CRYPTODEVIL trust abuse on LEGENDARY member.

[cryptodevil]

I described myself as the arbitrary identity associated with this account. . .I haven't lied about anything

Look at the title of this thread, dipshit. It pretty much encapsulates the nature of the very fraud you are trying to play down the significance of:

CRYPTODEVIL trust abuse on LEGENDARY member.

You are not a Legendary member, you're just using the account of one to make other people think you are a Legendary member.

That you have done so as part of the process of convincing people to send you money is a clear-cut case of fraud for personal gain.

[1714986295]

1714986295

[1714986295]

1714986295

[1714986295]

1714986295

[bitseedmike]

seems like the lir phoenix never lied. thanks for proving that quickseller.

phoenix1969 said in June that his account was not purchased. He said today that he received the account from a "friend" as a "gift" several months ago.

The little blurb that phoenix1969 has up about himself matches how the Eric guy (the original owner of the account) can be described, and it is most likely that no other person can be described in a similar way:

Phoenix1969
Marketing Director, Media Management, Networking
phoenix1969@letitride.io
Phoenix1969 was born in the USA and studied post-secondary at Ohio State University. He's a hard working entrepreneur who is a huge fan and supporter of the LISK project and hopes to work with Shogdite on finding applications of LISK relevant to the LetItRide project.

http://archive.is/PWZcv#selection-887.0-899.269

I described myself as the arbitrary identity associated with this account. I never once stated that I was Eric Hansen thus I have not impersonated anyone. Since joining BitcoinTalk I have learned much about the technology, markets and the psychology behind advertising. It's obvious to me that the Lisk platform is of great use to the LIR project as it can be utilized to decentralize aspects of LIR. Technology such as Lisk and Etherum don't come along often so when it does it's not hard to see why I would be a fan of and support such a project.

I haven't lied about anything but draw your own conclusions. This is the last time I'm going to address these allegations and demand that the red trust put on my account by cryptodevil be removed. I have even stated I am willing to edit the signature or title of this account to state that Eric Hansen is not Phoenix1969, at least not anymore he isn't if that will put him at ease.

So are you going to return this account to it's original owner now that he has reported it as stolen?

[BigBadBull]

Can I get a picture of all of you in bed sucking eachother off and make sure monkeynutz is in the middle on the bunch.

 

If the account was stolen and your fagfriend could prove it it would be back in his hands. ut he cant prove it. Can he?

You all abuse your trust and I'm going to be leaving everyone on this thread who is defending Cryptodevil bad trust and let people know you could all even be the same person. they will all be tagged together.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Can I get a picture of all of you in bed sucking eachother off and make sure monkeynutz is in the middle on the bunch.

 

If the account was stolen and your fagfriend could prove it it would be back in his hands. ut he cant prove it. Can he?

You all abuse your trust and I'm going to be leaving everyone on this thread who is defending Cryptodevil bad trust and let people know you could all even be the same person. they will all be tagged together.

Bro, you can get banned from this forum for trolling, and you are straddling the line.  You remember codishmumu, fwdxlsh, and the others?  That's exactly what happened to them.  If you threaten to leave indiscriminate feedback for members, that might be crossing the line.  Just sayin.  I think cryptodevil is a shit sucking prick, but he's been known to be right before.  If you disagree,  leave your arguments in this thread.

[BigBadBull]

Can I get a picture of all of you in bed sucking eachother off and make sure monkeynutz is in the middle on the bunch.

 

If the account was stolen and your fagfriend could prove it it would be back in his hands. ut he cant prove it. Can he?

You all abuse your trust and I'm going to be leaving everyone on this thread who is defending Cryptodevil bad trust and let people know you could all even be the same person. they will all be tagged together.

Bro, you can get banned from this forum for trolling, and you are straddling the line.  You remember codishmumu, fwdxlsh, and the others?  That's exactly what happened to them.  If you threaten to leave indiscriminate feedback for members, that might be crossing the line.  Just sayin.  I think cryptodevil is a shit sucking prick, but he's been known to be right before.  If you disagree,  leave your arguments in this thread.

I've leave the feedback They as a team or as one or whatever have been trying to wreck one of my investments. They deserve the trust I left for them and I will stand behind it every time.

Ive had enough with the games that they are playing and people need to be warned that its quite possible that they are all one and the same or at least all working together to further their own agenda.

Edit.

He may be right sometimes as we all are, but he is wrong here. He is blindly fighting for someone who sold his account, let it be used for a year, created a new account, used the old one he had no access too as proof that he's trustworthy to be a lisk delegate ect ect ect.

That's the most dirty shit I ever seen.

[suchmoon]

If the account was stolen and your fagfriend could prove it it would be back in his hands. ut he cant prove it. Can he?

Phoenix1969 already admitted that it's not his original account and there is only one person making a claim to it. While theymos probably wouldn't return the account without a signed message the existing proof is sufficient to conclude that the account changed hands, and likely not amicably.

You need to keep up, your bagholding colleagues have already moved away from the account ownership dispute and are now happily chanting "we don't care who the dev is as long as they're delivering stuff". There is an obvious flaw with this argument but I'll let you figure that out on your own.

