It seems by some of the questions, their community has been fed some incomplete or just false information.
This should not be of any surprise to anyone. A lot of the forkers are deliberately spreading false information that helps their own views.
Their major concerns center around 2MB HF and whether Blockstream and/or Core Devs are bad actors.
The people supporting Classic are the more likely candidates for bad actors.
But Andreas, in a neutral way (as he always attempts to do) sets the record straight with reasoning.
Indeed. He has properly answered all of the questions.
I think many of the big block supporters have lost sight of the primary function of the Core developers and that is not to make critical changes that might compromise the security of the network.
Some of them are becoming delusional at this point. I've seen some claims that the situation with ETH is a "healthy sign".