[PASC] PascalCoin: Induplicatable NFT

[escapefrom3dom]

..you have the ability to select multiple accounts in the last version of client...

But for the destination account to some accounts can not, is there a solution?

u can only make a payment from the all listed accounts balance to one another account by a single transaction.

This means for now transfers coin from one account to multiple accounts in one transfer can not? Or maybe it's a job to be solved for further development? Or maybe it is this that causes the withdrawal of coins from polo and miningpool into private wallet (personal account) takes a very long time.

we're talking about the gui wallet.

it's natural that on polo everything is implemented differently.

Yeah right, gui wallet i mean. Will be much easier again in the gui wallet on the next update there will be a transfer menu to multiple accounts. As this will make it easier for users to make one-time transfer payments to more than one account. For example for the company will pay 100 to 1000 employees, the company pays bills to some clients or taxes. Will save time and on time. I hope pascal coin will use the right tools to handle the transaction of it all, this will be a revolution in the financial world.

for such tasks the implementation through api is more suitable than gui.

[cryptotrader111]

For DEV or someone who can answer, how to send coins from one account to multiple accounts one-time sending, not one by one send? If one by one will take a long time. Thank's.

PascalCoin allows many types of operations. The commonly used "Transaction" operation only allows a single sender to send funds to a single recipient. In the future, this may be changed but there are complications here in terms of fee structuring. Aggregating N transactions into 1 for the fee of 1 transaction may lead to spam/DoS attacks.

That being said, PascalCoin is easily extensible to allow new operations in future. If you have a specific use case in mind, join the slack and discuss with us there (or github feature request).


Thanks,
Herman.

[yudhi999]

For DEV or someone who can answer, how to send coins from one account to multiple accounts one-time sending, not one by one send? If one by one will take a long time. Thank's.

PascalCoin allows many types of operations. The commonly used "Transaction" operation only allows a single sender to send funds to a single recipient. In the future, this may be changed but there are complications here in terms of fee structuring. Aggregating N transactions into 1 for the fee of 1 transaction may lead to spam/DoS attacks.

That being said, PascalCoin is easily extensible to allow new operations in future. If you have a specific use case in mind, join the slack and discuss with us there (or github feature request).


Thanks,
Herman.

Thank you for your response. I understand in general one sender for one receiver. But for the command used in the gui wallet can be used to send to multiple accounts from one account and for the implementation of the transfer remains one by one. Example there are 10 direct transfers, execution 1 transfer is completed then next until 10 transfers is completed. That's my opinion.

[babysas]

can someone share the wallet?

public key:
3GhhbovVTV1jQNPqRQksQquA2osv8F3YV6jErdUoLLCASHHP6aahf5tELn4zQNCk2SC4PKGwpW67wRw abctaArdyv9TgcVwzRLjcwy

Thanks!

[eggdescrambler]

can someone share the wallet?

public key:
3GhhbovVTV1jQNPqRQksQquA2osv8F3YV6jErdUoLLCASHHP6aahf5tELn4zQNCk2SC4PKGwpW67wRw abctaArdyv9TgcVwzRLjcwy

Thanks!

Perhaps a miner will send you one for free, but otherwise, check this out
http://getpasa.com/

[dissident]

So we have some agreement on slack about dropping "coin" from the name and simply calling it Pascal.   We should get rolling on that.    I still like Pask more. .  Pasa would be a fine name, too.

[jonald_fyookball]

So we have some agreement on slack about dropping "coin" from the name and simply calling it Pascal.   We should get rolling on that.    I still like Pask more. .  Pasa would be a fine name, too.

PascalCoin is not that great of a name for marketing.

Marketing isn't everything but it does mean something.   

I think Pascal is better than PascalCoin.  Anything with "coin" in it seems very dated.

Pask is ok. 

Right now community is very small, we need more voices and to have some more discussion.

