Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 12:08:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 [193] 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 ... 433 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [PASC] PascalCoin: Induplicatable NFT  (Read 990672 times)
escapefrom3dom
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 288



View Profile
January 28, 2017, 01:20:06 AM
 #3841


19:11:51 Error Deleting a Pending response message id:5 method:miner-authorize

Any one getting this message when mining on Nanopool to Poloniex?

i'm getting too.

it seems that it doesn't make any influence on the mining result.

Bojcha
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 848
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 28, 2017, 01:20:55 AM
 #3842

nano Pool is horrible.
D8V1D
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 163
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 01:23:36 AM
 #3843

19:22:04 Error Invalid Double Sha256 found. Timestamp 588BF23F nOnce A3150EA0 DSHA256 0000000024EEF6B4AC2678F7D9AECB8715

Also noticing this error...
Lucky - Luciano
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 711
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 28, 2017, 01:36:24 AM
 #3844


19:11:51 Error Deleting a Pending response message id:5 method:miner-authorize

Any one getting this message when mining on Nanopool to Poloniex?
It's the same with me. Also, the connection to Nanopool often interrupted. We should automatic reconnect options  as  Claymore softwers.
nesic1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 636
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 01:46:00 AM
 #3845

i have like 40% of my miner total hash reported on pool, crap
Biterion
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 01:49:35 AM
 #3846

my RX 480 8Gb at my cmd shows 595MH/s but at Nanopool after 2 hours just shows 312.0 MH/s  Cry Cry Cry

WTF..
D8V1D
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 163
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 01:52:44 AM
 #3847

i have like 40% of my miner total hash reported on pool, crap

I have 4 rigs, that should have 19,600 h/s.
Nanopool only show 12,100 h/s.

Maybe it just needs time to update, it only been about 20 minutes.
I'll report back in 1 hour.
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 250


It takes a lot to build but not much to lose


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 01:53:29 AM
 #3848

Finally after emailing nanopool for clarification; here is the updated information from them Check out their help page
https://pasc.nanopool.org/help

jelin1984
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004



View Profile
January 28, 2017, 01:54:47 AM
 #3849

what version of ati drivers you used?
rekcahxfb_foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


CrowdWiz


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 01:58:43 AM
 #3850

atlast. pool released, i will mine pascal coin now. thanks nanopool!



           ▄███▄
        ▄█████████▄
     ▄██████████▀  ██▄
  ▄████████▀█▀   ▄██████▄
█▀▀▀███████   ▄████████▀▀▀█
██▄   ▀████▄▄▄▄█████▀   ▄██
█████▄   ▀███████▀   ▄█████
████████▄   ▀█▀   ▄████████
▀██████████▄   ▄███████████
   ▀████████▌ ▐█████ ██████
██▄   ▀█ ███▌ ▐████   ▀████
█████▄    ██▌ ▐███▄▄ ▐█████
████████ ▄██▌ ▐█████ ▐█████
████████▄███▌ ▐█████ ▐█████
  ▀█████████▌ ▐█████ ▐██▀
     ▀██████▌ ▐██████▀
        ▀███▌ ▐███▀
           ▀███▀

╲╲╲╲╲╲╲╲▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
THE FIRST OF ITS KIND
SELF-GOVERNED ECOSYSTEM

╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
   
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱
JOIN THE ICO - 18th OCTOBER
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬╲╲╲╲╲╲╲╲


           ▄███▄
        ▄█████████▄
     ▄██████████▀  ██▄
  ▄████████▀█▀   ▄██████▄
█▀▀▀███████   ▄████████▀▀▀█
██▄   ▀████▄▄▄▄█████▀   ▄██
█████▄   ▀███████▀   ▄█████
████████▄   ▀█▀   ▄████████
▀██████████▄   ▄███████████
   ▀████████▌ ▐█████ ██████
██▄   ▀█ ███▌ ▐████   ▀████
█████▄    ██▌ ▐███▄▄ ▐█████
████████ ▄██▌ ▐█████ ▐█████
████████▄███▌ ▐█████ ▐█████
  ▀█████████▌ ▐█████ ▐██▀
     ▀██████▌ ▐██████▀
        ▀███▌ ▐███▀
           ▀███▀

D8V1D
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 163
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 02:02:57 AM
 #3851

what version of ati drivers you used?


I'm getting the best hashrate using the lastest 17.1.1 drivers.

16.3.2 performs about the same as 17.1.1

15.12 drivers are the slowest.
pokeytex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002



View Profile
January 28, 2017, 02:03:38 AM
 #3852

Hey everyone, updated the CUDA GPU miner with some of KlausT's improvements: https://github.com/Vorksholk/PascalCoin-CUDA/releases/tag/v1.04

No promise that the new miner can actually mine blocks, but if anyone gets a block with this, please let the rest of us know. About 360% performance improvements, I'm getting around 900 MH/s on an overclocked 1080.

