kilo17 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
|
|
September 19, 2016, 02:08:39 AM |
|
I have played around with the settings on SGminer-gm for a day of two on a test rig but cannot find any settings that don't throw a ton of HW's. I have adjusted the intensity, clocks, work size etc and have yet to find any combo that works. I have tried on 380's, 390's, Fury, 480's etc and none seem to work. Also have tried with current drivers and 15.12.
I would love to hear suggestions
|
Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
|
|
|
OhGodAGirl
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 199
Merit: 108
Look, I'm really not that interesting. Promise.
|
|
September 19, 2016, 08:15:57 AM |
|
I have played around with the settings on SGminer-gm for a day of two on a test rig but cannot find any settings that don't throw a ton of HW's. I have adjusted the intensity, clocks, work size etc and have yet to find any combo that works. I have tried on 380's, 390's, Fury, 480's etc and none seem to work. Also have tried with current drivers and 15.12.
I would love to hear suggestions
Are you getting any shares, mate? I'll be happy to assist you as best I can.
|
|
|
|
kilo17 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
|
|
September 19, 2016, 08:20:25 AM |
|
I have played around with the settings on SGminer-gm for a day of two on a test rig but cannot find any settings that don't throw a ton of HW's. I have adjusted the intensity, clocks, work size etc and have yet to find any combo that works. I have tried on 380's, 390's, Fury, 480's etc and none seem to work. Also have tried with current drivers and 15.12.
I would love to hear suggestions
Are you getting any shares, mate? I'll be happy to assist you as best I can. Hello, thanks for the reply. Yes I am getting shares. I am going to run it again and see how many I am getting.
|
Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
September 19, 2016, 08:22:31 AM |
|
I have played around with the settings on SGminer-gm for a day of two on a test rig but cannot find any settings that don't throw a ton of HW's. I have adjusted the intensity, clocks, work size etc and have yet to find any combo that works. I have tried on 380's, 390's, Fury, 480's etc and none seem to work. Also have tried with current drivers and 15.12.
I would love to hear suggestions
Are you getting any shares, mate? I'll be happy to assist you as best I can. Hello, thanks for the reply. Yes I am getting shares. I am going to run it again and see how many I am getting. Hey Kilo, Let me help you Use rawintensity. For a 390 use 256*16384 For a 380 use 64*16384 You'll see a nice increase and even better than Claymore's (see, i do help.. even those that "diss" me )
|
|
|
|
OhGodAGirl
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 199
Merit: 108
Look, I'm really not that interesting. Promise.
|
|
September 19, 2016, 08:29:29 AM |
|
I have played around with the settings on SGminer-gm for a day of two on a test rig but cannot find any settings that don't throw a ton of HW's. I have adjusted the intensity, clocks, work size etc and have yet to find any combo that works. I have tried on 380's, 390's, Fury, 480's etc and none seem to work. Also have tried with current drivers and 15.12.
I would love to hear suggestions
Are you getting any shares, mate? I'll be happy to assist you as best I can. Hello, thanks for the reply. Yes I am getting shares. I am going to run it again and see how many I am getting. HW's are actually normal in this situation. Try Eliovp's suggestions for settings, though.
|
|
|
|
kilo17 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
|
|
September 19, 2016, 08:45:19 AM |
|
I have played around with the settings on SGminer-gm for a day of two on a test rig but cannot find any settings that don't throw a ton of HW's. I have adjusted the intensity, clocks, work size etc and have yet to find any combo that works. I have tried on 380's, 390's, Fury, 480's etc and none seem to work. Also have tried with current drivers and 15.12.
