[PIO] Pioneershares - REBRANDED TO AMSTERDEX

[emersonlogan62]

Some people think that with 2k PIO or 1 BTC roadblock is enough to stop pio from mooning. 49K sat is still the lowest price with 200k supply. those who don't know what will happen after few weeks,i would like to show you something from Op




Still dev is working according to the roadmap,you don't even know how cheap you're selling PIO right now.I am sure you'll buy again at 500k sat or more.you have the lucky chance to buy cheap PIO before mooning.
Exchange platform coming very soon and do not forget that holders of PioneerShares are rewarded with 40% of the generated exchange fees. All fees are converted into BTC to buy PioneerShares in return. This results in constant buy-pressure and a long-term raise in value.  

Man you did it wrong  you should keep silent as well as all the PIO investors do.now i have to BID a higher then before as i missed the chance to buy cheap. last sell was 65k on yobit https://yobit.net/en/trade/PIO/BTC
please dumpers help me to get some more coins,please...

[WastedLTC]

Network weight almost tripled during the last several blocks.
Looks like someone added quite a big stake to the network.

yeah, interesting, because as fast as it spiked, it went back to normal.

Staking doesn't appear to be working for me anymore.   Unlocked wallet,  # of coins to stake would increase gradually and minting would happen.  Then as the day went on the number of coins would go up and down slowly and now it went all the way to zero.     Closed and opened wallet, staked coins would slowly rise and then fall back to zero.

One issue found,   when using parameter -datadir=<path> the # of connections to the network stay at 1.  Had to run the wallet with no parameters to get more connections.

[pokeytex]

Network weight almost tripled during the last several blocks.
Looks like someone added quite a big stake to the network.

yeah, interesting, because as fast as it spiked, it went back to normal.

Staking doesn't appear to be working for me anymore.   Unlocked wallet,  # of coins to stake would increase gradually and minting would happen.  Then as the day went on the number of coins would go up and down slowly and now it went all the way to zero.     Closed and opened wallet, staked coins would slowly rise and then fall back to zero.

One issue found,   when using parameter -datadir=<path> the # of connections to the network stay at 1.  Had to run the wallet with no parameters to get more connections.

Hrmm - I can't say that is true on my end.  I use -datadir=<path> and have 22 connections to the network!

My peers:
109.235.70.63:34061
51.254.181.195:8572
45.48.185.55:8572
167.114.103.43:54207
148.251.8.18:44673
91.153.109.149:8572
194.135.93.51:8572
[2003:41:2002:200:a00:27ff:fe5c:ec8f]:8572
62.153.176.78:9030
24.160.59.242:55276
50.168.101.34:35008
213.93.178.167:58846
68.224.11.146:49571
77.66.16.225:9538
106.69.55.195:49776
[2001:0:5ef5:79fd:388b:31c5:95ba:c83c]:49954
50.88.60.250:40022
104.200.24.136:41642
94.142.234.39:65049
[2001:0:9d38:90d7:3c25:240f:c17c:e004]:65281
62.131.31.251:8572
[2001:0:9d38:90d7:1c7a:7216:2686:ecb]:53417
85.11.163.123:65026
217.121.241.52:40778

[WastedLTC]

Network weight almost tripled during the last several blocks.
Looks like someone added quite a big stake to the network.

yeah, interesting, because as fast as it spiked, it went back to normal.

Staking doesn't appear to be working for me anymore.   Unlocked wallet,  # of coins to stake would increase gradually and minting would happen.  Then as the day went on the number of coins would go up and down slowly and now it went all the way to zero.     Closed and opened wallet, staked coins would slowly rise and then fall back to zero.

One issue found,   when using parameter -datadir=<path> the # of connections to the network stay at 1.  Had to run the wallet with no parameters to get more connections.

Hrmm - I can't say that is true on my end.  I use -datadir=<path> and have 22 connections to the network!

My peers:
....

interesting.  I'm running windows 10.   I can reproduce the issue every time.    This is all in an effort to diagnose an issue I'm having with staking.  Staking started off great and then slowly went back to zero and doesn't appear to be working correctly now.   the single connection to the network was thought to be the issue but solving the connection issue didn't solve the staking issue.

[tomkat]

Network weight almost tripled during the last several blocks.
Looks like someone added quite a big stake to the network.

yeah, interesting, because as fast as it spiked, it went back to normal.

Staking doesn't appear to be working for me anymore.   Unlocked wallet,  # of coins to stake would increase gradually and minting would happen.  Then as the day went on the number of coins would go up and down slowly and now it went all the way to zero.     Closed and opened wallet, staked coins would slowly rise and then fall back to zero.

One issue found,   when using parameter -datadir=<path> the # of connections to the network stay at 1.  Had to run the wallet with no parameters to get more connections.

Hrmm - I can't say that is true on my end.  I use -datadir=<path> and have 22 connections to the network!

