Nasakiotoes (OP)
Member
 Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 100
|
 |
August 09, 2016, 04:40:50 PM |
|
Im just brainstorming here.
#1 Reason to fork bitcoin is to remove the Ninja mined Satoshi coins. See what I did there, the parallels to the eth attackers coins...
Opposite direction from
No really, I'm sure you've thought that an Ixcoin 2.0 reboot would allow for some extra freebees given to the ixcoin foundation for future developments.
Step 1. Fork bitcoin
Step 2. Add in ixcoin merge mined code etc
Step 3. Add in a special address with new foundation coins.
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
August 09, 2016, 04:49:57 PM |
|
ninja mined coins? those were necessary to mine to support the nertwork, and since bitcoin was worth zero at that time, i see no comparison with etheruem
|
|
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
August 09, 2016, 05:52:58 PM |
|
This seems to be a fork with the sole objective of blacklisting coins and/or diminishing the total supply, thus this fork is effectively an altcoin (this thread will most likely be moved)
|
|
|
|
|
Cyrus
Ninja
Administrator
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 3990
Merit: 3212
|
|
August 09, 2016, 06:29:02 PM |
|
(this thread will most likely be moved)
Correct. |
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
August 09, 2016, 06:35:20 PM |
|
Lol, step 2 is funny. If BTC is going to be the auxilliary, then who's the parent?
Why even move this thread, just delete this clueless bullshit..
|
|
|
|
|
Kellor
|
|
August 09, 2016, 06:47:12 PM |
|
Satoshi did not ninja mine the coins. He was there to support the network. Satoshi's coin should be kept.
|
|
|
|
|
Nasakiotoes (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 100
|
|
August 09, 2016, 07:25:03 PM |
|
Im not calling for removing satoshi's coins.
But since we are on that topic if you applied the same scrutiny to bitcoin that we do with alts then yeah, bitcoin was stealth mined. Yes satoshi needed to support the network but he also could have burned the initial big blocks of coins, who knows, his coins might be lost already due to loss of priv keys.
Eth is brought up as an an example of a blacklist.
But Really i was bringing up the idea of adding in coins to a special foundation account for future development, which would be a premine of some sort.
|
|
|
|
Nasakiotoes (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 100
|
|
August 09, 2016, 07:28:12 PM |
|
Lol, step 2 is funny. If BTC is going to be the auxilliary, then who's the parent?
Why even move this thread, just delete this clueless bullshit..
Bitcoinix merged with bitcoin. Why can't bitcoin fork and add mege mining to one of the chains and merge with itself? |
|
|
|
Nasakiotoes (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 100
|
|
August 09, 2016, 07:30:03 PM |
|
This seems to be a fork with the sole objective of blacklisting coins and/or diminishing the total supply, thus this fork is effectively an altcoin (this thread will most likely be moved)
This thread is for discussions of a hypothetical topic. |
|
|
|
scamrise
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
August 09, 2016, 07:45:54 PM |
|
i dont like fork
i dont like etherium
|
|
|
|
|
European Central Bank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
|
|
August 09, 2016, 08:14:24 PM |
|
i'm sure satoshi woulda been absolutely delighted to share mining with as many people as possible as early as possible. it's extremely easy to forget how nothing it was when it got started. and I don't buy this million coin thing.
|
|
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
August 10, 2016, 12:27:19 AM |
|
Lol, step 2 is funny. If BTC is going to be the auxilliary, then who's the parent?
Why even move this thread, just delete this clueless bullshit..
Bitcoinix merged with bitcoin. Why can't bitcoin fork and add mege mining to one of the chains and merge with itself? That's even worse |
|
|
|
|
MarketMagic
|
|
August 10, 2016, 11:30:25 AM |
|
Satoshi did not ninja mine the coins. He was there to support the network. Satoshi's coin should be kept.
Surely satoshi has earned those coins by creating bitcoin in first place?Should he work for free?? |
█████████████████████
|
|
|
Nasakiotoes (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 100
|
|
August 10, 2016, 01:32:36 PM |
|
Lol, step 2 is funny. If BTC is going to be the auxilliary, then who's the parent?
Why even move this thread, just delete this clueless bullshit..
Bitcoinix merged with bitcoin. Why can't bitcoin fork and add mege mining to one of the chains and merge with itself? That's even worse Thanks for all the explanation spots. Even though I've witnessed many taking a shot at you over the years for being a coin cloner, I've never said anything. You are the guy that makes lots and lots of clones only to drop all your shit on the scene right? Well why don't you have an actual opinion other then 3 words you goof. |
|
|
|
Nasakiotoes (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 100
|
|
August 10, 2016, 01:34:27 PM |
|
Satoshi did not ninja mine the coins. He was there to support the network. Satoshi's coin should be kept.
Surely satoshi has earned those coins by creating bitcoin in first place?Should he work for free?? Im not calling for removing satoshi's coins.
But since we are on that topic if you applied the same scrutiny to bitcoin that we do with alts then yeah, bitcoin was stealth mined. Yes satoshi needed to support the network but he also could have burned the initial big blocks of coins, who knows, his coins might be lost already due to loss of priv keys.
Eth is brought up as an an example of a blacklist.
But Really i was bringing up the idea of adding in coins to a special foundation account for future development, which would be a premine of some sort.
Remember reading? It works great. |
|
|
|
|
