ghostbook (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Ghostbook - Sports Bookie for the Darknet
|
|
September 23, 2016, 10:34:58 AM |
|
Scheduled Maintenance
We've arranged access to our rack in the the data centre at midnight 12AM UTC.
Reason: Install new redundant internet connection. Window: 15-30 minutes. Impact: Micro-outages as we test fail over and recovery.
Please have your bets placed well in advance. Thanks
The upgrade was successful and failover testing passed. Any future connectivity issues have been mitigated. Enjoy the weekend. So many good games to bet on!
|
|
|
|
ghostbook (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Ghostbook - Sports Bookie for the Darknet
|
|
September 24, 2016, 03:58:13 AM |
|
Football for the weekend + many other games and events!---------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | Chinese Football Liaoning v Yanbian Shanghai SIPG v Guangzhou Ever Guangzhou R&F v Henan Jiyane Beijing Guoan v Shandong Lunen Hangzhou Greentown v Jiangsu Shijiazhuang v Changchun Yatai Tianjin Teda v Shanghai Shenhu
Dutch Football Den Haag v Heerenveen Groningen v Heracles Ajax v Zwolle AZ Alkmaar v GA Eagles Excelsior v PSV Nijmegen v Willem II Twente v Vitesse Utrecht v Sparta Rotterdam Feyenoord v Roda
| English Championship Aston Villa v Newcastle Sheffield Wed v Nottingham Rotherham v Cardiff Reading v Huddersfield QPR v Birmingham Norwich v Burton Leeds v Ipswich Fulham v Bristol City Derby v Blackburn Brighton v Barnsley Wolves v Brentford
English League One AFC Wimbledon v Shrewsbury Peterborough v Walsall Oxford Utd v Charlton Oldham v Swindon Northampton v Southend Millwall v Rochdale Gillingham v Coventry Fleetwood Town v Milton Keynes Bury v Chesterfield Bristol Rovers v Port Vale Bolton v Bradford Scunthorpe v Sheff Utd
English Premiership Manchester Utd v Leicester Bournemouth v Everton Liverpool v Hull City Middlesbrough v Tottenham Stoke City v West Brom Sunderland v Crystal Palace Swansea v Manchester City Arsenal v Chelsea West Ham v Southampton
| French Football Lorient v Lyon Bastia v Guingamp Bordeaux v Caen Dijon v Rennes Monaco v Angers Montpellier v Metz St Etienne v Lille Nancy v Nice Marseille v Nantes
German Football Augsburg v Darmstadt B. Monchengladbach v Ingolstad Eintracht Frankfurt v Hertha B Hamburger SV v Bayern Munich Mainz v Bayer Leverkusen Werder Bremen v Wolfsburg Hoffenheim v Schalke Koln v RB Leipzig
Italian Football Palmero v Juventus Napoli v Chievo Torino v AS Roma Sassuolo v Udinese Lazio v Empoli Inter v Bologna Genoa v Pescara Crotone v Atalanta Fiorentina v AC Milan Cagliari v Sampdoria
| + | Japanese Football Avispa Fukuoka v Kobe Vegalta Sendai v Nagoya Iwata v Shonan Urawa v Hiroshima G-Osaka v FC Tokyo Albirex Niigata v Kashima Omiya Ardija v Sagan Tosu Kashiwa v Kofu Kawasaki Frontale v Yokohama M
Portuguese Football Feirense v Nacional Chaves v Benfica Braga v Setubal Maritimo v Tondela Ferreira v Rio Ave Moreirense v Guimaraes Belenenses v Arouca
Scottish Football Celtic v Kilmarnock Hearts v Ross County Inverness v Dundee FC Partick v Motherwell Aberdeen v Rangers Hamilton v St Johnstone
| South Korean Incheon v Suwon Bluewings Jeonbuk v Seongnam Pohang v Gwangju FC Sangju Sangmu v Jeju Utd Suwon City v Jeonnam
Spanish Football Eibar v Real Sociedad Gijon v Barcelona Ath Bilbao v Sevilla Las Palmas v Real Madrid Leganes v Valencia Atl Madrid v Dep La Coruna Villarreal v Osasuna Espanyol v Celta Vigo Alaves v Granada CF
USA Football Toronto FC v Philadelphia DC United v Orlando City NY Red Bulls v Montreal Vancouver v Colorado Houston v Portland Real Salt Lake v FC Dallas San Jose v Kansas City LA Galaxy v Seattle
| Check them out at Ghost book, our odds are the best for your bitshttp://ghostbookdoyyvrs.onion/games/https://ghostbookdoyyvrs.onion.to/games/ (non-tor browser)
|
|
|
|
sportsbettor8
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
September 24, 2016, 07:28:57 AM |
|
So many events, good for my busy tor browser. Please implement asian handicap and over/under lines like others recommended before, it will bring your more customers.
