That was a little over the line, try to take it down a notch or two. That post probably would've been fine without the first few sentences.
That is a clear example of trolling. You were making ridiculous statements just to cause drama.
I think what this does do is highlight the double standard for posting rules over BFL reps and regular users.
One that has been confirmed by a board mod in no uncertain terms.
The premise was if BFL wants to dig themselves a verbal hole then to allow it. Considering their position as a merchant I'm fine with that line of thinking.
(To be fair the last time I saw Josh post something truly trollish was awhile ago.)
But do not be surprised to see snap judgments of 'censorship,' being claimed.
Meh, not really BFL specific. Josh is just the most visible one so gets attention, there are lots of good examples of brash, rude and aggressive "business" posters who often go without being moderated because the majority of their posts do contain some information about whatever. Responding to call him a pedo is just childish and unnecessary.
When the BFL situation becomes more clear over the next month or two (4-6 weeks
) I'll sleep better knowing that everyone had all the information BFL cared to post (rude or not, or "alternate account"), and were able to make their own decisions based on the contents.
