Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2019, 08:02:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 [131] 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 ... 512 »
  Print  
Author Topic: WINGS ★ Where DAO Unicorns Are Born! ★ Token launched!  (Read 510710 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (2 posts by 1 user deleted.)
luckylucky
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 06:39:20 PM
 #2601

how the bounty wings, Has it been distributed to the participants?

When will egg exchange come online?

I think it will be days before ICO ends. Somewhere between Jan 2 and 6 2017

We will enable claiming Wings tokens with Eggs after Nov 27th.

The Wings tokens campaign will be concluded on January 6th.

As the dev said after Nov 27th Eggs redeeming wings token will be enable.
Good news for participants to claim their bounty on the 27th, I think it would be great and view them later when completed ICO and launch
1560715320
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560715320

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560715320
Reply with quote  #2

1560715320
Report to moderator
1560715320
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560715320

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560715320
Reply with quote  #2

1560715320
Report to moderator
1560715320
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560715320

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560715320
Reply with quote  #2

1560715320
Report to moderator
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
MoneyJ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 504


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 10:47:46 PM
 #2602

how the bounty wings, Has it been distributed to the participants?

When will egg exchange come online?

I think it will be days before ICO ends. Somewhere between Jan 2 and 6 2017

We will enable claiming Wings tokens with Eggs after Nov 27th.

The Wings tokens campaign will be concluded on January 6th.

As the dev said after Nov 27th Eggs redeeming wings token will be enable.
Good news for participants to claim their bounty on the 27th, I think it would be great and view them later when completed ICO and launch

It was indicated after Nov 27 so meaning you can redeeem eggs by 28 and onward.
Revelations86
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429
Merit: 252


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 02:03:58 AM
 #2603

I have invested in the ICO, but I am getting pretty worried. Someone told me this:

1. several issues besides the growing bubble around icos...
2. wings has engineered their "twitter presence" i.e., bought followers and rts.
3. the use of "donation" heavily...
4. the idea sucks in general.
5. the creators of the platform cannot be identified save for their social media marketer.

I countered them with Wings' rating on ICOrating website.

Do we have answers to this negative list to get the ICO moving?

1 - Wings was especially designed to bring back order, transparency and community control in the chaotic ecosystem of crypto crowdfunding, by focusing the community attention via forecast markets on quality projects high potential preposition and public teams.

2 - We offered bounty for joining our twitter, this is a standard method all companies (mainstream as well) are doing, promoting their social presence in exchange for various perks. The nouncy campaign has followed among these lines as well.

3 - Wings token campaign was specifically designed as a donation based one, In order to be the first legal and regulatory compliant (goo.gl/k8N654) crypto-crowdfunding platform. Ethereum actually established this pattern, and other recent projects have followed it as well.

4 - As you correctly mentioned, people are welcome to read the latest review by ICOrating, where we got one of the highest ratings - http://icorating.com/project/12/Wings
That said we always welcome any constructive critique, and in fact improving the product design following the feedback we are constantly receiving.

5 - We are very public, and had our team members traveling the world extensively during the last few months (USA, China, Swiss, UK, Russia, Argentina and more).
Here are some of our team recorded public presentations, meet-ups and interviews:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZQ2LV_pYBHctbyx5ScdASg

This guys is full of shit.  If you don't see how much of a scam this whole campaign is, then you deserve to lose all your money.  There are no legal and regulatory laws preventing any company from having legitimate investors. If they really are confident in their product, then they shouldn't have any issue with calling investors what they are (or are they too scared to have REAL obligations to deliver). Investors clearly understand the risks of investing, but calling them "donators" is just pretty much robbing you in broad daylight.  Which company out there calls people "donators"??   You buy a stock of a company, you are an investor and shareholder flat out.  When Facebook, Twitter and Google conducted their IPOs, did they ask for "donations".

This scheme brings into mind Synerio AMPs where Dor Konforty ran with the same "donation" scam and fucked over all his "donators" when they lost more than 70% of what they put in before they even got their coins.  Guys, please wake up.  You have a snake oil salesman who is pretty much selling you snake oil and not even hiding the fact that its snake oil.   Do not "donate" to this fucker who will steal your money.  These guys (and I believe many are ex crypti) are all part of the same developer cartels that copy, develop, pump and dump the coins that you won't hear about in a years time.   Just look at what happened with Lisk, the DAO, and Synerio AMPs.

