[ANN] ICONOMI - Fund Management Platform

[soleiro]

Guys, the ICN price is not important, the important thing is to accumulate ICN for dividends. 1ICN can get 1 cent return per week.

Whats your calculation behind this? Or do you just post random numbers?

1 Cent each coin will be nothing. Just use your maths and you will see it is minimum 1 cent and can reach easyili 10cent each coin each week

You need $1mil of profit per week to get 1 cent dividends per week. This wont happen tomorrow. But it can happen with both funds+platform (if the platform can attract masses). It can also go beyond that if the crypto startups gain trust from the non crypto masses.

You need $1Mio of fees...not profit.. you think as an ICN holder you get profit from those investing in Performance Fund?

The Uber makes millions / day with its fees. Do you think Iconomi will not be able to profit from this too? Get Popcorn, guys! This also makes minhoes / day.
 

Yes sure I do...but I'm aware it's coming from fees only... and this for sure never will be 0.1 USD per token.. you think they gain 540 Mio USD in fees?

[mhd japar siregar]

It will be good if ICONOMI team get this project on another big exchange especial Bitfinex, Poloniex will have not choice but to list it then

Currently iconomi is ranked 16 (coinmarketcap) and the largest transaction in kraken
so I can say without poloniex iconomi will enter the ranks 5th in coinmarketcap

[andraxyz]

Guys, the ICN price is not important, the important thing is to accumulate ICN for dividends. 1ICN can get 1 cent return per week.

Whats your calculation behind this? Or do you just post random numbers?

1 Cent each coin will be nothing. Just use your maths and you will see it is minimum 1 cent and can reach easyili 10cent each coin each week

You need $1mil of profit per week to get 1 cent dividends per week. This wont happen tomorrow. But it can happen with both funds+platform (if the platform can attract masses). It can also go beyond that if the crypto startups gain trust from the non crypto masses.

You need $1Mio of fees...not profit.. you think as an ICN holder you get profit from those investing in Performance Fund?

Yes sorry, I expressed myself wrong, I meant profit as the profit for ICN holders, which means fees.
If we only take performance fund incto account, that would mean they have to make $5 mil every weak so that we get $1 mil as dividends.

[btctube]

It will be good if ICONOMI team get this project on another big exchange especial Bitfinex, Poloniex will have not choice but to list it then

Currently iconomi is ranked 16 (coinmarketcap) and the largest transaction in kraken
so I can say without poloniex iconomi will enter the ranks 5th in coinmarketcap

It should.I can see there are hundreds of big investors coming.

[puthupanth]

It will be good if ICONOMI team get this project on another big exchange especial Bitfinex, Poloniex will have not choice but to list it then

Currently iconomi is ranked 16 (coinmarketcap) and the largest transaction in kraken
so I can say without poloniex iconomi will enter the ranks 5th in coinmarketcap

you know i like the way you think... .... i am ranking it above ripple to be honest. just wait till fiat starts flowing in. Im betting both my nuts on that lol

[Marvintymo]

The AMA on Reddit went well, I had all my questions answered, and I feel the responsible answers poised the iconomi company for a great upcoming year. Here's to 2017!!

[electronicash]

Excited to participate their affiliate program. Someone asked this before so yes its confirmed they will have this feature next year. The sooner the better.

We will announce our affiliate program in 2017. However, if you have any suggestions, we would be happy to hear them out.

[topesis]

Can't say anything......

Interesting.....

no, expected. that's the reason of NDA's.  

Let me spell it out for you then....

Poloniex is obviously waiting for dividends to be paid out and then they going to pump that shit to the moon.....

Why always Poloniex, we have other big exchanges, ICN is not on any Chinese exchange presently, there is need to expose this project to other markets

[electronicash]

Can't say anything......

Interesting.....

no, expected. that's the reason of NDA's.  

Let me spell it out for you then....

Poloniex is obviously waiting for dividends to be paid out and then they going to pump that shit to the moon.....

Why always Poloniex, we have other big exchanges, ICN is not on any Chinese exchange presently, there is need to expose this project to other markets

I think the Chinese are not into these type of investment. ICN will most probably be accepted to the places like NY, Tokyo and London where fiat traders are based. Its where Forex sessions are.

[ShooterXD]

Lol and some guys dump your coins.

Thx guys, you make it possible, i Win my day today.

[TrueAnon]

NDA just for an exchange addition?  I find that odd...............................
Is there a valid reason for this or just smoke/mirrors from the devs???

[Marvintymo]

NDA just for an exchange addition?  I find that odd...............................
Is there a valid reason for this or just smoke/mirrors from the devs???

From what I've heard this is how it's always done when an exchange adds a new addition.

[petricag]

There's another one about future exchanges...

So what I understand is that the dev's would've wanted to list ICN on any exchange, because they promised the investor ICN will be listed on big exchanges and that is why they raised that much money among other reasons, so they got in touch with the exchanges, but those bitches from the exchanges just throw in their face an NDA to make them shut the f**uk up ... right? Probably the dev's even got threaded that the ICN will never be listed on those exchanges if they do not obey and sign the NDAs. This is the way to judge this ? ... or we should not even try to use our heads ... we just have to be true believers right ?

In reality its much simpler. IF they did not made an agreement with some of the exchanges to manipulate the price they could've just come and say to us something like this ... "Hey guys we submitted the request to be listed there and there, those exchanges came with shady things so we told them to go fuck them self, its not in our reach any more to listed there, and yes we already payed the lauzy 3 BTC to have it on Bitrex, because we respect our investors, sorry for not being able to do more, but we try to stay transparent and not get involved in shady schema with the evil Polo guys".
I presume now its too late, so personally I am not planing long term here, as for me its a red flag when simple things that are related to transparency are transformed in complicated NDA taped things.
I hope when it gets to Polo there will be enough stupid people to pump this up to 5 USD / ICN ... sell it all, rebuy at 1 USD or less .. and so on.

