This is for cryptodevil - Stop spamming feedbacks

[cryptohustla]

I would like to get the attention of this member cryptodevil

i am enraged because he left me with a negative feedback because of this post...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1534579.0

just incase the thread is deleted here are some screenshots of the discussion

i was just trolling with a scammer and pretended that i invested ..

for an obvious reason i didnt know that the scammer will fall from the troll and so the conversation were seriously taken by the dumb scammer so i tried to enjoy the conversation...


if you do a research about me and look where i post the most you will find out that aside from being new to this forum i am not interested in this type of programs seriously i believe this is the virus that killing bitcoin heres a proof that contradicts your belief cryptodevil


now get back to you ... if you are really concern about honest hard working people from getting scammed by these lazy opportunists scammers then what you are doing from copy / pasting is good enough you dont need to bother giving them negative feedback not unless you think and at least 90% sure that they are directly connected to the scammer... but if they are not for God sake STOP you dont know them you dont need to assume as if you know everything..

im starting to think that you are using this strategy to rank your account? i dont know cause what i see is post counts and activities are the basis of ranking right? pls correct me if im wrong so copy pasting is fast way to rank.

Or maybe im wrong maybe you just want people to think that you really hate scammers and make a name and earn reputation then later on you'll be the one who is shady lmao

look the section is intended for people that hopes for easy and fast cash they are warned already so you dont need to post feedbacks it annoys me especially when you do that to me......

>.<     giving bad reputation is like accusing everyone without even giving them a chance to at least depend themselves.. what an "A"...

PS: pls do me a favor can you change your username into cryptodumb? You're welcome

[Vod]

If you are promoting a ponzi, you are attempting to steal from other members of our community.  That makes you untrustworthy, and the feedback valid.

[coinyard]

As vod said You promote and help scammers to scam people so feedback very well deserved!

You shall stop to promote the and vouch for them and ask cryptodevial after a while to remove the feedback if you proved yourself to not promote or vouch for them anymore!

[cryptohustla]

If you are promoting a ponzi, you are attempting to steal from other members of our community.  That makes you untrustworthy, and the feedback valid.

Vod thanks for your time reading (im not sure if you really did) anyway to answer the allegation "NO" no i dont ......... its just that i thought its fun to ride with them sometimes... well i guessed it wrong

As vod said You promote and help scammers to scam people so feedback very well deserved!

You shall stop to promote the and vouch for them and ask cryptodevial after a while to remove the feedback if you proved yourself to not promote or vouch for them anymore!

i am really hoping for you to read my thread again and pls let me know which part of it that says im promoting it.. dont base your comment on someone else's

thanks

[Vod]

Vod thanks for your time reading (im not sure if you really did) anyway to answer the allegation "NO" no i dont ......... its just that i thought its fun to ride with them sometimes... well i guessed it wrong

   I read it.  Playing the ponzi is the same as promoting it, IMO. 

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Though I personally wouldn't leave you negative trust for playing a ponzi, and though I think cryptodevil is a condescending cocksucker, if he wants to neg you for it, I support him.  And that's exactly how the trust system here is supposed to work.   For better or worse.

I would go further and say that there shouldn't even be an "investor-based games" section and that shit should be banned outright.   But it brings in traffic and money for the powers that be.   Can't win em all.

[ultrloa]

Cryptodevil is doing a goodjob there hes tagging some scammer and supporter just to warn many people and save their pennies in that kind of scheme.

And the problem really there mate is he see you stating your support at ponzi that clearly that will steal peoples Money and that can be consider as scaming also because you can brought up some investor if they read your message in that thread.

Thats why if you want cryptodevil remove your bad tag all you need to do is ask for sorry and prove yourself that you will stop looking and support hyip.. Because same as Them im FUCKING HATE THOSE ASSHOLE's  HYIPS!