As a person who has been burnt before,  I am strongly urging anyone who is reading this to not "donate" money to these thieves.   The red flags are all there, "Donations", ex crypty folks, bribing people to post fake twitter posts to hype this product.  This is a clear SCAM.  A true company would not hide from calling people that fund it with their hard earned money investors and does not need to bribe people to create fake twitter hype.  I cannot begin to emphasize how much this has SCAM written all over it.

skrtel37
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 480
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 09:23:18 AM
 #2604


Cant understand how projects like Golem with no PR or practical product raise 8.5 M$ in 20 minutes and a project like Wings with its vast cover and long ago work, raises only 1 MB in 10 days....
V1saya
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 507


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 09:31:40 AM
 #2605


Cant understand how projects like Golem with no PR or practical product raise 8.5 M$ in 20 minutes and a project like Wings with its vast cover and long ago work, raises only 1 MB in 10 days....

Maybe they already have some funds or certain prospects but not enough for their cap target reason why they made an ICO. It looks good and impressive. I can see others will follow. Anyway people are still expecting Wings to reach at high amounts as there is still so much time left.
Revelations86
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429
Merit: 252


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 10:58:19 AM
 #2606


Cant understand how projects like Golem with no PR or practical product raise 8.5 M$ in 20 minutes and a project like Wings with its vast cover and long ago work, raises only 1 MB in 10 days....

Perhaps people see glaring red flags and are avoiding it like the plague  Smiley  The biggest red flag of them all is as many people here have correctly voiced concern about- The team's  incessant  use of "donation" plastered in all of their marketing and on their site that is making people uneasy about "donating" lol.  Let's put our rationale caps on, would you go in and buy a car or a TV or invest in a stock, where the salesperson tells you that the funds you are paying the company are "donations" to them??  No one in their rationale mind would make such a purchase or investment.   Merriam Webster defines donation as "free contribution".  They are pretty much flat out telling you whatever you're giving them is a free contribution with no expectation of anything in return.   Additionally, they also flat out admitted that have been bribing people to create twitter hype.  Contrary to them claiming this is the norm, this is actually not true. Let's take a look at ICONOMI. This is straight from their site:  ICONOMI provides an opportunity for investors looking for high profits, not possible in the old economy. With newly developed financial instruments, ICONOMI will drive new investors and fresh capital into decentralised economy.  

I implore people to put  2 and 2 together and see this for the scam it is.  The other coin to make a big use of "donation" is Synerio AMPs and the donators lost 70% off the bat after the insiders dumped immediately after the ICO was over.  History tends to repeat itself and people are cautioned not to donate on the basis that Wings folks (who are ex crypti and you see how well that worked) themselves are flat out telling you that whatever you give them is a free contribution.   Please buy this snake oil which is only snake oil and won't do anything for you.  C'mon, they're freaking telling you flat out its a scam!

crazydeadmoth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 11:32:20 AM
 #2607

I have invested in the ICO, but I am getting pretty worried. Someone told me this:

1. several issues besides the growing bubble around icos...
2. wings has engineered their "twitter presence" i.e., bought followers and rts.
3. the use of "donation" heavily...
4. the idea sucks in general.
5. the creators of the platform cannot be identified save for their social media marketer.

I countered them with Wings' rating on ICOrating website.

Do we have answers to this negative list to get the ICO moving?

1 - Wings was especially designed to bring back order, transparency and community control in the chaotic ecosystem of crypto crowdfunding, by focusing the community attention via forecast markets on quality projects high potential preposition and public teams.

2 - We offered bounty for joining our twitter, this is a standard method all companies (mainstream as well) are doing, promoting their social presence in exchange for various perks. The nouncy campaign has followed among these lines as well.

3 - Wings token campaign was specifically designed as a donation based one, In order to be the first legal and regulatory compliant (goo.gl/k8N654) crypto-crowdfunding platform. Ethereum actually established this pattern, and other recent projects have followed it as well.

4 - As you correctly mentioned, people are welcome to read the latest review by ICOrating, where we got one of the highest ratings - http://icorating.com/project/12/Wings
That said we always welcome any constructive critique, and in fact improving the product design following the feedback we are constantly receiving.

