Bitcoin Forum
November 12, 2024, 08:58:12 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: SIGNS OF SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN  (Read 3769 times)
salmanahmedone
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 21, 2016, 02:45:24 PM
 #81

Yes must do so in weekly payment just because most of the campaign now especially with ICO and altcoins the payment need to wait for the participants after the ICO before wages and the other a few weeks or months before they release the wages of participant . To avoid a delayed wage would make weekly payments to the participants in the sig .

Lets Suppose If three weeks go by and no one has touched the account, then one person can release the funds, but at that point it goes to the forum itself.
If three weeks go by and the company hasn't paid in and hasn't initiated payouts, Staff Members can send the last of the funds to the list or, if they simply are not there, then he can release the funds to the forum.

BitcoinPC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 28, 2016, 04:06:21 PM
 #82

Yes must do so in weekly payment just because most of the campaign now especially with ICO and altcoins the payment need to wait for the participants after the ICO before wages and the other a few weeks or months before they release the wages of participant . To avoid a delayed wage would make weekly payments to the participants in the sig .

Lets Suppose If three weeks go by and no one has touched the account, then one person can release the funds, but at that point it goes to the forum itself.
If three weeks go by and the company hasn't paid in and hasn't initiated payouts, Staff Members can send the last of the funds to the list or, if they simply are not there, then he can release the funds to the forum.



Sig campaign companies are not forced to use the system or escrow , but it is suggested and the forum is advised of any that do not.  The company cannot steal and run and even Mod or whomever is managing the campaign cannot.  Nothing against them, but even the most trusted people can surprise you, plus, by protecting everyone it is more likely that people will participate.
passivebesiege
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 502


CTO & Spokesman


View Profile WWW
September 29, 2016, 07:55:52 AM
 #83

After series of scam signature campaign that fails to pay its member at the end of their programme or as agreed in their T.O.S, i feel that it is necessary for us to discuss series of factors to be considered before joining a campaign though i understand clearly that all campaign their rules to get you accepted but the participants does not have any rule in order to join any signature programme making us to be a prey to some scam stars.
What are the things to watch for in a campaign before we can certify it legit or not?
The best thing you do before joining signature campaign .you need to know if the funds if the campaign already escrow to trusted people here in this forum. I actually do not join to campaign that don't have escrow I dont want campaign will not pay me for I work.
yakdivine
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 29, 2016, 02:11:18 PM
 #84

Escow will safe you from scammer not only on signatures campaign but also on your online transactions, and the campaign manager should beheld responsible.  the bitcointalk member from my experience any offer that is too good to be truth avoid it. This three suggestions will safe you from scammers.
0day
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Hire me for your campaign management.


View Profile
September 29, 2016, 10:24:58 PM
 #85

There should be a rule that every campaign will have its escrow to secure the hard work of the participants. If it become the rule of this forum then the trusted companies will without any hesitation keep their funds in escrow for the campaigns.

Hire me for your campaign management
JeffBrad12
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 533


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
September 30, 2016, 01:33:38 AM
 #86

There should be a rule that every campaign will have its escrow to secure the hard work of the participants. If it become the rule of this forum then the trusted companies will without any hesitation keep their funds in escrow for the campaigns.
This is just like a public storage for all of the participant, for making guarantee if the campaign is real, and for preventing a lot of people is get a scam, right? but I can't say if all of the campaigns is not having a manager is always a scam.

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
2girls
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1002
Merit: 254


Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big


View Profile
October 02, 2016, 06:25:30 AM
 #87

So, say that hilariousandco and Company X start a campaign.  Ten people are hired.  Their addresses go unto a CSV or database.  A BTC address is set up to pay the people, weekly payouts.  Anyone can obviously add funds to the address, but without both private keys, one from hilariousandco and one from Company X, funds cannot be taken out

2girls
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1002
Merit: 254


Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big


View Profile
October 02, 2016, 06:30:55 AM
 #88

However, using one private key, you can weekly send to the ten addresses on the list.  The list is also controlled by both hilariousandco and the Company, but that is not a Crypto issue, most likely using a third party document control or something.

Shiroslullaby
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 02, 2016, 02:32:08 PM
 #89

Escrow isn't a terrible idea, but it adds some complication for the admins,
and unless they are being compensated, it may not be worth their time.
It would do a bit to allow only companies that are reputable to post on this site, which would be a good thing,
but it would be a lot of work to verify and keep track of all of these websites.

Allowing people to earn from a signature campaign is a privilege,
and it's up to each user to make sure they join a campaign that is trusted and will pay them what they are promised.


BitHodler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1179


View Profile
October 02, 2016, 10:06:37 PM
 #90

Escrow isn't a terrible idea, but it adds some complication for the admins,
and unless they are being compensated, it may not be worth their time.
It would do a bit to allow only companies that are reputable to post on this site, which would be a good thing,
but it would be a lot of work to verify and keep track of all of these websites.

Allowing people to earn from a signature campaign is a privilege,
and it's up to each user to make sure they join a campaign that is trusted and will pay them what they are promised.


The majority of the people don't care about for what service they are advertising in their signature space as they just want to earn some quick and easy dollars.

It actually surprises me that a few times an obvious scam was hosting a signature campaign, and that so many people were applying for it.

These people don't care whether or not they are advertising a scam service that will have a lot victims as result. It's a shame. Pure greed.

BSV is not the real Bcash. Bcash is the real Bcash.
YTBitcoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 03, 2016, 01:58:11 AM
 #91

Escrow isn't a terrible idea, but it adds some complication for the admins,
and unless they are being compensated, it may not be worth their time.
It would do a bit to allow only companies that are reputable to post on this site, which would be a good thing,
but it would be a lot of work to verify and keep track of all of these websites.

Allowing people to earn from a signature campaign is a privilege,
and it's up to each user to make sure they join a campaign that is trusted and will pay them what they are promised.


The majority of the people don't care about for what service they are advertising in their signature space as they just want to earn some quick and easy dollars.

It actually surprises me that a few times an obvious scam was hosting a signature campaign, and that so many people were applying for it.

These people don't care whether or not they are advertising a scam service that will have a lot victims as result. It's a shame. Pure greed.

Yeah I also noticed that some times we see a ponzi comes and start a signature campaign and everyone rush towards that campaign and start to apply to there without reading even the rules and the details of the campaign.
People should have to study about the company that for it will they be able to advertise or not and they have to confirm that at the campaign for which we are applying is legit or not.
BitcoinPC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 03, 2016, 04:50:20 AM
 #92

I think i am lucky, because i never say any bad campaign are here, Even now i am still in a very good campaign, Actually when i started than i joined the different campaigns but i like only one campaign where now i am here Bitcoin.ag , So that's why i have no any bad experience about different campaigns. 
mishra1994u
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 03, 2016, 04:50:33 AM
 #93

Ya users must be aware of these signature campaigns where there is no reputed campaign manager available.People must learn before applying in signature campaign that weather a reputed member is announcing that or if the funds are escrow otherwise no need to waste time there.
CraigWrightBTC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 03, 2016, 05:00:57 AM
 #94

The signs of signature campaign that will make scam to their users usualy they give much payment every weeks, they are new service without escrow service while run signature campaign on this forum.
hajimasan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 03, 2016, 05:22:03 AM
 #95

yes , you are right but here problem is that how can we sure that the signature campaign that is new to offer to join new member is truely honest . here i am asking about the signature campaign omicron . think about it .
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!