|
|
|
|
ghostbook (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Ghostbook - Sports Bookie for the Darknet
|
|
September 24, 2016, 08:44:59 AM |
|
So many events, good for my busy tor browser. Please implement asian handicap and over/under lines like others recommended before, it will bring your more customers. Checkout the English Premiership. I've added winning margins, half/fulltime lead, over/under to all; ... and handicaps to clear favorites. Our system isn't really designed for the asian handicapping system. It's designed for straight up handicapping. Like give and take away points, not tier different levels. Have a look and let me know what you think.I'm not sure how it will go. I hope the system doesn't fuck up. Give us a chance guys, if something is clearly wrong. Please let us know. Don't take advantage as we'll be checking during grading. Anything clearly screwy, we'll need to work something out (comparable odds from somewhere else). Lets keep it fair and professional. We'd like to thank everyone who's been playing the last couple of weeks. You guys are the best! Any feedback good or bad is very welcome - What is your experience so far?
|
|
|
|
Tstar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
Decentralized Asset Management Platform
|
|
September 24, 2016, 02:31:00 PM |
|
So many events, good for my busy tor browser. Please implement asian handicap and over/under lines like others recommended before, it will bring your more customers. Checkout the English Premiership. I've added winning margins, half/fulltime lead, over/under to all; ... and handicaps to clear favorites. Our system isn't really designed for the asian handicapping system. It's designed for straight up handicapping. Like give and take away points, not tier different levels. Have a look and let me know what you think.I'm not sure how it will go. I hope the system doesn't fuck up. Give us a chance guys, if something is clearly wrong. Please let us know. Don't take advantage as we'll be checking during grading. Anything clearly screwy, we'll need to work something out (comparable odds from somewhere else). Lets keep it fair and professional. We'd like to thank everyone who's been playing the last couple of weeks. You guys are the best! Any feedback good or bad is very welcome - What is your experience so far?Good to see you are improving. And x10 is much better and less exploitable. What do you mean by " Don't take advantage as we'll be checking during grading"?? You are offering service/odds and at some point users can be fucked/guilty because they choose to bet with you?! For example if I want to bet on my team and see that on other bookies is 1.90 and with you is 2.00, of course I will choose you.
|
|
|
|
shapeshiftscam
|
|
September 24, 2016, 03:17:23 PM |
|
So many events, good for my busy tor browser. Please implement asian handicap and over/under lines like others recommended before, it will bring your more customers. Checkout the English Premiership. I've added winning margins, half/fulltime lead, over/under to all; ... and handicaps to clear favorites. Our system isn't really designed for the asian handicapping system. It's designed for straight up handicapping. Like give and take away points, not tier different levels. Have a look and let me know what you think.I'm not sure how it will go. I hope the system doesn't fuck up. Give us a chance guys, if something is clearly wrong. Please let us know. Don't take advantage as we'll be checking during grading. Anything clearly screwy, we'll need to work something out (comparable odds from somewhere else). Lets keep it fair and professional. We'd like to thank everyone who's been playing the last couple of weeks. You guys are the best! Any feedback good or bad is very welcome - What is your experience so far?Good to see you are improving. And x10 is much better and less exploitable. What do you mean by " Don't take advantage as we'll be checking during grading"?? You are offering service/odds and at some point users can be fucked/guilty because they choose to bet with you?! For example if I want to bet on my team and see that on other bookies is 1.90 and with you is 2.00, of course I will choose you. Sane gamblers choose higher odds one, unless that site has other advantages, like directbet, its odds are lowest, but they don't require username and password, direct deposit or withdraw from btc address.