5 - We are very public, and had our team members traveling the world extensively during the last few months (USA, China, Swiss, UK, Russia, Argentina and more).
Here are some of our team recorded public presentations, meet-ups and interviews:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZQ2LV_pYBHctbyx5ScdASg

This guys is full of shit.  If you don't see how much of a scam this whole campaign is, then you deserve to lose all your money.  There are no legal and regulatory laws preventing any company from having legitimate investors. If they really are confident in their product, then they shouldn't have any issue with calling investors what they are (or are they too scared to have REAL obligations to deliver). Investors clearly understand the risks of investing, but calling them "donators" is just pretty much robbing you in broad daylight.  Which company out there calls people "donators"??   You buy a stock of a company, you are an investor and shareholder flat out.  When Facebook, Twitter and Google conducted their IPOs, did they ask for "donations".

This scheme brings into mind Synerio AMPs where Dor Konforty ran with the same "donation" scam and fucked over all his "donators" when they lost more than 70% of what they put in before they even got their coins.  Guys, please wake up.  You have a snake oil salesman who is pretty much selling you snake oil and not even hiding the fact that its snake oil.   Do not "donate" to this fucker who will steal your money.  These guys (and I believe many are ex crypti) are all part of the same developer cartels that copy, develop, pump and dump the coins that you won't hear about in a years time.   Just look at what happened with Lisk, the DAO, and Synerio AMPs.

As a person who has been burnt before,  I am strongly urging anyone who is reading this to not "donate" money to these thieves.   The red flags are all there, "Donations", ex crypty folks, bribing people to post fake twitter posts to hype this product.  This is a clear SCAM.  A true company would not hide from calling people that fund it with their hard earned money investors and does not need to bribe people to create fake twitter hype.  I cannot begin to emphasize how much this has SCAM written all over it.


Donation means give away, they don't care about people lose or earn from ICO, especially AMP. I wish Wings is legit, but there were too many local spammers in this campaign, so they need to eliminate all the spammers.
skrtel37
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 480
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 11:42:38 AM
 #2608


Cant understand how projects like Golem with no PR or practical product raise 8.5 M$ in 20 minutes and a project like Wings with its vast cover and long ago work, raises only 1 MB in 10 days....

Perhaps people see glaring red flags and are avoiding it like the plague  Smiley  The biggest red flag of them all is as many people here have correctly voiced concern about- The team's  incessant  use of "donation" plastered in all of their marketing and on their site that is making people uneasy about "donating" lol.  Let's put our rationale caps on, would you go in and buy a car or a TV or invest in a stock, where the salesperson tells you that the funds you are paying the company are "donations" to them??  No one in their rationale mind would make such a purchase or investment.   Merriam Webster defines donation as "free contribution".  They are pretty much flat out telling you whatever you're giving them is a free contribution with no expectation of anything in return.   Additionally, they also flat out admitted that have been bribing people to create twitter hype.  Contrary to them claiming this is the norm, this is actually not true. Let's take a look at ICONOMI. This is straight from their site:  ICONOMI provides an opportunity for investors looking for high profits, not possible in the old economy. With newly developed financial instruments, ICONOMI will drive new investors and fresh capital into decentralised economy.  

I implore people to put  2 and 2 together and see this for the scam it is.  The other coin to make a big use of "donation" is Synerio AMPs and the donators lost 70% off the bat after the insiders dumped immediately after the ICO was over.  History tends to repeat itself and people are cautioned not to donate on the basis that Wings folks (who are ex crypti and you see how well that worked) themselves are flat out telling you that whatever you give them is a free contribution.   Please buy this snake oil which is only snake oil and won't do anything for you.  C'mon, they're freaking telling you flat out its a scam!



Knowing personally both the people behind AMP and Wings I'll say there is nothing alike between those two projects....AMP lead man is well know for his enthusiasm for personal gain...that's not the deal with wings guys ill tell you that...
Stating investing as donating may not be the smartest thing to do but shouldn't be the reason not to invest here...
wings.ai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 501


Community policed, priced and promoted ICOs on Eth


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2016, 12:09:35 PM
Last edit: November 27, 2016, 12:21:40 PM by wings.ai
 #2609

This guys is full of shit.  If you don't see how much of a scam this whole campaign is, then you deserve to lose all your money.  

It appears that you have something personal against our project or / and team, otherwise I find it hard to explain how you mixed so much negativity into a single post. Still, you took the time to raise your concerns in public, and we feel obliged to answer on them.