I've also seen some people worried about the PascalCoin wallet saying "Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload." This isn't a problem--the way my miner works (and presumably some others that are floating around now, although I haven't looked at the code for them) is by submitting shares that meet a target of 24000000. Note that we are currently on track for a target of 31000000 soon, which is 8192 times higher, so you should expect to see, on average, 8192 of those errors per actual block mined. The miner is submitting shares to the wallet, effectively. These shares don't count for anything unless they meet the target.

Your miner works!

I just found two blocks in rapid succession (with only one block between them  Cheesy) with a rather low hashrate.

Awesome, thanks!!

@Vorksholk - does this look correct?

Found nonce: 9fba7110    T: 588bf53d    Hashrate: -66.115 MH/s   Total: 79
    The hash is:
00000000 09adba34 c59c24ca 3ae6e296 a46286c3 bf5ce444 8d259f33 ed753a65
Found nonce: a9f63221    T: 588bf54f    Hashrate: -66.967 MH/s   Total: 80
 Real: 76DF0000CA022000065B6DC8C473B844CDE9E6FDD41B1DDB86A4BA221A144ADBF262B7EF45CA616 C20004DCA777EB90B0C7DB29D640A9AD78458A0AA6F081BAF18576E522EB1F812ADC540420F0000 00000
001000100A7F20F326D616E6E72697A7A3030AF612C7AF71D889D1DF8338EB87E679EF1F37FCC82 D56497EA9CB7C75D30CE05E3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7 852B85500000
000000000000000000
    The hash is:
00000000 06b8570b b4116d29 ff87a10c 96a6a128 7ab1bd5c 35554edc 1bb332c7
Found nonce: f109c210    T: 588bf5ec    Hashrate: -67.941 MH/s   Total: 81
    The hash is:
00000000 01a47eab 66e083e9 f679308a e5c56254 f675c65f a99dd213 1568e542
Found nonce: 37990430    T: 588bf62e    Hashrate: -68.838 MH/s   Total: 82
    The hash is:
00000000 03aca835 2f8d9354 e5c856a2 619f21c9 11d613a6 92aad7c5 6890112d
Found nonce: 2cb57b1b    T: 588bf657    Hashrate: -69.714 MH/s   Total: 83
    The hash is:
00000000 07371873 9c3f2cef aa7a6cac dde948de cceeabb8 1ee96139 9b6032c1
Found nonce: 848e3b34    T: 588bf6e7    Hashrate: -70.684 MH/s   Total: 84
 Real: 77DF0000CA022000065B6DC8C473B844CDE9E6FDD41B1DDB86A4BA221A144ADBF262B7EF45CA616 C20004DCA777EB90B0C7DB29D640A9AD78458A0AA6F081BAF18576E522EB1F812ADC540420F0000 00000
0010001008CE814326D616E6E72697A7A3030B4E3AF74532300421AB714F2984F8AE08EC700DBA1 9401E4BEF4D5AA5C0DCCC3E3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7 852B85500000
000000000000000000
    The hash is:
00000000 001b563d 174cdbed 23530d29 66eaa0cf 06464962 57fdd761 81221615
Found nonce: 40540d32    T: 588bf747    Hashrate: -71.613 MH/s   Total: 85
    The hash is:
00000000 020b0ebe 83cb434e a4f22f80 df2f655b df159376 a15c43ca 7c550a4d
Found nonce: 84036911    T: 588bf7fe    Hashrate: -72.627 MH/s   Total: 86
    The hash is:
00000000 039c7501 862ddc47 eec2c2ea 57e9f156 e1b212af 8e64ebc1 fdeb9b6c
Found nonce: 30595003    T: 588bf866    Hashrate: -73.570 MH/s   Total: 87
 Real: 78DF0000CA022000065B6DC8C473B844CDE9E6FDD41B1DDB86A4BA221A144ADBF262B7EF45CA616 C20004DCA777EB90B0C7DB29D640A9AD78458A0AA6F081BAF18576E522EB1F812ADC540420F0000 00000
001000100BED119326D616E6E72697A7A30305F9894CC1B4EF04FD45C0C0193FB4FB3FF90CB89A2 BCF3F9F2A65BC1514BF984E3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7 852B85500000
000000000000000000
    The hash is:
00000000 0a98443f a73bdfbc f7fa4bed 74232f80 297a5b44 12669643 6ef102a7
Found nonce: 7811662d    T: 588bf8f1    Hashrate: -74.549 MH/s   Total: 88
    The hash is:
00000000 0da6dd86 af5b06d6 16f9c6df 30d5b716 4150708d 6dd2ecd8 67f86f88
Found nonce: 2c25f328    T: 588bf926    Hashrate: -75.448 MH/s   Total: 89
    The hash is:
00000000 098014c6 58d6d59a 45c5fae5 44bd0a20 a0076707 8a59523a b658a922
Found nonce: afbf7c07    T: 588bf952    Hashrate: -76.340 MH/s   Total: 90
 Real: 79DF0000CA022000065B6DC8C473B844CDE9E6FDD41B1DDB86A4BA221A144ADBF262B7EF45CA616 C20004DCA777EB90B0C7DB29D640A9AD78458A0AA6F081BAF18576E522EB1F812ADC540420F0000 00000
0010001005EAE1E326D616E6E72697A7A30307F03C15526BFAE453FFE100FD5C3103A0C5EBF07B5 1358F94EE6FD0DE869EB2CE3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7 852B85500000
000000000000000000
    The hash is:
00000000 0a86a400 36011db6 964b54fc fa5f3324 64e8e355 659abcc8 f9553544
Found nonce: 0f75372a    T: 588bf97b    Hashrate: -77.229 MH/s   Total: 91
    The hash is:
00000000 07f3a86c 1754eb65 1c703ffb 0dcb0d42 ac508049 b20507bf a0d93a06
Found nonce: 48de9b1e    T: 588bf9b4    Hashrate: -78.135 MH/s   Total: 92
    The hash is:
00000000 0bccb3ae 1a352c58 db12c1d4 9ca0fd8b 1dc4299d 3c6190dc a78e06a3
Found nonce: 45f9473d    T: 588bf9cc    Hashrate: -79.009 MH/s   Total: 93
 Real: 7ADF0000CA022000065B6DC8C473B844CDE9E6FDD41B1DDB86A4BA221A144ADBF262B7EF45CA616 C20004DCA777EB90B0C7DB29D640A9AD78458A0AA6F081BAF18576E522EB1F812ADC540420F0000 00000
0010001008C7E23326D616E6E72697A7A3030E080E5E252A7D138CB058F13C8F5A3D125BB839D65 50208E80B971F25E5287F2E3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7 852B85500000
000000000000000000
    The hash is:
00000000 001c191a 373e0829 e9ec26a8 49cff24b d5dde453 fdbe0547 4ba10cd0
Found nonce: 74be1808    T: 588bf9fe    Hashrate: -79.911 MH/s   Total: 94
 Real: 7BDF0000CA022000065B6DC8C473B844CDE9E6FDD41B1DDB86A4BA221A144ADBF262B7EF45CA616 C20004DCA777EB90B0C7DB29D640A9AD78458A0AA6F081BAF18576E522EB1F812ADC540420F0000 00000
001000100674228326D616E6E72697A7A303016C8EA3871BBBE9D8C7404AE2F07D816C2C3DB256A 5F5DAD9F10499EEE27253DE3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7 852B85500000
000000000000000000