|
|
|
|
SyGambler
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1804
guess who's back
|
|
September 24, 2016, 04:10:52 PM |
|
Good to see you are improving. And x10 is much better and less exploitable.
What do you mean by "Don't take advantage as we'll be checking during grading"?? You are offering service/odds and at some point users can be fucked/guilty because they choose to bet with you?! For example if I want to bet on my team and see that on other bookies is 1.90 and with you is 2.00, of course I will choose you.
I think he means about the upcoming lines , there may be some bugs in the odds but those bugs are usually easy to detect as long as the results don't lead to a sure bet then you should be fine , and the bookie shouldn't cancel the bet but for example if the bookie is offering 2.3 and 1.9 for both under and over 2.5 then this is a clear bug me as a gambler every time I wan't to make a bet I check the other bookies , I never made a bet in a bookie when there is other bookie offering higher odds for a specific event , so this is not exploiting it's just what sportsbetting about
|
|
|
|
thejaytiesto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1014
|
|
September 24, 2016, 05:23:00 PM |
|
It's always goo to have options to bet and gamble under Tor. Sometimes when you are really bored as hell at work, you feel like gambling a bit but you can't because usually they always block gambling sites on offices.
|
|
|
|
ghostbook (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Ghostbook - Sports Bookie for the Darknet
|
|
September 24, 2016, 05:51:01 PM |
|
Sane gamblers choose higher odds one, unless that site has other advantages, like directbet, its odds are lowest, but they don't require username and password, direct deposit or withdraw from btc address.
By odds that are obviously different, like $5 and every other bookie is offering $3.50. shapeshiftscam -- we don't require any personal verifiable signup material. It's very easy and completely anonymous.
|
|
|
|
ghostbook (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Ghostbook - Sports Bookie for the Darknet
|
|
September 24, 2016, 05:55:03 PM |
|
I want to highlight a bug -- brought up by SyGambler, thank you.
If you try and bet your entire balance on a game (under the max bet) it says you don't have enough money. But if you bet slightly under (like 0.000001) it accepts it. We're looking into it, not a huge deal, but just to let everyone know that we're working on it, and use this work around if you experience it.
|
|
|
|
Tstar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
Decentralized Asset Management Platform
|
|
September 24, 2016, 06:16:28 PM |
|
Sane gamblers choose higher odds one, unless that site has other advantages, like directbet, its odds are lowest, but they don't require username and password, direct deposit or withdraw from btc address.
By odds that are obviously different, like $5 and every other bookie is offering $3.50. shapeshiftscam -- we don't require any personal verifiable signup material. It's very easy and completely anonymous. IMO you cannot hold the user responsible for this. YOU are the operator and YOU are offering the odds. In 2 x 2 Event it's not even such a diff for the outsider team. It could be obviously wrong for you, because you are comparing it with somewhere else till user is looking at YOUR site. Otherwise I need to loose my time on every single bet to check it on other bookies and I guess in many cases I will choose those other bookies too.
|
|
|
|
ghostbook (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Ghostbook - Sports Bookie for the Darknet
|
|
September 24, 2016, 06:32:51 PM |
|
Sane gamblers choose higher odds one, unless that site has other advantages, like directbet, its odds are lowest, but they don't require username and password, direct deposit or withdraw from btc address.