[BigBadBull]

If the account was stolen and your fagfriend could prove it it would be back in his hands. ut he cant prove it. Can he?

Phoenix1969 already admitted that it's not his original account and there is only one person making a claim to it. While theymos probably wouldn't return the account without a signed message the existing proof is sufficient to conclude that the account changed hands, and likely not amicably.

You need to keep up, your bagholding colleagues have already moved away from the account ownership dispute and are now happily chanting "we don't care who the dev is as long as they're delivering stuff". There is an obvious flaw with this argument but I'll let you figure that out on your own.

No no no no no no no!


Phoenix admitted he is not the original owner BUT that does not mean the account was stolen. Not even close.

I bet he sold the account because he was broke and needed a redneck beer and a pack of malboros and now he wants to cry wolf.

Fuck that shit and fuck him! Straight up his ass!

[BigBadBull]

If the account was stolen and your fagfriend could prove it it would be back in his hands. ut he cant prove it. Can he?

Phoenix1969 already admitted that it's not his original account and there is only one person making a claim to it. While theymos probably wouldn't return the account without a signed message the existing proof is sufficient to conclude that the account changed hands, and likely not amicably.

You need to keep up, your bagholding colleagues have already moved away from the account ownership dispute and are now happily chanting "we don't care who the dev is as long as they're delivering stuff". There is an obvious flaw with this argument but I'll let you figure that out on your own.

And after looking at your post history and your trust feedback I'm starting to think you also may be a shill of  MrPresident, CryptoDevil , Quickseller ect.

If I get that feeling i'll also be leaving you red trust.

[MrPresident]

The account is stolen, period.
The sig is invalid because of the date of the post. Any moron should be able to see that.
The Phoenix1969 account was mine, and stolen, point blank.
I furnished everything peeps need to verify that.
This is moot, and you are digging yourselves a deeper hole.

[suchmoon]

And after looking at your post history and your trust feedback I'm starting to think you also may be a shill of  MrPresident, CryptoDevil , Quickseller ect.

If I get that feeling i'll also be leaving you red trust.

Yes, there is no doubt that me and Quickseller are tight. Make sure to let me know when you neg me so that I could cry myself to sleep.

[MrPresident]

If the account was stolen and your fagfriend could prove it it would be back in his hands. ut he cant prove it. Can he?

Phoenix1969 already admitted that it's not his original account and there is only one person making a claim to it. While theymos probably wouldn't return the account without a signed message the existing proof is sufficient to conclude that the account changed hands, and likely not amicably.

You need to keep up, your bagholding colleagues have already moved away from the account ownership dispute and are now happily chanting "we don't care who the dev is as long as they're delivering stuff". There is an obvious flaw with this argument but I'll let you figure that out on your own.

theymos has yet to get my pm.
rest assure, he will.
I never posted bitcoin addresses, and you can see the post was edited. busted.
You guys have no clue who these assholes even are because none of them have offered an ounce of identification. They took your shit under a false identity.
Peeps see ICO and just throw money without an ounce of research. sad.
I however posted my hawaiian id, and showed you I have control of the linked accounts.
Do you think I'm putting myself through this for shits & giggles?

[BigBadBull]

If the account was stolen and your fagfriend could prove it it would be back in his hands. ut he cant prove it. Can he?

Phoenix1969 already admitted that it's not his original account and there is only one person making a claim to it. While theymos probably wouldn't return the account without a signed message the existing proof is sufficient to conclude that the account changed hands, and likely not amicably.

You need to keep up, your bagholding colleagues have already moved away from the account ownership dispute and are now happily chanting "we don't care who the dev is as long as they're delivering stuff". There is an obvious flaw with this argument but I'll let you figure that out on your own.

theymos has yet to get my pm.
rest assure, he will.
I never posted bitcoin addresses, and you can see the post was edited. busted.
You guys have no clue who these assholes even are because none of them have offered an ounce of identification. They took your shit under a false identity.
Peeps see ICO and just throw money without an ounce of research. sad.
I however posted my hawaiian id, and showed you I have control of the linked accounts.
Do you think I'm putting myself through this for shits & giggles?

YOU ARE A LIAR.

It's highly likely you sold your account because you're a broke chump and now you want it back.

but you'll never get it back because you can never prove you did not sell it and whoever has it now can prove he has had it and been posting with it for a year, while you were posting from your new account.

you wont win this because you're a fucking liar.

[bitseedmike]

If the account was stolen and your fagfriend could prove it it would be back in his hands. ut he cant prove it. Can he?

Phoenix1969 already admitted that it's not his original account and there is only one person making a claim to it. While theymos probably wouldn't return the account without a signed message the existing proof is sufficient to conclude that the account changed hands, and likely not amicably.

You need to keep up, your bagholding colleagues have already moved away from the account ownership dispute and are now happily chanting "we don't care who the dev is as long as they're delivering stuff". There is an obvious flaw with this argument but I'll let you figure that out on your own.

theymos has yet to get my pm.
rest assure, he will.
I never posted bitcoin addresses, and you can see the post was edited. busted.
You guys have no clue who these assholes even are because none of them have offered an ounce of identification. They took your shit under a false identity.
Peeps see ICO and just throw money without an ounce of research. sad.
I however posted my hawaiian id, and showed you I have control of the linked accounts.
Do you think I'm putting myself through this for shits & giggles?

