[ANN] ICONOMI - Fund Management Platform

[honolulumark]

wow , what happened, just woke up.

[1715139323]

1715139323

[1715139323]

1715139323

[cryptodromeda]

wow , what happened, just woke up.

It went down. Then it went back up.

Welcome to crypto.

[MoveCrypto]

Iconomi = Centralized

Funds are held by Iconomi middlemen in Slovenia

MelonPort = Decentralized

Tokens that represent shares of the various melonport investment funds can be be held in cold storage
The assets that will be included in the various melonport investment funds will be held in Ethereum smart contracts.

Melonport only works with ERC20 tokens, so you have to trust this centralized company to hold all the BTC and fiat:
https://www.decentralizedcapital.com/#/about

If it's not connected to centralized exchanges there will be no liquidity for fund managers.

No dividends and the supply inflates by 25% to 50% per year indefinitely.

[Warren_Buffett]

wow , what happened, just woke up.

It went down. Then it went back up.

The after-dumps always follow a major dump.

ICN will soon drop below ICO levels after Devs launch ICNX fund trading and start pimping ICNX instead of ICN, with no signs of OFM until end of 2017

[estenity]

pump to 0.000415 !
good conference results in usa ?

[Jiddu]

ICN will soon drop below ICO levels [blabla]

Great, can't wait to buy more, will you kindly remind me then?

[TopTrade]

Iconomi = Centralized

Funds are held by Iconomi middlemen in Slovenia

MelonPort = Decentralized

Tokens that represent shares of the various melonport investment funds can be be held in cold storage
The assets that will be included in the various melonport investment funds will be held in Ethereum smart contracts.

Melonport only works with ERC20 tokens, so you have to trust this centralized company to hold all the BTC and fiat:
https://www.decentralizedcapital.com/#/about

If it's not connected to centralized exchanges there will be no liquidity for fund managers.

No dividends and the supply inflates by 25% to 50% per year indefinitely.

From an ROI potential, let's not forget that:

Iconomi = Security Token = Cannot be listed by Poloniex

MelonPort = Usage Token = Can be listed by Poloniex

[MoveCrypto]

Iconomi = Centralized

Funds are held by Iconomi middlemen in Slovenia

MelonPort = Decentralized

Tokens that represent shares of the various melonport investment funds can be be held in cold storage
The assets that will be included in the various melonport investment funds will be held in Ethereum smart contracts.

Melonport only works with ERC20 tokens, so you have to trust this centralized company to hold all the BTC and fiat:
https://www.decentralizedcapital.com/#/about

If it's not connected to centralized exchanges there will be no liquidity for fund managers.

No dividends and the supply inflates by 25% to 50% per year indefinitely.

From an ROI potential, let's not forget that:

Iconomi = Security Token = Cannot be listed by Poloniex

MelonPort = Usage Token - Can be listed by Poloniex

Iconomi devs are waiting until both ICNX and ICN tokens are in circulation before pushing to get them both listed on additional exchanges.

If you follow Bittrex slack, you will see that Bittrex wanted to list ICN, but ICN devs told them they didn't want to be listed on additional exchanges yet.

[mpunisher]

Iconomi = Centralized

Funds are held by Iconomi middlemen in Slovenia

MelonPort = Decentralized

Tokens that represent shares of the various melonport investment funds can be be held in cold storage
The assets that will be included in the various melonport investment funds will be held in Ethereum smart contracts.

Melonport only works with ERC20 tokens, so you have to trust this centralized company to hold all the BTC and fiat:
https://www.decentralizedcapital.com/#/about

If it's not connected to centralized exchanges there will be no liquidity for fund managers.

No dividends and the supply inflates by 25% to 50% per year indefinitely.

From an ROI potential, let's not forget that:

Iconomi = Security Token = Cannot be listed by Poloniex

MelonPort = Usage Token - Can be listed by Poloniex

we don't need poloniex

[MoveCrypto]

Christ, Warren_Buffet, how many buy orders do you have?  I would think that big dump would have filled all your orders and you would shut the fuck up by now, but it looks like this guy is a whale who can't get enough ICN.  

Extremely bullish signal.

My prediction is the $1.875m worth of MLN tokens that are for sale will be bought out in 1 mega transaction by an insider, just like Yunbi did with FirstBlood ico.

People who dump their ICN for cheap to go into MLN now will get their ETH transactions rejected, and would make more profit by just holding ICN for 1 more month.

[TopTrade]

Iconomi = Centralized

Funds are held by Iconomi middlemen in Slovenia

MelonPort = Decentralized

Tokens that represent shares of the various melonport investment funds can be be held in cold storage
The assets that will be included in the various melonport investment funds will be held in Ethereum smart contracts.

Melonport only works with ERC20 tokens, so you have to trust this centralized company to hold all the BTC and fiat:
https://www.decentralizedcapital.com/#/about

If it's not connected to centralized exchanges there will be no liquidity for fund managers.

No dividends and the supply inflates by 25% to 50% per year indefinitely.

From an ROI potential, let's not forget that:

Iconomi = Security Token = Cannot be listed by Poloniex

MelonPort = Usage Token - Can be listed by Poloniex

Iconomi devs are waiting until both ICNX and ICN tokens are in circulation before pushing to get them both listed on additional exchanges.

If you follow Bittrex slack, you will see that Bittrex wanted to list ICN, but ICN devs told them they didn't want to be listed on additional exchanges yet.

Bittrex is US based so they will NEVER list an SECURITY TOKEN like ICN, unless they want to have problems with the SEC.