There are no legal and regulatory laws preventing any company from having legitimate investors. If they really are confident in their product, then they shouldn't have any issue with calling investors what they are (or are they too scared to have REAL obligations to deliver). Investors clearly understand the risks of investing, but calling them "donators" is just pretty much robbing you in broad daylight.  Which company out there calls people "donators"??   You buy a stock of a company, you are an investor and shareholder flat out.  When Facebook, Twitter and Google conducted their IPOs, did they ask for "donations".

You really should look into SEC regulations including Howey test for unregistered securities, and how SEC can pursue any company worldwide that has even a single US based investor, before posting such statements. Rather than rushing into ICO (which we could do as early as June), we spent 5 months deeply studying the subject, including working with one of the leading legal companies, in order to set up the best available structure that will protect us, our users and the companies that will be using Wings. Designating any transaction as a donation is a part of the structure, and it has nothing to do with any of the other reasons that you have mentioned.

For the matter of fact, one of the most successful altcoin projects Ethereum, was also set up as a non-profit foundation (and actually done by the same legal team), would you accuse them as a scam because of that?

This scheme brings into mind Synerio AMPs where Dor Konforty ran with the same "donation" scam and fucked over all his "donators" when they lost more than 70% of what they put in before they even got their coins.  Guys, please wake up.  You have a snake oil salesman who is pretty much selling you snake oil and not even hiding the fact that its snake oil.   Do not "donate" to this fucker who will steal your money.  These guys (and I believe many are ex crypti) are all part of the same developer cartels that copy, develop, pump and dump the coins that you won't hear about in a years time.   Just look at what happened with Lisk, the DAO, and Synerio AMPs.

We don't have any relation whatsoever to Synereo, which also to my best knowledge is a US LLC company, rather than a Swiss non-profit foundation. Same with the DAO, and the only relation to Lisk, is that we shared same team with its founders (Max and Olivier), taking no part in Lisk campaign (beyond supporting Crypti until the transition to Lisk was completed). I'm sorry if you lost any money on these projects, however you really should address these concerns with these project leaders, rather than projecting this experience on us.

It worth emphasizing that one of the main reasons that Wings was established in the first place, was to bring more accountability to the crowd-funded projects, and returning control back to the project backers via DAO mechanics. We hope that once people see the benefit in such control over projects, they will demand from the project creators using Wings or / and similar platforms, in order to make sure the creator sticks to the original commitments, including how many project tokens the creator has access to.
thepo1m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 27, 2016, 12:29:18 PM
 #2610

I have invested in the ICO, but I am getting pretty worried. Someone told me this:

1. several issues besides the growing bubble around icos...
2. wings has engineered their "twitter presence" i.e., bought followers and rts.
3. the use of "donation" heavily...
4. the idea sucks in general.
5. the creators of the platform cannot be identified save for their social media marketer.

I countered them with Wings' rating on ICOrating website.

Do we have answers to this negative list to get the ICO moving?

1 - Wings was especially designed to bring back order, transparency and community control in the chaotic ecosystem of crypto crowdfunding, by focusing the community attention via forecast markets on quality projects high potential preposition and public teams.

2 - We offered bounty for joining our twitter, this is a standard method all companies (mainstream as well) are doing, promoting their social presence in exchange for various perks. The nouncy campaign has followed among these lines as well.

3 - Wings token campaign was specifically designed as a donation based one, In order to be the first legal and regulatory compliant (goo.gl/k8N654) crypto-crowdfunding platform. Ethereum actually established this pattern, and other recent projects have followed it as well.

4 - As you correctly mentioned, people are welcome to read the latest review by ICOrating, where we got one of the highest ratings - http://icorating.com/project/12/Wings
That said we always welcome any constructive critique, and in fact improving the product design following the feedback we are constantly receiving.

5 - We are very public, and had our team members traveling the world extensively during the last few months (USA, China, Swiss, UK, Russia, Argentina and more).
Here are some of our team recorded public presentations, meet-ups and interviews:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZQ2LV_pYBHctbyx5ScdASg

This guys is full of shit.  If you don't see how much of a scam this whole campaign is, then you deserve to lose all your money.  There are no legal and regulatory laws preventing any company from having legitimate investors. If they really are confident in their product, then they shouldn't have any issue with calling investors what they are (or are they too scared to have REAL obligations to deliver). Investors clearly understand the risks of investing, but calling them "donators" is just pretty much robbing you in broad daylight.  Which company out there calls people "donators"??   You buy a stock of a company, you are an investor and shareholder flat out.  When Facebook, Twitter and Google conducted their IPOs, did they ask for "donations".

