ISIS is nothing compared to U.S. cops.

[Astargath]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uOsRZwZk34
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gAzpibLxXo
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/hero-police-officer-saves-baby-12625288
https://metro.co.uk/2018/05/11/dashcam-footage-captures-police-officer-saving-babys-life-side-road-7537197/

When are you going to realize that one story doesn't prove anything? Why are you still doing this, are you getting paid by someone?

[1714142592]

1714142592

[1714142592]

1714142592

[1714142592]

1714142592

[mocker001]

I'm not supporting ISIS(they all are bastards) but they do fight against the Russian army, U.S army, Syrian army, and Iraq Army. And the cops well they fight against "the n word" people and Mexicans drug dealers.

[Babyrica0226]

When I heard ISIS it is back up by U.S, I remembered that here in my country, some of the place we have here has been attacked by the terrorist people and the government find out in the end that behind the war it was ISIS who supported that terrorist, according to the news we had it in here. Which means that ISIS was not a good people.

[BADecker]

Average people in the USA do not want ISIS to be supported by the U.S.  And most of them don't know that it is. Because of this, the U.S. supporters of ISIS are simply people in the U.S. government, actually stepping outside of their authority. But there is no way to stop them that is readily known (except, perhaps one, that I am not going to elaborate on here).

So, it is not really the U.S. that is supporting ISIS. Talking like that is propaganda being used to mess with the minds of honest people being attacked by ISIS in the ME, and by cops in America.

[BADecker]

The answer is to take the man, not the cop, and his bond, to Federal District Court in common law. Federal District Court is a court where the magistrate (judge) is separate from the tribunal (accuser, accused, jury). When you beat his bond in this court (as well as the man, of course), he loses his job forever, because no bonding agent will ever bond him again. Remember, the jury has the right and duty to judge both facts and law. They can declare a law null and void in a particular case. To get their sympathy for a guilty verdict against cops, they need to be shown that it could have been them the cops mistreated.


When Nonviolence Isn't Enough

In August 2017, Richard Hubbard III stopped at a red light in Euclid, Ohio, but his front bumper went a few feet past the white line. The cops pulled him over. That's no surprise: Police in Euclid, Cleveland Heights, and the surrounding cash-strapped towns strictly enforce traffic rules. But officers didn't just give the driver a ticket.

The police demanded Hubbard—a black man—step out of his vehicle. Dashcam footage shows that he calmly complied. Yet one officer immediately spun Hubbard around, bent his arm, and slammed him against his Hyundai. He flipped Hubbard again, punched him in the face, and kicked his groin. Hubbard screamed and put his arms up to protect himself. The other officer joined in.

They threw Hubbard to the ground but continued to punch, hammer, and kick him. When he tried to protect his face, they chanted the informal motto of American police, "Stop resisting!" Even when Hubbard was subdued, prostrate with his hands behind his back and two large officers pinning him down, one officer continued to pummel his skull.

Imagine you witness the whole thing. A thought occurs to you: You're armed. You could shoot the officers, perhaps saving Hubbard's life or preventing him from being maimed and disabled. May you do so?

Below, I defend a controversial answer: Yes, you may.

[BADecker]

Now, this is the way ISIS should be. So, cops really ARE way worse.


When Cops Respond to Noise Complaint About Friends Playing New Nintendo...

Instead of ruining the fun for a couple of friends who were enjoying the new Nintendo video game, two police officers accepted their offer to join in.

Jovante Williams had been playing the newly-released "Super Smash Brothers Ultimate" game at his friend's apartment in Minneapolis, Minnesota when they heard a knock at the door.

Local police officers had been called to the apartment based on a noise complaint from a neighbor. Since Williams says that the actual source of the noise was coming from somewhere else in the apartment complex's hallway, however, the cops left.

The officers returned several more times to make sure that the noise wasn't too loud, until finally, Williams's friend told the squad they they were simply drinking beers and playing Smash.

When one of the officers asked "what is smash?", Williams asked them if they wanted to play.