I would love to hear suggestions
Are you getting any shares, mate? I'll be happy to assist you as best I can. Hello, thanks for the reply. Yes I am getting shares. I am going to run it again and see how many I am getting. Hey Kilo, Let me help you Use rawintensity. For a 390 use 256*16384 For a 380 use 64*16384 You'll see a nice increase and even better than Claymore's (see, i do help.. even those that "diss" me ) LOL- I have apologized twice already -- so here we go a third time- I am sorry.
|
Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
|
|
|
c2n14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2016, 01:22:09 PM |
|
Use rawintensity. For a 390 use 256*16384 For a 380 use 64*16384 You'll see a nice increase and even better than Claymore's Is this 256*16384 = worksize*rawintensity? For RX 470 with 256*16384 as worksize*rawintensity I got 12mhs only (22 @ CM). Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
abbeytim
|
|
September 20, 2016, 01:39:27 AM |
|
need some help when I try to run I get unexpected command line arguments
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer_win64 -o http:// us1.ethermine.org:4444 -u 0x54bcacb910c307f41a8d5aacd31c98b213e76c08 -p password
|
|
|
|
kilo17 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
|
|
September 21, 2016, 04:53:06 AM |
|
I am sure this is a great miner but without an info on drivers etc it is a pain in the butt. I have yet to find any reliable driver or settings to use.
It appears I am not the only one as there is scarce info on it being used on any forum. It is like giving someone a Ferrari and Free Gas (compared to Claymore) and no engine.
|
Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
|
|
|
kilo17 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
|
|
September 21, 2016, 09:00:29 AM |
|
Getting close to nailing this miner- hitting 25-27 on a 390x which I typically get 30-31 on with ethminer or claymore's. Another day and I will have it nailed down
|
Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
|
|
|
Za1n
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
|
September 23, 2016, 11:24:22 PM |
|
I have played around with the settings on SGminer-gm for a day of two on a test rig but cannot find any settings that don't throw a ton of HW's. I have adjusted the intensity, clocks, work size etc and have yet to find any combo that works. I have tried on 380's, 390's, Fury, 480's etc and none seem to work. Also have tried with current drivers and 15.12.
I would love to hear suggestions
I think HW errors are not uncommon for this software. I get on average 1 HW error per minute on a 4 GPU rig. The main thing to compare is your hash-rates, or more precisely you submitted shares. As long as shares are being submitted and accepted by the pool you are fine. For me, I only got the locally displayed hashrate on SGminer to be about the same as I did on Claymore, but on the pool I am showing about 4 MH/s higher since switching over. Some of this is obviously because the Dev fee is not redirecting some of your hash, but also I think it is due to more shares being generated. So even with the HW errors being displayed, on average all my rigs I have migrated over so far seem to have improved about 4-5 MH/s per rig on the pool side of the readings. I think I will stay at half Claymore half SGminer for a few days as sort of an experimental group/control group until I have more data to be sure, but so far it looks like SGminer can at least perform on par with the Claymore miner.
|
|
|
|
toptek
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 24, 2016, 01:50:38 AM Last edit: September 24, 2016, 04:50:54 AM by toptek |
|
I am sure this is a great miner but without an info on drivers etc it is a pain in the butt. I have yet to find any reliable driver or settings to use.
It appears I am not the only one as there is scarce info on it being used on any forum. It is like giving someone a Ferrari and Free Gas (compared to Claymore) and no engine.
If this helps any i got mine up to 18 MH stable about what it should do : heres my sgminer.conf after a few days of playing with it, with Claymore i could only get it to do 17 MH tops with driver radeon-crimson-15.12-win10-64bit. installing driver non-whql-win10-64bit-radeon-software-crimson-16.9.2-sep21 see what that does. }], "profiles": [{ "gpu-powertune": "0", "worksize": "256", "name": "eth", "algorithm": "ethash", "gpu-threads": "1", "rawintensity": "1916928" }], "no-extranonce": "true", "default-profile": "eth", "api-allow": "W:10.0.0.0/8", "gpu-engine" : "1150", "gpu-memclock" : "1500", "temp-target": "72", "gpu-fan": "45-85", "api-port": 4028, "temp-cutoff": "82", "api-listen": true, "auto-fan": true, "temp-overheat": "80" } I also followed this some http://www.overclock.net/t/1461916/tutorial-ultimate-guide-to-tweaking-amd-cgminer-3-7-2-kalroth-edition-sgminer-instructions-included-aswell-get-the-most-hash-out-of-your-gpuGPU 0: 45.0C 45% | 18.09M/17.96Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:1 WU:16.370/m rI:1916928
|
|
|
|
Za1n
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
|
September 24, 2016, 04:52:06 AM |
|
I am sure this is a great miner but without an info on drivers etc it is a pain in the butt. I have yet to find any reliable driver or settings to use.