This scheme brings into mind Synerio AMPs where Dor Konforty ran with the same "donation" scam and fucked over all his "donators" when they lost more than 70% of what they put in before they even got their coins.  Guys, please wake up.  You have a snake oil salesman who is pretty much selling you snake oil and not even hiding the fact that its snake oil.   Do not "donate" to this fucker who will steal your money.  These guys (and I believe many are ex crypti) are all part of the same developer cartels that copy, develop, pump and dump the coins that you won't hear about in a years time.   Just look at what happened with Lisk, the DAO, and Synerio AMPs.

As a person who has been burnt before,  I am strongly urging anyone who is reading this to not "donate" money to these thieves.   The red flags are all there, "Donations", ex crypty folks, bribing people to post fake twitter posts to hype this product.  This is a clear SCAM.  A true company would not hide from calling people that fund it with their hard earned money investors and does not need to bribe people to create fake twitter hype.  I cannot begin to emphasize how much this has SCAM written all over it.



I was shock to see the terms DONATION on their website, I'm 100% certain that most people did not read the terms and conditions and decided to invest blindly, I don't think the so called donors see themselves as donors but investors. I think something needs to be done to protect investors. Can wings team tell me they will go for funding from VCs and will tell them they are not investors but donors.

I think we need people on this forum who can provide legal advice and services to people interested.
wings.ai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 501


Community policed, priced and promoted ICOs on Eth


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2016, 12:48:24 PM
Last edit: November 27, 2016, 01:07:10 PM by wings.ai
 #2611

Perhaps people see glaring red flags and are avoiding it like the plague  Smiley  The biggest red flag of them all is as many people here have correctly voiced concern about- The team's  incessant  use of "donation" plastered in all of their marketing and on their site that is making people uneasy about "donating" lol.  Let's put our rationale caps on, would you go in and buy a car or a TV or invest in a stock, where the salesperson tells you that the funds you are paying the company are "donations" to them??

Speaking of Golem for example, there are also no investor relations with the participants whatsoever, you are welcome to comb through their agreement, and see they giving tokens in exchange for the transactions - exactly as we are doing:
https://golem.network/doc/GNTterms.pdf

However as Wings can be used to launch any kind of projects (possibly nefarious as well), we had to go extra step in order to make sure everyone participating in the project will be completely protected, and designate all activity as a non-profit foundation, sponsored by the community donations.

Additionally, they also flat out admitted that have been bribing people to create twitter hype.  Contrary to them claiming this is the norm, this is actually not true. Let's take a look at ICONOMI. This is straight from their site:  ICONOMI provides an opportunity for investors looking for high profits, not possible in the old economy. With newly developed financial instruments, ICONOMI will drive new investors and fresh capital into decentralised economy.  

Giving incentive (either in form of bounty in crypto area, bonus points in mainstream, etc...) is a common practice to boost project awareness. ICONOMI did exactly the same as well.
Regarding them designating their campaign as investment, we preferred to follow our experienced legal partner advise, especially with the SEC rumored to take interest in ICO's lately.

I implore people to put  2 and 2 together and see this for the scam it is.  The other coin to make a big use of "donation" is Synerio AMPs and the donators lost 70% off the bat after the insiders dumped immediately after the ICO was over.

If you read the Wings Terms of Campaign, you will see that foundation tokens are locked in a vesting-like contract, and will be gradually released over the time, making impossible for any foundation member to sell a large portion of them immediately.
wings.ai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 501


Community policed, priced and promoted ICOs on Eth


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2016, 12:52:37 PM
Last edit: November 27, 2016, 01:08:41 PM by wings.ai
 #2612

I was shock to see the terms DONATION on their website, I'm 100% certain that most people did not read the terms and conditions and decided to invest blindly, I don't think the so called donors see themselves as donors but investors. I think something needs to be done to protect investors. Can wings team tell me they will go for funding from VCs and will tell them they are not investors but donors.

Being a non-profit foundation, Wings will not (and can not) apply to VC capital. We will remain solely community funded.

