They were 2 separate statements. One speaking to the OP about why this forum shouldn't push to keep religion out of Bitcoin discussions, and one speaking to Vod. I never implied they are not ignorant because they are a majority. There are plenty of ignorant religious people, and there are plenty of ignorant non-religious people. I've bolded what I said above, if you can try to read and not quickly post to increase your count and make your YoBit quota. This is to say there are plenty, plenty of well educated high caliber people that he just called ignorant in his asinine generalization. I would explain more, but I'm realizing you wouldn't read it.
If I was referring to the first response you made I would have separated it or highlighted it.
Signature bashing aside,lets address this statement.
If only he knew the amount & caliber of people around the world he was calling ignorant, he would realize how ignorant he was by calling them ignorant.
The response you give makes little sense. You talk about the obviousness in numbers and then go on to talk about caliber,which I reference below. Then you state he would realize how ignorant it is to call them ignorant. This implies that religion has a leg to stand on,which is why I state you are passing judgement based on religious belief. It may not be your own religious belief but you allow them ground in stating that religion is not ignorant.
The issue is you are sitting on the fence and allowing them ground to play with,well others like Vod and myself believe that religion is a corruption of the human mind. Should not speak for Vod and will let him address that if he chooses to.
noun
1.
the diameter of something of circular section, especially that of the inside of a tube:
a pipe of three-inch caliber.2.
Ordnance. the diameter of the bore of a gun taken as a unit of measurement.3.
degree of capacity or competence; ability:
a mathematician of high caliber.
4.
degree of merit or excellence; quality:
the high moral caliber of the era.
So stating they are of higher moral standing or higher degree of capacity,or you saying the opposite?
Now back to the signature issue. Its arrogant to dismiss a opposing view point based on a bias you have towards the service that is allowed in the forum. I speak on religion because it is the topic at hand,my signature was not on the table and there are plenty of threads where you can bitch to your hearts content about the signatures spamming up the forum.
Just know that by writing people off based on a signature is really just pointing out that you where unable to say anything of substance and decided to take the easy way out.
Cheers.