It appears I am not the only one as there is scarce info on it being used on any forum. It is like giving someone a Ferrari and Free Gas (compared to Claymore) and no engine.
If this helps any i got mine up to 19 MH stable about what it should do : heres my sgminer.conf after a few days of playing with it, with Claymore i could only get it to do 17 MH tops and driver radeon-crimson-15.12-win10-64bit. }], "profiles": [{ "gpu-powertune": "0", "worksize": "256", "name": "eth", "algorithm": "ethash", "gpu-threads": "1", "rawintensity": "1916928" }], "no-extranonce": "true", "default-profile": "eth", "api-allow": "W:10.0.0.0/8", "gpu-engine" : "1150", "gpu-memclock" : "1500", "temp-target": "72", "gpu-fan": "45-85", "api-port": 4028, "temp-cutoff": "82", "api-listen": true, "auto-fan": true, "temp-overheat": "80" } I also followed this some http://www.overclock.net/t/1461916/tutorial-ultimate-guide-to-tweaking-amd-cgminer-3-7-2-kalroth-edition-sgminer-instructions-included-aswell-get-the-most-hash-out-of-your-gpuJust curious if you tried the suggestion from Eliovp earlier on using "256*16384" to get the raw intensity setting. In this case it would be a value of: 4194304 I ask as on a couple of my rigs I was using a rawintenstiy similar to the one you have above and by bumping it up to 4194304 I gained another .5 Mhash/sec per card. It would be interesting to hear of others experiences on this as not all of my rigs respond the same.
|
|
|
|
toptek
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 24, 2016, 04:55:11 AM |
|
no but I'll try it
|
|
|
|
kilo17 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
|
|
September 24, 2016, 04:56:04 AM |
|
no but I'll try it
Check out the other thread with an update from Wolf.. you won't have luck with the Github release unless you are using a good CPU
|
Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
|
|
|
toptek
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 24, 2016, 05:08:14 AM Last edit: September 24, 2016, 05:46:43 AM by toptek |
|
This GPU won't go much higher i have just about maxed it . I'm still working on buying a few 470 or 480 but for now i have to use a PowerColor Radeon R9 280 TurboDuo OC with a Intel Xeon e3 1230 V2 my Motherboard is junk, i burnt out a nice ASUS board i had and needed a cheap board so the CPU didn't set. but that make sense why one other PC won't go over 10MH with a even older CPU and GPU in it that card should hit 13 MH and won't break 10 MH no mater what i do . @ Za1n I just tried that and it did give about that much more GPU 0: 46.0C 45% | 18.11M/18.04Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:9 WU:16.182/m rI:4194304 it was GPU 0: 45.0C 45% | 18.09M/17.96Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:1 WU:16.370/m rI:1916928
|
|
|
|
kilo17 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
|
|
September 24, 2016, 05:31:16 AM |
|
In response to the RawInt vs Int vs xInt - it really doesn't matter much which one you use as long as you know what they are -
Intensity is the work done by the GPU - or number of threads and it doubles with each increase - like 64, 128, 256 etc from 1-31
Raw Intensity is just the following: 2^I or shaders * xI
xI is answered above, it is rawI/shaders
So ultimately it comes down to knowing how many shaders each GPU has and then just tweaking the intensity you use-- I prefer xI cause it makes the most sense and it is for fine tuning but the range to use is from 1-9999 so it is more difficult to tune.
Intensity is from 1-31 and easier to tune. I use Intensity to find a range and then convert to xI to fine tune it.
A good starting point is an Intensity of about 18-21 but sometimes that is to high and you need something in the 13 range. Then convert it to xI
|
Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
|
|
|
|