As stated several times before, we have exactly the same structure (and even the same auditor) as the Ethereum Foundation. In fact, you are welcome to compare the Swiss registrar entries:



This means we are obliged not just to the campaign participants but actually to the Swiss government as well, which expects us to deliver a working product and audits how the collected funds are used. This makes "running" with the money completely impossible.
Regarding the foundation tokens, as it was previous mentioned (and emphasized in Wings Terms of Campaign), they will be locked in a vesting mechanism and be released to foundation members gradually over the time.
disconnectme
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 502


Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 01:41:12 PM
 #2613

We all know the reasons all these guys are running to Switzerland to register the company (called now foundation), they are only going there to protect themselves not the investors. In my country most of if not all corrupt officials have been accused to have Swiss bank accounts because the country allows for some kind of protection for these people. I will appreciate it, if you guys will stop running to Switzerland to register your company. You are just talking novice investors for granted.


Donor: a person who gives money or goods to an organization

Investor: a person who puts money into something in order to make a profit or get an advantage.


Just check the dictionary mean of this two terms. A donor is a giver.

Thank you for giving your Bitcoin to Wings foundation.

           ▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
       ▄████████▀████████▄
    ▄█████████▀   ▀█████████▄
   ████   ▄█▀       ▀█▄   ████
  █████ ▄▀    ▄▄▄▄▄    ▀▄ █████
 ██████▀   ▄███▀▀▀███▄   ▀██████
▐████▀    ██▀       ▀██    ▀████▌
████     ▐██         ██▌     ████
▐████▄    ██▄       ▄██    ▄████▌
 ██████▄   ▀███▄▄▄███▀   ▄██████
  █████ ▀▄    ▀▀▀▀▀    ▄▀ █████
   ████   ▀█▄       ▄█▀   ████
    ▀█████████▄   ▄█████████▀
       ▀████████▄████████▀
           ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀
.Bcnex.The Ultimate   ───2 Millions Orders/s───
Blockchain Trading Platform
..Follow us:..

                          ▄▄▄
                    ▄▄▄██████
              ▄▄▄█████▀▀████▌
        ▄▄▄████████▀ ▄██████
  ▄▄▄██████████▀▀  ▄███████▌
▀███████████▀   ▄██████████
   ▀▀▀███▀    ▄███████████▌
        █▌  ██████████████
        ▐█ ██████████████▌
         █████▀ ▀████████
          ██▀      ▀████▌
                      ▀▀

             ▄████▄▄   ▄
█▄          ██████████▀▄
███        ███████████▀
▐████▄     ██████████▌
▄▄██████▄▄▄▄█████████▌
▀████████████████████
  ▀█████████████████
  ▄▄███████████████
   ▀█████████████▀
    ▄▄█████████▀
▀▀██████████▀
    ▀▀▀▀▀

||
LINKEDIN
MEDIUM
REDDIT


  ▸  BUY NOW  ◂  
wings.ai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 501


Community policed, priced and promoted ICOs on Eth


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2016, 02:18:27 PM
 #2614

We all know the reasons all these guys are running to Switzerland to register the company (called now foundation), they are only going there to protect themselves not the investors. In my country most of if not all corrupt officials have been accused to have Swiss bank accounts because the country allows for some kind of protection for these people. I will appreciate it, if you guys will stop running to Switzerland to register your company. You are just talking novice investors for granted.

Donor: a person who gives money or goods to an organization

You should really check the updated Swiss laws, after all the scandals you have mentioned Swiss got so much pressure, that it basically did a 180 flip and now one of the most transparent countries in the world.
For example:
http://www.taxavoidancestrategy.com/why-former-tax-havens-like-switzerland-and-luxembourg-are-no-longer-tax-havens/

As per the donor definition you brought, the full definition also means that you don't get anything back, while with Wings (and any other crypto projects) you get a trade-able token which may appreciate in value due to the demand created by the platform adoption and the network effect.
royalfestus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 500


HydraX


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 02:24:05 PM
 #2615

If the registration will improve their genuinity, I think it will be safer for investors then. The increase in the number of these ICO is scary and cautions should be made, and stringent measure to reduce scam and failures.

.SIGMA..
by HYDRA X
eTrade Crypto, Stocks, FX and moree
efrom a single trading platform...........
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████▀    ▐███████
███████████    ▄▄█████████
▐██████████▀    ▀▀█████████▌
▐█████████▌       █████████▌
▐███████████    ███████████▌
███████████    ███████████
██████████    ██████████
▀████████▄  ▄████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.No commissions.
.or hidden fees.
eSign Upe


franc0
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


Hire me! Spanish translator and community manager!


