Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 09:28:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Price of BTC based upon supply analysis in relation to AU  (Read 1090 times)
jbreher (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
March 14, 2013, 07:09:16 AM
 #1

I'm sure we all daydream from time to time. I got to musing about what the price of BTC would be, if the market valued it on a par with gold.

According to one non-authoritative website, there may be approximately 10 Billion Troy Oz of gold mined in the history of the world. (http://money.howstuffworks.com/question213.htm). The precise number is inconsequential for the purposes of this back of the envelope analysis. Let's call it 10.5 B Oz to make the math simple.

In the long term, there will be 21 M BTC mined. Accordingly, and ignoring the growth in mined gold, the trend is towards 500 Troy Oz of gold for every BTC (10.5B / 21M).

Gold is currently trading at somewhere near $1600 Oz.

This would suggest that, if the market valued gold and BTC about the same, then BTC should be worth approximately (500 OzAU / BTC)($1600/OzAU) = $800,000 / BTC.

Will the market come to value BTC on par with AU? Who knows? If so, though, I could have a comfortable retirement.

Yes, I can poke holes in this too. But it is one data point.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
1715592492
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715592492

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715592492
Reply with quote  #2

1715592492
Report to moderator
1715592492
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715592492

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715592492
Reply with quote  #2

1715592492
Report to moderator
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715592492
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715592492

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715592492
Reply with quote  #2

1715592492
Report to moderator
1715592492
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715592492

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715592492
Reply with quote  #2

1715592492
Report to moderator
jbreher (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
March 14, 2013, 07:15:09 AM
 #2

InB4

The first stone... The market for a store of wealth is probably bounded. As such, demand for BTC (again assuming it comes to being valued on par with AU) would likely cannibalize demand for AU. Ignoring other stores of wealth puts a lower bound on this cannibilizaiton of a factor of 1/2.

I'd be happy with a price of $400,000 per BTC.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
Melbustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1003



View Profile
March 14, 2013, 07:28:00 AM
 #3

Well, I kinda consider the upper bound on that calculation to be the amount of private-investment demand that gold enjoys, which is 16% of total mined gold if memory serves. (TODO: check wikipedia)

So, your $800k becomes $128,000.

Bitcoin can't replace the jewelry demand that gold enjoys, which is something like 50% of total gold. Then there's industrial use... Central bank use is debatable. That leaves the above-noted private-investment demand. So what percent of that demand do you think might ultimately go to bitcoin? Sidenote: even just 1% looks pretty nice...



Bitcoin is the first monetary system to credibly offer perfect information to all economic participants.
jbreher (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
March 14, 2013, 07:34:50 AM
 #4

I'd be happy with $128K.

ETA: lacking any evidence to the contrary, I'm happy to accept your factor of .16 for proportion of gold in private investments.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
yucca
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
March 14, 2013, 12:44:30 PM
 #5

I have 10 BTC and I am 40, so it's possible I may buy a nice estate with them in my autumn years, crazy thought! Cheesy

edit:

on the subject of AU and BTC, take a look at this chart overlay, BTC time axis is stretched, but it seems the charts show correlation beyond coincidence, perhaps some fractal pattern common to both?:

BTC==BLACK  AU=RED



if the correlation continues then BTC may soon become a predictor of AU. Weird stuff.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!