[cryptohustla]

Vod thanks for your time reading (im not sure if you really did) anyway to answer the allegation "NO" no i dont ......... its just that i thought its fun to ride with them sometimes... well i guessed it wrong

   I read it.  Playing the ponzi is the same as promoting it, IMO. 

seriosuly VOD i am not playing it (like play it literally) i was playing dumb with the OP omg..  i admit english is not my native language but seriously? you interpreted it the wrong way how sad

Though I personally wouldn't leave you negative trust for playing a ponzi, and though I think cryptodevil is a condescending cocksucker, if he wants to neg you for it, I support him.  And that's exactly how the trust system here is supposed to work.   For better or worse.

I would go further and say that there shouldn't even be an "investor-based games" section and that shit should be banned outright.   But it brings in traffic and money for the powers that be.   Can't win em all.

Cryptodevil is doing a goodjob there hes tagging some scammer and supporter just to warn many people and save their pennies in that kind of scheme.

And the problem really there mate is he see you stating your support at ponzi that clearly that will steal peoples Money and that can be consider as scaming also because you can brought up some investor if they read your message in that thread.

Thats why if you want cryptodevil remove your bad tag all you need to do is ask for sorry and prove yourself that you will stop looking and support hyip.. Because same as Them im FUCKING HATE THOSE ASSHOLE's  HYIPS!

you guys just dont read and just keep on commenting based on previous comments .. like what is happening? i know, i know you are vigilant with these ponzi's and because of that you often misinterpret JOKES lmao .. guys pls stop commenting without realizing and understanding..

ok i admit cryptodevil is doing a good job, ok i get it.. but hey sometimes you should at least be considerate before you judge others wheres the due process here? lol

ok lets just say all of you are in favor with cryptodevil .. but isnt it unfair with other members who are easily being judge by these self proclaimed "honest" people?

[Lutpin]

I would like to get the attention of this member cryptodevil

Why not use one of the countless threads about it?

i am enraged because he left me with a negative feedback because of this post.

Calm down, nothing good ever comes from doing things while being upset.

ok i admit cryptodevil is doing a good job, ok i get it.

Indeed, he is.


Now here's what you do (or rather what I would do in your situation, you're free to do whatever you want):
You go and delete your posts in that stupid ponzi thread.
After that you PM cryptodevil, explain the situation to him and ask him to remove the feedback (in a polite way).
Oh, and remove the joke retaliation feedback you've left before, it's not helping your case.

I would go further and say that there shouldn't even be an "investor-based games" section and that shit should be banned outright. But it brings in traffic and money for the powers that be. Can't win em all.

While agreeing that we don't need those s*ckers around here, I think in this case, the argument about not being abled to prevent it actually works out.
(I've changed my opinion about account sales though, never supported them, but used to agree on the not-preventable argument, don't do that anymore either, ok, off-topic here).
Moderation of the forum is already kind of challenging (from what I hear/read when talking with Lauda/Mitchell/... every now and then).
Fully banning ponzis would just mean those threads pop up in other sections where they don't belong. It's better to have them in their own rat's nest all together, than putting out one fire after another all over the forum.
We already have the (Speculation-)FUD and KnC spam posts for the never-ending nuke war.

[cryptohustla]

I would like to get the attention of this member cryptodevil

Why not use one of the countless threads about it?

i am enraged because he left me with a negative feedback because of this post.

Calm down, nothing good ever comes from doing things while being upset.

ok i admit cryptodevil is doing a good job, ok i get it.

Indeed, he is.


Now here's what you do (or rather what I would do in your situation, you're free to do whatever you want):
You go and delete your posts in that stupid ponzi thread.
After that you PM cryptodevil, explain the situation to him and ask him to remove the feedback (in a polite way).
Oh, and remove the joke retaliation feedback you've left before, it's not helping your case.

I would go further and say that there shouldn't even be an "investor-based games" section and that shit should be banned outright. But it brings in traffic and money for the powers that be. Can't win em all.