By odds that are obviously different, like $5 and every other bookie is offering $3.50. shapeshiftscam -- we don't require any personal verifiable signup material. It's very easy and completely anonymous. IMO you cannot hold the user responsible for this. YOU are the operator and YOU are offering the odds. In 2 x 2 Event it's not even such a diff for the outsider team. It could be obviously wrong for you, because you are comparing it with somewhere else till user is looking at YOUR site. Otherwise I need to loose my time on every single bet to check it on other bookies and I guess in many cases I will choose those other bookies too. This was only for asian handicap, the one time test on some English Premiership games. For everything else, if you can lock in good odds, we'll payout. We have no issues with that. One step further, we've seen a lot of people exploiting our early odds; odds and lines change before we can update them. But we have never not paid out a bet and always honored peoples odds.
|
|
|
|
DarkStar_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
|
|
September 24, 2016, 06:38:52 PM |
|
Sane gamblers choose higher odds one, unless that site has other advantages, like directbet, its odds are lowest, but they don't require username and password, direct deposit or withdraw from btc address.
By odds that are obviously different, like $5 and every other bookie is offering $3.50. shapeshiftscam -- we don't require any personal verifiable signup material. It's very easy and completely anonymous. IMO you cannot hold the user responsible for this. YOU are the operator and YOU are offering the odds. In 2 x 2 Event it's not even such a diff for the outsider team. It could be obviously wrong for you, because you are comparing it with somewhere else till user is looking at YOUR site. Otherwise I need to loose my time on every single bet to check it on other bookies and I guess in many cases I will choose those other bookies too. It isn't that special of a condition - a lot of sportsbooks have something like that. Sometimes errors are obvious, and it would be way to costly for ghostbook to pay it out. If I accidentally mix up my odds, and give the heavy favorite @10, and the underdog @1.1, that would be an obvious error. I think your example (ghostbook) is a bad one. For one of my arbs, coinbet24 thought differently and offered @3.5 on an event where cloudbet offered @2.5. It wasn't an error though, and they just thought differently of the games.
|
taking a break - expect delayed responses
|
|
|
Tstar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
Decentralized Asset Management Platform
|
|
September 24, 2016, 06:43:31 PM |
|
Sane gamblers choose higher odds one, unless that site has other advantages, like directbet, its odds are lowest, but they don't require username and password, direct deposit or withdraw from btc address.
By odds that are obviously different, like $5 and every other bookie is offering $3.50. shapeshiftscam -- we don't require any personal verifiable signup material. It's very easy and completely anonymous. IMO you cannot hold the user responsible for this. YOU are the operator and YOU are offering the odds. In 2 x 2 Event it's not even such a diff for the outsider team. It could be obviously wrong for you, because you are comparing it with somewhere else till user is looking at YOUR site. Otherwise I need to loose my time on every single bet to check it on other bookies and I guess in many cases I will choose those other bookies too. It isn't that special of a condition - a lot of sportsbooks have something like that. Sometimes errors are obvious, and it would be way to costly for ghostbook to pay it out. If I accidentally mix up my odds, and give the heavy favorite @10, and the underdog @1.1, that would be an obvious error. I think your example (ghostbook) is a bad one. For one of my arbs, coinbet24 thought differently and offered @3.5 on an event where cloudbet offered @2.5. It wasn't an error though, and they just thought differently of the games. Exactly my point. This is not a reason for non-payment or voiding bets. - snip -
But we have never not paid out a bet and always honored peoples odds.
Good! This is a professional attitude because updating of odds is by you, not the user.
|
|
|
|
SyGambler
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1804
guess who's back
|
|
September 24, 2016, 06:47:44 PM |
|
Sane gamblers choose higher odds one, unless that site has other advantages, like directbet, its odds are lowest, but they don't require username and password, direct deposit or withdraw from btc address.