Two of the cops immediately accepted the offer and sat down for a few rounds. Amidst everyone sharing some good-natured banter, Williams says that he jokingly told one of the cops: "Just don't fine me if I beat you."

When asked who won the games, Williams replied: "We did. But they were pretty good [and] one of them was sick with Pikachu."

Williams posted a video of the exchange to Reddit where it was upvoted thousands of times, much to his delight.

"Ultimately (badum-tssh), [I'm] just super happy to post wholesome content and have it go a li'l viral for the world to watch," he wrote in a comment.

Cops are way worse.


 

[BADecker]

This is what it's really like, and it could happen to you, for nothing, just like it happened to these people, for nothing.


The real reason 4 cops got shot in Houston last week

    We are sick and tired of having dirtbags try to take our lives when all we are trying to do is protect this community and protect our families…

    Well just know, we all got your number now.

    We are going to be keeping track of all of ya’ll, and we’re going to make sure we hold you accountable. Every time you stir the pot on our police officers. We’ve had enough, folks.

    We’re out there doing our jobs every day, putting our lives on the line for our families. Enough is enough. Now please, keep these officers in your prayers.


That was the Houston Police Officer’s Union President Joe Gimaldi.

He made the comments after 5 cops were injured while serving a warrant.

He thinks that rhetoric critical of police officers is responsible for, what he claims is an increase in police being targeted.

All the headlines would have you believe these cops were ambushed, attacked just for being cops while minding their own business.

But when you look deeper at the case, you realize these cops didn’t get shot because of anti-police rhetoric.

They got shot because they invaded an innocent couple’s home without announcing themselves.

...

Cops murdered this couple, for nothing.

[expertofexperts]

Sorry but you cannot compare terrorists with any Department that is under constitution. ISIS is bloody people who dont have any law and they want same thing to happen all over the world. Still those cops who goes against the law of land are punishable. You find such in ISIS?

Stop blaming whole Dept just bcoz of few events. Such cops should be punished and even hanged. But we would never call ISIS instead of cops for help..

[BADecker]

ISIS acts as ISIS does because that's the way they are supposed to act.

Cops in Arizona are forbidden by Arizona law from asking for ID without a reason. The turn signal thing was simply an excuse to make people think that they had a reason.

In other words, ISIS is law abiding because they do what they are lawfully meant to do... terrorize.

Cops are worse than ISIS because they terrorize when they are strictly forbidden from terrorizing, but they do it anyway.

[BADecker]

Glendale police used the excuse of a turn signal infraction to ask for ID. ID request in AZ is not legal to do without a reason. The guy didn't have an ID, so cops elevated nothing to something by tazing the heck out of the guy. Now there is a court action with famed Mark Victor as the attorney.


Glendale police offer few answers for 2017 stun gun tactics that led to federal lawsuit

What happened during the incident

Wheatcroft and Chapman were parked outside a Motel 6 in downtown Glendale with their two minor children and a family friend after they were stopped in traffic by Schneider and Lindsey on July 26, 2017. The car was pulled over for a traffic violation.

Wheatcroft, who was in the front-passenger seat, refused the officer's requests to provide his driver's license and asked why he needed to identify himself.

The body-camera footage then shows one of the officers pulling Wheatcroft from the car, twisting his right arm while the seat belt was still engaged. One of the officers can be heard threatening to shock Wheatcroft. Wheatcroft repeatedly yells that he hasn't done anything wrong.

As he is partway out of the vehicle, the seat belt still tangled around him,police begin using the stun guns repeatedly as he is pulled onto the ground.

[BADecker]

^^^ The cop-shop is doing an internal briefing to its people about what to say and do if they are questioned about the incident in the above post. But they aren't letting the media cover it, 'cause the way they are going about it is illegal.


Abuse of Force: ABC15 confronts Glendale police about no-camera briefing

GLENDALE, AZ — Glendale police refused to let cameras inside to record a briefing where officials promised they would share everything with the media surrounding repeated use of force by its officers in a 2017 traffic stop.