My peers:
....

interesting.  I'm running windows 10.   I can reproduce the issue every time.    This is all in an effort to diagnose an issue I'm having with staking.  Staking started off great and then slowly went back to zero and doesn't appear to be working correctly now.   the single connection to the network was thought to be the issue but solving the connection issue didn't solve the staking issue.

With "slowly went back to zero" do you mean your network weight?
Staking works fine for me, and have many connections all the time (15 at the moment)

[WastedLTC]

Network weight almost tripled during the last several blocks.
Looks like someone added quite a big stake to the network.

yeah, interesting, because as fast as it spiked, it went back to normal.

Staking doesn't appear to be working for me anymore.   Unlocked wallet,  # of coins to stake would increase gradually and minting would happen.  Then as the day went on the number of coins would go up and down slowly and now it went all the way to zero.     Closed and opened wallet, staked coins would slowly rise and then fall back to zero.

One issue found,   when using parameter -datadir=<path> the # of connections to the network stay at 1.  Had to run the wallet with no parameters to get more connections.

Hrmm - I can't say that is true on my end.  I use -datadir=<path> and have 22 connections to the network!

My peers:
....

interesting.  I'm running windows 10.   I can reproduce the issue every time.    This is all in an effort to diagnose an issue I'm having with staking.  Staking started off great and then slowly went back to zero and doesn't appear to be working correctly now.   the single connection to the network was thought to be the issue but solving the connection issue didn't solve the staking issue.

With "slowly went back to zero" do you mean your network weight?
Staking works fine for me, and have many connections all the time (15 at the moment)

So lets rewind my issue.   

Distribution from August to my wallet was around 22,000 PIO.
Didn't get around to trying to stake until 2 days ago.
Unlocked wallet and waited.
On the QT wallet, the Stake: 0.00 PIO number started at 0.00 and then slowly rose to around 2000 which decreased my available balance to around 20,000.  Showed my weight around 600,000.   Every few minuted I started minting .08 coins.  This lasted a few hours but my Stake: 2000.00 PIO slowly would move around between 1000 and 2000.  Not even close to the 22,000 PIO available.     After minting about 8 PIO, the Stake: 0.00 PIO went back to zero and just stayed there and stopped minting.
Left it over night, nothing.  Maybe 1 transaction came in for 0.08.
Next day tried to figure out why I was stuck on 1 connection to the network and fixed that by using the default directory for the data directory.  That didn't fix my issue with minting.
Moved my coins to see if that would help, left 2500 in the original spot and created a 10,000 address, 2500x2, and 5000.   Then waited 6+ hours to see where I was at.
It has been 24 hours, my weight is around 5000 and very slowly rising which I have no idea how that is calculated. When I look at each of the addresses, the weight associated to each address is not directly tied to the # of coins?  And these values keep jumping around. 
My wallet still shows  Stake: 0.00 PIO and I've minted very few coins.   .48 in the past 10 hours.
My connections stay around 10.

Something is definitely funky.

[BanzaiBTC]

Instead of creating so many addresses, you should use the blocksplitter instead.. That said, splitting your coins into inputs of 2 coins, is not going to help you with getting more stakes.. Since it takes longer for those inputs to gain enough weight on the network to generate a stake.. The recommended input is around 25-50 PIO..

Staking is based on your amount of coins, personal weight, total network weight and a bit of luck.. Coins are ready to stake after 6 hours.. However, that does not mean you will actually generate a stake after 6 hours with each input.. Its all based on block inputs and weight..

[Maloppo]

Do you have a plan to listing of PIO in some an exchange?
Like bittrex, polonie or c-cex?

[coldfusion]

In four weeks we will be on another exchange . Thats all we need , after that i am pretty sure the big exchanges will look more closely at this coin.

[BanzaiBTC]

Do you have a plan to listing of PIO in some an exchange?
Like bittrex, polonie or c-cex?

Our own exchange will open it's doors in 4 weeks time.. Please read the OP for what that means for PIO holders.. Hopefully no need for "bigger" exchanges after that..

[bhokor]

Do you have a plan to listing of PIO in some an exchange?
Like bittrex, polonie or c-cex?

Our own exchange will open it's doors in 4 weeks time.. Please read the OP for what that means for PIO holders.. Hopefully no need for "bigger" exchanges after that..

Nice to listen so good news, analyzing actual exchanges is totally clear an exchange under Polo and Bittrex but better than ccex and yobit is needed and i am quite sure  banzai is perfectly qualified for do that

[Maloppo]

Do you have a plan to listing of PIO in some an exchange?
Like bittrex, polonie or c-cex?

Our own exchange will open it's doors in 4 weeks time.. Please read the OP for what that means for PIO holders.. Hopefully no need for "bigger" exchanges after that..

Thanks for the information
It is a great news, your an exchange will open it in october.