While agreeing that we don't need those s*ckers around here, I think in this case, the argument about not being abled to prevent it actually works out.
(I've changed my opinion about account sales though, never supported them, but used to agree on the not-preventable argument, don't do that anymore either, ok, off-topic here).
Moderation of the forum is already kind of challenging (from what I hear/read when talking with Lauda/Mitchell/... every now and then).
Fully banning ponzis would just mean those threads pop up in other sections where they don't belong. It's better to have them in their own rat's nest all together, than putting out one fire after another all over the forum.
We already have the (Speculation-)FUD and KnC spam posts for the never-ending nuke war.

finally a non bias comment... well anyway my fault here is being upset i just realized that.. still i want to inform him to at least slow it down when giving negative feedback? that thread should never exist but i agree they will just spam their scams all over the forum so now as long as cryptodevil apologize or at least remove the negative feedback i will be more than happy to help him warn others (of course in my own way)

but anyway it was all a joke i was just trying to ride the scammers and make fun i didnt realize that others really take it seriously so thats the problem.. i dont know that thread is for stupid lazy people right? so i have the right to do what i want including humiliation as long as i dont bully other legit members... i really just dont get it thats what makes me upset how did i turned out to be helping the scammer? oh well i will jsut slip this away as long as i hear from cryptodevil..

thanks lutpin, will have to follow what you suggested right after i hear from him.

[cryptodevil]

Yay, a butt-hurt thread for me! I haven't had one of these in a while.

Firstly:

I think cryptodevil is a condescending cocksucker

:hugs: Guilty as charged.

Secondly:

still i want to inform him to at least slow it down when giving negative feedback?

Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me (RATM reference FTW!). Seeing as the negative rating process is not non-reversible you can 'inform' me all you like but you'll still be in the exact same position you are right now. The sheer scale of the community actions against ponzi/pyramid/HYIP scams means I generally have to shoot first and ask questions later. If a thread is for a legitimate operation (which is hardly ever) it won't do it any harm to be properly reviewed after the fact if they offer up evidence and reasoning to support their claims towards legitimacy.

so now as long as cryptodevil apologize

LOL. Yeah, cos that's going to happen.

or at least remove the negative feedback i will be more than happy to help him warn others (of course in my own way)

I routinely remove negative ratings from people who promptly revise or remove their posts which support, or imply support, of a scam. Herein lies the problem, my young friend. If you insist on continuing to 'help warn others' and 'your own way' consists of posts which could be interpreted as showing tacit support for a scam, then you risk other forum members failing to see the 'cleverness' of your intentions and believing you to genuinely be indicating that said scam might be worth participating in because you appear to be doing so.

Now, either you delete/replace the posts you have made which are open to misinterpretation, for which I will remove the rating, or you do not.

The choice, as always, is yours.

[cryptohustla]

Yay, a butt-hurt thread for me! I haven't had one of these in a while.

Firstly:

I think cryptodevil is a condescending cocksucker

:hugs: Guilty as charged.

Secondly:

still i want to inform him to at least slow it down when giving negative feedback?

Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me (RATM reference FTW!). Seeing as the negative rating process is not non-reversible you can 'inform' me all you like but you'll still be in the exact same position you are right now. The sheer scale of the community actions against ponzi/pyramid/HYIP scams means I generally have to shoot first and ask questions later. If a thread is for a legitimate operation (which is hardly ever) it won't do it any harm to be properly reviewed after the fact if they offer up evidence and reasoning to support their claims towards legitimacy.

so now as long as cryptodevil apologize

LOL. Yeah, cos that's going to happen.

or at least remove the negative feedback i will be more than happy to help him warn others (of course in my own way)

I routinely remove negative ratings from people who promptly revise or remove their posts which support, or imply support, of a scam. Herein lies the problem, my young friend. If you insist on continuing to 'help warn others' and 'your own way' consists of posts which could be interpreted as showing tacit support for a scam, then you risk other forum members failing to see the 'cleverness' of your intentions and believing you to genuinely be indicating that said scam might be worth participating in because you appear to be doing so.

Now, either you delete/replace the posts you have made which are open to misinterpretation, for which I will remove the rating, or you do not.

The choice, as always, is yours.

lol i am expecting this from you.. Who are you anyway? you self proclaimed righteous fagg i certainly accept the fact that this would happen... just because you copy paste and warns people you deserve to be always right? come on

call me butthurt call me anything you want.. you made rules on a section where everyone is already warned ... i deleted the post and i am hoping you can remove the negative feedback you gave me .. but this topic remains ..

the rule (which you made for yourself to make you look right for everything) has been done and you win this time.

