Right now I see there are 4 options:
- The coins go to someone willing to give the coins back.
I really prefer option 1. Don't you?
If it's proven that the coins were in fact hacked and OP really gives them then whoever wins should give them back to the rightful owner.
It's proven? Proven where? Exactly how do you plan for the 'winner' (if there is one) to return the funds to the rightful owner(s)
it is proven. At the moment there's
some initial proof the funds were hacked from inputs.io. If the winner is willing to give the coins back then several users and the rightful owner can research more. Are you willing to return the coins if someone proves who the rightful owner is?
without there being too much hassle? The thread is being obliterated by shill/alt accounts.
I don't think "too much hassle" should stop the rightful owner from getting their coins.
Yes there are a lot of shill/alt accounts. I'm not following what it has to do with giving the coins back.