I am getting a lot of negative hashrate.

Thanks - pokeytex

joaogti36
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 162
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 02:05:13 AM
 #3853

restart miner and select a better proxy.exe Cheesy
i'm using sm60.exe with an gtx 1060
Lucky - Luciano
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 711
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 28, 2017, 02:06:35 AM
 #3854

i have like 40% of my miner total hash reported on pool, crap

I have 4 rigs, that should have 19,600 h/s.
Nanopool only show 12,100 h/s.

Maybe it just needs time to update, it only been about 20 minutes.
I'll report back in 1 hour.
For me  displayed small hashrate for 3 hours. I have a 3600 MH / s and now shows 624 Mh / s.
Biterion
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 02:06:43 AM
 #3855

we all as miners have treated many scams
hashrate we have not get the appropriate reward
developers never give full support
while the pool is always steal some hashrate we have
 Angry Angry Angry
smaxz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 430
Merit: 253


VeganAcademy


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 02:08:33 AM
 #3856

with pools going active, is pascal coin worthy of solo mining? like was with ETH back then (chances of getting more coins doing solo instead of using pools).

any opinion on minimum hash rate for solo mining?

BTW it is also good to look at your wallet "current target" like 31B0B194 and your miner should have the same target. seen my miner with different target and i have to restart the miner to have the right target.


i think it is.. i'm setting a rig aside to silently solo mine this coin.

being late to the table, the fact that you need to research properly to mine this coin effectively was a big factor in my initial buy-in, and the account distribution being limited to block finders is something that makes keeping a wallet open and mining a worthwhile endeavor.

i didn't unload anywhere near the top but with the advent of some pools here the dump was inevitable and predictable.

although i would have preferred a coin code-base ported to assembler instead of pascal, the fact that we're far below when i did dump my wad means i've set my buy to re-enter this market and i'd advise others to do likewise.

