...
But since science has proven that God exists, high faith in God is way more important than stupid high IQ. Why? High IQ people die just like low IQ people. But those who have faith in God at least have a chance
to be resurrected to eternal life. Those without faith in God
will be resurrected to eternal damnation and destruction. If they had high IQ, it doesn't benefit them at all.
BADecker, you cannot be resurrected. When you die, you die. If your body is cremated you become ashes. If they bury you, you become food for maggots, all will be left is bones. You cannot be resurrected from ashes or bones.
BTW, cell death is irreversible. Sorry to disappoint you.
Stop posting these insane statements.
But you are forgetting one of the greatest facts about life. This fact is, there is only ONE reason why we know that life can exist... ONLY ONE. That reason is BECAUSE IT DOES EXIST.
There is nothing in nature and science and thinking that suggests how life could have come to exist in the first place... to say nothing about the abundance and variety. Our best bet - evolution - has been proven so extremely mathematically impossible that it is not even a contender for the idea of being possible... at least in any way that we have been able to imagine. See
The Mathematical Impossibility of Evolution - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1454732.msg14706492#msg14706492.
The point? Right now the existence of life is essentially something that is impossible by any means that we can logically imagine. Nor can we imagine how a resurrection could take place. But, since impossible life exists, impossible resurrection can exist as well.
How can life and resurrection exist? Through God, Who has been proven to exist by science.
Your thread about "Mathematical Impossibility of Evolution" assumes that mutations in a living organism decrease "order" in such organism.
Exactly opposite is true. Mutations make an organism function better in a given environment. That is how organisms become better and better
at what they do, i.e. live and survive.
The rest of the scribbling is just that.
Except for one major point. There is absolutely NO evidence of beneficial mutation being done in nature. Even the "guided" mutations in the lab that are supposed to be beneficial, may not be so in the long run. So far that we see, everything that is attributed to evolution in nature, can be attributed more easily to programmed change built into the genes one way or another.
I suggest you read on evolution before you attempt to discredit it. It is not a theory, it is a fact. With hard, physical evidence.
So, you have never heard of the Theory of Evolution then? Science considers it a theory simply because evolution in nature has not been proven to be a fact. Again, when you look at so-called evolution that is found in nature, it all can more readily be shown to be built-in genetic programming that is made to adapt to the environment.
People like you who believe evolution is fact in opposition to what science itself says, have a religion going for yourselves. I admire the fact that you have such strong faith in your evolution religion, but it is science fiction, not science fact.
Regarding resurrection: Saying that it exists "through God" is as insane as a concept of a supernatural God. There is no physical evidence of either.
Cause and effect, the fact that the universe is highly complex, and the fact of universal entropy, when combined, prove that God exists. The God that is proven by this science is NOT the God described by the religions. Yet, He/It is a God shown by the definition of the word "God."
- Cause and effect in everything shows that everything was programmed.
- To program something as complex as the universe means complexity of a far greater nature in the programmer.
- The complexity shows that the programmer must have been ONE - as opposed to many programmers working in concert - because there would be lack of cohesion in the parts of the universe if there were many programmers, and the whole project would never have gotten off the ground, so to speak.
- Universal entropy shows that there must have been a beginning to the programming, and that the whole universe is becoming less complex all the time. This means that even we are intellectually less capable than our ancestors, who understood way more clearly that God exists.
- The greatness of the Creator proven by this science, and upheld by lots more science, is of the type that shows the Creator to not only be God, but to be God way beyond all our imaginings of how great a God can be.
Regarding the resurrection, there is little or no evidence for it other than the things that God has told the people... that there will definitely be a resurrection. But you have to look at the religions to see this. It isn't easily found in science.
Give me one example of someone (any animal) being resurrected after being cremated or buried. Don't give me the "but in the future, when Jesus comes, you'll be resurrected...". The idea of a character from an ancient myth coming back to life is as insane as an idea of resurrection itself.
No direct examples are available that I am aware of. However, there is no reason why life even exists, or can exist, either.
The resurrection theme is based on what God has told people through several religions, but mostly the Judeo-Christian religion, which religion is as impossible to exist as life is.
Nobody can be resurrected. If you think you can, you are not well. You are missing few screws.
Actually, if you do not recognize God, and recognize that He tells us that He will resurrect us, you are the one who is not well. You have fallen into a detrimental mutation of your soul which is as destructive to you as some form of detrimental mutation of the body was to survivors and children of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The difference is, God is willing to heal your soul. And this healing will lead you to eternal life in glory and joy after the resurrection.
Why hasn't science discovered this? Science needs two things to understand all this:
1. Honesty in looking at the science they have found: they ignore the science that proves God exists;
2. Enough millions of years to prove out such a greatness as God: it will take this long because of our remoteness.
EDIT: I want to thank you, however, for attempting to contradict the science that shows God. Why? Because our training in the schools in this world tries to draw us away from the fact that God exists. And every time I have to explain how science shows that God exists, it strengthens other aspects of my faith in Him. And this is the thing He is looking for in all of us... faith in the things that He tells us = faith in Him.
So, thank you for helping my faith in God to grow.
