Hehehe! In all seriousness, it's the perfect choice for the 46th potus.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umSgoyjoviEOn this video he does the introduction for trump at a rally. I can only be impressed by the oratory progress that Flynn did! At the end of trump admin he will reach Obama level!
Furthermore I can only be disappointed by the cia Chiefs that I listened too. Flynn is really another level. Would be great after trump to have him run for office.
How about the 45'th?
If Trump gets assassinated and/or the election is blatantly stolen, and if the United States military and para-militaries decide to not put up with it, they would have my support. Especially with Flynn heading up the defense. I say this with an eye toward the experiences in Turkey where such things have seemed to happen in a cycle and the military tends to relinquish power when the existential threats are dealt with. Obviously a coup is not something I would like to see, but if the alternative is an end to our democracy and constitution, and if it would likely be permanent because it was part of an attempt to solidify a global government, I would choose the coup and do what I could to support it. Mostly with an eye toward how to recover to a constitutional republic at some point.
With slimy apparatchik Jeh Johnson 'taking over' the elections and with 'oversight' from shadowy foreign groups, it seems quite possible to me that we are being set up for a leader selected by 'globalists' to be installed. Especially since day by day it is more clear that the actual citizens of the U.S. are not going to be 'voting right' this time around and might be voting for someone who seems to be the globalist project's worst nightmare.
Anyway, I don't think it's premature to start to mull some of this stuff over and evaluate the various options.
Thank you for expressing your point of view. You aren't alone to think like that be assured. The globalist a have pushed too far in the west, and it will inevitably lead to a counter moves.
For example and just for the discussion: Sorros who want to micro manage the USA, Peter suterland who want to genocide white Europeans, the Harvard school who want to ban cash and impose the global order on America... Now the problem is that there is a big financial price to pay in going revolutionary.
To accomplish what you say it is necessary to have the full support of Chinese and Russia military. It's not a good proposition to be dependent on anyone but the USA.
As such I personally would prefer a more systemic clean approach. First unite the troops, then purge the fbi (simply said extra judicial, traitors and domestic ennemies, always start at the top) then cia, same traitors and domestic ennemies. Once those two organizations are secured move to simply eliminate those that are domestic ennemies and finally a quick raid to eliminate the foreign ennemies (plz inform Chinese and Russia authorities about the person who conspire against the USA, because those person will betray their country too, later).
The advantage of my theoretical idea is that it's faster, most of the fbi and cia people are patriots, just a few black mailed internally or externally (remember forgiveness for the sins self exposed) and the foreigners who pressures them can quickly be purged.
But don't get me wrong I 100% agree with your assessment of the situation and the need for serious counter strikes, I just think that another strategy less disruptive can be used. And then go! The problem is that it's always easy to remove the civilians but hard to put them back. But when the civilians gov become a worthless corrupt self enriching dangerous treacherous cleptocracy => pull down!