[cryptodevil]

lol i am expecting this from you.. Who are you anyway? you self proclaimed righteous fagg i certainly accept the fact that this would happen... just because you copy paste and warns people you deserve to be always right? come on

FFS, man, will you choose just ONE fucking thread or PM to have this conversation on.

and you actually took it seriously without even analyzing and reading?

Sure, because you're so fucking special I'm the one to blame for not spending time deeply analysing your intentions and words which, for all intents and purposes, clearly imply you are participating in a ponzi scam.

just apply as moderator trying to build reputation on that section where warnings is all over? i know what you are trying to accomplish here.. pls show a proof that i indeed participated on ponzi .. a proof and i will gladly leave this forum just for you. Just a proof other than the thread you saw my post which is seriously irrelevant pathetic self proclaimed righteous vigilant that makes you so great and perfect

Get over yourself, you were in the wrong for making a post in a scam thread which CLEARLY implied you were participating in the ponzi, and it is THIS implication which encourages other people to believe it might be worth also participating in said ponzi. I don't care how fucking 'clever' you believed your post to be, it simply wasn't and I couldn't care less whether you have participated or not, I only care whether your posted words risk being interpreted as though you are participating or supporting it.

[cryptohustla]

lol i am expecting this from you.. Who are you anyway? you self proclaimed righteous fagg i certainly accept the fact that this would happen... just because you copy paste and warns people you deserve to be always right? come on

FFS, man, will you choose just ONE fucking thread or PM to have this conversation on.

and you actually took it seriously without even analyzing and reading?

Sure, because you're so fucking special I'm the one to blame for not spending time deeply analysing your intentions and words which, for all intents and purposes, clearly imply you are participating in a ponzi scam.

just apply as moderator trying to build reputation on that section where warnings is all over? i know what you are trying to accomplish here.. pls show a proof that i indeed participated on ponzi .. a proof and i will gladly leave this forum just for you. Just a proof other than the thread you saw my post which is seriously irrelevant pathetic self proclaimed righteous vigilant that makes you so great and perfect

Get over yourself, you were in the wrong for making a post in a scam thread which CLEARLY implied you were participating in the ponzi, and it is THIS implication which encourages other people to believe it might be worth also participating in said ponzi. I don't care how fucking 'clever' you believed your post to be, it simply wasn't and I couldn't care less whether you have participated or not, I only care whether your posted words risk being interpreted as though you are participating or supporting it.

tell me are you really that oblige to do this i mean are you a moderator? i am not against what you are doing ok.. i am against by what you did to me.. without even realizing the fact.. seriously? you are just the same as everyone else you are not above anyone.. ok enough with this ok i accept that i lose the battle to you, followed your rule.. maybe in the future ill make my own strategy as well to look righteous and oblige people to obey my rule.. lol alright enough just remove my negative feedback as i followed your rules. thats it.

[Monnt]

Im taking Cryptodevil's side here although he evidently have me negative trust

Op, you clearly were supporting a Ponzi. I believe the investor based games board shouldn't even exist.


Regarding the title, Cryptodevil tries his best (emphasis on tries his best) to keep his/her posts unbiased in a futile attempt to prevent harming the community. I admire his work, actually.

[Quickseller]

Cryptodevil tries his best [...] to keep his/her posts unbiased

This could not be farther from the truth, nor could it be a more obvious attempt to get on his good side in an attempt to get him to remove his negative trust.

[cryptohustla]

Im taking Cryptodevil's side here although he evidently have me negative trust

Op, you clearly were supporting a Ponzi. I believe the investor based games board shouldn't even exist.


Regarding the title, Cryptodevil tries his best (emphasis on tries his best) to keep his/her posts unbiased in a futile attempt to prevent harming the community. I admire his work, actually.

says by who? goodluck with your negative feedback as well clearly supported ponzi huh? yeah right...

locking this thread...