SIGNS OF SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN

[Cast12]

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

[anama]

its ok signature campaign is longterm and this enough good rate
and every time always accepted new particpant

[JeffBrad12]

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Well, according to from the opair I think not all the owner of the campaign having a trust although they're already using escrow. and seeing another fact like yobit, second and another is managing their own campaign without escrow and that is running with smoothly. and at the first time they are starting their campaign they're not having an enough reputable in this forum.

[altcoinrich]

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Well, according to from the opair I think not all the owner of the campaign having a trust although they're already using escrow. and seeing another fact like yobit, second and another is managing their own campaign without escrow and that is running with smoothly. and at the first time they are starting their campaign they're not having an enough reputable in this forum.

Opair is closed now, yobit doesn't hire more participants either. Yobit's reputation is very bad, since they run over 1 year campaign, yobit is 3rd biggest altcoin exchange, 1. polo, 2. bittrex and 3. yobit.

[boyptc]

its ok signature campaign is longterm and this enough good rate
and every time always accepted new particpant

Every signature campaign has their own fund for advertising their website and services by it. But there is a certain signature campaign that you are saying it is already running for a long time already and paying its participants always on time and there is no limitation for the maximum participants. And that would be secondstrade, but not all campaigns are not able to do the same like secondstrade.

[GregH37]

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

it is all up to the campaign manager. I would always go with a reputed campaign manager. because I believe  a responsible campaign manager will never go with a ponzi site.
like SFR, Yahoo, Lutpin, Gianluca etc.

[Sharma]

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Nobody wants to promote scam or ponzi sites but the problem is you dont know which site turn scam or ponzi.There are instanves where some so called reputed sites run away with members money.

[Fatanut]

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Nobody wants to promote scam or ponzi sites but the problem is you dont know which site turn scam or ponzi.There are instanves where some so called reputed sites run away with members money.

You can't actually that much about that. All you can do is trust them or leave them. Trust that they aren't like the other projects that have ran away right after they have solicited enough money. Leave them if you think they're going to run away from you. It's quite hard to identify which one's are going to run away especially if it's ran by a high ranked and trusted member of this forum.

[Patatas]

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Nobody wants to promote scam or ponzi sites but the problem is you dont know which site turn scam or ponzi.There are instanves where some so called reputed sites run away with members money.

You could make out ponzi sites by looking at their business model.Not a difficult task for an experienced bitcointalk member.Unfortunately not many are bothered about this forum or the newbies around,if they're getting paid for their signatures,they wouldn't mind advertising child porn.Harsh truth,digest it!

[Hellacopter]

I think members shouldn't join the signature campaigners runned by people without reputation, nor using the escrow services. The escrow is the better method to encourage members promoting the campaign safely.

[nejibens]

I think its better for the campaign's managers which havent good trust in this forum, to use escrow and hold the campaign's funds with him, otherwise its better for members to avoid joining it

[x4]

I think its better for the campaign's managers which havent good trust in this forum, to use escrow and hold the campaign's funds with him, otherwise its better for members to avoid joining it

People now in this community is aware of this by now from what had happened this two last signature campaigns that didn't use an escrow and didn't paid there participants. So much better is to avoid from this kind of campaign, and campaign must have an experienced manager to manage his campaign to avoid from running or simply cheating to deceive their members.

[electronicash]

the previous campaign that didn't pay that i know was the Opair signature campaign. the participants should know that the ICO was somewhat scammy so if he found out about it and get out before wasting a lot of time, he should have got out from the very start. one thing that a participant should do is to observe and read about them.

[pcoin]

the previous campaign that didn't pay that i know was the Opair signature campaign. the participants should know that the ICO was somewhat scammy so if he found out about it and get out before wasting a lot of time, he should have got out from the very start. one thing that a participant should do is to observe and read about them.

There is also what i feel should be stopped and that is the issue of long awaiting time before payment, to me daily and weekly payments are better but can still go for monthly payments if the money are escrowed anything more than that should be avoided.

[tigerclub]

the previous campaign that didn't pay that i know was the Opair signature campaign. the participants should know that the ICO was somewhat scammy so if he found out about it and get out before wasting a lot of time, he should have got out from the very start. one thing that a participant should do is to observe and read about them.

Yes, there was a scam accusation against opair, luptin should refused the offer, but he still offered the service. Some saw luptin is reputable so join it, but face the issue.

[morantis]

we simply need to build a system, either through the forum or on another site, that controls the money of a campaign.  figure that an easy way to make money is to find a ad revenue service.  Let's say that there is even a pay-per-visit around these days, lol.  so, you calculate that each time the ad is seen, you make 2 pennies.  So, you set up the sig campaign and pay them 1 penny per post.  if it all evened out, then the end of the week the ads pay you $20 and you split $10 of it among the sig participants. that is a perfect system. 

but, try to make that happen.  the first thing you find out is that those ad providers never pay pay visit anymore, either per click or per sign up.  so you run them on your own posts to get an average amount of revenue per post and then find your ads kicked out because of how you displayed them, some companies hate their ads in forum posts.  three weeks later, you finally found the right ads and you have made 0.001 cents per your posts through average clicking.  you set up the campaign, find the tracking software, split the revenue average with the people and after thirty days the revenue slows and drops, this is because there are only so many of these people that are going to click and they have already done it in the past thirty days.  new people are not as frequent as the initial blast of revenue and......the camp dies with people unpaid for their last week.

the same thing happens when promoting your own website or service.  revenue generated changes, plateaus and is rarely of the level that you think it should be.  to properly and ethically do this, whether for your site or another person's, have the funds ready for week 1 and in the amount of three times what you think you need.  set maximum posts numbers and monitor the new people coming in.  pay them on time and never make them think it is not going to happen.  keep twice the average weekly payout in cold storage and never touch it.  things go belly up, announce it, and pay the people.

any company, service or person that fails should always make the first priority of the last week paying the employees.  make sure that you have those funds and never touch them.  you think you are gone for good, who cares what these people think and then two months down the road you are back with a new business and those people and the forum remember.

[MFahad]

If the owner of the signature campaign isn't reputable, we should check whether or not the campaign has a campaign manager and/or escrow. Although, if the site that is being advertised is a scam, we shouldn't advertise it.

Simply use a trusted campaign manager and a funded account.  Require two Private Keys to move money out of the fund, unless X period of days has gone by with inactivity and then one person can do so. 

[Sweetbtc]

its ok signature campaign is longterm and this enough good rate
and every time always accepted new particpant

The weekly payments can be prearranged, so that those funds can be moved with just one Priv Key, but only to the list of clients.

[Babayega31]

Yes must do so in weekly payment just because most of the campaign now especially with ICO and altcoins the payment need to wait for the participants after the ICO before wages and the other a few weeks or months before they release the wages of participant . To avoid a delayed wage would make weekly payments to the participants in the sig .

[2double0]

If they opt for signature campaign managers or escrows to hold their funds who were already in such business, then I think that we may join the campaign without any hassle. Still, that would only be good till the funds are used and after that, it all depends on the admin whether they want to run it and send more funds to escrow or not. Unless this gets revealed, they get some more advertising for free because posters will post.