- NGdTwHRSdnThdi1drQuHGT3khAHRtZ1HMq -
fmz89
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1766
Merit: 1002



View Profile
January 28, 2017, 02:35:33 AM
Last edit: January 28, 2017, 02:48:37 AM by fmz89
 #3857

nano is always crap, so much less(only got 1/10 from my earning) when mining in here, i think their bad code share based on 24h hashrate or another miss calculation
back to solo

  ▄█▀                       ▀█▄
 ██           ▄▄ ▄▄           ██
███       ▄ ▄███ ███▄ ▄       ███
████▄   ███ ████ ████ ███   ▄████
 ██████████ ███▀ ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄ ▄██████
  ▀▀███████  ▀▄█████████ ████▀▀
       ███▀▄ ██████▀▀▀ ▄▄
       █▀▄██ ████▄▄█▀▄████
        ████ ▀█████▄▀██▀
        ████ █▄▀█████▄
        ████  ▀▀ █████▀
         ▀▀█      ▀█▀
.REXX.|||
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████▀    ▐███████
███████████    ▄▄█████████
▐██████████▀    ▀▀█████████▌
▐█████████▌       █████████▌
▐███████████    ███████████▌
███████████    ███████████
██████████    ██████████
▀████████▄  ▄████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀  █████
████████████▀▀      ██████
▐████████▀▀   ▄▄     ██████▌
▐████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ███████▌
▐████████ █▀        ███████▌
████████ █ ▄███▄   ███████
████████████████▄▄██████
▀████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
████ ▄▀██████████  █████
██████▄▀▄▀██████  ████████
▐████████▄▀▄▀██  ██████████▌
▐██████████▄▀▄ ████████████▌
▐██████████  ▄▀▄▀██████████▌
████████  ████▄▀▄▀████████
█████  ████████▄▀ ██████
▀████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|.BUY REXX.
l30z1n
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 03:03:45 AM
 #3858

What is the real global hashrate??

On the Pascal Block explorer is 4.7 TH, but just nano is 8.7 TH.

 Huh Huh Huh
chronek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 273
Merit: 250


BD People Are Legend


View Profile
January 28, 2017, 03:09:33 AM
 #3859

What is the real global hashrate??

On the Pascal Block explorer is 4.7 TH, but just nano is 8.7 TH.

 Huh Huh Huh

wooho 9,05 TH on nanopool, 4 hours ago was 250 GH ... whattomine show global nethash 9,07 ... all hashrate from nanopool ;-)
I think rather after first pool big mining farms decided to join party and just sites not refreshed global nethash stats (pascal block explorer never show right amount)


                 ▄▄▄██████████████████▄▄▄
            ▄▄██▀▀▀▀▀███████████████████████▄▄
        ▄▄███▀   ▄▄▄   ▀████████████████████████▄▄
     ▄██████  ▄███████▄  ▀██████████████████▀▀▀█████▄
   ▄███████    ███▀▀ ██    ███████████  ███▀  ▄███████▄
  █████████▄  ▄█▀  ▄███    ██████████  ▄██  ▄███████████
 ██████████████▀  ████▀   ▄██▀▀▀████  ▄████▀  ███████████
██████████████▀  ▄███▀   ▄█▀  ▄▄ ██▀ ▄█  ██  █████████████
██████████████   ▀     ▄██▀  ▄█  █▀  █   █▀▄  ▀███████████
█████████████▀  ▄███▄  ▀██   ██ ▄▄▄  █▀ ▄▄▀█▄  ▀▄█████████
█████████████   █████   ▀██▄ ▀▄████▄  ▄███▄▀  ▄███████████
 █████   ▀██▀  ▄█████    █▀▀█████████████████▀███████████
  ████   ▄█▀   █████    ██ ▀▄█▀▄▄▀█ ▀▄▀█▀▄▀ █▀█ ▀▄██████
   ▀███▄▄   ▄█▄ ▀▀     ███ █ █ ▄▄▄█  █ █ █  █ █ ██████▀
     ▀██████████▄▄▄▄▄█████▄█▄██▄▄██ █▄███▄█▄█▄█▄████▀
        ▀▀██████████████████████████████████████▀▀
            ▀▀██████████████████████████████▀▀
                 ▀▀▀██████████████████▀▀▀
      Supported by
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
John McAfee     
|
|
|
|

   ▀██▄       ▀████▄
▄    ▀██          ▀██▄
██▄ ▄███         ▄█████▄▄
 ▀███████▄     ▄██▀ ▀▀████
      ▀████▄ ▄██▀     ▀█▀
        ▀████▄
        ▄█▀████▄
      ▄███▄▀▀████▄
    ▄████▀    ▀████▄
  ▄████▀        ▀██▀█▄
  ▀██▀            ▀██▀
Bojcha
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 848
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 28, 2017, 03:11:57 AM
 #3860

Vardiff on nano is too big, that's problem
Pages: « 1 ... 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 [193] 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 ... 433 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!