"This is a full information briefing. We're going to give you all the information on recording once you guys leave," a police official, who did not identify himself, told reporters gathered outside the department's training facility Monday afternoon.

When pressed about why the public would not be able to hear directly from the police themselves, officials indicated that they would tell the media and then the media would inform the public.

Reporters were let into the building around 4:30 p.m. The briefing, which was originally scheduled for 2:30 p.m., was postponed Monday afternoon to 4 p.m.

A small group of protesters also gathered at the Glendale Police Headquarters during a 4 p.m rally. Hundreds of comments have been left on a thread about the protest that was posted to Glendale Police Department's Facebook page.

Check out the videos in both posts, this one and the above.

[Astargath]

ISIS acts as ISIS does because that's the way they are supposed to act.

Cops in Arizona are forbidden by Arizona law from asking for ID without a reason. The turn signal thing was simply an excuse to make people think that they had a reason.

In other words, ISIS is law abiding because they do what they are lawfully meant to do... terrorize.

Cops are worse than ISIS because they terrorize when they are strictly forbidden from terrorizing, but they do it anyway.

Horribly wrong analogy. Anyone is like ISIS then when they do what they are not meant to?

''Cops are worse than ISIS because they terrorize'' Also I have shown you that most cops 99.9%+ are good cops and the other ones do not terrorize either since it doesn't fit the definition of terrorism.

[BADecker]

ISIS acts as ISIS does because that's the way they are supposed to act.

Cops in Arizona are forbidden by Arizona law from asking for ID without a reason. The turn signal thing was simply an excuse to make people think that they had a reason.

In other words, ISIS is law abiding because they do what they are lawfully meant to do... terrorize.

Cops are worse than ISIS because they terrorize when they are strictly forbidden from terrorizing, but they do it anyway.

Horribly wrong analogy. Anyone is like ISIS then when they do what they are not meant to?

''Cops are worse than ISIS because they terrorize'' Also I have shown you that most cops 99.9%+ are good cops and the other ones do not terrorize either since it doesn't fit the definition of terrorism.

In certain ways, anyone who does wrong is like ISIS. But if the wrong doesn't include terrorism as ISIS does, then they are not like ISIS.

And I have shown you that there aren't any good cops. All of them will back the police union in almost any case, no matter how the police union decides, good, bad, or indifferent. The best that cops might be is silent on an issue.

[Astargath]

ISIS acts as ISIS does because that's the way they are supposed to act.

Cops in Arizona are forbidden by Arizona law from asking for ID without a reason. The turn signal thing was simply an excuse to make people think that they had a reason.

In other words, ISIS is law abiding because they do what they are lawfully meant to do... terrorize.

Cops are worse than ISIS because they terrorize when they are strictly forbidden from terrorizing, but they do it anyway.

Horribly wrong analogy. Anyone is like ISIS then when they do what they are not meant to?

''Cops are worse than ISIS because they terrorize'' Also I have shown you that most cops 99.9%+ are good cops and the other ones do not terrorize either since it doesn't fit the definition of terrorism.

In certain ways, anyone who does wrong is like ISIS. But if the wrong doesn't include terrorism as ISIS does, then they are not like ISIS.

And I have shown you that there aren't any good cops. All of them will back the police union in almost any case, no matter how the police union decides, good, bad, or indifferent. The best that cops might be is silent on an issue.

The ''police union'' is formed by a few people so I don't know what your point is. Cops when acting wrong are not using terrorism, by definition.

[BADecker]

ISIS acts as ISIS does because that's the way they are supposed to act.

Cops in Arizona are forbidden by Arizona law from asking for ID without a reason. The turn signal thing was simply an excuse to make people think that they had a reason.

In other words, ISIS is law abiding because they do what they are lawfully meant to do... terrorize.

Cops are worse than ISIS because they terrorize when they are strictly forbidden from terrorizing, but they do it anyway.

Horribly wrong analogy. Anyone is like ISIS then when they do what they are not meant to?

