad is a pointless debate. In any case I'm agreeing with notlist3d, you have made accusations regarding s7's causing house fires which is absolute nonsense. I have (through months of research preparing for my mining rig) come across ZERO incidents regarding a miner fire. I have found a couple incidents regarding electrical fires where miners happened to be the devices pulling the power when the electrical failed, most likely due to poor design or cutting corners. If you have a REAL incident regarding a MINER and NOT THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE causing a fire I would love to review that information. Not that it makes much of a difference because I built a fire-resistant enclosure for my mine because it made all the sense to do so. tl;dr talks_cheep continues to be a hater with nothing to back it up
|
|
|
|
notlist3d
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 11, 2016, 04:14:05 PM |
|
What a crap article, so much typos. Anyways, i guess this just prove competing with China's cheap labor, parts and manufacture is a hard thing to do.
power costs killed them more then anything else they never could self mine to off set costs It was also the machines to though. Compare the SP20 and S5 that went head to head. SP20 was metal all the way around they really did not keep material cost down. Then look at S5 they managed to use 2 slabs of plastic and keep cost's down. So there really was a big difference on materials. Bitmain just out designed them on a miner to sell to masses. And SP claimed they lost money trying to compete on price with S5 (we cannot be sure if true). But I do agree on power to if they would have self mined at less power costs... they might have been able to stay around much longer. "Bitmain just out designed them" Really??? You mean, Bitmain beat them by cutting corners and lowering the price. Design-wise Spondoolies SP20 was miles ahead of Bitmain S5. SP20 is an elegant piece of hardware, S5 is a junk in comparison. Bitmain just does NOT know how to DESIGN anything, they know how to CUT CORNERS for more PROFIT. Bitmain Sux. I'm just so appalled by these pro-Bitmain people on the forum, do they get paid by Bitmain? If not, they must be smoking something. Did I tell you how crappy Bitmain S5/S7 miners are? They sux. To say that Bitmain's miners are subpar is fair, you can't for a second deny the fact that building things cheap and en masse is China in a nutshell. You've failed to consider the fact that in terms of price/reliability/efficiency they are fantastic (not perfect). You're arguing that "Spondoolie makes far superior miners" yet here they are, out of business, almost certainly due to refusing to "cut corners" as you put it. Guess what, when your competition comes out with a cheaper, mass produced product and drives you out of business; THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF CAPITALISM! Just look at the f**king Iphone! A cheap, poorly made imitation product mass produced by nearly slave labor that holds a huge chunk of the market FOR THOSE PRECISE REASONS! I have two family members who scoff anytime Bitcoin is mentioned because "China owns 70% of Bitcoin". THIS FACT MAKES PERFECT SENSE! China has 1bn people and some of the most restrictive currency controls. Of course they're adopting Bitcoin. They have one of if not the best mass-production capability for consumer products especially electronics. Of course they're mass-manufacturing miners. Don't hate China for doing what they do best, don't even hate the USA or EU for NOT being the manufacturers, your livable wages and quality of life are the price you pay for your country not being able to compete with them. Whether that's good or bad is a pointless debate. In any case I'm agreeing with notlist3d, you have made accusations regarding s7's causing house fires which is absolute nonsense. I have (through months of research preparing for my mining rig) come across ZERO incidents regarding a miner fire. I have found a couple incidents regarding electrical fires where miners happened to be the devices pulling the power when the electrical failed, most likely due to poor design or cutting corners. If you have a REAL incident regarding a MINER and NOT THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE causing a fire I would love to review that information. Not that it makes much of a difference because I built a fire-resistant enclosure for my mine because it made all the sense to do so. tl;dr talks_cheep continues to be a hater with nothing to back it up He likely will do like last thread and never come back after being asked for proof. He made a big deal saying S7 burn down houses! But I have not seen a single report on forum of it with S7. I almost feel like hes a troll at this point. The fact is bitmain was able to keep putting out products. People wanted the S5 at lower price per hash then a SP20 with a shinny nice metal case. People spoke with their money. And he mixes S5 and S7 into one... I see them as very different products. And SP had nothing to even compete with S7, so hard to fight for their design when they really were no longer part of the equation.
|
|
|
|
okopipi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2016, 04:45:02 PM |
|
got this email today: To our valued customers ,
As of May 4, 2016 Spondoolies-tech has ceased operations.