[dpapaemc]

  So, no issues for anyone else staking their wallets? Thinking of jumping in and kinda excited about new exchange platform.

  I like the idea of share holder getting paid in PIO to keep a constant buy pressure on the coin. Interesting approach...

 

[coldfusion]

I havent had a single issue running the wallet , stakes beautifully and currently 22 connections.
0.08 PIO each stake regular as clockwork.

[Fuzzbawls]

I haven't noticed any problems at all...just set up a wallet on my RPi2 and let it run 24hrs a day

[pokeytex]

I have also been running my wallet since the ICO distribution with absolutely no issues.  22 plus connections all the time and consistent stakes.  Windows 10 64 Bit - Anniversary Edition.

-pokeytex

[doriangray]

I havent had a single issue running the wallet , stakes beautifully and currently 22 connections.
0.08 PIO each stake regular as clockwork.

The wallet looks perfect I also never encounter any problem with it.

[Fuzzbawls]

Compared to many coins out right now, this one is certainly on top of the main code issues that plague the altcoin scene.

Code:

     ___      _         ___ _               _
    / __\___ (_)_ __   / __\ |__   ___  ___| | _____ _ __
   / /  / _ \| | '_ \ / /  | '_ \ / _ \/ __| |/ / _ \ '__|
  / /__| (_) | | | | / /___| | | |  __/ (__|   <  __/ |
  \____/\___/|_|_| |_\____/|_| |_|\___|\___|_|\_\___|_|
      v0.0.3 September 2016 | http://www.fuzzbawls.pw

Creating temp folder to clone remote repository...
Cloning https://github.com/BlockPioneers/pioneershares.git...

-= Repository Information =-
============================================================
Number of commits: 1
Last commit date: Thu, Aug 04, 2016  1:59:08 PM
Days since last commit: 50.25 Days

-= Build System Information =-
============================================================
Build Type: QMAKE/Makefile
Build Version: 1.0.0.1
Qt Bin: Pioneershares-qt
Daemon Bin: Pioneersharesd

-= Coin Specifications =-
============================================================
Coin Name: Pioneershares
Client Version: 1.0.0.1
Client Name: /Pioneershares:1.0.0.1/
Default P2P Port: 8572
Default PRC Port: 8573

-= Coin Information Checks =-
============================================================
Matching P2PPORT in init documentation:                 [OK]
Matching RPCPORT in init documentation:                 [OK]
Build & Client Version Match:                           [OK]

-= Library Version Compliance Checks =-
============================================================
Miniupnpc v1.9 (API 14):                                [OK]
OpenSSL v1.0.1k+ (Strict DER Signatures):               [OK]
Boost v1.58+ (boost::get):                              [OK]

-= Security Standards Checks =-
============================================================
Free of IRC related files:                              [OK]
IRC based peer fetching:                                [--]
Contains signature malleability patch (PPCoin):         [OK]

-= Connectivity Checks =-
============================================================
Contains unique ClientName:                             [OK]
Contains DNS seeder addresses:                          [OK]
Contains Hex-Encoded seeder addresses:                  [!!]
Has at least ONE default connection method:             [OK]
Number of DNS Seeds: 2
Listing DNS Seed addresses...
* seed.blockpioneers.info
* seed2.blockpioneers.info

-= OS Specific Checks =-
============================================================
Mac OS X Native Notification Support:                   [OK]
Mac OS X Deployment Script:                             [OK]
Windows Deployment Script:                              [**]

============================================================
* Windows deployment script is using an incorrect name!
* Deployment build won't have the correct metadata!

* Windows deployment sript is using an incorrect version!
* Deployment build won't have the correct metadata!

Results should be manually verified and you should NOT rely
on any automated scripts (including this one) before running
or compiling any crypto wallet.
============================================================

There are certainly always improvements that can be made, but he's got all but one of the basics covered...and even the one [!!] in the list is really only used as a fallback option these days

[tomkat]

Instead of creating so many addresses, you should use the blocksplitter instead.. That said, splitting your coins into inputs of 2 coins, is not going to help you with getting more stakes.. Since it takes longer for those inputs to gain enough weight on the network to generate a stake.. The recommended input is around 25-50 PIO..

Staking is based on your amount of coins, personal weight, total network weight and a bit of luck.. Coins are ready to stake after 6 hours.. However, that does not mean you will actually generate a stake after 6 hours with each input.. Its all based on block inputs and weight..

SplitBlock cost is 0.1 PIO whereas transaction fee is 0.00002, so it's much better to do even several transactions manually than using the splitter, imo

[Golftech]

I havent had a single issue running the wallet , stakes beautifully and currently 22 connections.
0.08 PIO each stake regular as clockwork.

care to share how many pio do you have inside your wallet not bad for staking and just letting it to keep earnings. really believed what banzai can do with his project more progress to expect. good luck