[_DaNiLo_]

This was the most failed fud ever.
It was so fast that I couldn't even ride on it  

[cryptodromeda]

ICN will dump to .00030s, then continues dumping to .00020s when Devs launch the platform with just ICNX trading, with no OFM in sight. Then will drop below ICO level like the majority of ICOs.

No, I'm sorry. I don't plan on buying back AT ALL.
I rather invest in another ICO and make a quick x4 or x5 return, than go down with this ship back under ICO level.
With so many competitors showing promising prototypes (MelonPort, NeuFund.org, Equibit, TaaS, etc...), Iconomi's value proposition has "gone out the window".
As I said:

Iconomi had potential back in Q3/Q4 2016 but unfortunately the delays, the lies, the woes are starting to unravel in their business plan, especially with the legal barriers & OFM delay to end of 2017.

Don't say I didn't warn you!
The next dump will drop ICN below ICO level.

All of this fud reminds me of the early Monero days. There's gold in these hills.

[MoveCrypto]

Iconomi = Centralized

Funds are held by Iconomi middlemen in Slovenia

MelonPort = Decentralized

Tokens that represent shares of the various melonport investment funds can be be held in cold storage
The assets that will be included in the various melonport investment funds will be held in Ethereum smart contracts.

Melonport only works with ERC20 tokens, so you have to trust this centralized company to hold all the BTC and fiat:
https://www.decentralizedcapital.com/#/about

If it's not connected to centralized exchanges there will be no liquidity for fund managers.

No dividends and the supply inflates by 25% to 50% per year indefinitely.

Bullshit, I read the Bittrex slack yesterday where Bittrex-Bill specifically said the reason they didn't list it yet was because Iconomi devs didn't give them the green light.

From an ROI potential, let's not forget that:

Iconomi = Security Token = Cannot be listed by Poloniex

MelonPort = Usage Token - Can be listed by Poloniex

Iconomi devs are waiting until both ICNX and ICN tokens are in circulation before pushing to get them both listed on additional exchanges.

If you follow Bittrex slack, you will see that Bittrex wanted to list ICN, but ICN devs told them they didn't want to be listed on additional exchanges yet.

Bittrex is US based so they will NEVER list an SECURITY TOKEN like ICN, unless they want to have problems with the SEC.

Bullshit, I read the Bittrex slack yesterday where Bittrex-Bill specifically said he met with Jani and they haven't listed ICN yet because Jani didn't want them to list it.

Iconomi devs are clearly waiting until both ICNX and ICN are in circulation before pushing to have them both listed simultaneously on more exchanges.

Look at the amount of effort this guy is putting in to fudding ICN.  ~8 different account, hundreds of posts, more than 20 hours put into this fud campaign already.

If this guy still has more buy orders after that dump, then it's obvious he is a big whale who is buying as much ICN as he possibly can around 40k satoshi.

This is an extremely bullish signal.

[electronicash]

i don't think majority of the ICN investors are hoping to get it listed on bittrex or to any other exchange. if they don't add ICN, its their choice. but it looks good on kraken.  

Warren, you miss the cheap price again?  you're going to miss it over and over if you keep posting images, its a waste of energy.

[CryptoInsiders]

Bittrex is almost DEAD... it's got NO VOLUME, how's that going to help ICN?

https://i.imgur.com/7uqRaIj.png

[TopTrade]

My point is the reason ICN is not listed on more exchanges, is because devs are waiting for both ICN and ICNX to be in circulation before pushing for more exchanges.

Bittrex-Bill basically confirmed this in slack yesterday, because he said he met with Jani and Jani told him he didn't want to list ICN at that time.

So it's not regulation FUD that is preventing more listings, it is Iconomi devs themselves.

Bittrex is US based so they will NEVER list an SECURITY TOKEN like ICN, unless they want to have problems with the SEC.

[MoveCrypto]

Proof that it's not regulation FUD preventing exchange listings.  He was talking about a meeting with Jani, and he meant to say "ICN" in that message.

It's the Iconomi devs themselves telling exchanges to wait.  They're probably waiting until both ICN and ICNX are in circulation before pushing for more exchange listings.


Kraken being a US exchange, just like Poloniex and Bittrex, is further proof that it's not regulation FUD preventing listings, but Iconomi devs themselves.

[stormia]

My point is the reason ICN is not listed on more exchanges, is because devs are waiting for both ICN and ICNX to be in circulation before pushing for more exchanges.

Bittrex-Bill basically confirmed this in slack yesterday, because he said he met with Jani and Jani told him he didn't want to list ICN at that time.

So it's not regulation FUD that is preventing more listings, it is Iconomi devs themselves.

Bittrex is US based so they will NEVER list an SECURITY TOKEN like ICN, unless they want to have problems with the SEC.

Kraken is based in the US (San Fran) and they have ICN listed you imbecile. Poloniex is also US based and they listed DAO, even held the DAO ICO.

Btw what is it with trolls and bright colors and large bold text? It's tacky and adds to the already excessive fraudulent used-car salesman vibe you got going on.

[Philogus]

Hey guys, I'm going to go count my Iconomi tokens: my goal is to eventually get to 1 million.  

Please keep on busting CryptoInsider's and Warren_Buffett's balls.  They're losers, and they'll end up doing what losers always do: move on to try to distract another successful project.  Deep down, losers want to win, but they can't.  Unfortunately, losing becomes a habit for them.  Losers can't stand being around winners, so they will eventually disappear from this thread.    Cheers!