Monero ICO

[prettybuds]

I think now that Monero has flopped they could consider relaunching the network with an ICO

I mean like LISK and etc is doing, just use an existing project (in Monero's case Monero, in Lisk's case Crypti), and relaunch it with an ICO to work on the unfinished product.

That means Monero devs can attract a lot of funds and then finally finish the GUI etc

what say you,  folks?

[1715543995]

1715543995

[1715543995]

1715543995

[1715543995]

1715543995

[1715543995]

1715543995

[Macrochip]

Ehehah aha, WHAT?!

[bathrobehero]

I have no words.

[mightyghz]

I think now that Monero has flopped they could consider relaunching the network with an ICO

I mean like LISK and etc is doing, just use an existing project (in Monero's case Monero, in Lisk's case Crypti), and relaunch it with an ICO to work on the unfinished product.

That means Monero devs can attract a lot of funds and then finally finish the GUI etc

what say you,  folks?

Monero is a great coin! I believe it will succeed when devs finished his product;
change the rules of distribution!?? I think it's bad for the ideology of cryptocurrency or opensource.

[cryptoheadd]

I think now that Monero has flopped they could consider relaunching the network with an ICO

I mean like LISK and etc is doing, just use an existing project (in Monero's case Monero, in Lisk's case Crypti), and relaunch it with an ICO to work on the unfinished product.

That means Monero devs can attract a lot of funds and then finally finish the GUI etc

what say you,  folks?

Are you talking about a Swap with an ICO?   

[prettybuds]

I think now that Monero has flopped they could consider relaunching the network with an ICO

I mean like LISK and etc is doing, just use an existing project (in Monero's case Monero, in Lisk's case Crypti), and relaunch it with an ICO to work on the unfinished product.

That means Monero devs can attract a lot of funds and then finally finish the GUI etc

what say you,  folks?

Are you talking about a Swap with an ICO?  

Actually I mean just like LISK is doing now. Close the old project (Crypti), offer some bonus for Crypti holders in the ICO. Reopen with the same code, edit/revise/finish it with the help of the ICO funds.
Monero can close the old chain and issue the ICO. Old Monero holders can exchange their coins for the new Monero.
This way Monero devs can revive Monero, and gain the funds necessary to finish the GUI and other important stuff that's been neglected.

 

[enjoyingthesunonmybalcony]

Very good idea! This way Monero can attract real users!

I heard Monero only has about 50-100 active users at the moment? Is this really the case?

[generalizethis]

I think now that Monero has flopped they could consider relaunching the network with an ICO

I mean like LISK and etc is doing, just use an existing project (in Monero's case Monero, in Lisk's case Crypti), and relaunch it with an ICO to work on the unfinished product.

That means Monero devs can attract a lot of funds and then finally finish the GUI etc

what say you,  folks?

Are you talking about a Swap with an ICO?  

Actually I mean just like LISK is doing now. Close the old project (Crypti), offer some bonus for Crypti holders in the ICO. Reopen with the same code, edit/revise/finish it with the help of the ICO funds.
Monero can close the old chain and issue the ICO. Old Monero holders can exchange their coins for the new Monero.
This way Monero devs can revive Monero, and gain the funds necessary to finish the GUI and other important stuff that's been neglected.

 

You know you're trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist? You can follow the progress with the following links:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=753252.msg14830769#msg14830769

The presumption that throwing money or people at technical problems misses that bigger or more isn't always better--especially with complex programs that hinge on separate parts working seamlessly together. Or maybe a million monkeys could actually write Hamlet.

Though it seems pretty unlikely: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem

[underhyped]

I want to invest!
When will the ICO open
How long will it run
Thanks

[smooth]

Actually I mean just like LISK is doing now.

Monero is doing fine, near peak market cap after two years (a peer group you can count on one hand easily), good liquidity, etc. Just as it has outlasted countless temporariy-hot ICO, etc. projects that allegedly had better ways to pay for development, it will likely outlast LISK as well.

Furthermore, unlike projects such as Crypti, no one could "close the project" even if they wanted to. You would have to convince literally 100% of the developers and community members -- something that isn't ever going to happen -- otherwise the project would continue. A good example here is Dashcoin, which Evan Duffield tried to buy and close, only to have the project switch repos and continue.

I would guess these two observations are not unrelated. A good test as to whether a supposedly decentralized cryptocurrency is worth giving any attention at all is to consider whether it would be plausible for someone to close it down.

[noah tall]

here is Dashcoin, which Evan Duffield tried to buy and close, only to have the project switch repos and continue.

Yeah, what a success story

[smooth]

here is Dashcoin, which Evan Duffield tried to buy and close, only to have the project switch repos and continue.

Yeah, what a success story

You're missing the the point: It couldn't be shut down like Crypti, just because the developer(s) wanted to cash in.

(BTW, while it's obviously a small coin and mocking or bullying it based on size is pretty pathetic, its value is higher than it was before the shutdown attempt.)

[BitcoinNational]

monerICO

ICO are already a dirty word ... come fall ICO will be a stinkin dirty filthy word

---
the point is most of the ICOs are vaporware products;
bleeding edge tech; unfinished junk;
the future of the 'smart 2.0' genre is going to be alot like the 'anon' boondoggle
(and yes Monero stands as the most legitimate in the field after the dust has settled)
((yet it too is still 'unfinished' beta))

mean while outside the crypto babble;
the general public will still favor: BTC, LTC, DOGE, and products that are identical to them say UNO
this will go on for years before they even attempt to understand some of the more exotic flavors.

[GingerAle]

Very good idea! This way Monero can attract real users!

I heard Monero only has about 50-100 active users at the moment? Is this really the case?

You may be referring to my recent analysis of node count, but nodes are not a good measure of active users. Does every bitcoin user run a node? No.

Should they? Thats a different question

And for what its worth, one interpretation of how things have played out is that the ICO is going on RIGHT NOW. Its been going on for 2 years, and it has about another 2 years until you could consider the ICO phase over. But who knows what the markets will do.

[arielbit]

here is Dashcoin, which Evan Duffield tried to buy and close, only to have the project switch repos and continue.

Yeah, what a success story

it is a success since DSH Dashcoin is still a pain your asses you darkcoiners 

[JosNekoKopa]

I don't get it why people still trying to glorify ICO projects and in their mission they attacking good old coins? Monero is giant and will have its time! I will collect as more as i can while price dont skyrocket. Monero alredy proved that have best developers-ever!

[robelneo]

I think now that Monero has flopped they could consider relaunching the network with an ICO

I mean like LISK and etc is doing, just use an existing project (in Monero's case Monero, in Lisk's case Crypti), and relaunch it with an ICO to work on the unfinished product.

That means Monero devs can attract a lot of funds and then finally finish the GUI etc

what say you,  folks?

Are you talking about a Swap with an ICO?  

Actually I mean just like LISK is doing now. Close the old project (Crypti), offer some bonus for Crypti holders in the ICO. Reopen with the same code, edit/revise/finish it with the help of the ICO funds.
Monero can close the old chain and issue the ICO. Old Monero holders can exchange their coins for the new Monero.
This way Monero devs can revive Monero, and gain the funds necessary to finish the GUI and other important stuff that's been neglected.

 

Sounds like a good idea it could bring Monero to a new greater height but if ever they are going to do that they should be very transparent and they also need the consensus of the community..

[Shrikez]

The trolling attempts are becoming weaker by the hour...

[klarki]

We must look for something better than ICO
You watch what ICO has become now? In a simple deception of participants ...

[prettybuds]

The trolling attempts are becoming weaker by the hour...

For your instance, I wasn't trolling at all.