[vingaard]

can someone share the wallet?

public key:
3GhhbovVTV1jQNPqRQksQquA2osv8F3YV6jErdUoLLCASHHP6aahf5tELn4zQNCk2SC4PKGwpW67wRw abctaArdyv9TgcVwzRLjcwy

Thanks!

Perhaps a miner will send you one for free, but otherwise, check this out
http://getpasa.com/

I think http://getpasa.com/ is more expensive than https://www.pascwallet.com market ... but is your choice 

[yudhi999]

can someone share the wallet?

public key:
3GhhbovVTV1jQNPqRQksQquA2osv8F3YV6jErdUoLLCASHHP6aahf5tELn4zQNCk2SC4PKGwpW67wRw abctaArdyv9TgcVwzRLjcwy

Thanks!

You can buy an account in www.pascwallet.com or mine in https://pasc.nanopool.org/you will get a free account address after mine 20 PASC and do not forget to enter your public key in settings.

[yudhi999]

So we have some agreement on slack about dropping "coin" from the name and simply calling it Pascal.   We should get rolling on that.    I still like Pask more. .  Pasa would be a fine name, too.

PascalCoin is not that great of a name for marketing.

Marketing isn't everything but it does mean something.  

I think Pascal is better than PascalCoin.  Anything with "coin" in it seems very dated.

Pask is ok.  

Right now community is very small, we need more voices and to have some more discussion.

I think the name is the identity of a good or something that can be known to many people. If the name is changed from the beginning of its birth this will confuse many people. A new name means starting popularity from scratch. Name is not important for coin popularity. But more importantly how the technological developments adopted by the coin are used for many people for various purposes. And more importantly the function of the coin.

[jonald_fyookball]

So we have some agreement on slack about dropping "coin" from the name and simply calling it Pascal.   We should get rolling on that.    I still like Pask more. .  Pasa would be a fine name, too.

PascalCoin is not that great of a name for marketing.

Marketing isn't everything but it does mean something.  

I think Pascal is better than PascalCoin.  Anything with "coin" in it seems very dated.

Pask is ok.  

Right now community is very small, we need more voices and to have some more discussion.

I think the name is the identity of a good or something that can be known to many people. If the name is changed from the beginning of its birth this will confuse many people. A new name means starting popularity from scratch. Name is not important for coin popularity. But more importantly how the technological developments adopted by the coin are used for many people for various purposes. And more importantly the function of the coin.

true but changing from PascalCoin to Pascal is not very confusing.

[eggdescrambler]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

[tabithaz]

Dear all friend
I am an exhanger of PASC ( not minner) show can share me account via Public key:
3GhhbokJZXG3XxpLANiQAu69JEiRs1wcC1hsqu9c8fuJBeN4MbzYxbaDBBdpEwckrkqkobzZuYVqido iND9KL2KU2tzQkZuKFXwCt8
I want to store coin on my way
Thánks

yes why not you can store according to your own way and can be winner at any point too.

[escapefrom3dom]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

[jonald_fyookball]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

[escapefrom3dom]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

[jonald_fyookball]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I think it should be possible and I agree , there should be more PASA. 1000% agree. 

[nightraven]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I don't understand. There are around 510,000 unused PASAs. Only 4442 accounts have a balance bigger than 0.0000. There are two web sites where PASAs are sold. So I can't see any bottleneck.

[escapefrom3dom]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I don't understand. There are around 510,000 unused PASAs. Only 4442 accounts have a balance bigger than 0.0000. There are two web sites where PASAs are sold. So I can't see any bottleneck.

just looking into the future.

[yudhi999]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I don't understand. There are around 510,000 unused PASAs. Only 4442 accounts have a balance bigger than 0.0000. There are two web sites where PASAs are sold. So I can't see any bottleneck.

Because miners PASA owners do not fully trust the 3rd party PASA market. Because of the lack of confidence that resulted in the amount of PASA supply in the market less than the maximum pasa. Pasa / miner owner hopes there is PASA market in gui wallet. Possibly over time of trust will arise and market pasa can be used optimally. While whitepaper V2 mentions the presence of pasa market in the wallet.