racerx (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 2
|
|
October 31, 2010, 09:29:48 PM Last edit: December 09, 2010, 10:41:59 PM by racerx |
|
Compiled this as I thought it may be of interest to someone... just some averages from hardware I'm running at the moment.
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU M 350 @ 2.27GHz cores : 2 cpu MHz : 2266.000 hashespersec : 1486742
model name : Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU E5400 @ 2.70GHz cores : 2 cpu MHz : 2700.000 hashespersec : 2271696
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7300 @ 2.66GHz cores : 2 cpu MHz : 2667.000 hashespersec : 2518728
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 240e Processor cores : 2 cpu MHz : 2812.699 hashespersec : 2706358
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz cores : 4 cpu MHz : 2265.620 hashespersec : 6502822
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5530 @ 2.40GHz cores : 4 cpu MHz : 2395.000 hashespersec : 7138070
model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T Processor cores : 6 cpu MHz : 2819.765 hashespersec : 15840454
|
|
|
|
FlyingMoose
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
November 08, 2010, 05:14:22 AM |
|
What OS are you using? I'm running on a 6-core, faster Xeon, and my rate is way below yours (OSX). Are you using SSE or a GPU to get these rates?
|
|
|
|
FlyingMoose
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
November 08, 2010, 06:06:02 PM |
|
I'm getting about 6,000Khash/sec with a 6-core, 3.33GHz Xeon Mac Pro. I tried the -4way switch but it didn't seem to help.
|
|
|
|
Stephen Gornick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
|
|
November 19, 2010, 05:46:33 PM |
|
Just want to make sure I understand this correctly.
The next hash that the Bitcoin client running on my old single-core laptop has just as much chance of solving the block as does the next hash performed by a miner running on the most souped up GPU-aided hardware out there, right?
The only difference is that the number of attempts by the miner is an order of magnitude or greater than the number of attempts by me.
Is my understanding of this correct?
|
|
|
|
ribuck
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1060
|
|
November 19, 2010, 05:56:23 PM |
|
Your understanding is correct.
But the difference in number of attempts between your laptop and a souped-up GPU is enormous...
|
|
|
|
wumpus
|
|
November 19, 2010, 07:46:23 PM |
|
device: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ cpu MHz : 2999.654 cores: 2 hashespersec: 2816639
device: GeForce 8600 GT (m0mchil OpenCL miner) gpu MHz : 1188 cores: 4 hashespersec: 5666000
|
Bitcoin Core developer [PGP] Warning: For most, coin loss is a larger risk than coin theft. A disk can die any time. Regularly back up your wallet through File → Backup Wallet to an external storage or the (encrypted!) cloud. Use a separate offline wallet for storing larger amounts.
|
|
|
|
BitLex
|
|
November 26, 2010, 09:13:17 PM Last edit: December 09, 2010, 10:55:28 PM by BitLex |
|
from old single-core laptops to souped-up GPUs, here's some more info to look at == CPUs == model name : Pentium(R) III mobile cores : 1 cpu MHz : 1066 khash/s : 300miner : default 0.3.1x os : Windows2000 model name : Intel(R) Atom(tm) N270 cores : 1 cpu MHz : 1600 khash/s : 420miner : default 0.3.1x os : WindowsXP model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X3 720 cores : 3 cpu MHz : 2800 khash/s : 3800miner : default 0.3.1x os : WindowsXP model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X3 720 cores : 3 cpu MHz : 2800 khash/s : 7200miner : jgarzik's cpu-miner 0.2.1 os : WindowsXP == GPUs == model name : Nvidia GTX260 cores/sp : 27/216 shader MHz : 1242 (OC 1432) gpu MHz : 575 (OC 680) khash/s : 37500 ( 44000) miner : m0mchil's OpenCL os : Windows7 model name : ATI HD5570 cores/sp : 5/400 gpu MHz : 650 (OC 700) khash/s : 59000 ( 64000) miner : m0mchil's OpenCL os : WindowsXP model name : ATI HD5850 cores/sp : 18/1440 gpu MHz : 725 (OC 925) khash/s : 236000 ( 300000) miner : m0mchil's OpenCL os : WindowsXP
|
|
|
|
bfever
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 1
|
|
November 28, 2010, 09:27:08 AM |
|
Another 2 GPUs tested:
model name : ATI HD4870 cores/sp : 10 gpu MHz : 750 khash/s : 78000 miner : m0mchil's OpenCL os : Windows Vista 64bit
model name : NVidia GeForce 8800 GTS cores/sp : 12 gpu MHz : 513 khash/s : 16800 miner : m0mchil's OpenCL os : Windows Vista 64bit
|
|
|
|
hritzen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 1
|
|
December 02, 2010, 11:42:47 PM Last edit: December 03, 2010, 12:38:03 AM by hritzen |
|
Here are two additional statistics:
Model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 450 @ 2.40GHz OS : Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Client version : 0.3.17 Core speed : 1197.3 MHz Multiplier: : x 9.0 Hash rate : ~1800 khash/s
Model name : ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 OS : Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Client version : 0.3.17 GPU clock : 550 MHz GPU MHz : 933.000 Miner : m0mchil's OpenCL Hash rate : ~48,000 khash/s
I apologize for the lack of other information; I am not a computer-savvy person. However, if other members could define the needed specifications or explain how to obtain additional precision, I would be glad to provide the data.