It has been a great privilege to serve the Bitcoin mining community and especially our customers. We deeply appreciate the support and faith that you have placed in us and wish you success in your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Guy Corem CEO Spondoolies-tech
It's shame, they were one of best mining hardware companies.
|
|
|
|
VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
|
May 11, 2016, 05:14:32 PM |
|
I wonder what happened with their 110TH/s units. The SP50.
Maybe by the time they sold them, they had devalued too much because their production time could not keep up with our Chinese friends?
|
|
|
|
HerbPean
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 11, 2016, 06:02:03 PM |
|
I wonder what happened with their 110TH/s units. The SP50.
Maybe by the time they sold them, they had devalued too much because their production time could not keep up with our Chinese friends?
I asked Guy if they made the chip ... no answer
|
|
|
|
notlist3d
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 12, 2016, 12:45:05 AM |
|
I wonder what happened with their 110TH/s units. The SP50.
Maybe by the time they sold them, they had devalued too much because their production time could not keep up with our Chinese friends?
I asked Guy if they made the chip ... no answer I think if they had them we would have seen a demo video of them showing it off to try to get more investors/cash. I'm guessing they did not have the chip and had not been working on it for a while (just speculation). Once they heard bitfury's next gen specs... they had to re-evulate sp-50. If they did have something I'm guessing early prototype and did not come close to spec.
|
|
|
|
d57heinz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
|
|
May 15, 2016, 02:16:38 PM Last edit: May 15, 2016, 02:35:27 PM by d57heinz |
|
What a crap article, so much typos. Anyways, i guess this just prove competing with China's cheap labor, parts and manufacture is a hard thing to do.
power costs killed them more then anything else they never could self mine to off set costs It was also the machines to though. Compare the SP20 and S5 that went head to head. SP20 was metal all the way around they really did not keep material cost down. Then look at S5 they managed to use 2 slabs of plastic and keep cost's down. So there really was a big difference on materials. Bitmain just out designed them on a miner to sell to masses. And SP claimed they lost money trying to compete on price with S5 (we cannot be sure if true). But I do agree on power to if they would have self mined at less power costs... they might have been able to stay around much longer. "Bitmain just out designed them" Really??? You mean, Bitmain beat them by cutting corners and lowering the price. Design-wise Spondoolies SP20 was miles ahead of Bitmain S5. SP20 is an elegant piece of hardware, S5 is a junk in comparison. Bitmain just does NOT know how to DESIGN anything, they know how to CUT CORNERS for more PROFIT. Bitmain Sux. I'm just so appalled by these pro-Bitmain people on the forum, do they get paid by Bitmain? If not, they must be smoking something. Did I tell you how crappy Bitmain S5/S7 miners are? They sux. To say that Bitmain's miners are subpar is fair, you can't for a second deny the fact that building things cheap and en masse is China in a nutshell. You've failed to consider the fact that in terms of price/reliability/efficiency they are fantastic (not perfect). You're arguing that "Spondoolie makes far superior miners" yet here they are, out of business, almost certainly due to refusing to "cut corners" as you put it. Guess what, when your competition comes out with a cheaper, mass produced product and drives you out of business; THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF CAPITALISM! Just look at the f**king Iphone! A cheap, poorly made imitation product mass produced by nearly slave labor that holds a huge chunk of the market FOR THOSE PRECISE REASONS! I have two family members who scoff anytime Bitcoin is mentioned because "China owns 70% of Bitcoin". THIS FACT MAKES PERFECT SENSE! China has 1bn people and some of the most restrictive currency controls. Of course they're adopting Bitcoin. They have one of if not the best mass-production capability for consumer products especially electronics. Of course they're mass-manufacturing miners. Don't hate China for doing what they do best, don't even hate the USA or EU for NOT being the manufacturers, your livable wages and quality of life are the price you pay for your country not being able to compete with them. Whether that's good or bad is a pointless debate. In any case I'm agreeing with notlist3d, you have made accusations regarding s7's causing house fires which is absolute nonsense. I have (through months of research preparing for my mining rig) come across ZERO incidents regarding a miner fire. I have found a couple incidents regarding electrical fires where miners happened to be the devices pulling the power when the electrical failed, most likely due to poor design or cutting corners. If you have a REAL incident regarding a MINER and NOT THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE causing a fire I would love to review that information. Not that it makes much of a difference because I built a fire-resistant enclosure for my mine because it made all the sense to do so. tl;dr talks_cheep continues to be a hater with nothing to back it up Not to back up talks cheep. but this was just posted int he bitmain thread.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1165628.msg14821437#msg14821437 also its not uncommon the s5 went total nuclear meltdown.. And i was the first to report the psu burning up in the s4.. So to be naive of bitmain track record falls on you.. Noone else. i find it also naive to blame that one on the user since it was load balanced. There are safer ways to put power to these rigs.. We all know from running these over long periods of time the pcie get "loose" Bitmain knows it been a problem since s1 days. Do we really think they care if they burn down our house?. They had to know that sending out a psu rated at 1400 watts at 240 volts wouldnt work worth a fuck at 120 volts for the s4's. Of course the amount they gained in mined bitcoins from all the hw down time, im sure far exceeded the amount they had to spend sending out new psu. Now we have the issue with the pic controllers magically failing on the s7. Id say there is a pattern there. BEst Regards d57heinz
|
As in nature, all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry, alternating currents - electric wave motion - will have the sway. ~Nikola Tesla~
|
|
|
notlist3d
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 15, 2016, 02:27:15 PM |
|
What a crap article, so much typos. Anyways, i guess this just prove competing with China's cheap labor, parts and manufacture is a hard thing to do.
