Please understand that I'm not trying to go against the core dev team.
I KNOW the did not order anything.
I just want to analyze if there is any piece of evidence that can be used against them.
I think at this point the real danger is not what they could do in an honest manner, but what they want to do.
Even if they demanded that people switch, short of buying up botnets galore at a loss, they could not force it as there is no contractual binding by which they could legally punish those who refuse. A contract requires two parties or none exists.
What's really dangerous is their ability to confuse regulators with more power than they have.
This is where the libertarian ideal of leave me alone fails. Being left alone does not excuse you from reality. If we fail to inform and educate we deserve all the consequences.