[petricag]

NDA just for an exchange addition?  I find that odd...............................
Is there a valid reason for this or just smoke/mirrors from the devs???

From what I've heard this is how it's always done when an exchange adds a new addition.

Nobody can force you to sign an NDA ... what do you think, Polo guys threaten the dev's if they don't sign and NDA they will not list ICN ?
Really ?

[boestin]

Guys look at the buy support @ kraken.  It's starting 

Where is the guy with the weekly/daily chart with the red line?

[CrowdFunder]

Guys look at the buy support @ kraken.  It's starting 

Where is the guy with the weekly/daily chart with the red line?

Yea, he should be hired for a full time job. 

[stormia]

There's another one about future exchanges...

So what I understand is that the dev's would've wanted to list ICN on any exchange, because they promised the investor ICN will be listed on big exchanges and that is why they raised that much money among other reasons, so they got in touch with the exchanges, but those bitches from the exchanges just throw in their face an NDA to make them shut the f**uk up ... right? Probably the dev's even got threaded that the ICN will never be listed on those exchanges if they do not obey and sign the NDAs. This is the way to judge this ? ... or we should not even try to use our heads ... we just have to be true believers right ?

In reality its much simpler. IF they did not made an agreement with some of the exchanges to manipulate the price they could've just come and say to us something like this ... "Hey guys we submitted the request to be listed there and there, those exchanges came with shady things so we told them to go fuck them self, its not in our reach any more to listed there, and yes we already payed the lauzy 3 BTC to have it on Bitrex, because we respect our investors, sorry for not being able to do more, but we try to stay transparent and not get involved in shady schema with the evil Polo guys".
I presume now its too late, so personally I am not planing long term here, as for me its a red flag when simple things that are related to transparency are transformed in complicated NDA taped things.
I hope when it gets to Polo there will be enough stupid people to pump this up to 5 USD / ICN ... sell it all, rebuy at 1 USD or less .. and so on.

Cool story. Now put your money where your mouth is and sell 

[petricag]

There's another one about future exchanges...

So what I understand is that the dev's would've wanted to list ICN on any exchange, because they promised the investor ICN will be listed on big exchanges and that is why they raised that much money among other reasons, so they got in touch with the exchanges, but those bitches from the exchanges just throw in their face an NDA to make them shut the f**uk up ... right? Probably the dev's even got threaded that the ICN will never be listed on those exchanges if they do not obey and sign the NDAs. This is the way to judge this ? ... or we should not even try to use our heads ... we just have to be true believers right ?

In reality its much simpler. IF they did not made an agreement with some of the exchanges to manipulate the price they could've just come and say to us something like this ... "Hey guys we submitted the request to be listed there and there, those exchanges came with shady things so we told them to go fuck them self, its not in our reach any more to listed there, and yes we already payed the lauzy 3 BTC to have it on Bitrex, because we respect our investors, sorry for not being able to do more, but we try to stay transparent and not get involved in shady schema with the evil Polo guys".
I presume now its too late, so personally I am not planing long term here, as for me its a red flag when simple things that are related to transparency are transformed in complicated NDA taped things.
I hope when it gets to Polo there will be enough stupid people to pump this up to 5 USD / ICN ... sell it all, rebuy at 1 USD or less .. and so on.

Cool story. Now put your money where your mouth is and sell  

Did it already got to 5 USD / token ? Why the fuck would i sell at this price ? I risked a few BTC for gaining peanuts ?

[boestin]

There's another one about future exchanges...

So what I understand is that the dev's would've wanted to list ICN on any exchange, because they promised the investor ICN will be listed on big exchanges and that is why they raised that much money among other reasons, so they got in touch with the exchanges, but those bitches from the exchanges just throw in their face an NDA to make them shut the f**uk up ... right? Probably the dev's even got threaded that the ICN will never be listed on those exchanges if they do not obey and sign the NDAs. This is the way to judge this ? ... or we should not even try to use our heads ... we just have to be true believers right ?

In reality its much simpler. IF they did not made an agreement with some of the exchanges to manipulate the price they could've just come and say to us something like this ... "Hey guys we submitted the request to be listed there and there, those exchanges came with shady things so we told them to go fuck them self, its not in our reach any more to listed there, and yes we already payed the lauzy 3 BTC to have it on Bitrex, because we respect our investors, sorry for not being able to do more, but we try to stay transparent and not get involved in shady schema with the evil Polo guys".
I presume now its too late, so personally I am not planing long term here, as for me its a red flag when simple things that are related to transparency are transformed in complicated NDA taped things.
I hope when it gets to Polo there will be enough stupid people to pump this up to 5 USD / ICN ... sell it all, rebuy at 1 USD or less .. and so on.

I think there is a strategy behind the waiting and nda talk.. Yes you are right. For a lousy 3 btc you can trade on bittrex which btw isn't that great, but still is a fairly good exchange. If you are asking me, they are deliberately keeping icn out of exchanges like bitter, polo and so on.

[mtnsaa]

NDA just for an exchange addition?  I find that odd...............................
Is there a valid reason for this or just smoke/mirrors from the devs???

From what I've heard this is how it's always done when an exchange adds a new addition.

Nobody can force you to sign an NDA ... what do you think, Polo guys threaten the dev's if they don't sign and NDA they will not list ICN ?
Really ?

LOL, that's not how it works man. The guys fully agreed to sign a NDA before exchanges consider to add Iconomi or discuss any details. They can't say anything until a deal is made or not. This is just standard for companies so people, companies, clients don't spread sensitive information about proceeds, requirements, etc. You can't even disclose there was deal signed, how, when, etc, depending on the NDA.