[PASC] PascalCoin: Induplicatable NFT

[jonald_fyookball]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I think it should be possible and I agree , there should be more PASA. 1000% agree. 

[nightraven]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I don't understand. There are around 510,000 unused PASAs. Only 4442 accounts have a balance bigger than 0.0000. There are two web sites where PASAs are sold. So I can't see any bottleneck.

[escapefrom3dom]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I don't understand. There are around 510,000 unused PASAs. Only 4442 accounts have a balance bigger than 0.0000. There are two web sites where PASAs are sold. So I can't see any bottleneck.

just looking into the future.

[yudhi999]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I don't understand. There are around 510,000 unused PASAs. Only 4442 accounts have a balance bigger than 0.0000. There are two web sites where PASAs are sold. So I can't see any bottleneck.

Because miners PASA owners do not fully trust the 3rd party PASA market. Because of the lack of confidence that resulted in the amount of PASA supply in the market less than the maximum pasa. Pasa / miner owner hopes there is PASA market in gui wallet. Possibly over time of trust will arise and market pasa can be used optimally. While whitepaper V2 mentions the presence of pasa market in the wallet.

[yudhi999]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

Hardfork is not a good way for a coin. The greater the safebox will be to increase the time for syncing, aggravating PC and wasteful bandwidth. This will result in reduced nodes and aggravate network power. I think the situation is right now, and pascal coin is a pure untouched coin hardfork altogether. I think pascal coin is a very precious coin, unlike other coins whose address is worthless.

[noeeel]

Is it planed to increase the adress generation speed?

[yudhi999]

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think all future coins will use deletable blockchain not just ETH only. PASCAL COIN is a pioneer of deletable blockchain coins . That means lots of coins that will migrate to deletable blockchain and they have to be hardfork. While PASCAL COIN pure deletable blockchain without hardfork.

[noeeel]

Is there any other coin in existance with deltable blockchain technlogy?

[Alex_He]

There are already about 300,000 Pascal Accounts, probably owned by not more than 30,000 people. Building a PASA market is really important issue and for the long term a decentralized one build into the wallet is a must have.

It is urgent to develop an easy way for people who do not mine to obtain easily a single account so they can store their PASC into the wallet and not on the exchanges. A lot of investors will not feel secure if they buy PASC and do not have where to store their money.

[escapefrom3dom]

1. There are already about 300,000 Pascal Accounts, probably owned by not more than 30,000 people. Building a PASA market is really important issue and for the long term a decentralized one build into the wallet is a must have.

2. It is urgent to develop an easy way for people who do not mine to obtain easily a single account so they can store their PASC into the wallet and not on the exchanges. A lot of investors will not feel secure if they buy PASC and do not have where to store their money.

1. actually, more than 515 000.

2. already done.

[jonald_fyookball]

Is there any other coin in existance with deltable blockchain technlogy?

there's a fork pasclite... smaller cap and likely not to gain community traction

[noeeel]

Is there any other coin in existance with deltable blockchain technlogy?

there's a fork pasclite... smaller cap and likely not to gain community traction

Okay, but no other coin that just builds on the developed technology and is not just a fork with minor changes?

[jonald_fyookball]

Is there any other coin in existance with deltable blockchain technlogy?

there's a fork pasclite... smaller cap and likely not to gain community traction

Okay, but no other coin that just builds on the developed technology and is not just a fork with minor changes?

Not that I am aware. 

It is really an entirely new architecture for the blockchain...it seems pretty much impossible to "bolt it on" to anything existing.
You would have to plan the coin like this from the beginning... so anything would likely be a fork or a completely new implementation.

[yudhi999]

So we have some agreement on slack about dropping "coin" from the name and simply calling it Pascal.   We should get rolling on that.    I still like Pask more. .  Pasa would be a fine name, too.

PascalCoin is not that great of a name for marketing.

Marketing isn't everything but it does mean something.  

I think Pascal is better than PascalCoin.  Anything with "coin" in it seems very dated.

Pask is ok.  

Right now community is very small, we need more voices and to have some more discussion.

I think the name is the identity of a good or something that can be known to many people. If the name is changed from the beginning of its birth this will confuse many people. A new name means starting popularity from scratch. Name is not important for coin popularity. But more importantly how the technological developments adopted by the coin are used for many people for various purposes. And more importantly the function of the coin.

true but changing from PascalCoin to Pascal is not very confusing.

Why are you impressed to have fear with the word "COIN" attached to pascalcoin? Are you afraid pascalcoin will precede coins with a giant blockchain? Why do not you tell the bitcoin community to change the name to BIT?

[spacezx]

Proposal: PascalCoin treasury system

PascalCoin network should allocates 10% of its coin generation to its treasury system (90% for miners). The treasury funds are allocated monthly to any independent contractor or service provider who wants to be "hired" by the network to provide services including programming, web design, marketing, graphic design, or any other services that help improve and promote the PascalCoin currency and community.

This way PascalCoin can found itself, without expecting any donation or voluntary services. We can hire full time developers to help @Albert Molina. We can hire web designers to redesign the www.pascalcoin.org website or even do some marketing to increase the public awareness.

[BicolIsarog]

Time to buy some PascalCoin again!

[olarsson]

Is there any mobile wallet for Pascal?

[spacezx]

Is there any generous person who is willing to give me an account number?

My public key:
3GhhbouXPEif3ZD56zvMxBmfhTo3qw1ZzsXhet1EeRp4U8pBS6zGovbyHce9sPDiKm6usmmYktnXbE1 KiamaUG4i2jPVpYA3sUCdCc

[jonald_fyookball]

Is there any generous person who is willing to give me an account number?

My public key:
3GhhbouXPEif3ZD56zvMxBmfhTo3qw1ZzsXhet1EeRp4U8pBS6zGovbyHce9sPDiKm6usmmYktnXbE1 KiamaUG4i2jPVpYA3sUCdCc

they only cost a dollar you know.  if you dont have a dollar for an address, how are you going to have any more for PASC? 

[Imro]

And how to buy an address actually? Sombody sent me the website but I had to pay in PASC, and I can't buy PASC without an address..