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 06:01:00 PM
 #2616

wings.ai can you tell me what is going to happen if the first goal is not reached? What will happen to the less than 5000 btc raised?

Also i still don't understand what will happen to all the money raised (please don't tell me to see roadmap) I don't understand the roadmap, to me is just a bunch of letters that doesn't tell me anything, the last DAO of slock.it that failed, at least all the 100 million dollar there raised was strictly to fund projects of proposals posted by the own DAO members. With your Roadmap is just telling me, first 5000 raised will be for enabling chatbot v1, who cares about chatbot? I don't know why i have the impression that you guys are charging for the technology? Like with 5000 BTC we'll enabling you THIS, Instead of with 5000 BTC the DAO members will have 5000 BTC to decide which proposal(s) they want to fund.

Please enlighten me.

I'm a professional Spanish translator. Projects like WePower, Envion, Atlant, etc. Among others... are part of my portfolio. Hire me or sign me up as a bounty participant for your project!
Kazadar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 27, 2016, 06:07:45 PM
 #2617

wings.ai can you tell me what is going to happen if the first goal is not reached? What will happen to the less than 5000 btc raised?

They have said that they have enough to launch Wings with what they have collected so far.

Now its just a matter of how many features Wings will get.

kalpit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 27, 2016, 06:21:02 PM
 #2618

wings.ai can you tell me what is going to happen if the first goal is not reached? What will happen to the less than 5000 btc raised?

Also i still don't understand what will happen to all the money raised (please don't tell me to see roadmap) I don't understand the roadmap, to me is just a bunch of letters that doesn't tell me anything, the last DAO of slock.it that failed, at least all the 100 million dollar there raised was strictly to fund projects of proposals posted by the own DAO members. With your Roadmap is just telling me, first 5000 raised will be for enabling chatbot v1, who cares about chatbot? I don't know why i have the impression that you guys are charging for the technology? Like with 5000 BTC we'll enabling you THIS, Instead of with 5000 BTC the DAO members will have 5000 BTC to decide which proposal(s) they want to fund.

Please enlighten me.


Chatbots are helpful many times. You don't have to visit website to perform some functions. You can instruct chatbots to perform some functions.

They would be using the money raised for developing the technology.

No, they are not using ico money for funding the proposals. Wings does not fund any proposal. It would be users of wings who would invest in them after Wings Platform is launched.

CRYPTRADE
◉ Decentralized Exchange ◉
✔ Share Profits ✔ CryptradeCoin ✔ High ROI ✔ Masternode ✔ PoS ✔ BTS2.0
 ▼ ANN ▲ Twitter ▼ Discord ▲ Website ▼ Vote ▲ MNO ★﹝CryptoBridge Listed﹞★
wings.ai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 501


Community policed, priced and promoted ICOs on Eth


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2016, 06:41:11 PM
 #2619

wings.ai can you tell me what is going to happen if the first goal is not reached? What will happen to the less than 5000 btc raised?

Also i still don't understand what will happen to all the money raised (please don't tell me to see roadmap) I don't understand the roadmap, to me is just a bunch of letters that doesn't tell me anything, the last DAO of slock.it that failed, at least all the 100 million dollar there raised was strictly to fund projects of proposals posted by the own DAO members. With your Roadmap is just telling me, first 5000 raised will be for enabling chatbot v1, who cares about chatbot? I don't know why i have the impression that you guys are charging for the technology? Like with 5000 BTC we'll enabling you THIS, Instead of with 5000 BTC the DAO members will have 5000 BTC to decide which proposal(s) they want to fund.

Please enlighten me.


Chatbots are helpful many times. You don't have to visit website to perform some functions. You can instruct chatbots to perform some functions.

They would be using the money raised for developing the technology.

No, they are not using ico money for funding the proposals. Wings does not fund any proposal. It would be users of wings who would invest in them after Wings Platform is launched.

This is indeed correct.  WINGS is not a "fund".

Regarding chatbots, this has been part of the WINGS story since Day 0 and we believe necessary to mainstream people to interact easily with DAO smart contracts.

Crpto4$
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 27, 2016, 09:46:37 PM
 #2620

Wings is a good project with strong team .


Pages: « 1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 [131] 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 ... 512 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!