By odds that are obviously different, like $5 and every other bookie is offering $3.50. shapeshiftscam -- we don't require any personal verifiable signup material. It's very easy and completely anonymous. IMO you cannot hold the user responsible for this. YOU are the operator and YOU are offering the odds. In 2 x 2 Event it's not even such a diff for the outsider team. It could be obviously wrong for you, because you are comparing it with somewhere else till user is looking at YOUR site. Otherwise I need to loose my time on every single bet to check it on other bookies and I guess in many cases I will choose those other bookies too. It isn't that special of a condition - a lot of sportsbooks have something like that. Sometimes errors are obvious, and it would be way to costly for ghostbook to pay it out. If I accidentally mix up my odds, and give the heavy favorite @10, and the underdog @1.1, that would be an obvious error. I think your example (ghostbook) is a bad one. For one of my arbs, coinbet24 thought differently and offered @3.5 on an event where cloudbet offered @2.5. It wasn't an error though, and they just thought differently of the games. yeah I think ghostbook didn't explain that well in general getting higher odds isn't exploiting , I have bet on many matches where the odds are higher clearly in one book over others but that's not exploiting , it's just how the markets work and that's why we don't only have one bookie to place our bets at when people are betting heavily on a specific team on a specific bookie obviously that team will have low odds and the other options will have higher odds but in other bookie bettors may be going heavily on a draw for example , which means the favor team will have higher odds in this book
|
|
|
|
ghostbook (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Ghostbook - Sports Bookie for the Darknet
|
|
September 24, 2016, 10:57:39 PM |
|
yeah I think ghostbook didn't explain that well in general getting higher odds isn't exploiting , I have bet on many matches where the odds are higher clearly in one book over others but that's not exploiting , it's just how the markets work and that's why we don't only have one bookie to place our bets at
when people are betting heavily on a specific team on a specific bookie obviously that team will have low odds and the other options will have higher odds but in other bookie bettors may be going heavily on a draw for example , which means the favor team will have higher odds in this book
That's a very good point, each bookie is hedging depending on what action they get. Good explanation.
|
|
|
|
Sarthak
|
|
September 26, 2016, 06:16:58 AM |
|
You guys must seriously work on the design I guess. It kinda sucks. BTW, I lost that 1m BTC, I'll make a new account and start again if that's cool with you.
|
|
|
|
ghostbook (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Ghostbook - Sports Bookie for the Darknet
|
|
September 26, 2016, 08:24:36 AM |
|
You guys must seriously work on the design I guess. It kinda sucks. BTW, I lost that 1m BTC, I'll make a new account and start again if that's cool with you. Be our guest, you and about 500+ other throw away accounts
|
|
|
|
Daffadile
|
|
September 26, 2016, 06:09:05 PM |
|
You guys must seriously work on the design I guess. It kinda sucks. BTW, I lost that 1m BTC, I'll make a new account and start again if that's cool with you. Be our guest, you and about 500+ other throw away accounts Is it even possible ti win with that amount or is the withdraw or wage requirement very high ? Would like to know before I install tor again. Don't really wanna have to run tor and use onion sites but whatever lets try.
|
|
|
|
ghostbook (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Ghostbook - Sports Bookie for the Darknet
|
|
September 26, 2016, 11:17:59 PM |
|
You guys must seriously work on the design I guess. It kinda sucks. BTW, I lost that 1m BTC, I'll make a new account and start again if that's cool with you. Be our guest, you and about 500+ other throw away accounts Is it even possible ti win with that amount or is the withdraw or wage requirement very high ? Would like to know before I install tor again. Don't really wanna have to run tor and use onion sites but whatever lets try. Turning 100k into 15m is basically impossible. The point is to give you some money to play with, check out our site, place some bets, get a feel for the website. If you like it, make a deposit and get receive a deposit match, which only has a 10x turnover requirement, betting on games with odds $1.50 (US -200) or greater. This is very achievable and many people have done it and withdrawn in full. As for the Tor Firefox browser, you don't have to use it, you can use a Tor proxy like https://ghostbookdoyyvrs.onion.to/
|
|
|
|
|