power costs killed them more then anything else they never could self mine to off set costs It was also the machines to though. Compare the SP20 and S5 that went head to head. SP20 was metal all the way around they really did not keep material cost down. Then look at S5 they managed to use 2 slabs of plastic and keep cost's down. So there really was a big difference on materials. Bitmain just out designed them on a miner to sell to masses. And SP claimed they lost money trying to compete on price with S5 (we cannot be sure if true). But I do agree on power to if they would have self mined at less power costs... they might have been able to stay around much longer. "Bitmain just out designed them" Really??? You mean, Bitmain beat them by cutting corners and lowering the price. Design-wise Spondoolies SP20 was miles ahead of Bitmain S5. SP20 is an elegant piece of hardware, S5 is a junk in comparison. Bitmain just does NOT know how to DESIGN anything, they know how to CUT CORNERS for more PROFIT. Bitmain Sux. I'm just so appalled by these pro-Bitmain people on the forum, do they get paid by Bitmain? If not, they must be smoking something. Did I tell you how crappy Bitmain S5/S7 miners are? They sux. To say that Bitmain's miners are subpar is fair, you can't for a second deny the fact that building things cheap and en masse is China in a nutshell. You've failed to consider the fact that in terms of price/reliability/efficiency they are fantastic (not perfect). You're arguing that "Spondoolie makes far superior miners" yet here they are, out of business, almost certainly due to refusing to "cut corners" as you put it. Guess what, when your competition comes out with a cheaper, mass produced product and drives you out of business; THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF CAPITALISM! Just look at the f**king Iphone! A cheap, poorly made imitation product mass produced by nearly slave labor that holds a huge chunk of the market FOR THOSE PRECISE REASONS! I have two family members who scoff anytime Bitcoin is mentioned because "China owns 70% of Bitcoin". THIS FACT MAKES PERFECT SENSE! China has 1bn people and some of the most restrictive currency controls. Of course they're adopting Bitcoin. They have one of if not the best mass-production capability for consumer products especially electronics. Of course they're mass-manufacturing miners. Don't hate China for doing what they do best, don't even hate the USA or EU for NOT being the manufacturers, your livable wages and quality of life are the price you pay for your country not being able to compete with them. Whether that's good or bad is a pointless debate. In any case I'm agreeing with notlist3d, you have made accusations regarding s7's causing house fires which is absolute nonsense. I have (through months of research preparing for my mining rig) come across ZERO incidents regarding a miner fire. I have found a couple incidents regarding electrical fires where miners happened to be the devices pulling the power when the electrical failed, most likely due to poor design or cutting corners. If you have a REAL incident regarding a MINER and NOT THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE causing a fire I would love to review that information. Not that it makes much of a difference because I built a fire-resistant enclosure for my mine because it made all the sense to do so. tl;dr talks_cheep continues to be a hater with nothing to back it up Not to back up talks cheep. but this was just posted int he bitmain thread.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1165628.msg14821437#msg14821437 also its not uncommon the s5 went total nuclear meltdown.. And i was the first to report the psu burning up in the s4.. So to be naive of bitmain track record falls on you.. Noone else. BEst Regards d57heinz There is no story behind that miner though. I would love to hear what happened what PSU was used, etc. Just no info there. You mention other models talks cheap specifically said: S7 is a fire hazard, especially in hot climate like India. Many of the S7 owners risk burning down their houses. This will be a front page news in many countries around the world: "Bitcoin miner burns house down!"
Find one claim of a S7 burning down a house.... I just have not seen it.
|
|
|
|
|