''Cops are worse than ISIS because they terrorize'' Also I have shown you that most cops 99.9%+ are good cops and the other ones do not terrorize either since it doesn't fit the definition of terrorism.

In certain ways, anyone who does wrong is like ISIS. But if the wrong doesn't include terrorism as ISIS does, then they are not like ISIS.

And I have shown you that there aren't any good cops. All of them will back the police union in almost any case, no matter how the police union decides, good, bad, or indifferent. The best that cops might be is silent on an issue.

The ''police union'' is formed by a few people so I don't know what your point is. Cops when acting wrong are not using terrorism, by definition.

I don't know what you are talking about. All big-city cops are in a branch or chapter of the Police Union. Many of the rest of them are, as well.

Perhaps the legal definition of terrorism doesn't include the terrorizing that cops do. But there are a whole lot of average people who include cop terrorism in their common law definition.

Google gives us almost 30 million hits on police brutality. You can find loads of people who talk about police terrorism.

[Astargath]

ISIS acts as ISIS does because that's the way they are supposed to act.

Cops in Arizona are forbidden by Arizona law from asking for ID without a reason. The turn signal thing was simply an excuse to make people think that they had a reason.

In other words, ISIS is law abiding because they do what they are lawfully meant to do... terrorize.

Cops are worse than ISIS because they terrorize when they are strictly forbidden from terrorizing, but they do it anyway.

Horribly wrong analogy. Anyone is like ISIS then when they do what they are not meant to?

''Cops are worse than ISIS because they terrorize'' Also I have shown you that most cops 99.9%+ are good cops and the other ones do not terrorize either since it doesn't fit the definition of terrorism.

In certain ways, anyone who does wrong is like ISIS. But if the wrong doesn't include terrorism as ISIS does, then they are not like ISIS.

And I have shown you that there aren't any good cops. All of them will back the police union in almost any case, no matter how the police union decides, good, bad, or indifferent. The best that cops might be is silent on an issue.

The ''police union'' is formed by a few people so I don't know what your point is. Cops when acting wrong are not using terrorism, by definition.

I don't know what you are talking about. All big-city cops are in a branch or chapter of the Police Union. Many of the rest of them are, as well.

Perhaps the legal definition of terrorism doesn't include the terrorizing that cops do. But there are a whole lot of average people who include cop terrorism in their common law definition.

Google gives us almost 30 million hits on police brutality. You can find loads of people who talk about police terrorism.

Statistically police brutality is less than 0.1% of the cops mate, I already showed you stats.

[BADecker]

Statistically police brutality is less than 0.1% of the cops mate, I already showed you stats.

Well, Google doesn't really go along with your stats, even if they say they do, formally. Try a bunch of antonyms for "brutality" in Google, and you might possibly get triple the hits that you would with police brutality. That doesn't equal out to 0.1%.

If you Google a bunch of words that are synonyms of "brutality," you get a whole bunch more hits for brutality.

I guess I'm a little surprised at how many people are against cops. Besides, that wasn't the point. The point was that ISIS does their job way better than cops, if they terrorize or if they don't. Why? Because cops aren't supposed to terrorize at all. But there are times when ISIS gets to take a break from terrorizing.

[Astargath]

Statistically police brutality is less than 0.1% of the cops mate, I already showed you stats.

Well, Google doesn't really go along with your stats, even if they say they do, formally. Try a bunch of antonyms for "brutality" in Google, and you might possibly get triple the hits that you would with police brutality. That doesn't equal out to 0.1%.

If you Google a bunch of words that are synonyms of "brutality," you get a whole bunch more hits for brutality.

I guess I'm a little surprised at how many people are against cops. Besides, that wasn't the point. The point was that ISIS does their job way better than cops, if they terrorize or if they don't. Why? Because cops aren't supposed to terrorize at all. But there are times when ISIS gets to take a break from terrorizing.

Right, because google results = real statistics? If I type ''gay'' in google and I get 2.3b results, does it mean that there are 2.3b gays in the world? Are you actually dumb? There were like 1000 people killed in 2018 by police and that's overall, not counting which were justified or not but even then that's still not even 1% of cops.