On a side note, my i5-450M seems to have a lower hash rate than racerx's i3-350M. Is there an optimum parameter for the processors that I should use to obtain higher hash rates?
|
|
|
|
BitLex
|
|
December 03, 2010, 12:06:31 AM |
|
are you sure that you are using all cores? ~800 khash/s seems like your using a single core only. you can also try jgarzik's cpu-miner with the 4way-switch, to squeeze out some more hashes, it doubles the hash-rate on my AMD X3 720, not sure what it does to your i5 though.
|
|
|
|
hritzen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 1
|
|
December 03, 2010, 12:40:32 AM |
|
are you sure that you are using all cores? ~800 khash/s seems like your using a single core only. you can also try jgarzik's cpu-miner with the 4way-switch, to squeeze out some more hashes, it doubles the hash-rate on my AMD X3 720, not sure what it does to your i5 though. Thank you; I set the parameters to use all of the cores available and the client started to obtain ~1800 khash/s. There seems to be a large fluctuation between the hash rates, though - the range of the hash rates is 750-1800 khash/s.
|
|
|
|
prometheus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
December 03, 2010, 06:56:17 AM Last edit: May 20, 2011, 11:19:14 PM by prometheus |
|
CPUs Model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 980x OS : Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Client : bitcoin-miner 0.10 Core speed : 3333 MHz Multiplier : x 22 Hash rate : 25000 khash/s
Model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 980x OS : Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Client : jgarzik's cpu-miner Core speed : 4405.6 MHz Multiplier : x 33.0 Hash rate : 19200 khash/s
Model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 980x OS : Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Client : 0.3.17 Core speed : 3900 MHz Multiplier : x 27.0 Hash rate : 8701 khash/s
GPU
Model name : 2x GeForce GTX 460 in SLI OS : Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Miner : m0mchil's OpenCL Core speed : 795 Mhz Hash rate : 102000 khash/s (sum of the two)
and this is unbelieveable...
Model name : ASUS ATi Radeon 5870 OS : Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Miner : m0mchil's OpenCL Core speed : 875 Mhz Hash rate : 299000 khash/s (!!)
I'm surprised that the 6-core AMD is getting great numbers. It's beating the pants off the 980x. I'll try compiling the bitcoin client with the microsoft or intel compilers. The intel compiler should definitely generate much faster code. EDIT: Update. Using a CPU miner with 12 threads I got the CPU to pump out 19200 khash/s using the 4way algo. EDIT: Update. Clocked the 4.4 Ghz system back down to 3.33, and started using bitcoin-miner v0.10. Big performance improvement. Also update GPU performance to reflect what I'm currently seeing with m0mchil's GPU miner.
|
|
|
|
BitLex
|
|
December 03, 2010, 08:26:02 AM |
|
I'm surprised that the 6-core AMD is getting great numbers. my guess would be the 4way-switch, improvement on Phenom II X3 from 3800 to 7200khash, it just wasn't available/useful for windows until jgarzik's cpu-miner came along. updated my CPU-table above.
|
|
|
|
prometheus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
December 03, 2010, 09:33:01 AM |
|
I'm surprised that the 6-core AMD is getting great numbers. my guess would be the 4way-switch You're right. I jumped to 19000ish once I started using the 4way algo of the cpu miner. However, it's still nothing compared to the 5870.
|
|
|
|
racerx (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 2
|
|
December 09, 2010, 10:45:51 PM |
|
What OS are you using? I'm running on a 6-core, faster Xeon, and my rate is way below yours (OSX). Are you using SSE or a GPU to get these rates?
amd64 debian linux 5.04. Just running the vanilla bitcoind binary. All my stats were in full numbers so its about 15000 k/hashs per sec. Nice work! Cheers will update my typos.
|
|
|
|
cereal_killer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2010, 05:06:16 PM |
|
Im new here. wanted to share my rates. OS is windows 7 64bit
Dual Xeon 5630 16 logical cpus (8 physical cores with hyperthreading) Offical Client(0.3.17)
8,006 khash/s (single core 1132 khash/s)
Same system using opencl client (poclbm_py2exe_20101126) ATI 5850 250,263 khash/s
|
|
|
|
Netsniper
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 1
|
|
January 13, 2011, 06:23:59 AM |
|
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ Windows x64 Bitcoin 0.3.19 2,090 khash/s
AMD Athlon XP 2000+ Ubuntu Bitcoin 0.3.18 617 khash/s
Nvidia 8800GT Nvidia driver 260.99 poclbm -w 64 Windows x64 24,500 khash/s
|
|
|
|
em3rgentOrdr
|
|
January 13, 2011, 10:16:51 AM |
|
Intel(R) Celeron(R) E3300 @ 2.50GHz, Dual Core Ubuntu 10.04 Bitcoin 0.3.19 ~2,200 khash/s
nVidia GF 9800GX2 @ 600 Mhz, Dual Card, with 128 cores/card ~26,000 khash/s on card running display ~28,000 khash/s on card not running display
|
"We will not find a solution to political problems in cryptography, but we can win a major battle in the arms race and gain a new territory of freedom for several years.
Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks, but pure P2P networks are holding their own."
|
|
|
ribuck
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1060
|
|
January 13, 2011, 10:32:01 AM |
|
I don't do CPU generating anymore, but those who do may be interested in my experience.
I got 5200 kHash/s from an intel i5 quad core using the standard client. But when I compiled my own client from svn (without tweaking any optimizations, or even stripping the binary) the rate went up to 6500 kHash/s. This is on Fedora 12 Linux.
|
|
|
|
|