YOU ARE A LIAR.

It's highly likely you sold your account because you're a broke chump and now you want it back.

but you'll never get it back because you can never prove you did not sell it and whoever has it now can prove he has had it and been posting with it for a year, while you were posting from your new account.

you wont win this because you're a fucking liar.

Given your signature, does that mean you have a dick for a brain?

[Quickseller]

If the account was stolen and your fagfriend could prove it it would be back in his hands. ut he cant prove it. Can he?

Phoenix1969 already admitted that it's not his original account and there is only one person making a claim to it. While theymos probably wouldn't return the account without a signed message the existing proof is sufficient to conclude that the account changed hands, and likely not amicably.

You need to keep up, your bagholding colleagues have already moved away from the account ownership dispute and are now happily chanting "we don't care who the dev is as long as they're delivering stuff". There is an obvious flaw with this argument but I'll let you figure that out on your own.

theymos has yet to get my pm.
rest assure, he will.
I never posted bitcoin addresses, and you can see the post was edited. busted.
You guys have no clue who these assholes even are because none of them have offered an ounce of identification. They took your shit under a false identity.
Peeps see ICO and just throw money without an ounce of research. sad.
I however posted my hawaiian id, and showed you I have control of the linked accounts.
Do you think I'm putting myself through this for shits & giggles?

YOU ARE A LIAR.

It's highly likely you sold your account because you're a broke chump and now you want it back.

but you'll never get it back because you can never prove you did not sell it and whoever has it now can prove he has had it and been posting with it for a year, while you were posting from your new account.

you wont win this because you're a fucking liar.

I think that it does really not matter if Phoenix1969 is a sold account or not. He outright said that his account was not purchased several months ago and now is saying that he is not the original owner.

He also said that his "partner" was not using a purchased account, which is also clearly not true, in addition to the fact that Phoenix1969 was looking to purchase multiple "trusted" accounts in the months prior to starting LIR. Several accounts that match the description of what he was trying to buy have posted in the LIR thread.

The list of shady things about LIR does not end there and is very long.

As I have previously mentioned, I believe that Phoenix1969 faked the sale of his account in order to put some amount of doubt in who is really behind the account once he outright scams his "investors". There is a decent amount of evidence to back this up.

[MrPresident]

use the wayback machine
They just lie and lie and lie

[Vinnie Stanley]

If the account was stolen and your fagfriend could prove it it would be back in his hands. ut he cant prove it. Can he?

Phoenix1969 already admitted that it's not his original account and there is only one person making a claim to it. While theymos probably wouldn't return the account without a signed message the existing proof is sufficient to conclude that the account changed hands, and likely not amicably.

You need to keep up, your bagholding colleagues have already moved away from the account ownership dispute and are now happily chanting "we don't care who the dev is as long as they're delivering stuff". There is an obvious flaw with this argument but I'll let you figure that out on your own.

theymos has yet to get my pm.
rest assure, he will.
I never posted bitcoin addresses, and you can see the post was edited. busted.
You guys have no clue who these assholes even are because none of them have offered an ounce of identification. They took your shit under a false identity.
Peeps see ICO and just throw money without an ounce of research. sad.
I however posted my hawaiian id, and showed you I have control of the linked accounts.
Do you think I'm putting myself through this for shits & giggles?

YOU ARE A LIAR.

It's highly likely you sold your account because you're a broke chump and now you want it back.

but you'll never get it back because you can never prove you did not sell it and whoever has it now can prove he has had it and been posting with it for a year, while you were posting from your new account.

you wont win this because you're a fucking liar.

I think that it does really not matter if Phoenix1969 is a sold account or not. He outright said that his account was not purchased several months ago and now is saying that he is not the original owner.

He also said that his "partner" was not using a purchased account, which is also clearly not true, in addition to the fact that Phoenix1969 was looking to purchase multiple "trusted" accounts in the months prior to starting LIR. Several accounts that match the description of what he was trying to buy have posted in the LIR thread.

The list of shady things about LIR does not end there and is very long.

As I have previously mentioned, I believe that Phoenix1969 faked the sale of his account in order to put some amount of doubt in who is really behind the account once he outright scams his "investors". There is a decent amount of evidence to back this up.

quickscammer back to talk shit, surprising? Not really. It matters that the account was sold because the president claims it to be hacked and has been proven to be a liar as well. Who is going to say yes the account is brought people? I doubt anyone would be doing and that and especially you haha.
Alarm bells, accounts have posted on a very popular 270 page thread... I find it really hard to sink into my boots that you assholes believe pushing the anonymous devs to run is going to benefit anyone, who does that benefit? That is right the devs who walk with hundreds of btcs.
Bravo you are all real hero's!!!!!!!!!! I have had enough of hearing all your carry on shit and it obvious when but buddies start humping nothing will get between those welded buttcheeks and the penis.