[BADecker]

Statistically police brutality is less than 0.1% of the cops mate, I already showed you stats.

Well, Google doesn't really go along with your stats, even if they say they do, formally. Try a bunch of antonyms for "brutality" in Google, and you might possibly get triple the hits that you would with police brutality. That doesn't equal out to 0.1%.

If you Google a bunch of words that are synonyms of "brutality," you get a whole bunch more hits for brutality.

I guess I'm a little surprised at how many people are against cops. Besides, that wasn't the point. The point was that ISIS does their job way better than cops, if they terrorize or if they don't. Why? Because cops aren't supposed to terrorize at all. But there are times when ISIS gets to take a break from terrorizing.

Right, because google results = real statistics? If I type ''gay'' in google and I get 2.3b results, does it mean that there are 2.3b gays in the world? Are you actually dumb? There were like 1000 people killed in 2018 by police and that's overall, not counting which were justified or not but even then that's still not even 1% of cops.

I admit that I haven't been running around questioning people about the way they feel about cops. Have you?

Wherever you get your stats from, how do you know they are being reported on correctly and honestly. If it is from polls, they can be adjusted any way the pollsters want to adjust them. And the questions asked of people polled are often very ambiguous in their meaning between the pollster and the people polled.

Google hits is a much better way of taking a look at how people really feel.

Further, the percentage doesn't matter with this comparison between ISIS and cops. Why? Because ISIS is expected to terrorize at times, but not at other times. Cops are expected to never terrorize.

In America, have you ever heard of innocent 'til proven guilty? The jails are full of people awaiting trial, who were not violent, and are not proven guilty. And the prisons are full of innocent people who harmed no-one, but were talked into agreeing that they were guilty, by the courts. And cops terrorized them to put them there. Cops are way worse than ISIS.

[Astargath]

Statistically police brutality is less than 0.1% of the cops mate, I already showed you stats.

Well, Google doesn't really go along with your stats, even if they say they do, formally. Try a bunch of antonyms for "brutality" in Google, and you might possibly get triple the hits that you would with police brutality. That doesn't equal out to 0.1%.

If you Google a bunch of words that are synonyms of "brutality," you get a whole bunch more hits for brutality.

I guess I'm a little surprised at how many people are against cops. Besides, that wasn't the point. The point was that ISIS does their job way better than cops, if they terrorize or if they don't. Why? Because cops aren't supposed to terrorize at all. But there are times when ISIS gets to take a break from terrorizing.

Right, because google results = real statistics? If I type ''gay'' in google and I get 2.3b results, does it mean that there are 2.3b gays in the world? Are you actually dumb? There were like 1000 people killed in 2018 by police and that's overall, not counting which were justified or not but even then that's still not even 1% of cops.

I admit that I haven't been running around questioning people about the way they feel about cops. Have you?

Wherever you get your stats from, how do you know they are being reported on correctly and honestly. If it is from polls, they can be adjusted any way the pollsters want to adjust them. And the questions asked of people polled are often very ambiguous in their meaning between the pollster and the people polled.

Google hits is a much better way of taking a look at how people really feel.

Further, the percentage doesn't matter with this comparison between ISIS and cops. Why? Because ISIS is expected to terrorize at times, but not at other times. Cops are expected to never terrorize.

In America, have you ever heard of innocent 'til proven guilty? The jails are full of people awaiting trial, who were not violent, and are not proven guilty. And the prisons are full of innocent people who harmed no-one, but were talked into agreeing that they were guilty, by the courts. And cops terrorized them to put them there. Cops are way worse than ISIS.

''Because ISIS is expected to terrorize at times, but not at other times. Cops are expected to never terrorize.'' Again, wrong analogy, just because ISIS is expected to kill people doesn't mean cops are worse than ISIS because they are not expected to kill people.

What's worse?

ISIS killing 5000 people

or

Cops killing 200 people